Connect with us

News

Weerasekera tears into Wigneswaran, Ponnambalam

Published

on

By Saman Indrajith

State Minister of Provincial Councils and Local Government Rear Adm. (retd) Sarath Weerasekara yesterday challenged Tamil MPs in the Opposition to prove that they had a genuine concern for the welfare of their people.

Participating in the debate on the Vote on Account Minister Weeraskera said that so-called representatives of Tamil people would not even donate blood for the people they represented.  “I ask them if they have ever donated blood for their own people. When the Jaffna Hospital runs out of blood it is the Sinhalese soldiers who donate blood. The Vellalas will never donate their blood as they don’t want the socially disadvantaged Tamils to receive their blood. These are the very people who are talking about the aspirations and welfare of the Tamil people. They don’t have the right to talk about the aspirations of the Tamil people.

We have greater right to talk about the Tamil people. 

Former Navy Chief of Staff Weerasekera said that Rs. 174 billion had been allocated for Defence expenditure at a time when there was peace in the country. He said that after 30 years of war, there was peace in the country and in case that peace was compromised, the government would allocate more from the Vote on Account for defence expenditure.

“The minister said that if anyone was trying to instigate the youth and spread hatred between the Sinhalese and Tamils and laying the foundation for another conflict, then that persons had to be exposed.

On the inaugural day of the Parliament one party leader went out of his way to speak of self-determination and supremacy of the Tamil language. This august Assembly was not a place to decide whether one language was superior to the other. But, one could sympathise with him as a person who was clueless about the true history of Sri Lanka.

“We are a country with a written history of over 2500 years and an even longer Sinhala history. The ruins and historical monuments spread throughout the country are testament to the history of the country based on Sinhala civilisation.  Hence, knowing of this past very well, these statements intended to ignite disharmony should be strongly condemned.  

“Somehow, we must be concerned about his statement about self-determination. If self-determination is given to the North to fulfil the aspirations of the Tamils living in the North, then what about the Tamils living in the South? More than 50% of the Tamils are living in the South among the Sinhalese and the Muslims. Does this mean he is not concerned about the aspirations of the Tamils living in the South or is he fully convinced that their aspirations have already been met? Weerasekera asked. 

“Weerasekera said the particular MP when he was holding a very responsible position in Jaffna, had claimed that the Sinhalese and the Muslims had no right to live in the Jaffna Peninsula. He attended the Colombo Royal College and studied with the Sinhalese, then went to Law College and studied with the Sinhalese, then went on to become a magistrate and High Court judge and became a Supreme Court judge and lived among the Sinhalese and Muslims for 65 years and then had the audacity to go to Jaffna thereafter and claim that the Sinhalese and Muslims had no right to live in the North.

“This MP is eternally insulting the government and the Sinhalese people, Buddhism and the Sinhala language and engages in protests in Killinochchi demanding the removal of Buddhist statues.  He is none other than MP C.V. Wigneswaran. This same MP took oaths in Mulliwaikkal prior to taking oaths in parliament. This spot is where the most intense battle took place. There, many were killed and the battle was for a separate state and him taking oaths at this very spot is a clear manifestation that he too is has the same agenda. Hence, he definitely needs to give an explanation for his actions. As pointed out by MP Manusha Nanayakkara, such racist statements should be removed from Hansard.

“Similarly, MP Gajendrakumar Ponnambalam said that the Sri Lankan forces had committed war crimes and that was the reason why President Gotabaya Rajapaksa had lost the electorates in the North. However, I want to ask him how come the former Army Commander Sarath Fonseka, who commanded the Army during the war, won so many votes in the North when he contested the Presidential election. Therefore, I don’t think his utterances should be taken seriously as they are baseless.

“Although he claims the Sri Lankan forces committed war crimes , experts in the field such as Sir Desmond de Silva, Sir Geoffrey Nice and David Crane, Prof. Michael Newton, Rodney Dixon QC and  Maj. Gen. John Holmespic, after extensive investigations and cleared the Sri Lankan armed forces of war crimes and crimes Minister .”



Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

‘Investigations won’t be stopped due to protests’

Published

on

Easter Sunday carnage:

Investigations into the 2019 Easter Sunday terror attacks will not be halted due to protests, demonstrations or Satyagraha campaigns, Minister of Public Security Ananda Wijepala told Parliament yesterday (10), while alleging that investigators had gathered sufficient evidence to establish the involvement of former State Intelligence Service (SIS) Director, retired Major General Suresh Sallay, in a conspiracy linked to the attacks.

Making a special ministerial statement in the House, the Minister said that evidence uncovered during ongoing investigations indicated that Sallay had prior knowledge of the planned attacks and related extremist activities before the coordinated bombings that claimed more than 270 lives and injured hundreds of others, on April 21, 2019.

Wijepala claimed that three weeks before the attacks, Sallay had deployed four Muslim individuals to gather intelligence, including information on the number of worshippers attending mass at a church in Negombo.

According to the Minister, the principal individual among the four had been identified by witnesses to the CID as an ISIS extremist and had subsequently gone missing following the Easter Sunday attacks.

“There is evidence suggesting that Major General Sallay met the informant who had tipped off Army Intelligence regarding the attacks at a hotel in Colombo,” Wijepala said.

The Minister maintained that investigators had uncovered evidence indicating that Sallay had taken steps to prevent the disclosure of information that could have revealed crucial details relating to the attacks and the events leading up to them.

