Continued from yesterday
He explained that the community receives high-quality service free of charge. “There are many people who cannot afford surgeries and vaccines in the areas we work in. Dogstar offers it for free. We educate the community on rabies control and pet ownership. We help to enhance the health of community dogs, giving them a better chance to co-exist with the community.”
Team Blue, Deputy team leader Duminda Liyanage got to know about Dogstar through his brother-in-law who also works for Dogstar. Liyanage has been with Dogstra for five years. “We help to control rabies, one of the most dangerous viruses in the world. We have processes in place, we use technology to ensure sustainability.” He admitted that the skills and knowledge they acquire through international standard training are irreplaceable.
“We also offer to collect the dogs from owners who cannot travel to a clinic and bring them back,” said Liyanage. He believed that animals that are spayed or neutered and vaccinated against rabies are more accepted by the community which allows the dogs to live a happy life. “Conflicts that arise due to unwanted puppies and issues related to stray dogs and rabies are mostly reduced. People tend to care for and adopt community dogs that have already been neutered,” he said. Liyanage believes that the programme had made a huge difference at both personal and community levels. “Personally, I have learned more about animal behaviour and welfare which allows me to help people or owners in need. And job security is very reassuring. Especially during the COVID-19 period.
Project Assistant Anjali de Silva joined Dogstar as a volunteer and became a permanent staff member in 2017. “We are very focused on animal welfare and the priority is to control dogs and cat population humanely. Dogstar constantly adopts new ways that could enhance the quality of the free service we offer to the community. Not to mention constant learning opportunities from the international professionals who are at the top of their game,” said de Silva. She is of the opinion that Dogstar has made a significant difference in the areas it operates. “Stray dog population has been controlled to a great extent, not to mention the improved overall health of the stray dogs.” She pointed out that the community education programmes are focused on promoting responsible pet ownership and animal welfare.
She admitted that the programme has made a huge positive impact on her personal life. “I’m constantly challenged to perform better as both my superiors are perfectionists. We are given tools to learn new things, be it animal-related or management related. We are empowered to make decisions to achieve our targets, our ideas and opinions are always considered. And most importantly the opportunities I’m presented with to learn and grow professionally is massively beneficial.”
The major benefits to the community, are the humane control of dog and cat population and rabies control. “And 90% of our staff are locals. That’s because Samantha always gives priority to recruiting Sri Lankans. So as Dogstar grew over the years it has created many job opportunities for locals.” de Silva pointed out the numerous other ways Dogstar is helping the community; donating dry rations to vulnerable families during the lockdown, sponsoring breakfast at an underprivileged local school called Yawajeewa every day and offering work opportunities to its students once they complete their education.
But Samantha couldn’t have done it without her husband Mark, whose role as the Deputy in Country Director is to support Samantha’s vision and help her make it happen. “What Samantha is doing here is making a change to so many people, it’s making communities safe, and it’s improving the welfare and lives of the dogs,” said Mark, who has no regrets about coming to Sri Lanka.
Samantha hopes one day she would be able to pass the torch on to one of her assistants. Her husband’s role is to support Samantha’s vision and help her make it happen. When asked whether he has any regrets about uprooting his life in the UK to start Dogstar, Mark said he has no regrets. “What Samantha is doing here is making a change to so many people, it’s making communities safe, and it’s improving the welfare and lives of the dogs.”
What is a typical day in Samantha’s life at Dogstar like? Samantha said it varies and no two days are alike. She spends a lot of time in her office budgeting, financial forecasting and coordinating with government departments such as the Ministry of Health, Rabies eradication programme and PHIs. “People often say that they would love to do what I do for a living, ‘being with dogs all day’. In truth it involves a lot more paperwork than people would think.” She admitted that although she makes every effort to spend time with the dogs, often the only dogs whose company she is in are her own pet dogs. Having said that, Samantha admitted that project management skills of her old job were vital to the success of the programme. “It is much like running a business,” explained Samantha. “Products are our services and shareholders are donors.” Hopefully, without further lockdowns, Samantha and her team are looking to sterilize 11,000 dogs and up to 3,000 cats. The current project is keeping her fully occupied with spreadsheets and Gantt Chart.
