News
SL Anti-Terrorism Bill less draconian than one in Britain
– Justice Minister Rajapakshe
By Saman Indrajith
Justice Minister Dr Wijeyadasa Rajapakshe yesterday told Parliament that the provisions contained in the Anti-Terrorism Bill, presented to the House, were less severe and harsh than those in the counter terrorism laws in Great Britain.
Dr. Rajapakshe said so responding to a question raised by SLMC leader Rauff Hakeem, who asked the Minister to explain the changes the new Bill envisaging to be introduced to the Prevention of Terrorism Act.
Earlier in the day, the Minister presented the Bill to the House and Secretary General of Parliament Kushani Rohanadeera read out the Bill’s preamble: “Anti-Terrorism,— Bill to make provision for the protection of the National Security of Sri Lanka and the people of Sri Lanka from acts of terrorism, other offences associated with terrorism and certain specified acts constituting the offence of terrorism committed within or outside Sri Lanka; for the prevention of the use of Sri Lankan territory and its people for the preparation for terrorism outside Sri Lanka; to provide for the detection, identification, apprehension, arrest, detention, investigation, prosecution and punishment of any person who has committed an act of terrorism or any other offence associated with terrorism; for the repeal of the Prevention of Terrorism (Temporary Provisions) Act, No. 48 of 1979; and for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto.”
Responding to MP Hakeem, Minister Dr. Rajapakshe said: “The Prevention of Terrorism Act had many criticisms against it. In 2015, we started the process of bringing a new law under the name of Counter Terrorism Act. It was presented to Parliament and then challenged before the Supreme Court and the Supreme Court has issued its determination on the Counter Terrorism Bill.”
However, the then government had not been able to proceed with the Bill and following the Easter Sunday terror attacks, the proces had come to a halt. “In 2022, we resumed the process. We decided to bring about a new Act on the matter. We formulated a new Act, and it took one and half years because we allowed all stakeholders to express their views on this. We met with all Ambassadors and High Commissioners in this country and explained to them the content of this legislation. They also approved it.
“Thereafter we gazetted it and hoped to take it up in Parliament in November, but there were concerns that if we presented the Bill in the House, it would hinder the chances for people to go before the court against it because court vacation was to commence soon. There were requests from many parties to postpone it. As such, we delayed the process. Briefly I can explain some of the changes that we introduced. A court can convict a person on the basis of a confession. It is not recognized under the normal law of evidence. Yet it was possible under the special laws of the PTA.
It was the biggest criticism against the PTA. We have removed that and now it goes as per the normal law of evidence. The second issue of contention was that as per the existing law, the Defence Minister has the powers to issue detention orders. The Defence Minister can give a detention order for three months and he can also extend it.
There was a proposal that powers should be given to the DIGs. We now plan to give those powers to the Defence Secretary. As per the law to be introduced, the Defence Secretary can give a detention order for one month and if there is a need to extend that, then prior approval of a magistrate is needed. So, we brought the detention under the courts’ powers. In addition, the Human Rights Commission would be given powers to visit and inspect those under detention.
“We did not have a definition for the term terrorism. Though there is an internationally accepted definition for the term corruption there is no such definition for the term terrorism. Each country has defined it as per their needs and requirements. We have brought about a definition for the term terrorism which is quite similar to the definition in the Counter Terrorism Act in Great Britain. However, our definition is not as severe as the one in Great Britain.”
News
Namal, Janaki further remanded
SLPP MP Namal Rajapaksa and former Krrish Group Executive Director and businesswoman Janaki Siriwardena were further remanded until October 23 by the Colombo Chief Magistrate’s Court yesterday in connection with an alleged Rs. 70 million bribery case involving the Krrish Group.
Colombo Chief Magistrate Asanga S. Bodaragama rejected the bail application filed on behalf of Siriwardena.
The Magistrate said the order on Namal Rajapaksa’s bail application was not ready and would be delivered on the next court date.
The Commission to Investigate Allegations of Bribery or Corruption (CIABOC) arrested the two suspects and produced them before court over allegations that a bribe of Rs. 70 million had been solicited and accepted in connection with the affairs of the Krrish Group.
News
Review of progress in reforms and modernisation of key state revenue-collecting institutions
A progress review meeting on reforms and modernisation initiatives at Sri Lanka’s key state revenue-collecting institutions was held on Thursday (15) at the Presidential Secretariat, chaired by Secretary to the President Dr Nandika Sanath Kumanayake, with the participation of representatives of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and officials of the Revenue Administration, Reform and Modernisation Bureau (RARMB) of the Presidential Secretariat.
