Features
When does private become public? The blurry line in politics
Sri Lanka’s political discourse is ablaze following the arrest of former President Ranil Wickremesinghe, accused of misappropriating approximately Rs. 16.9 million in public funds for a September 2023 London trip—allegedly to attend his wife’s university convocation, with no official meetings on his itinerary.
At first glance, the charge sounds simple enough: taxpayers’ money, a family trip, misuse. But politics, like life, is rarely that neat. This allegation raises deeper questions every citizen ought to reflect on: Is every movement of a Head of State automatically “official”? Or should leaders be judged by the same yardstick as private citizens, expected to pay out of pocket even when their position demands state resources? And at what point does the blending of personal and public duties become a matter of accountability?
The Entitlement of Office
A President, unlike you or me, cannot simply book an online ticket and slip through the airport unnoticed. Every journey is accompanied by a security convoy, diplomatic clearance, protocol officers, and logistical support. These arrangements are not luxuries—they are obligations of the State.
Whether the President is addressing the UN, meeting another head of state, or attending a family event, the government machinery moves with him. This is the nature of the office.
But here lies the tricky part: what if the trip contains a personal element? Should the public purse still bear the full expense?
When Precedent Speaks Louder
Sri Lanka is no stranger to blurred lines between personal and official travel.
Ranil Wickremesinghe’s case is now in the spotlight because it involved his wife’s convocation in London.
The current President recently came under scrutiny for deploying state security and official vehicles for visits to Thambuththegama, Anuradhapura, where his ailing mother was receiving treatment. Sympathetic though the situation was, questions were raised: should public resources be tied up for personal family visits?
During the recent election campaign, the President and several Cabinet ministers toured the country under the banner of the NPP and other parties. Official vehicles, security details, and government resources inevitably followed. Were these “official” or “political” trips?
These examples illustrate the same conundrum: private purposes wrapped in the unavoidable trappings of public office.
The Hard Numbers
Criticism grows sharper when numbers enter the conversation.
According to parliamentary disclosures, between 2010–2024, over Rs. 3,956 million was spent on overseas travel by Presidents and their entourages.
Mahinda Rajapaksa alone accounted for Rs. 3,572 million between 2010–2014, with his most expensive single year being 2013, when his trips cost the state Rs. 1,144 million.
Maithripala Sirisena spent Rs. 384 million (2015–2019).
Gotabaya Rajapaksa (2020–2022) spent Rs. 126 million.
Ranil Wickremesinghe (2023–2024) spent Rs. 533 million.
Anura Kumara Dissanayake (since Sept. 2024) has spent just Rs. 1.8 million on foreign travel. This claim has been contested by the Opposition, which insists that it should be much higher.
Placed in this context, the Rs. 16.9 million in question during Wickremesinghe’s London trip may look modest compared to Mahinda’s billion-rupee years—but it strikes a nerve because it appears tied to a purely personal occasion, not diplomacy or governance.
Drawing the Line
Legal experts have long wrestled with this blurred boundary. Ali Sabry, the former Minister of Foreign Affairs, has argued that it is nearly impossible to draw a perfect line between official and private conduct in the life of a political leader. A President or Minister remains a public figure 24 hours a day. Even their private movements require state protection and resources.
As many lawyers and scholars highlight, what matters is not whether private and public overlap, but whether the overlap is done in good faith or in abuse of power.
Did the leader intentionally divert public money for personal enrichment? Or did state expenditure arise naturally because of the responsibilities of office? This distinction is crucial.
Point of No Return: From Warplanes to the Rubicon
The phrase “Point of No Return” carries two powerful origins — one modern, one ancient.
In aviation, it refers to the exact point in a long flight when an aircraft no longer has enough fuel to turn back. Beyond that, the pilot must press on, no matter what the risks ahead. During World War II, bomber crews often faced this calculation: once beyond the point of no return, there was no choice but to fly into enemy territory, even if weather worsened or defences thickened.
But in ancient history, the phrase finds its political metaphor. In 49 BC, Julius Caesar crossed the Rubicon River with his army, an act forbidden by Roman law. By doing so, he made civil war inevitable. The die was cast, retreat impossible. That moment became the classic symbol of a political point of no return — a decision so consequential that there is no path back.