Their work involves an initial census and awareness campaign. The owners are then given the option of bringing their animals to the clinic or requesting the team to transport the animal to the clinic. Roaming dogs are netted and brought to the clinic. Surgery is performed and the animals are micro-chipped to keep track of all the information from age to their home range. “This way, after they are released, we are able to follow-up on them.” The process is wrapped up with another census, of the number of dogs sterilized. Some dogs are so clever that they skip town for the duration.
“Our target is to sterilize at least 90 percent of the population.” Samantha vouches that this is far more effective than culling, done in certain western countries. There are other advantages of reduced dog population that the average Sri Lankan is oblivious to, such as less fighting among dogs over resources and territory, lower dog bite incidence and resulting change in attitudes. Samantha pointed out that, as the numbers drop and dogs become healthier, they cease to be a nuisance. The community becomes more sympathetic towards them as they are not overwhelmed by a large number of dogs. Consequently, the balance between people and dogs matter, Samantha reiterated. “We have a static dog population now and most of them are vaccinated.”
Samantha admits that anyone working in animal welfare is faced with many challenges. The major obstacle she has had to face is the resistance on the part of owners to spay neuter their pets. “Their argument is that they don’t want to subject their pet to surgery and neutering is not natural. But they don’t think twice about dumping unwanted litter on the roadside or temples.” Samantha pointed out that the puppies have little chance of survival on the streets. According to her there are too many dogs and not enough good homes.
“There is this idea that imported dogs are better, which is ridiculous,” said Samantha, who sees this as a major reason Sri Lankans do not want to adopt local dogs. “Sri Lankan dogs are amazing. They are possibly healthier than some of the imported breeds and, because of their body weight and short coats, are better adapted to the local climate and far more resistant to disease.”
Dogstar is in the process of creating awareness about the benefits of spay neutering. According to Samantha, getting the services of vets have also proved difficult with only one university, University of Peradeniya, producing 50 to 60 veterinary graduates a year. “Most of them will go into food security, working for the Department of Animal Production and Health or Ministry of Livestock. Some will want to go abroad or continue studies.” There aren’t that many vets for a country of over 21 million people. “Some of the drugs and equipment that we take for granted in Europe are not available here or are very difficult to procure.” While the Dogstar team awaited shipments of supplies, the situation was compounded by cancelled flights and delays at seaports due to the pandemic.
Raising money to sterilize street dogs may not be the most exciting proposition. Thankfully the spay neuter programme is supported by a number of charities and establishments such as Dogs Trust Worldwide, The University of Edinburgh, Worldwide Veterinary Service, Mission Rabies and Foundation Brigitte Bardot. “We have to raise money for everything else from the public, from the UK, Europe and Australia.” Samantha admitted it is difficult to raise all the money required, locally. But with the pandemic putting most of their UK donors out of work, forced to face considerable financial difficulties themselves, times have been difficult for Dogstar.
The Dogstar motto is Eat, Spay, Love. But how does a predominantly Buddhist society, where sterilization of any kind is thoroughly discouraged, take to neutering. Samantha admitted that some do object to it based on their faith beliefs, but many support the programme because their need to alleviate suffering overrides it. Having worked in both predominantly Buddhist and Catholic areas, Samantha said that many places of worship, both Buddhist and Catholic, had offered their premises to conduct clinics. She admitted that the community was naturally suspicious, but are warming up to the concept. “They actually call us for help now.”
Contrary to popular belief, stray dogs and cats aren’t solely responsible for over population and unwanted litter is dumped at temples or roadsides, in which case what may be required is change of attitudes. To address this need, this year Dogstar is stepping up the programme to raise awareness locally.
