Connect with us

Latest News

South Africa overcome Pakistan jinx in edge-of-the-seat thriller

Published

on

Pakistan lost by the barest of margins. (Cricbuzz)

The World Cup finally got its high-octane thriller as South Africa narrowly edged past Pakistan by one wicket in a riveting encounter in Chennai on Friday (October 27). Chasing a slightly under-par target of 271, South Africa were cruising at one point with Aiden Markram and David Miller guiding them towards a comfortable win. However, they imploded dramatically from 205/4 to find themselves at 260/9 with 27 deliveries remaining. Keshav Maharaj and Tabraiz Shamsi held their nerve to get the Proteas over the line in a nail-biting finale. This is the first time that South Africa have beaten Pakistan in a World Cup match (ODI/T20I) in seven attempts since 1999.

The run chase started off in rollicking fashion as Iftikhar Ahmed sent the very first delivery of the innings for five wides, an absolute shocker down the leg-side that Mohammad Rizwan could do nothing about. An 11-run over to start was far from ideal for Pakistan and it got worse when the next over, Shaheen Afridi’s first, went for 19 including four boundaries from Quinton de Kock. It was the kind of fast start that South Africa would have wanted but Pakistan soon gained control with the wickets of the openers inside the first Powerplay. It was the short ball ploy that did the trick as Afridi removed de Kock before Mohammed Wasim Jr sent Temba Bavuma packing.

Markram was into his work straightaway, finding instant timing on a surface where most batters struggled to get their tempo right. Rassie van der Dussen gave him support for a while before the former fell to spin for the sixth time in as many games. A head injury early on to Shadab Khan while fielding meant that Pakistan were forced to bring on Usama Mir as the concussion substitute. It proved to be a beneficial move as Mir removed van der Dussen in his very first over to bring Pakistan back into the game. The continued short ball ploy then yielded a massive breakthrough as Heinrich Klaasen holed out to third man. At 136/4, the game was right in the balance before Markram and Miller combined for a crucial 70-run stand.

As the partnership went through the gears, it seemed like they were running away with the game. Pakistan needed a spark of inspiration from somewhere and Afridi came back to provide just that by getting Miller to nick one through to Rizwan. It was the opening Pakistan longed for and this allowed the Afridi-Rauf pairing to have a crack at South Africa’s lower order. Wickets kept falling at regular intervals and Mir then struck a telling blow by getting rid of Markram who looked set for a century. That was the breakthrough which completely broke the game open and South Africa started to lose their composure due to the pressure exerted by Pakistan’s bowlers.

Shamsi joined Maharaj with 11 still needed and on a slow surface with variable bounce, those were still a long way away for South Africa. As much as the Proteas needed the duo to apply themselves, they also knew that the rub of the green had to go their way in such a contest. And it did in the final ball of Rauf’s spell. Having struck early in that over with a phenomenal return catch to remove Lungi Ngidi, Rauf had Shamsi pinned on the front pad, only for the umpire to rule it not out. Pakistan reviewed and ball tracking had it to clipping leg stump. South Africa had survived albeit by the barest of margins. In hindsight, that was the moment which decided the game as Maharaj and Shamsi then kept their cool to see the side through.

The option to bowl Mohammad Nawaz at the end instead of a wrist spinner in Mir to the tail will be one that will be debated. Nevertheless, Pakistan made a spectacular game of defending this under-par score. However, they only have themselves to blame having failed to utilise 20 deliveries from their allotted 50 overs. On one of the better batting surfaces at Chepauk, most of the Pakistan batters got starts but failed to kick on to make a substantial score. Skipper Babar Azam and Saud Shakeel got to fifties but again weren’t able to bat deep into the innings. Losing wickets at regular intervals meant that Pakistan weren’t able to dominate proceedings against the South African bowlers.