When drawing on this dual imagery: the pilot who cannot turn back, and Caesar who, once across the Rubicon, changed history irreversibly. The argument is that, there is a danger that Sri Lanka’s institutions may cross a point where constant abuse of privilege and weak ethical standards make it impossible to rebuild public confidence.
Relating this to today’s controversies, including the Ranil Wickremesinghe London trip:
If every act that blends private and public is condemned as “misuse,” then the public ceases to differentiate between abuse of office and incidental costs of high office.
Once citizens treat all acts as corrupt, Sri Lanka itself crosses a Rubicon — a point of no return where cynicism permanently replaces trust.
Lessons from Past Presidents
Sri Lanka has seen this debate before:
Mahinda Rajapaksa faced criticism for the size of his delegations abroad and use of state funds for family members’ travel.
Chandrika Bandaranaike Kumaratunga was questioned overuse of the Presidential aircraft for both official and semi-official trips.
Even J.R. Jayewardene in the 1980s was accused of blurring official travel with family commitments.
None of these cases were ever clearly resolved, partly because Sri Lanka lacks strict guidelines on how to classify official versus private expenses. The vacuum leaves the door open to selective outrage, often driven more by politics than by principle.
Why the Debate Matters
For ordinary citizens, struggling with high inflation and daily survival, such debates often sound like elites protecting each other. “Why should my tax money pay for a politician’s family trip?” is a fair and emotional question.
But the counterpoint is equally important: If we expect our leaders to serve, travel, and represent the country, we must accept that public funds will sometimes cover situations that look private. The problem is not overlap—it is excess.
A President accompanying his wife abroad, while carrying state duties, may be acceptable.
A President using public aircraft to fly in supporters for political rallies is not.
A Minister who attends a personal event but also holds bilateral meetings could argue that his role justifies the expense. A Minister who disguises a holiday as “official business” crosses the line.
This is where the “point of no return” metaphor bites: once politicians repeatedly blur private and public without accountability, trust in government collapses. Citizens then view all spending as theft, regardless of context.
When Enemies Become Best Friends Behind Bars
And then came the parade of visitors—Wickremesinghe’s old political enemies, suddenly transformed into bedside sympathisers. Men and women who once thundered about his failures now with practiced solemnity, as if paying homage to a fallen monarch. Some scholars saw it not as compassion but as a class solidarity, elite and non-elite. In Sri Lanka, the political elite may clash fiercely in public, like cats, but when scrutiny arrives, old enemies close ranks. Leaders once condemned as tyrants are swiftly rebranded as “respected statesmen,” while citizens are expected to applaud. It is hardly surprising, then, that public faith in politics continues to erode.
Conclusion: The True Test of Integrity
The Ranil Wickremesinghe controversy is less about one former President’s trip and more about Sri Lanka’s culture of accountability. We are at risk of reaching a “point of no return” in public trust, where citizens no longer distinguish between minor overlaps and major abuses.
So, the next time you hear cries of “misuse,” don’t just ask who paid the bill. Ask instead:
Was it in good faith linked naturally to the duties of office?
Was it excessive or abusive, designed for personal gain?
Did it cross the line from overlap to outright exploitation?
That, more than headlines or political mudslinging, may be the true test of integrity in public life.
(The writer, a senior Chartered Accountant and professional banker, is Professor at SLIIT, Malabe. The views and opinions expressed in this article are personal.)
Features
US’ anti-migrant stance set to intensify tensions in Western camp
The announcement by the US authorities of an anti-migrant stance during a recent commemoration in France of the epochal D-Day Landings of June 6, 1944, ought to strike impartial observers as a supreme irony. Whereas what should have been expected was a vibrant celebration of the beginning of the process of Western Europe freeing itself decisively from Nazi or fascist control during the crucial stages of World War Two, this was not to be.
What the world heard instead was a call to contemporary Western Europe to arm itself against a seemingly rising and threatening migrant presence in the region. In other words, the migrant must be despised and ‘shown the door’.
Instead of a commemoration that rejoiced in the flourishing of liberal democracy and its values what one got was a strong affirmation of fascism and racial chauvinism. US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth vented his spleen against the migrant or foreigner presence in Europe reportedly thus: ‘Sadly today different European beaches are stormed by different dangerous ideologies.’ To ‘beaches in Spain and Italy and Greece and Bulgaria, boats and men arrive. When will European capitals do something about that invasion?’