“There definitely needs to be a change in attitudes,” said Samantha. “For example, one may complain that their neighbour’s dog is barking all the time. Some may be quick to point out that it’s barking because it’s a dog, but the fact is it’s barking because it’s frustrated, because it’s locked in a kennel or chained for 24 hours a day.” She pointed out that people in the community should be encouraged to tackle issues relevant to themselves, working directly with pet owners. She pointed out that owners should also be more attuned to their own responsibilities towards their pets.
She also emphasised the pressing need for legal backing. She said that the proposed Animal Welfare Bill will go a long way in ensuring animal rights. “Everyone in animal welfare is excited about the possibilities a new act could afford us,” said Samantha, who pointed out that the existing laws are archaic and offers hardly any protection to animals. “In any country there are those who are unfortunately cruel to animals. Legislation is the one way that would ensure that animals are safeguarded from such people.” She pointed out that animal rights were non existent 150 years ago. But with the introduction of legislation, people’s mindset was also changed.
To ensure that the work they do is not duplicated Dogstar coordinates with government counterparts such as Ministry of Health and the Department of Animal Production and Health within the Ministry of Livestock and Rural Community Development. And red tape, typical of local government service is nuisance that the Dogstar team has learned to deal with. “Sri Lankan departments have a lot of paperwork that gets moved back and forth a lot. But in the recent past most departments have come on line and conduct online meetings. Although when it comes to reporting most of it is still physical.”
Their programme churns out a lot of data. When asked what kind of an impact the programme has made in Sri Lanka, according to the stats, Samantha said that they have recorded a 32 percent drop in the dog population of the area. Dogstar has currently sterilised 45,802 dogs and 3,632 cats and carried out 67,284 rabies vaccinations. “Data is important to determine the impact of the spay neuter programme, specially to know where we went wrong, to learn from it and share the findings internationally and locally.” Samantha explained that statistics point the way to a targeted organized programme.
When asked how the Sri Lankan government has reacted to the programme, Samantha informed that the Ministry of Health has shown positive interest in their work. Samantha and her team is more than happy to share their experience and technology pertaining to the spay neuter programme.
The first dog she saved at the temple many years ago eventually made a full recovery and was christened Mango. She is long gone now, true to her name, buried under a mango tree. “If it weren’t for Mango and the monk, I would probably be in London, doing a corporate job.” it begs the question, did she save the dog or vice versa.
Pics courtesy Richard Murgatroyd, Dogs Trust Worldwide
Notes on a not-so radical class
By Uditha Devapriya
A little over a year ago, Devani Jayathilaka, the Gampaha Division Wildlife Officer now on a crusade against the government, stood up to a State Minister and got away with it. Objecting to Sanath Nishantha’s proposal to build a children’s playground on forest land, she stood her ground even as the Minister and his acolytes attempted to intimidate her.
Videos of Devani retorting to Nishantha and those acolytes gained supporters across social media. Public opinion being very much with her, the government quickly began feting her: Bandula Gunawardena said that the Cabinet took her side, and S. M. Chandrasena regretted the incident while half-heartedly exonerating the Minister.
Devani Jayathilaka’s courage was seen at the time as a symptom of the President’s resolve to make the bureaucracy more independent and efficient, free of bias and politicisation. As such, supporters of the government jumped on the bandwagon. The Daily News dedicated an entire editorial to her, calling her “the toast of all environmentalists, nature lovers and generally all those who cherish our country’s legal and constitutional integrity.” Hopefully, the laudatory piece concluded, “this signal act… will be a beacon to others in the public service to do their bit in fulfilling their public duty while resisting the pressures of politicians.” The subtext was unmistakably clear: the President’s reformism had empowered the officer’s activism.
A year later, and here we are: the premature love affair aborted, the feeling of celebration dampened. Yet could one have expected otherwise? At no point here in living memory have environmental concerns permeated every layer of society, from Colombo’s civil society to Sinhala nationalist outfits, as they are now. A broad conjuncture of oppositional forces, some drawn from organisations that fuelled the ideology which brought the government to power (such as the Sinhale movement), has pitted itself against that government’s apathy over the environment, while social media continues to enthrone activists: environmentalists and state officials. The President’s men, meanwhile, seem to be resorting to a policy of either ignoring or retorting to these voices. In both cases, it’s the government that has lost out.