At the meeting, the IMF representatives commended the revenue collection efficiency of the Department of Inland Revenue, Sri Lanka Customs and the Department of Excise, the country’s three leading state revenue-collecting institutions. Extensive discussions were also held on the progress of the reform and modernisation programmes being implemented at these institutions.
Secretary to the President Dr Nandika Sanath Kumanayake outlined the progress achieved by the three institutions to date and the reforms planned for implementation in the future.
The IMF representatives also highlighted the importance of strengthening risk management, developing human resources and ensuring the efficient operation of computer systems at the respective institutions.
Senior Additional Secretary to the President Seevali Arukgoda also attended the meeting. The IMF was represented by Cindy Negus, Senior Economist in Revenue Administration for the Asia and Pacific, Europe, Middle East and Central Asia regions; Alison Lister, Revenue Administration Adviser; and Gregory Toppin, Resident Revenue Adviser in Sri Lanka. A group of senior officials from the Revenue Administration, Reform and Modernisation Bureau of the Presidential Secretariat also participated.
(President’s Media Division)
News
Cut power bills by 3-5%, don’t hike them, consumers demand
By Anuradha Hiripitiyage
Electricity tariffs should be reduced by between 3 and 5 percent instead of being increased by 2.88 percent in the fourth quarter, as proposed by the National System Operator (NSO), Electricity Consumers’ Association Secretary Sanjeewa Dhammika said.
Addressing a media briefing in Maradagahamula, Divulapitiya, Gampaha, yesterday (16), Dhammika said a proper assessment of electricity generation costs, including the contribution of hydropower, could justify a reduction in tariffs.
He said the NSO had sought approval from the Public Utilities Commission of Sri Lanka (PUCSL) for a 2.88 percent tariff increase, which was expected to generate an additional Rs. 4,438 million.
However, the Commission had indicated that an increase of only 1.46 percent was warranted, amounting to Rs. 2,245 million, he said, adding that even this increase was unnecessary.
Dhammika alleged that the proposed revision sought to pass on to electricity consumers the financial burden arising from the non-arrival of five coal shipments and failed tenders.
“The Government had said that the burden of coal-related losses would not be passed on to the public. It is therefore unjust to make consumers bear these costs,” he said.
He pointed out that the PUCSL had forecast that hydropower would account for 32.34 percent of total electricity generation in the coming quarter, while the cost of such generation would represent only 3.45 percent of the overall cost of electricity production.
Consumers should benefit from the lower cost of hydropower generation rather than bear the burden of more expensive thermal power generation, he said.
Dhammika also questioned the inclusion of Rs. 669 million in capacity charges that had not been approved by the PUCSL, as well as a further Rs. 1,069 million to repay loans relating to incomplete projects.
Including such charges in the proposed tariff revision was unjustifiable, he said.
The PUCSL has given the public until October 30 to submit their views on the proposed tariff revision.
Dhammika said the possibility of increased hydropower generation in the coming weeks, as reservoir levels rise, should also be taken into account when determining electricity tariffs.
He maintained that tariffs could be reduced by 3 to 5 percent if hydropower generation was properly assessed and coal-related losses and unapproved charges were excluded from the calculations.
He further claimed that electricity tariffs could be reduced by as much as 10 percent through the promotion of renewable energy and the effective use of solar power and battery storage systems.
The Electricity Consumers’ Association urged the Government to withdraw the proposed tariff increase, insisting that consumers should not be made to bear costs arising from coal supply problems and other disputed charges.
-
News7 days agoSri Lanka escalates anti-graft drive with Shiranthi’s jailing
-
News7 days agoIranian ships stranded, Lanka fears US sanctions
-
Latest News6 days agoFarhan and Sadaqat help Pakistan seal series in style
-
Latest News4 days agoNissanka’s return headlines Sri Lanka’s Test squad against Pakistan
-
Features6 days agoIntake 16: 45 years of duty and honour
-
News6 days agoMalwathu Chapter issues statement on talks with President over Gnanasara Thera’s robes
-
News7 days agoNavi Pillay’s Lankan affairs in focus as she wins 2026 Nobel Peace Prize
-
News6 days agoCP alleges NPP has taken the blame for illegal US sanctions on Iranian vessels