While at the outbreak of World War Two it was Nazi Germany that was doing the invading and bringing some principal European countries under its suzerainty, this time around we are being given to understand that it’s migrants to the West who are seeking to colonize the latter. It goes without saying that such inflammatory rhetoric would have the deleterious effect of keeping racial tensions alive in the West and jeopardize all possibilities of the countries concerned cementing and maintaining social stability.
The Trump administration gives the impression of taking a leaf from the politically underdeveloped regions of the South to keep the US polity stable and united. In South Asia, for instance, we are not short of ambitious demagogues who use what is referred to as the ‘race card’ to gather unto themselves a following and thereby further their political fortunes. By seeking to stir and sustain anti-migrant hysteria, the Trump administration is also essentially replicating Nazi Germany’s policy of anti-Semitism. That is, fascism is very much alive in the US under President Trump.
Such efforts at churning racial hysteria at this juncture in the US should not come as a surprise. For all intents and purposes, the Trump administration is nowhere near achieving its aims in West Asia, for instance, in the short term. It has failed to bring Iran down to its knees, as it hoped to do, but is adopting the expedient of keeping the world guessing and confused on what it is doing in the region, since it cannot withdraw from the theatre in a hurry without losing face.
While perhaps working out an escape strategy the Trump administration it seems, is hoping to maintain its following at home intact and silent by playing on their racial biases and insecurities. Hence, the anti-foreigner campaign.
Simultaneously, the Trump administration will need to keep a close eye on how economic pressures on the domestic front are panning out. Anti-administration sentiments first break to the surface at meal tables. On this score, the news cannot be good because the average US family’s spending power ought to be shrinking on account of rising energy and oil prices. Consequently, it would not be a bad idea to keep the attention of the US consumer diverted by adeptly playing ‘the race card’; once again, lessons from intellectually bankrupt Southern politicians are coming in handy.
To be sure such comparisons many politicians in vibrantly democratic countries would find quite unflattering. But the stark truth is that racism cannot be tolerated in civilized societies and those politicians who resort to it risk being branded as racists of the first degree. In fact they could be seen as being on par with the likes of German dictator Adolph Hitler and his close collaborators.
However, on the question of migrant policy the Trump administration would likely be at polar opposites with the most vibrant of liberal democracies of the West. This will be the case with the UK, France and Italy for instance. The latter continue to keep their doors open to legal migrants and they are likely to view a virtual blanket ban on migrants as reprehensible.
Moreover, in the foremost democracies of the West debates are vibrantly ongoing on the need to keep racism or any hint of it completely outlawed in the public plane. There is the case of the UK, for instance, where the authorities continue to emphatically pinpoint their adherence to the principle of anti-racism in the conduct of public affairs.
One proof of the above was the parliamentary debate relating to the killing of 18-year-old Henry Nowak in Southampton. Police handling of the victim came in for sharp scrutiny by particularly the opposition in the House of Commons but there seemed to be a consensus over the main political divide that the matter should not be politicized.
Moreover, the UK authorities stressed in the House the government’s strict adherence to the policy of non-racism. It was also pointed out that British institutions set up to manage racism at the national, county and neighbourhood levels, for example, were very much intact. In fact, Sri Lanka could gain considerably by studying and implementing locally, legislation modeled on the relevant UK laws if it is in earnest when it speaks of ‘reconciliation’.
Accordingly, it is highly unlikely that Western Europe would ‘cave in’, so to speak, to US pressure on issues related to migration. The liberal democracies of Western Europe in particular would remain for the foreseeable future migrant-welcoming, multi-ethnic and plural democracies.
Nor is it likely that Western Europe would be passively receptive to US demands that it drastically increases its defense spending to meet the latter’s aims. Within the Western fold the EU is remaining committed to backing Ukraine, for instance, in its ongoing armed resistance to the Russian invasion and it is not giving any indication of being deferent to US pressure.
However, although tensions would continue to bristle within US-Western Europe relations on the above and numerous other matters of contention it would be far too premature to announce a parting of company between the two sections of the West. In that sense, the post-World War Two order remains essentially intact. There are still many things in common between the two, particular on the economic plane, that will ensure the continuance of the partnership.