It is hard not to side with the activists. They have a point: no regime has engaged properly with the environment. Between 2017 and 2019, forest cover reduced from 29.7% to 16.5%. It was the yahapalana government, remnants of which are tweeting against the present regime’s environmental record now, that held
the reins of power then. Yet the administration before it was no different: in 2012, to give just one example, roughly 1,585 hectares of primary forest land were lost, the biggest annual loss in a decade. The numbers for 2020 and 2021 have not been released yet, but there’s no doubting they are as big as, if not bigger than, these figures; according to the Rain Forest Protectors of Sri Lanka, forest cover stands at 17%, above what it was in 2019, but well below the 30% promised by the president.
The politics of the campaigns against the government, however, goes well beyond a simple dichotomy between political representatives and wildlife activists. Frustratingly enough, it’s not easy to put a finger on the dynamics of these protests, to draw a line between protagonists and antagonists within them, not least of all because a simple twofold division – government versus us – has been replaced by a threefold one in them: the government (high level officials included) on one side, activists and officials on another, and us on yet another.
Led by a mostly Sinhala and Buddhist lower middle-class, including the clergy (no less than the Sinhala Ravaya), these campaigns, which have mobilised activists and officials, appear to have unearthed a rather interesting contradiction from within that middle-class: a distrust of political representatives, and an ambivalent attitude towards lower level officials. To identify this contradiction for what it is, and explore it, is not easy: that requires research, the mettle of an anthropologist or ethnographer, and I am neither. Yet from what little I have been able to gather, it appears that this recent spurt of activism has facilitated a shift in the character of anti-state activism, particularly in its class composition. How so?
Devani’s message resonates profoundly with a section of the country’s upward aspiring middle-class, educated mostly in Sinhala but idealising a better life: one to which they feel both government representatives and private interests are obstacles.
They hold contrasting views regarding the state. As far as the government proper – Ministers plus high level officials – is concerned, they are against it. It’s a different story with officials, not least because of the latter a great many hail from the milieu they do: Sinhala educated and upward aspiring. This is the demographic Patali Champika Ranawaka is targeting through his “43 Senankaya”, a demographic parties have not tried to court until fairly recently.
What explains their relationship with the state? Regarding government representatives, their opposition is easy to rationalise: most of these representatives are seen to have risen to where they are now by foul means, not fair. That irks an educated middle-class bereft of political or economic power; simply put, they feel hard done by, left out, unrepresented.
Such feelings of distrust cut through parties; indeed, a defining characteristic of the middle-class is the absence of a unifying political ideology. Any Opposition which believes that by coming to power on the strength of their convictions it can expect support from them forever is therefore walking on water, for this lower middle-class happens to be adamantly protean. It is their protean character, incidentally, that explains their response to state officials.
Their view of the latter is borne out by two main considerations: that they hail from the same class background, and that, since of late, these officials have taken up arms against political authorities, a group whose actions are seen as burdening the lower middle-class.
Indeed, far from berating officials like they berate political authorities, the lower middle-class rebelling against the regime share a desire to enter the bureaucracy as either professionals or administrators, though through education attainment, and not political backing. This desire is essentially a retread of the demand made by unemployed graduates: they want to fill a post in a state institution as soon as they leave university. Under Gotabaya Rajapaka their integration into the bureaucracy has been remarkably rapid: by September last year, for instance, around 60,000 graduates had been absorbed into the Public Service, as part of his “Rata Wenuwen Weda” programme. Yet even this rather modest realisation of lower middle-class aspirations has failed to dampen, or stunt, lower middle-class opposition to his government.
To sum up, what we are seeing here is a division between state officials, assumed to have entered the government through merit, and political representatives, assumed to have entered it through influence. That Devani Jayathilaka continues to be idealised by this class therefore points at the consolidation of a uniquely petty bourgeois consciousness, which at once aspires upward in the bureaucracy, and pits itself against the government overseeing the bureaucracy. Gravitating to meritocratic ideals, they have become a huge floating electorate.
