Connect with us

Sports

MCC throws renewed support behind bowlers running out non-striker’s leaving the crease

Published

on

The MCC World Cricket Committee has reaffirmed its stance on the matter of bowlers who run out non-strikers leaving the crease prior to delivery – colloquially referred to as a “Mankad” – which may help settle the cries for less severe punishment than the batter losing their wicket. In the same statement issued on Thursday following a meeting of the committee members in Dubai, the MCC also called for “calm across the global game following several high-profile incidents in a relatively short space of time.”

The hot-button debate generated renewed interest last September when India allrounder Deepti Sharma ran out England’s Charlie Dean for the game-clinching wicket in the 44th over of the third ODI at Lord’s which India won by 16 runs. Dean was on 47 off 80 balls at the time trying to rally her side which was chasing a target of 170. A detailed analysis conducted by ESPNcricinfo subsequently showed that Dean had left her crease early at the non-striker’s end on 72 occasions prior to being run out.

Deepti received support from captain Harmanpreet Kaur in the immediate aftermath of the incident during a post-match interview, saying, “Whatever we have done, I don’t think it was any crime. It is part of the game and is an ICC rule, and I think we just need to back our player.” The MCC World Cricket Committee made clear in its statement released on Thursday that the batter is at fault in such a scenario and that “there is no precedent to require a bowler to give a warning to a batter, confirming they are completely within their right to dismiss the batter on their first occasion they break the Law.”

The World Cricket Committee pointedly stated that such dismissals would not happen if non-strikers are “complying with the Law and remaining within their ground until they have seen the ball being released from the bowler’s hand.” In other words, it is the batter’s responsibility to avoid being dismissed like this, just as it is their responsibility to avoid being dismissed bowled or lbw or caught.

“The bowler is not the villain here,” Committee member Kumar Sangakkara said. “Every batter has a choice; to stay in their ground, or risk being given out if they try to steal ground. If they choose the latter, they are the ones who are breaking the Law.”

Running non-strikers out for backing up too far tends to foster the argument that it isn’t so big a mistake that it should cost a wicket. There is also a fear that normalising it would have a negative effect at grassroots level. But MCC World Cricket Committee chairman Mike Gatting disagrees.

“We have seen suggestions that this method of dismissal will be attempted more and more at recreational level and there is the possibility of matches descending into chaos,” Gatting said. “Whilst attempts may increase in the short term, we would expect batters to learn their responsibilities under the Laws very quickly and drive it out of prominence.”

“Our stance on this is simple – batters must not steal ground if they do not wish to be given out in this manner. Nor should they be expecting to be given a warning if they do. If all non-strikers only left the popping crease once the ball had been released, there would never be the need for such a dismissal again.

“The game is in a place where it should be able to self-regulate on this dismissal but there needs to be a Law in place, as we can’t have a situation whereby batters are able to gain ground without bowlers being able to do anything about it.”

The issue came under more scrutiny once again during a two week stretch in January where a spate of incidents happened across franchise cricket as well as men’s and women’s international cricket. The first incident in the sequence took place on January 3 in a Big Bash League match between Melbourne Stars and Melbourne Renegades. Stars captain Adam Zampa attempted to remove the bails with Renegades batter Tom Rogers well outside of his crease, but umpires ruled the appeal not out deeming that Zampa had gone past the point in his delivery action “where the bowler would normally have been expected to release the ball”.

This specific incident resulted in the MCC releasing a statement on January 19 to make a slight adjustment in the wording of Law 38.3.In a different incident on January 10, India men’s captain Rohit Sharma chose to withdraw an appeal made after fast bowler Mohammed Shami removed the bails to catch Sri Lanka captain out of his crease in the final over of the first ODI at Guwahati in January. Shanaka was on 98 at the time and the reprieve allowed him to score a century in a match that India won a few balls later by 67 runs defending a total of 373. The incident sparked debates about whether the dismissal should be attempted only at certain moments of a match versus being fair game for the entirety of play.

Just five days later, Pakistan Women’s U19 bowler Zaib-un-Nisa ran out Rwanda batter Shakila Niyomuhoza in an opening round fixture at the ICC Women’s U-19 T20 World Cup in South Africa. The run-out occurred in the final over of the first innings in which Rwanda finished on 106 for 8 before Pakistan chased the target down to win by eight wickets with 13 balls to spare.

(Cricinfo)



Sports

Chandul shatters Rumesh Tharanga’s discus record

Published

on

Vetum Chandul de Zoysa

by Reemus Fernando

‎Vetum Chandul de Zoysa of Galewela Central hogged the limelight on the opening day of the All Island School Games Athletics Championship as he shattered one of Rumesh Tharanga’s longstanding meet records on Friday.

‎Chandul, who is trained by his parents, both physical education instructors, improved Rumesh Tharanga’s 2017 record twice during the event.

‎He first shattered the record when he cleared 55.67 metres in his third attempt to enter the best eight as the leader.

‎Then he further improved the record with a performance of 55.83 metres.

‎Tharanga’s record of 55.58 metres stood unshaken since 2017.

‎Current world leader in the javelin throw, Rumesh Tharanga took part in both the javelin and discus throw when he was attending St. Peter’s College.

Continue Reading

Sports

Prima KottuMee backs Asia Rugby Sevens as sponsor

Published

on

Himpa Gunawardana, Marketing Manager at Prima Group Sri Lanka, and Achala Ramanayake, Head of International Marketing and Business Development at Prima Group Sri Lanka, handing over the sponsorship to Shanitha Fernando, Deputy President of Sri Lanka Rugby; Subash Jayathilake, Secretary of Sri Lanka Rugby; and Hassan Sinhawansa, CEO of Sri Lanka Rugby are also in the image

Prima KottuMee has come on board as the Silver Sponsor of the Asia Rugby Emirates Sevens Series 2026, throwing its weight behind Sri Lankan rugby as the national team prepares to take on the region’s best.