Features
A decade among Yala’s ghosts of gold
The first rays of dawn creep over the ancient rocks of Yala. The Indian Ocean glimmers in the distance, and the wilderness slowly awakens. Somewhere amid the scrub jungle, a pair of amber eyes scans the landscape.
For wildlife conservationist and leopard researcher Milinda Wattegedara, moments such as these have defined more than a decade of dedication to one of Sri Lanka’s most iconic creatures—the Sri Lankan leopard.
What began as fascination evolved into a remarkable conservation journey that has transformed the understanding of Yala’s leopard population and placed Sri Lanka firmly on the global wildlife research map.
“Long before I ever lifted a camera, leopards had already captured my imagination,” says Wattegedara. “What fascinated me was not merely their beauty but the complexity of their lives—their hunting strategies, movements, reproductive behaviour and their remarkable ability to adapt to changing environments.”
That fascination led to the birth of the Yala Leopard Diary in 2013, an ambitious long-term project dedicated to documenting individual leopards and unraveling the mysteries surrounding their lives.
For many visitors, a leopard sighting is a fleeting thrill. For Wattegedara and his team, every encounter is a chapter in an ongoing scientific story.
“Each photograph was never the end of an encounter,” he explains. “It was the beginning of deeper questions. How did a particular leopard use the landscape? How did its behaviour change with the seasons? What environmental pressures shaped its decisions?”
These questions drove years of meticulous fieldwork. Every sighting was carefully recorded with details including location, habitat, behaviour, date and time. Photographs were analysed to identify individual animals through unique spot patterns, allowing researchers to distinguish one leopard from another with remarkable accuracy.
What followed was groundbreaking.

YF77 “Shelly” pauses in quiet observation, embodying the alertness
and grace that define Yala’s leopard population.
From 2013 to 2026, the Yala Leopard Diary identified an astonishing 189 individual leopards within the Yala Block 1. The research revealed a leopard density of approximately 0.524 leopards per square kilometre, making Yala one of the highest leopard-density landscapes ever recorded anywhere in the world.
Such findings have elevated Yala’s status among global wildlife researchers.
Nestled between the Indian Ocean and a mosaic of habitats, ranging from rocky outcrops to dense scrub forests, Yala offers an ecological stage unlike any other.
Here, leopards are photographed silhouetted against ocean horizons, perched atop ancient granite formations, resting on tree branches and stalking prey across sunlit grasslands.
The images tell stories of extraordinary lives.
There is Haminee, a devoted mother navigating the challenges of raising cubs in a competitive landscape. There is Lucas, one of Yala’s most frequently documented males, striding confidently across the Gonalabba Plains with the vast ocean forming an unforgettable backdrop.
There is Ruki demonstrating the species’ incredible strength by hoisting prey onto branches, and Shelly, quietly surveying her surroundings in a moment of feline vigilance.
Together, these individuals have become familiar characters in a living wilderness drama.

YM31 “Ruki” secures prey on a branch, illustrating the remarkable strength and coordination of the Sri Lankan leopard.
Recognising the immense value of long-term documentation, Wattegedara joined forces with fellow researchers Dushyantha Silva, Raveendra Siriwardana and Mevan Piyasena to establish the Yala Leopard Centre in 2020.
Located at the Palatupana entrance to the Yala National Park, the centre is believed to be the world’s first information facility dedicated exclusively to leopards.
“The centre serves as a repository of knowledge, accumulated through years of observation and research,” Wattegedara says. “Our goal is to connect visitors with the science behind conservation and foster a deeper appreciation of these magnificent animals.”
The project’s impact extends far beyond Sri Lanka’s borders.
Research arising from the Yala Leopard Diary has been published in internationally recognised scientific journals. One study introduced an innovative framework for identifying individual leopards, while another documented an extraordinary and previously unrecorded case of a leopard cub being consecutively adopted by two different adult females—first a relative and later an unrelated leopardess.
The discovery attracted international scientific attention and highlighted the complexity of leopard social behaviour.
Yet for Wattegedara, the most important lesson remains one of humility.