This raises another point: their disavowal of party politics. Let’s not mistake karawala for mallum here, however; the line this milieu touts, that they lack party ideology, should not mislead one into thinking that they can’t be co-opted into any party ideology. For those who believe that a non-political middle-class rebelling against an elected government, even one infringing every other norm in the book, is incapable of political manoeuvring, the case of Anna Hazare offers a counterargument: opposed to political groups, what Hazare achieved in the end was an electoral landslide for just such a group, Narendra Modi’s BJP.
By no means am I saying that Anna Hazare was/is to India what officials crusading against political representatives are/will be to Sri Lanka. Yet not unlike Hazare, these officials have given what little of an Opposition that’s there in the country some much needed ammunition (with which to topple the government). Far from welcoming such a state of affairs, I see two problems with this: the lack of a proper policy on the environment from the Opposition (apart from a few perfunctory protests), and the risk of letting what environmentalists are combating continue under a future administration led by that Opposition. As environmentalists and Left activists have pointed out only too clearly, much of what is being protested against, including the Sinharaja debacle, can be traced back to the yahapalana period. How wise would it be to trust the party that held the cards then so much as to return them to power now?
To these two problems one can add a third: the contradiction between the social conditioning and the activism of the middle-class. That contradiction translates itself into another: between political ideals that pit this middle-class against political authority, and social aspirations that orient them towards personal achievement in education and employment.
One can ask why this is a problem, why it’s so problematic. In matters of political concern, so the idealists say, personal matters are of no relevance.
But that’s precisely the issue. How pertinent are one’s personal aspirations to one’s political inclinations? Not pertinent, some would say; pretty pertinent, in my book.
That leads us to a crucial issue, the most important to crop up from what we’re seeing today: the extent to which those leading the protests are willing to own up to how class aspirations, and not just state complicity, have contributed to environmental degradation.
Let me reduce this to a simple query: how much do you attribute everything wrong with the environment to the government’s doing and non-doing, and how much do you attribute it to, say, our propensity to import, a major factor in environmental degradation?
To be fair, of course, it’s not only imports. The truth is that degradation of the environment is linked inextricably to an economic model rooted in consumerism and urbanisation.
But that merely reinforces my point: consumerism is promoted by the private sector, and urbanisation by the public, because both have an audience: the same middle-class blaming the government for what’s happening to our forests, our rivers, our way of life.
To restate this as simply as I can, then, the problems of environmental degradation today are the result of a decades-long experiment with capitalism and neoliberalism that has failed. The crisis is thus a crisis of a consumerist and exploitative model based on a capitalist framework. Now no critique of what is happening to our forests can evolve without taking this model into consideration. As perhaps its biggest beneficiaries, the middle-class must hence recognise the need to formulate an alternative model to it, in line with their activist inclinations.
However, in continuing to ignore if not marginalise this need, those taking the government to task over the environment are offering an inadequate response, radical enough to question the regime for its failings, yet not radical enough to question our embracement of an acquisitive, consumption-led economic model that has contributed to the quagmire we are in. Now I hate gazing into crystal balls, but if this is what will continue in the future, then these protests, no matter how laudable, will someday, somehow, fizzle out. That would be a pity.
The writer can be reached at email@example.com
CELEBRATING EARTH DAY: THE VOICE OF THE NEXT GENERATION
Our world needs transformational change, and it is time for us, those of the present generation to hold ourselves accountable for our role in the environmental crisis while also calling for bold, creative, and innovative solutions. This year marks the 51st anniversary of Earth Day and this Webinar is designed to commemorate the occasion and to support the worldwide efforts to conserve and revitalize the environment of the blue planet that is our home. If we are to succeed, we must listen to the children who will link hands from around the world during this webinar and voice their concerns and ideas to preserve a pristine environment for their generation.