The prestigious tournament will reach its climax in Colombo on 17 and 18 October, giving local rugby enthusiasts an opportunity to witness some of Asia’s finest talent in action on home soil.

The 2026 edition features 24 national teams, with 12 sides each competing in the men’s and women’s categories, promising two days of fiercely contested rugby.

Prima KottuMee has been a longstanding supporter of Sri Lankan rugby, extending its backing to the sport at school, club and national levels.

Over the years, the brand has played an active role in supporting players, teams and tournaments, contributing to the development and promotion of rugby across the country.

With Colombo set to host the final leg of the series, Prima KottuMee hopes to add further momentum to the occasion while reaffirming its commitment to nurturing local sporting talent.

Continue Reading

Sports

D-Day looms for Sri Lanka Cricket

Published

on

Eran Wickramaratne’s Cricket Transformation Committee has brought in financial discipline into SLC, but their biggest achievement will be introducing a new constitution that makes SLC a modern body on par with Cricket Australia and England and Wales Cricket Board

by Rex Clementine

The long awaited overhaul of Sri Lanka Cricket has reached a decisive stage, with the Supreme Court set to play a pivotal role next week in determining the fate of the proposed new constitution.

For months, legal experts have been burning the midnight oil, working on sweeping reforms aimed at dragging cricket administration into the modern era and bringing its governance structure into line with international standards. The draft constitution was presented to Parliament and following days of debate, received the legislature’s initial nod. The matter is now before the Supreme Court, where interested parties have been given an opportunity to raise objections.

A lawyer and former cricket board chief Thilanga Sumathipala have so far filed objections. The judges will examine whether these challenges have merit and more importantly, whether the proposed constitution is compatible with the law of the land.

One contentious provision that has raised eyebrows among key stakeholders is the proposal to strip District Cricket Associations of their voting rights.

October 20 is the deadline for submitting objections. The court will then fix dates for arguments, following which the judges are expected to communicate their determination to the Speaker of Parliament within 48 to 72 hours.

Parliament will subsequently have to complete the remaining legislative formalities before the new constitution can become law, potentially drawing the curtain on decades of mediocrity, mismanagement and administrative wrangling in cricket administration.

More objections had been anticipated from those who have called the shots at Maitland Place in recent years. Although several expressed reservations behind closed doors, few have shown any appetite for a courtroom battle.

There is a delicious irony here. When these gentlemen were running Sri Lanka Cricket, they would dash to Hulftsdorp at the drop of a hat, seeking judicial intervention even if a reporter called them ‘misfits’. Now, with the very structure that sustained them facing the axe, they appear to have developed a sudden case of cold feet.

The proposed constitution promises greater transparency in the running of the cash rich cricket board. Equally important is the emphasis on efficiency and professionalism, with suitably qualified individuals expected to occupy key administrative positions rather than appointments being dictated by friendships, club loyalties or reputations earned on the cricket field.

The Sunday Island learns that the Attorney General’s Department has been providing legal advice and expertise to the Cricket Transformation Committee from the outset.

Former ICC legal officer David Becker was also brought on board to lend his expertise to the drafting of the new constitution.

For years, successive governments have been reluctant to confront the cricket establishment, despite mounting public pressure for meaningful reform. Administrators survived one controversy after another, even weathering a unanimous parliamentary resolution calling for their removal following the national team’s disastrous performances.

Their survival owed much to their connections in the corridors of power. Whenever their positions came under serious threat, the spectre of Sri Lanka losing its ICC membership was raised, effectively holding the country’s cricketing future to ransom.

This time, however, the familiar manoeuvres have been conspicuous by their absence.

President Anura Kumara Dissanayake recognised the depth of public dissatisfaction with cricket administration and opted for a different approach. Rather than installing a political loyalist, as has so often been the practice when filling influential positions, he entrusted the responsibility to Eran Wickramaratne, a figure from the opposition political camp.

A former first-class cricketer and banker, Wickramaratne brought financial expertise to an institution where fiscal discipline had long been a subject of concern.

AKD also enlisted the services of three respected former cricketers; Kumar Sangakkara, Roshan Mahanama and Sidath Wettimuny, to help steer Sri Lankan cricket through a difficult period.

It is said that members of the Cricket Transformation Committee, despite hailing largely from the Colombo and Kandy elite, have been so impressed by President AKD’s vision and his hands off approach to cricket administration that they are now inclined to cast their votes for the NPP at the next election. That, if true, would be quite a political transformation in its own right.

The results on the field have not arrived as quickly as supporters would have wished. Sri Lanka’s performances remain a source of frustration and there is still a mountain to climb before the national team can regain its standing among the game’s elite.

But one significant change is already evident. Those entrusted with the responsibility of putting cricket back on its feet have sent an unmistakable message: no individual, however celebrated or influential, is bigger than the game.

Even the superstars are beginning to fall in line.

That, in itself, is no small achievement in a cricketing culture where reputations have too often carried more weight than results.

The real test, of course, lies ahead. A new constitution alone will not produce world class cricketers or restore Sri Lanka to its former glory. But sound administration is the foundation on which lasting success must be built.

After years of false starts, broken promises and endless power struggles, Sri Lankan cricket finally has an opportunity to turn the page.

Continue Reading

Trending