Shamsi had a great day with a four-fer to his name. It’s not just the wickets but his aggressive intent to pick wickets that paid dividends. Marco Jansen had set the tone early on with the twin strikes of the openers in the first Powerplay. The duo were nagging in their spells, Jansen more so, as Pakistan failed to register healthy partnerships barring the one between Shakeel and Shadab. The duo batted with refreshing intent and while they were there, a total of 290-300 seemed on the cards. But once Shamsi broke that partnership, the innings nosedived in dramatic fashion as Pakistan were bowled out well inside their allotted overs. In a game that went right down to the wire, Babar’s men would rue those extra 10-20 runs which could have made a lot of difference.

Brief scores:
Pakistan 270 in 46.4 overs (Saud Shakeel 52, Babar Azam 50, Mohaamad Rizwan 31, Ifthikhar Ahmed 21, Shadab Khan 43, Mohaamad Nawaz 24; Tabraiz Shamsi 4-60, Marco Jansen 3-43, Gerald Coetzee 2-42) lost to South Africa 271/9 in 47.2 overs ( Temba Bavuma 28, Rossi van der Dussen 21, Aiden Markram 91, David Miller 29, Marco Jansen 20; Shaheen Afridi 3-45, Haris Rauf 2-62, Mohammad Wasim 2-50, Usama Mir 2-45) by one wicket

(Cricbuzz)



Latest News

Former President Mahinda Rajapaksa has arrived at the Bribery Commission

Published

on

By

Former President Mahinda Rajapaksa has arrived to appear before the Commission to Investigate Allegations of Bribery or Corruption (CIABOC) this morning (12) to provide a statement regarding the alleged SriLankan Airlines Airbus deal.

Continue Reading

Foreign News

US in closely-guarded talks to open new bases in Greenland

Published

on

By

Vice-President JD Vance toured the US military's only base on the territory earlier this year [BBC]

The US has been holding regular negotiations with Denmark to expand its military presence in Greenland, according to multiple officials familiar with the discussions, with talks between both sides progressing in recent months.

US officials are seeking to open three new bases in the south of the territory, a semi-autonomous part of Denmark, as they work to resolve a diplomatic crisis sparked by President Donald Trump when he threatened to seize Greenland by force.

Trump said in January that the US should “own” Greenland to prevent Russia or China from taking it. He said this could happen the “easy way ” or “the hard way”.

The White House confirmed the administration was engaged in high-level talks with Greenland and Denmark, but declined to comment on details of the negotiations. A White House official told the BBC the administration was very optimistic the talks were headed in the right direction.

Denmark has previously expressed a willingness to discuss additional American military bases in Greenland, and its foreign ministry confirmed talks with the US were taking place. “There is an ongoing diplomatic track with the United States. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs will not go into further detail at this time,” a spokesperson said.

US officials have floated an arrangement in which the three new military bases would be formally designated as US sovereign territory, according to one source with knowledge of the negotiations.

The bases would be in southern Greenland and primarily focus on surveillance of potential Russian and Chinese maritime activity in an area of the northern Atlantic between Greenland, Iceland and the United Kingdom known as the GIUK Gap, the officials who spoke to the BBC said.

The two sides have not formally agreed to anything yet and the final number of bases could change, the sources said. One of the new bases would likely be located in Narsarsuaq, on the site of a former US military base that housed a small airport.

Any other new military bases would likely also be located on sites in Greenland that have existing infrastructure such as airfields or ports, which could be upgraded at a lower cost than building new facilities, analysts said.

US officials have not raised the possibility during talks of somehow seizing control of Greenland, something that Denmark and Nato have publicly rejected.

Despite Trump’s threats, the countries have been actively working towards a deal in recent months.

The talks have been confined to a small working group of officials in Washington who have made headway negotiating outside of the spotlight while the administration has been consumed by the war in Iran.

General Gregory Guillot, the head of US Northern Command, gave a broad sense of the negotiations during congressional testimony in March. He said the US was seeking to open new bases, but the sources close to the talks described new details that paint a picture of regular high-level meetings that have progressed in recent months.