This is the 17th of a series of virtual zoom panel discussions hosted by the America-Sri Lanka Photographic Art Society in Los Angeles California, USA (ASPAS); Member of Photographic Society of America (PSA) and The International Federation of Photography of Art in France (FIAP). The objective of the series is to showcase the beauty of world fauna and flora and promote environmental conservation in the context of nature photography and tourism, with a special focus on the grandeur of Sri Lanka’s natural habitat. The upcoming programme will commemorate World Earth Day 2021.
At a previous ASPAS Webinar, Dr. Peter H. Sand, former Secretary-General of ICUN, stated, “Pandemics, such as coronavirus, are the result of humanity’s destruction of nature, the illegal and unsustainable wildlife trade, as well as the devastation of forests and other wild places, are the driving force behind the increasing number of diseases leaping from wildlife to humans.” The ASPAS Webinars are intended to offer a platform to discuss a more balanced relationship with these ecosystems and the tools that can help us reach this objective, so that future generations can continue to enjoy and benefit from them sustainably and responsibly.
Earth Day marks the anniversary of the birth of the modern environmental movement in 1970 which gave voice to an emerging public consciousness about the state of our planet. Our planet is an amazing place, but it needs our help to thrive! That is why each year on April 22, more than a billion people celebrate Earth Day to protect the planet from pollution and deforestation and environment related issues. By taking part in activities like picking up litter and planting trees, we are making our world a happier, healthier place to live.
In the decades leading up to the first Earth Day, the world was consuming vast amounts of leaded gas through massive and inefficient automobiles. Industry belched out smoke and sludge with little fear of the consequences from either the law or the press. Air pollution was commonly accepted as the smell of prosperity. Until this point, the world remained largely oblivious to environmental concerns and how a polluted environment threatens human health. Since, the great challenge for the environmental community is to combat the cynicism of climate change deniers, well-funded oil lobbyists, reticent policy makers, and a disinterested public. In the face of these challenges, Earth Day prevailed and established itself as a major movement for global action for the environment.
Over the decades, it has brought hundreds of millions of people into the environmental movement, creating opportunities for civic engagement and volunteers in 193 countries. Earth Day engages more than 1 billion people every year and has become a major steppingstone along the pathway of engagement around the protection of the planet.
Now, the fight for a clean environment continues with increasing urgency, as the ravages of climate change become more and more apparent every day. As the awareness of our climate crisis grows, so does civil society mobilization, which is reaching a fever pitch across the globe today. Digital and social media are bringing these conversations, protests, strikes and mobilizations to a global audience, uniting a concerned citizenry as never before and mobilizing generations to join together to take on the greatest challenge that humankind has faced.
It is quite apparent that the youth of our world should also be engaged in this vital conversation as an absolutely indispensable partner.
Governments have recognized this for decades and many have introduced some level of climate and environmental education into their education systems. But the truth is that impact of climate and environmental education is in some cases week, cursory, and still in many countries non-existent. In the decades since the launch of the global environmental movement, it is estimated that more than 3 billion young people have graduated from high school having learned little or nothing about one of the greatest issues that will shape their lives and their livelihoods for decades to come.
The time is now, indeed it is long overdue, for a massive environmental literacy campaign that can create a generation of citizens, workers and leaders who really understand why and how to stop climate change and environmental degradation, ensuring that every student around the world completes their formal education as an environmental and climate literate citizen. A citizen who is ready to take action and speak up for change and build knowledge and skills for the growing green sector of clean energy, efficient transportation, sustainable business and making themselves competitive for new jobs.
The youth must also equip themselves with the knowledge and skills needed to build a better future and be stewards of this planet. They must learn that to sustain a functional society and economy, natural resources must be used wisely and efficiently while protecting the ecological systems to ensure clean air, clean water, and food security for all.
But just as vitally, we need to equip future generations with the knowledge, skills, and enthusiasm to survive and indeed thrive in the decades to come. And that begins in school. Even world leaders recognized that pivotal role as far back as 30 years, when the countries that forged the original United Nations climate change treaty in 1992 at the Rio Earth Summit enshrined climate education as an essential part of a national response to a global emergency.