Referring to allegations that Sallay had been subjected to inhumane treatment while in custody, Wijepala rejected such claims, describing them as false and misleading.

He told Parliament that the former intelligence chief had been afforded all facilities and privileges due to a primary suspect under the law, including unrestricted access to legal counsel.

“The Magistrate personally visited Sallay to ascertain his health and wellbeing. At no stage did he complained of any inhumane treatment. Neither has he lodged complaints with any other relevant authority in that regard,” the Minister said.

Wijepala also disclosed that Sallay had thus far declined to provide investigators with the passwords to his laptop computer and mobile phone, a move he described as an attempt to obstruct the investigative process.

“He is acting in a manner that hinders the progress of investigations,” the Minister alleged.

The Public Security Minister maintained that the government remained committed to uncovering the full truth behind the Easter Sunday attacks and bringing all those responsible before the law, irrespective of their status or position.

Emphasising that the investigation would continue without interference, Wijepala said attempts to exert pressure through public protests or Satyagraha campaigns would not influence the course of the inquiry.

“The investigations into the Easter Sunday attacks will not be halted by any protests or Satyagraha,” he said.

By Saman Indrajith

Continue Reading

News

267,138 Lankan children dropped out of school system between 2018 and 2024

Published

on

A total of 267,138 children dropped out of the school system between 2018 and 2024, Prime Minister and Minister of Education Dr. Harini Amarasuriya informed Parliament yesterday (10).

Responding to a question raised by SJB Ratnapura District SJB MP Hesha Withanage, the Prime Minister said that the government did not possess definitive data on school dropouts from 2010 to the early part of 2017.

She explained that the figures for the period from 2018 to 2024 had been derived from annual school census reports using an internationally recognised methodology that takes into account student enrolment figures and dropout rates from Grade One to Grade Ten.

According to the statistics presented to Parliament, 38,839 students dropped out of school in 2018,

while the figure increased to 41,503 in 2019. In 2020, the number stood at 32,540 before declining further to 25,492 in 2021.

However, a sharp increase was recorded in 2022, when 52,596 students were identified as having left the school system. The figure remained high in 2023 at 50,345 before declining to 25,823 in 2024.

The Prime Minister cautioned that the figures did not necessarily indicate that all students classified as dropouts had completely discontinued their education.

She noted that some students may have transferred to schools in other provinces, enrolled in international schools, or migrated overseas with their families while continuing their studies.

Dr. Amarasuriya said that such cases could not be separately identified under the methodology used to compile the statistics and were, therefore, included in the overall dropout figures.

Addressing the causes of school dropouts, the Prime Minister said a range of factors contributed to students leaving the formal education system.

These included personal circumstances, school-related issues, family and economic difficulties, social influences, as well as students opting for alternative educational pathways and training opportunities, she said.

By Saman Indrajith

Continue Reading

News

PM declares PC polls only under new electoral system

Published

on

Prime Minister Harini Amarasuriya told Parliament yesterday that Provincial Council elections would not be conducted under the existing proportional representation system and would instead be held under a new electoral system.

Responding to a question raised by MP Ravi Karunanayake, the Prime Minister said there was no justification for holding elections without ensuring adequate representation for women and youth in Provincial Councils.

She said that the government’s position was to first finalise reforms to the electoral system before proceeding with polls.

The Prime Minister also provided a detailed breakdown of when the terms of Provincial Councils expired, noting that all nine councils had been without elected administrations for several years. According to her, the Sabaragamuwa Provincial Council term ended on September 29, 2017, followed by the Eastern and North Central Councils on September 30 and October 1, 2017 respectively.

The Central and North Western Provincial Councils ended their terms on October 08 and 10, 2018, while the Northern Provincial Council term ended on October 24, 2018. The Southern Provincial Council term expired on April 10, 2019, followed by the Western Provincial Council on April 21, 2019, and the Uva Provincial Council on October 8, 2019.

Amarasuriya said that under Section 10(a) of the Provincial Councils Elections Act No. 2 of 1988, the Election Commission was required to publish a notice of intention to hold an election within one week after the dissolution or expiry of a council, following a direction from the President.

However, she noted that the Election Commission had not issued such notices due to the absence of enabling legal provisions following subsequent amendments.

She further explained that under Section 3A of the Provincial Councils Elections (Amendment) Act No. 17 of 2017, the holding of elections is linked to the completion of a delimitation process. This requires the appointment of a Delimitation Committee by the President to define electorates within administrative districts and submit its report to Parliament, with elections to be held only after parliamentary approval.

The Prime Minister said the delimitation process has not yet been completed, which has prevented the conduct of Provincial Council elections under the revised framework.

Amarasuriya also informed Parliament that a parliamentary select committee had been appointed to examine and make recommendations on whether Provincial Council elections could be conducted under the previous electoral system through further amendments to existing legislation.

The committee, titled the “Select Committee of Parliament to look into and report to Parliament on the matter of selecting the Electoral System under which the Provincial Council Elections should be held and submit its proposals and recommendations in that regard,” comprises MPs Vijitha Herath (Chairman), Nizam Kariapper, Chandana Sooriyarachchi, Darmapriya Wijesinghe, Samanmali Gunasingha, Shanakiyan Rasamanickam, Lakshman Nipuna Arachchi, Mano Ganesan, Ranjith Madduma Bandara, Arun Hemachandra, Sunil Watagala and Muneer Mulaffer.

She said further decisions regarding the holding of Provincial Council elections will be taken based on the recommendations of the parliamentary select committee.

Continue Reading

Trending