The delicate diplomatic effort is being led by Michael Needham, a senior state department official who has been tasked with crafting a deal that satisfies Trump while also respecting Denmark’s redlines around protecting its borders.

“Needham is running point” on Greenland, said a senior diplomat with knowledge of the talks. Behind the scenes, the person said, the administration is “approaching it very professionally”.

The teams have met at least five times since mid-January. Needham is usually accompanied by one or two US officials from the state department or National Security Council, several sources said. His counterparts in the room include Jesper Møller Sørensen, Denmark’s ambassador to the US, and Jacob Isbosethsen, the top Greenlandic diplomat in Washington.

Trump’s special envoy to Greenland, Republican Louisiana Governor Jeff Landry, hasn’t taken part in the negotiations and is largely absent from the diplomatic process, three sources said.

“He was supposed to be more of like a rah-rah cheerleader of the idea that we could just flex our muscles and take over Greenland as a security asset,” said a close Landry ally who asked not to be named. Landry “has never been to any of the actual talks.”

Landry’s office did not respond to a request for comment.

The US currently has one military base in Greenland, down from approximately 17 military facilities during the height of the Cold War. Pituffik Space Base is located in northwestern Greenland – it monitors missiles for NORAD but is not configured to conduct maritime surveillance.

Some current and former officials, as well as Arctic security experts, told the BBC that Washington could have advanced its interests in Greenland without threatening a Nato ally in such strong terms.

“Why threaten an ally with a military operation or invasion when what you want is something that could be negotiated quite easily?” said one former senior US defence official.

Others, however, praised the co-operation between the US and Denmark.

“Wherever the US and our allies leave a vacuum, that vacuum is often filled by China and Russia,” retired General Glen VanHerck, the head of Northern Command and North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD) from 2020 to 2024, told the BBC.

Behind closed doors, negotiators have sought to reach a compromise under the framework of an existing decades-old security agreement between the US and Denmark.

The 1951 pact grants the US a wide berth to expand its military operations in Greenland. The Danish government must approve any US military expansions in the territory, but Denmark has historically supported America’s military operations there and has never rejected a US request to expand its presence, Arctic security experts said.

Representatives of the Greenland government in Washington declined to comment. The US state department also declined to comment.

Trump expressed interest in the US gaining greater access to Greenland during his first term as president. But his renewed interest earlier this year set off a diplomatic crisis that highlighted tensions between Nato and the Trump administration.

[BBC]

Continue Reading

Latest News

Trump says Iran ceasefire is on ‘massive life support’

Published

on

By

[file pic]

US President Donald Trump has said the month-long ceasefire between the US and Iran is on “massive life support”.

He told reporters in the Oval Office on Monday that while the ceasefire remained in place, it was “unbelievably weak”.

Following Trump’s comments, Iranian parliamentary speaker Mohammad Ghalibaf wrote on X that Iran’s armed forces were, “ready to respond and to teach a lesson for any aggression.”

Iran laid out its demands to end the war and reopen the Strait of Hormuz in a counter-offer sent to the US on Sunday. Trump rejected the proposal, calling it “totally unacceptable” and a “piece of garbage”.

After Trump’s comments, Esmail Baghaei, a foreign ministry spokesperson for Iran, said Tehran’s proposals were “responsible” and “generous”.

After his comments saying Iran’s armed forces ready to respond, Ghalibaf said in a separate post on X that there was “no alternative but to accept the rights of the Iranian people as laid out in the 14-point proposal”.

“The longer they drag their feet, the more American taxpayers will pay for it,” he said.

Tehran’s offer includes an immediate end to the war on all fronts – a reference to the continued Israeli attacks against Iran-supported Hezbollah in Lebanon – a halt to the US naval blockade of Iranian ports and guarantees of no further attacks on Iran, according to Iran’s semi-official Tasnim news agency.

[BBC]

Continue Reading

Trending