Educationists believe every school in the world must have compulsory, assessed climate and environmental education with a strong civic engagement component. They have also pointed out that the onus for developing environmental consciousness in youth could not be the sole responsibility of schools as the young people need the help of adult allies. There is a role for everyone, parents, relatives, and society to support youth voices and stand alongside them.
It is in that spirit that the America-Sri Lanka Photohtaphic Art Society Los Angeles, led by its President, Suriya Jayalath Perera, has organized this Webinar to bring together 10 young people from the U.S., the U.K., Canada, and Sri Lanka to voice their concerns and present their ideas on the occasion of Earth Day 2021. Youth from ages six to 18, will address the entire gamut of environmental issues from climate change to plastic pollution. It would be a truly ground-breaking event, and you can be a part of it by virtually joining them on Sunday April 18th, 2021. The webinar will be moderated by Medini Ratnayake.
More Information: www.usacaaspas.com
Join us live on Sunday April 18th, at 8.30 P.M. 2021 https://www.facebook.com/aspaslausa/live Nandasiri (Nandi) Jasentuliyana, Former Deputy Director-General, United Nations
How to flush cholesterol out of your body
Cholesterol is a waxy, fat-like substance found in all the cells in your body. Your body needs cholesterol to make hormones, vitamin D, and substances that help you digest foods. Your liver makes all the cholesterol you need. The cholesterol in your body that you do not need comes from animal bodies.
If you have more cholesterol in your body than you need, then you are heading for heart disease and heart attacks. A build-up of cholesterol narrows arteries, causing a restriction of blood flow to the heart. Very often a person with high cholesterol levels has no symptoms until he has his first heart attack.
This is even more problematic if you are overweight – which you will be, because the food that causes an increase in cholesterol also increases your weight. Though some cholesterol components are stored in the liver and gallbladder, the main storage area is in fat cells called adipocytes. When you have too much cholesterol, these cells swell up and you gain weight. Too much cholesterol can be caused by eating too much fat or carbohydrates.
There are two types of cholesterol: HDL and LDL
High density lipoprotein (HDL) is good cholesterol which protects you from hearts attacks, and strokes, by mopping up excess bad cholesterol. It takes the cholesterol that you don’t need back to the liver. The liver breaks it down so it can be passed out of your body. LDL is bad cholesterol. This blocks the blood supply and causes strokes and heart attacks. Non-HDL take cholesterol from the liver to the cells around your body. Too much bad cholesterol (non-HDL) can be harmful because it sticks to the inside walls of your arteries. This can lead to fatty material (atheroma) building up – this process is known as atherosclerosis.
Cholesterol is found in animal foods, meat, milk, butter and cheese.
There are only two things that raise cholesterol in the blood: saturated and trans fats.
Saturated fats are found in meats, dairy products, chocolate, baked goods like biscuits and popcorn, margarine, deep-fried, and processed foods, basically junk food.
Trans fats occur in some fried and processed foods, also in junk food.
In adults, total cholesterol levels less than 200 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL) are considered healthy. 200 – 239 mg/dL is borderline high. 240 mg/dL and above is high. LDL cholesterol levels should be less than 100 mg/dL.
How do you know that your cholesterol levels are high? You usually don’t. There are no typical signs if you have high cholesterol, which is why it is so important to get it checked. It is a hidden risk factor, which means it happens without us knowing until it is too late. Some people get soft, yellowish, growths or lesions on the skin, especially round the eyes, called xanthomas. If you are lucky you develop left-sided chest pain, pressure, or fullness; dizziness; unsteady gait; slurred speech; or pain in the lower legs. Any of these conditions may be associated with high cholesterol.
How do you flush cholesterol out of your body?
