Connect with us

News

Activist who had Diana unseated now warns SJB

Published

on

‘EC should review utterly flawed process of registering political parties’

By Shamindra Ferdinando

Civil society activist Oshla Herath says the Supreme Court judgment in the case against Diana Gamage has restored public confidence in the judiciary.Herath, a one-time media aide to Yahapalana President Maithripala Sirisena, believes the no-nonsense stand taken by the SC in respect of an extremely politically sensitive case should encourage political parties to review their strategies.

In a brief interview with The Island over the weekend, Herath declared: “It is certainly an extraordinary judgment. Contrary to skepticism expressed by many, particularly on social media, I felt the SC would upend the Court of Appeal’s judgment.”

The SC, last week, disqualified dissident SJB National List MP Gamage from being a member of Parliament on the basis that she was not a Sri Lankan citizen. Shavindra Fernando, PC with M. Skandarajah appeared for the first respondent.

Asked why he had moved the SC after the Court of Appeal upheld the preliminary objections raised by first respondent Gamage, Herath said he had was determined to bring the court action to a successful conclusion. He pointed out that the case had been heard by a divisional bench of the Court of Appeal and a majority judgment upheld the first respondent’s preliminary objections. The justices were N. Bandula Karunarathna, President of the Court of Appeal, and K. K. A. V. Swarnadhipathi.

“The minority judgment was for granting the Writ of Quo Warranto sought by me, Herath,” said. Justice M. A. R. Marikar disagreed with the President of the Court of Appeal. Hafeel Farisz with Nishika Fonseka and Shannon Tillekeratne appeared for the petitioner.

The historic SC judgment was delivered by Justices Janak De Silva, E.A.G.R. Amarasekara and Kumudini Wickremasinghe. The three-judge bench declared that the majority report had erred in law by upholding three preliminary objections made on behalf of the first respondent while pointing out that the minority judgment had not taken into consideration preliminary objections, at all.

Responding to another query, Herath pointed out that the SC had rectified, what he called, a flawed majority decision given by the Court of Appeal within four months. “Instead of being critical of the Appeal Court decision, I was determined to set the record straight.”

Herath dismissed statements made by the former State Minister and her husband subsequent to the SC ruling as mere rhetoric.

Asked whether he had targeted the State Minister over a personal enmity, Herath said that he had never met her or at least talked to her over the phone. Declaring that he had absolutely no personal problem with the ousted MP, Herath said that he had first lodged a complaint with the Criminal Investigation Department (CID) and then moved court as she was not a Sri Lankan citizen.

Political parties, represented in Parliament, should be ashamed of their pathetic failure to take up this issue, even after he exposed the State Minister, Herath said. “I never asked her to be deported, under any circumstances, or punished in any other way. The intervention of the Court of Appeal was sought to deprive her of the SJB National List slot as she remained a British citizen.

The civil society activist said that in addition to the ousted lawmaker, there were other MPs who should have been dealt with under the law over various offences. “I have no intention or any interest in pursuing them. What prompted me to take on Gamage was her foreign citizenship,” Herath said.

Now that she had been found to be a British national, the Wickremesinghe-Rajapaksa government should look into the circumstances under which she had received a salary from Parliament and enjoyed a range of other perks and privileges at the taxpayers’ expense.

Commenting on the SC judgment on the SJB, Herath said that some believed and, in fact, publicly asserted that the rebel MP’s ouster could be beneficial to the main Opposition party. However, the SC declaration that Gamage had been a foreign citizen at the time she, along with her husband, transferred a political party, registered by them, to the breakaway UNP group, led by Sajith Premadasa and later re-named as Samagi Jana Balawegaya, in 2020, exposed an utterly corrupt system, Herath said.

Acknowledging that he had failed to block the registration of the new party ahead of the last general election conducted in August 2020, Herath questioned the responsibility on the part of the Election Commission to look into this matter. “Whatever the SJB says today, the fact remains that of those who signed the transfer papers, one was a foreigner. This is the undeniable truth.”

Perhaps, Sajith Premadasa should seriously consider contesting from a constituent party of the SJB-led grouping, Herath said, warning the SJB that it couldn’t wish that Gamaga’s removal from Parliament wouldn’t affect it.

Herath unsuccessfully contested the last general election on the UNP ticket. He was on the Colombo district list, along with UNP leader Ranil Wickremesinghe and Ravi Karunanayake. The UNP was reduced to a single National List slot.

Herath urged Parliament and the Election Commission to take tangible measures to stop taking over political parties through financial and other deals.

“The legitimacy of SJB is at stake. Similarly, the constitutionality of the whole process of registering political parties is questionable” Herath said, alleging that political parties were being sold.

Herath said many people had told him that Diana couldn’t be ousted as she had the backing of both President Wickremesinghe as well as the ruling SLPP. Having entered Parliament through the SJB National List, she crossed over to the SLPP. Soon after President Gotabaya Rajapaksa had been ousted through a public protest campaign in July 2022, the SJBer had switched her allegiance to President Wickremesinghe, Herath said.



Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Latest News

Landslide Early Warnings issued to the districts of Colombo, Galle, Gampaha, Hambanthota, Kalutara, Kandy, Kegalle, Kurunegala, Matara, Nuwara Eliya and Ratnapura

Published

on

By

The National Building Research Institute has issued landslide early warnings to the districts of Colombo, Galle, Gampaha, Hambanthota, Kalutara, Kandy, Kegalle, Kurunegala, Matara, Nuwara Eliya and Ratnapura from 16:00 hrs on 25.09.2026 To 16:00 hrs on 26.09.2026

Accordingly,
LEVEL III [RED] landslide early warnings have been issued to the Divisional Secretaries Divisions and surrounding areas of Neluwa, Nagoda, Niyagama and Thawalama inthe Galle district, Ganga Ihala Korale, Udapalatha, Doluwa and Pasbage Korale in the Kandy district, and  Kothmale West, Ambagamuwa, Kotmale East and Norwood in the Nuwara Eliya district.

LEVEL II [AMBER] landslide early warnings have been issued to the Divisional Secretaries Divisions and surrounding areas of Elpitiya, Baddegama and Karandeniya in the Galle district, Walallawita in the Kalutara district, Deltota, Udunuwara, Gangawata Korale, Yatinuwara and Panvila in the Kandy district, Aranayake, Dehiowita, Mawanella, Deraniyagala and Yatiyanthota in the Kegalle district, Thalawakelle in the Nuwara Eliya district and Ratnapura and  Pelmadulla in the Ratnapura district.

LEVEL I [YELLOW] landslide early warnings have been issued to the Divisional Secretaries Divisions and surrounding areas of Seethawaka and Padukka in the Colombo district, Attanagalla and Mirigama in the Gampaha district, Katuwana and Walasmulla in the Hambanthota district, Ingiriya and Bulathsinhala in the Kalutara district, Hatharaliyadda, Poojapitiya, Medadumbara, Kundasale, Ududumbara, Thumpane, Akurana, Pathadumbara, Harispattuwa and Pathahewaheta in the Kandy district, Warakapola, Bulathkohupitiya, Galigamuwa, Kegalle and Ruwanwella in the Kegalle district, Mallawapitiya, Alawwa, Polgahawela and Mawathagama  in the Kegalle district, Pitabeddara,  Kotapola and  Pasgoda  in the Matara district, Nuwara Eliya in the Nuwara Eliya district and Elapatha, Ayagama, Nivithigala, Kuruwita and Kalawana in the Ratnapura district

 

 

Continue Reading

News

22A, Judicature Amendment Bills passed with 2/3 majority

Published

on

Parliament yesterday passed the Twenty-Second Amendment to the Constitution Bill and the Judicature (Amendment) Bill with two-thirds majorities, with 158 MPs voting in favour and 63 against each Bill.

The Illankai Tamil Arasu Kadchi (ITAK) and Sri Lanka Muslim Congress (SLMC) voted with the SJB against the Bills.

NDF MPs Ravi Karunanayake and Faizer Musthapha and SJB Badulla District MP Nayana Wasalathilaka were not present when the votes were taken.

The final vote on the Judicature (Amendment) Bill was announced at around 8.08 p.m. after Opposition MPs called for divisions on its clauses during the Committee Stage.

The votes followed a two-day debate which commenced on Thursday (24), after Justice and National Integration Minister Harshana Nanayakkara presented the Bills for their Second Reading.

The Supreme Court’s determination on the Bills was presented to Parliament on Tuesday (22) by Speaker Dr Jagath Wickramaratne. The Court determined that the 22nd Amendment Bill did not require approval at a referendum and could be passed by a special two-thirds majority in Parliament.

The amendment provides for raising the mandatory retirement age of Supreme Court judges from 65 to 67 and that of Court of Appeal judges from 63 to 65. It also provides for the Chief Justice to retire at 67 or after completing six years in office, whichever comes earlier.

The Speaker informed Parliament that the Judicature (Amendment) Bill could be passed by a simple majority.

The SJB opposed the legislation and its MPs attended Parliament dressed in black yesterday. The party also staged a protest at Polduwa Junction, Battaramulla, under the theme “No to 22, which destroys democracy”, with Opposition Leader Sajith Premadasa and several SJB politicians participating.

Continue Reading

News

TIN mandatory for key transactions from Nov. 1

Published

on

A valid Taxpayer Identification Number (TIN) Certificate will be required for a range of key transactions in Sri Lanka from November 1, 2026, the Inland Revenue Department (IRD) has announced.

The requirement, introduced under the Inland Revenue (Amendment) Act, No. 11 of 2026, applies to transactions specified under Section 102(3) of the Inland Revenue Act.

Accordingly, individuals will be required to produce a valid TIN Certificate when opening an account at a bank or financial institution, obtaining approval for a building plan, registering or renewing the licence of a motor vehicle, registering land or title to land, registering a business, transferring shares in a company incorporated in Sri Lanka or obtaining a credit card.

In the case of share transfers, both the transferor and transferee will be required to provide TIN certificates.

The IRD said officials handling such transactions had been instructed to ensure that a valid TIN Certificate was submitted before processing or completing the relevant transaction.

The Department advised those who do not already have a TIN to obtain one in advance through its e-Services platform.

It said a printout of the TIN verification result showing the applicant’s National Identity Card number and TIN could also be accepted instead of the certificate.The IRD also reiterated that obtaining a TIN is mandatory for resident individuals aged 18 and above under the applicable provisions.

Continue Reading

Trending