Connect with us

News

Opp. Leader protests against arrest of MP Gajendrakumar on his way to Parliament

Published

on

By Saman Indrajith

Opposition and SJB leader Sajith Premadasa told Parliament yesterday that the arrest of Jaffna District MP Ponnambalam was illegal. Arresting an MP on his way to attend Parliament was against the law, Premadasa said.

“We have differences with the ideology and standpoints of MP Ponnambalam but he is entitled to be treated as any other MP in this House. He was taken into police custody today while he was on his way to attend Parliament. That is illegal as per the law. We urge the government to respect the law. This is an illegal arrest,” Premadasa said.

The Opposition Leader said that he would not go into the details of the cause or the incident that prompted the arrest of the MP. “But we must understand that he is an MP entitled to privileges. We as MPs have a right to talk about when the privileges of a fellow MP are violated. As far as I know MP Ponnambalam contacted the Speaker and said that he would go to the police station after attending the parliament session. However, he was taken into custody. It is illegal to arrest an MP who is on his way to Parliament. Implement the law to the letter and we call on the Speaker to protect the rights of MPs,” Premadasa said.

Chief Opposition Whip Kandy District SJB MP Lakshman Kiriella said MP Ponnambalam was a law-abiding MP. “He has engaged in peaceful protests against the government. He did not even avail himself of the police protection. He is entitled for police protection, Ponnambalam did not obtain police protection. Ponnambalam goes anywhere only with his driver. He was taken into custody while he was coming to parliament. That is against the law,” Kiriella said.

Speaker Mahinda Yapa Abeywardena said that he had no powers to interfere in police matters. He said that he had been informed by the police top brass that they would arrest Ponnambalam yet he did not have powers to stop them. “Police higher-ups called me and said that they would report the matter pertaining to the courts and would obtain the court’s permission to arrest him. I understand that Ponnambalam has a right not to be arrested while on his way to parliament. Ponnambalam and a DIG of police too called me in this regard. The police said that they would present Ponnambalam before Kilinochchi Magistrate and then allow his attendance in parliament. That was their duty plan. I cannot interfere in that matter. It is the duty of the police to produce the MP before the courts.

Opposition Leader Premadasa said that there was a precedent and guidelines set by former Speaker Chamal Rajapaksa to police on how to arrest an MP. He referred to the Hansard records of March 3, 2015 and said that the former Speaker Rajapaksa had laid down the procedure that should be followed when an MP is arrested by the police and asked the incumbent Speaker to adhere to that.



Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Namal, Janaki further remanded

Published

on

SLPP MP Namal Rajapaksa and former Krrish Group Executive Director and businesswoman Janaki Siriwardena were further remanded until October 23 by the Colombo Chief Magistrate’s Court yesterday in connection with an alleged Rs. 70 million bribery case involving the Krrish Group.

Colombo Chief Magistrate Asanga S. Bodaragama rejected the bail application filed on behalf of Siriwardena.

The Magistrate said the order on Namal Rajapaksa’s bail application was not ready and would be delivered on the next court date.

The Commission to Investigate Allegations of Bribery or Corruption (CIABOC) arrested the two suspects and produced them before court over allegations that a bribe of Rs. 70 million had been solicited and accepted in connection with the affairs of the Krrish Group.

Continue Reading

News

Review of progress in reforms and modernisation of key state revenue-collecting institutions

Published

on

By

A progress review meeting on reforms and modernisation initiatives at Sri Lanka’s key state revenue-collecting institutions was held on Thursday  (15) at the Presidential Secretariat, chaired by Secretary to the President Dr Nandika Sanath Kumanayake, with the participation of representatives of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and officials of the Revenue Administration, Reform and Modernisation Bureau (RARMB) of the Presidential Secretariat.

At the meeting, the IMF representatives commended the revenue collection efficiency of the Department of Inland Revenue, Sri Lanka Customs and the Department of Excise, the country’s three leading state revenue-collecting institutions. Extensive discussions were also held on the progress of the reform and modernisation programmes being implemented at these institutions.

Secretary to the President Dr Nandika Sanath Kumanayake outlined the progress achieved by the three institutions to date and the reforms planned for implementation in the future.

The IMF representatives also highlighted the importance of strengthening risk management, developing human resources and ensuring the efficient operation of computer systems at the respective institutions.

Senior Additional Secretary to the President Seevali Arukgoda also attended the meeting. The IMF was represented by Cindy Negus, Senior Economist in Revenue Administration for the Asia and Pacific, Europe, Middle East and Central Asia regions; Alison Lister, Revenue Administration Adviser; and Gregory Toppin, Resident Revenue Adviser in Sri Lanka. A group of senior officials from the Revenue Administration, Reform and Modernisation Bureau of the Presidential Secretariat also participated.

(President’s Media Division)

Continue Reading

News

Cut power bills by 3-5%, don’t hike them, consumers demand

Published

on

By Anuradha Hiripitiyage

Electricity tariffs should be reduced by between 3 and 5 percent instead of being increased by 2.88 percent in the fourth quarter, as proposed by the National System Operator (NSO), Electricity Consumers’ Association Secretary Sanjeewa Dhammika said.

Addressing a media briefing in Maradagahamula, Divulapitiya, Gampaha, yesterday (16), Dhammika said a proper assessment of electricity generation costs, including the contribution of hydropower, could justify a reduction in tariffs.

He said the NSO had sought approval from the Public Utilities Commission of Sri Lanka (PUCSL) for a 2.88 percent tariff increase, which was expected to generate an additional Rs. 4,438 million.

However, the Commission had indicated that an increase of only 1.46 percent was warranted, amounting to Rs. 2,245 million, he said, adding that even this increase was unnecessary.

Dhammika alleged that the proposed revision sought to pass on to electricity consumers the financial burden arising from the non-arrival of five coal shipments and failed tenders.

“The Government had said that the burden of coal-related losses would not be passed on to the public. It is therefore unjust to make consumers bear these costs,” he said.

He pointed out that the PUCSL had forecast that hydropower would account for 32.34 percent of total electricity generation in the coming quarter, while the cost of such generation would represent only 3.45 percent of the overall cost of electricity production.

Consumers should benefit from the lower cost of hydropower generation rather than bear the burden of more expensive thermal power generation, he said.

Dhammika also questioned the inclusion of Rs. 669 million in capacity charges that had not been approved by the PUCSL, as well as a further Rs. 1,069 million to repay loans relating to incomplete projects.

Including such charges in the proposed tariff revision was unjustifiable, he said.

The PUCSL has given the public until October 30 to submit their views on the proposed tariff revision.

Dhammika said the possibility of increased hydropower generation in the coming weeks, as reservoir levels rise, should also be taken into account when determining electricity tariffs.

He maintained that tariffs could be reduced by 3 to 5 percent if hydropower generation was properly assessed and coal-related losses and unapproved charges were excluded from the calculations.

He further claimed that electricity tariffs could be reduced by as much as 10 percent through the promotion of renewable energy and the effective use of solar power and battery storage systems.

The Electricity Consumers’ Association urged the Government to withdraw the proposed tariff increase, insisting that consumers should not be made to bear costs arising from coal supply problems and other disputed charges.

Continue Reading

Trending