Stop eating meat or drinking milk. Avoid ghee, butter and paneer, and seafood like crabs, shrimps and lobsters. Don’t smoke. Exercise. Eat fewer refined grains such as maida. Foods to avoid if you have high cholesterol levels include white bread, white potatoes, and white rice, highly processed sugars. Fried foods should be avoided, as well as foods high in saturated fats.
Eat fruits, vegetables, beans and whole grains, every day.
A report from Harvard Health has identified foods that actively decrease cholesterol levels: Oats, barley and whole grains, beans, eggplant and okra, nuts, vegetable oil (canola, sunflower), fruits (mainly apples, grapes, strawberries, and citrus), soy and soy-based foods. Eating just one and one-half cups of cooked oatmeal a day can lower your cholesterol by 5 to 8%. Oatmeal contains soluble and insoluble fibre – two types that your body needs.
In June 2020 a report, led by Imperial College London Majid Ezzati, et al. and involving dozens of universities, “Repositioning of the global epicentre of non-optimal cholesterol” was published in Nature. It said that while cholesterol levels have declined in high income countries, particularly Europe, since 1980 , they have increased vastly in lower and middle income countries, with Asia, specially Southeast Asia, now being the centre.
The reason for this is the consumption of animal-based foods, refined carbohydrates (maida) and palm oil. In short, the heart attack and stroke risks have been globally repositioned with the shifting of a high cholesterol diet.
A group of nearly 1,000 researchers, from around the world, analysed data from 1,127 studies comprising 102.6 million adults, to assess global trends in cholesterol levels from 1980 to 2018. This is the largest ever study of global cholesterol levels.
Previously cholesterol was considered a problem in high income Western countries.
The report said that Belgium, Sweden, Switzerland (the centre of the milk/meat diet) and Iceland (meat) had shown the steepest declines in cholesterol, going from the highest to the lowest. There has been a sharp drop in LDL cholesterol in the UK, according to the British Heart Foundation.
China, which had the lowest levels of cholesterol in 1980, was among the highest in 2018. India, Malaysia, Philippines and Thailand have not covered themselves in glory either.
In 1980 Australian women ranked 32nd highest in the world in cholesterol levels. Today they are 146th . Australian men have fallen from 31st highest to 116th.
Dr Avula Laxmaiah, National Institute of Nutrition, one of the authors of the research paper, said LDL cholesterol among Indian men ranked 128th in 1980 and remained the same in 2018. Women are 139th in the global line-up.
Other conditions, that can lead to high cholesterol levels, include diabetes drugs that increase LDL cholesterol and decrease HDL cholesterol, such as progestins, anabolic steroids, and corticosteroids. India is one of the highest users of steroids – not directly, but through these being fed to chicken.
The authors have suggested that each country in Asia set into place prices, and regulatory policies, that shift diets to non-saturated fats. But, at the end of the day it is not prices that will decide – meat/chicken and milk are already expensive but it doesn’t stop you from eating them. You will have to take a personal decision, depending on how much you value your life or the lives of your family.
(To join the animal welfare movement contact firstname.lastname@example.org, www.peopleforanimalsindia.org)
SJB: Excise, FM officials all out to pocket Rs 1 bn
Reserves fall to lowest since 2009, rupee strengthening to be short-lived: report
Sinharaja World Heritage
7-billion-rupee diamond heist; Madush splls the beans before being shot
Unfit, unprofessional, fat Sri Lankans
The Burghers of Ceylon/Sri Lanka- Reminiscences and Anecdotes
Features4 days ago
Port City Bill Requires Referendum
Sports5 days ago
Sebs’ cricket stalwart Cooray retires after more than three decades of service
news4 days ago
Two hotels to be built obstructing elephant corridor in Sinharaja – MONLAR
news5 days ago
Govt. MP Wijeyadasa strikes discordant note on Port City Bill
Opinion5 days ago
Buddhism and all beings’ right to life
Sports5 days ago
Mendis and Babar; careers that have taken different routes
Features5 days ago
Precision measurement shakes world of science
Features3 days ago
Dangerous and meticulous work copying Sigiriya frescoes in Bell era (1896)