“One conclusion has become increasingly clear,” he reflects. “Our understanding of these leopards remains far from complete. We are only beginning to understand how they live, adapt and persist in one of Sri Lanka’s most dynamic protected landscapes.”

YF15 “Hope” descends Rukvila Rock at dawn, showcasing the agility and adaptability of Yala’s leopards.
His words underscore an essential conservation truth: the more we learn about nature, the more mysteries emerge.
As Sri Lanka navigates growing environmental challenges, the Yala Leopard Diary stands as a shining example of what sustained observation, scientific curiosity and public engagement can achieve.
Beyond the stunning photographs and remarkable sightings lies something even more valuable—a growing body of knowledge capable of informing future conservation decisions and ensuring that future generations inherit a wilderness where leopards continue to roam free.
For more than a decade, Wattegedara and his colleagues have followed the tracks of Yala’s elusive predators through dust, rain and scorching heat.
Their work has revealed that every leopard has a story, every sighting has significance and every photograph can contribute to conservation.
And perhaps, most importantly, it has reminded us that the golden ghosts of Yala still have many secrets left to share.
By Ifham Nizam
Features
Glamour, music and community spirit …
Sri Lankans are quite active, all around the globe.
News has just come my way, from Glasgow, in Scotland, where the glamour of masks, music, dancing, and community spirit, came together, in spectacular fashion, at Masquerade Night, bringing together members of the Sri Lankan community for an evening filled with music, fashion, food and entertainment.
Organised by Mahesh Balaaratchi (DJ Mowgli) together with Sulochana Asmone, Hiroshini, Prasad, Ashi, and Shawn, the evening provided guests with an opportunity to socialise, enjoy live entertainment, and celebrate in a unique and elegant setting.
Guests arrived from 6:00 pm, dressed in formal attire and decorative masks, creating a colourful and vibrant atmosphere throughout the venue.

DJ Mowgli: The main
organiser of
Masquerade Night
There was a delicious selection of Sri Lankan cuisine and street food, which proved popular throughout the evening.
The buffet offered a variety of traditional favourites, giving attendees a taste of home while adding to the festive atmosphere.
Entertainment was provided by DJ Mowgli, whose performance kept the audience engaged throughout the night. His playlist featured a mixture of popular favourites, dance classics, and cultural music, remixed for a younger generation.
One of the highlights of the evening was the Baila session, which brought a distinctly Sri Lankan flavour to the event.
The Baila segment highlighted the importance of preserving and celebrating cultural traditions, while bringing people together through music and dance.
As familiar rhythms filled the room, guests enthusiastically took to the dance floor, creating one of the most memorable moments of the night.
The crowd was described as lively, energetic, and welcoming, with attendees embracing the spirit of the masquerade theme while enjoying the opportunity to reconnect with friends and meet new people. The family-friendly atmosphere ensured that guests of all ages could take part in the celebrations.
The festivities continued until midnight and included a range of competitions and entertainment.
Children and adults alike participated in fashion shows, while guests competed for awards in several ‘Best Dressed’ categories.
The creativity and effort displayed in both costumes and formal wear added an extra layer of excitement to the evening.
As the final songs played and guests prepared to leave, many were already looking forward to the next Event Night.
The evening’s proceedings were handled by Sam, Mahela and Isuru.
Their enthusiasm reflected the growing popularity of these gatherings and their increasing importance, within the local community calendar.
A series of community events has continued to grow in popularity among the Sri Lankans in Glasgow, with Halloween Night coming up on 31st October.
-
Features6 days agoPower crept into the Sangha and is now tearing it apart
-
Features6 days agoKondachchi wind farm and battery storage project to boost energy security, says Power Ministry Secretary
-
News4 days agoWomen’s T20 World Cup 2026 warm-up: Chamari Athapaththu’s 94 helps Sri Lanka beat Pakistan
-
Features6 days agoSaudi Arabia sets new benchmark in Hajj management as 1.7 million pilgrims complete sacred journey
-
News5 days agoAsst. Manager, security officer arrested over Rs 30 mn snatch at Horana PB branch
-
Editorial3 days agoProbe Sallay’s complaint
-
News4 days agoLankan-Canadian inducted to Toronto Sports Hall of Fame
-
News1 day agoLocal firms move millions of dollars overseas for phantom imports: Govt.
