Connect with us

Foreign News

Trump hush money trial: Michael Cohen admits to stealing

Published

on

Former President Donald Trump attends his New York hush-money trial on May 20 at the Manhattan Criminal Court (Aljazeera)

Disbarred lawyer Michael Cohen has completed his testimony before a New York criminal courtroom, as the case against his boss, former United States President Donald Trump,  approaches its likely end.

Monday marked Cohen’s fourth and final day on the witness stand.  His words were the last witness testimony the prosecution called before resting its case.

Now, the trial shifts towards the defence, as it seeks to rebut allegations that Trump falsified business records to conceal a hush-money payment to a former adult film actress – and thereby bolster his chances in the 2016 presidential election.

In October 2016, Cohen transferred $130,000 to the adult film actress Stormy Daniels to buy her silence about an affair she alleged she had with then-candidate Trump.

Cohen has maintained that he made the payment at Trump’s command, and that Trump then reimbursed the payment through surreptitious means, filing it under “legal expenses”.

But on Cohen’s last day on the stand, the defence sought to puncture that narrative, attacking Cohen’s credibility by drawing attention to instances where he lied and stole.

The defence has consistently maintained that Trump had nothing to do with the payment. Trump himself has denied any wrongdoing and refuted Daniels’s allegation of an affair.

Day 19 of the New York hush-money trial also marked the start of a short week. Not only is the witness list for the defence expected to be relatively brief, but the court is scheduled to break early this week, to accommodate the Memorial Day holiday in the US.

Trump faces 34 felony counts of falsifying business records in the case. Here are the takeaways from Cohen’s final day of testimony.

Donald Trump points with a finger as he speaks outside the Manhattan courtroom.

Former President Donald Trump told reporters outside the Manhattan Criminal Court on Monday that the prosecution has ‘no case’ (Aljazeera)

Cohen admits to stealing from Trump Organization

Before ending its cross-examination of Cohen on Monday, the defence landed a significant blow to his credibility, getting him to admit that he had stolen $30,000 from Trump’s namesake company.

Defence lawyer Todd Blanche asked Cohen outright: “You stole from the Trump Organization, right?”

Cohen offered his standard response, “Yes, sir.”

The theft came after Cohen hired the technology company Red Finch to help boost Trump’s numbers in an online poll from CNBC, ranking the best businessmen of the past half-century.

Cohen testified that Trump was “upset” that he had landed towards the bottom of the poll. By hiring Red Finch, Cohen explained that he and Trump could manipulate the poll: The tech company would cast false votes on Trump’s behalf using different IP addresses.

Red Finch was originally slated to be paid $50,000 for its services, Cohen explained.  But he told the jury that he instead paid Red Finch $20,000 to “placate” its owner and then pocketed the rest, after Trump decided to reduce his holiday bonus.  “I was angered because of the reduction in the bonus, and so I just felt like it was self-help,” Cohen said.

Blanche pressed the issue during his cross-examination: “Have you paid back the Trump Organization the money you stole from them?”

“No, sir,” Cohen said.

Trump’s entourage in the courtroom took the admission as a major coup for his defence.

“This just got interesting: Michael Cohen is now admitting to stealing money from our company,” Trump’s second son Eric posted on social media.

Kash Patel, an official under Trump’s administration, told reporters outside the courtroom that “we finally have a crime”.  “We also have a victim,” he added. “That victim is Donald J Trump.”

Kash Patel stands behind a row of microphones and a metal barricade as he speaks to the press outside the Manhattan Criminal Court.
Kash Patel told reporters that Cohen’s testimony shows Trump to be a ‘victim’ in the case (Aljazeera)

Cohen reveals he made millions from media appearances

The defence has long maintained that Trump himself is not guilty of falsifying business records — but that figures like Cohen and the Trump Organization’s former chief financial officer, Allen Weisselberg, were responsible for any misdeeds.

As the defence team brought its cross-examination of Cohen to a close, it sought to paint a portrait of Cohen’s alleged greed, highlighting the ways he profited from his association with Trump.

Cohen testified that, after Trump was elected president in 2016, he made about $4m from consulting contracts, including with AT&T, a telecommunications company seeking a merger at the time.

In 2018, however, Cohen pleaded guilty to campaign finance violations and other federal crimes, including lying to Congress. He was sentenced to prison as a result.

But when he was transferred to home confinement in 2020, he took on an increasingly public role as a Trump critic. Cohen testified that, starting in 2020, he made approximately $4.4m from tell-all books and podcast appearances.

The defence also asked Cohen about a reality TV show called The Fixer he had been shopping to networks, though he said no studio has picked it up yet.

Michael Cohen, wearing a suit and pink tie, walks outside his apartment building in New York.
Michael Cohen leaves his New York City home to attend his fourth day of testimony at the Manhattan Criminal Court on Monday (Aljazeera)

Cohen cross-examination ends, prosecution rests

In the final minutes of Cohen’s cross-examination, the defence tried to impress upon the jury that there were holes in the former lawyer’s testimony.  While Cohen has maintained that the hush-money payments were falsely logged as “legal expenses”, the defence has maintained the label is accurate, as Cohen was in fact Trump’s personal lawyer.

The defence also questioned whether Cohen could accurately recollect his conversations with Trump from October 2016, the month when the hush-money payment was made.

“Notwithstanding everything you’ve said over the years, you have specific recollection of having conversations with then-candidate Donald J Trump about the Stormy Daniels matter?” Blanche, the defence lawyer, asked.

Cohen answered his usual “yes, sir”.

“No doubt in your mind?” Blanche asked again. “No doubt,” Cohen responded.

The cross-examination ended shortly thereafter, and the prosecution briefly stood to question Cohen one last time.

Prosecutor Susan Hoffinger took the opportunity to point out that Trump’s actions were on trial, not Cohen’s.  “I know you might feel like you’re on trial here after cross-examination, but are you actually on trial here?” she asked Cohen.

“No, ma’am,” he replied.

The prosecution also asked Cohen to reflect upon what speaking out against Trump has cost him.

“My entire life has been turned upside down as a direct result,” Cohen responded, citing a decline in his family’s wellbeing as well as his professional prospects.  “I lost my law license, my businesses, my financial security, which I was fortunately enough early to have been able to obtain.”

With that, the prosecution rested its case.

A protester in New York holds up a sign that reads, "Slept with a porn star, screwed the voters."
A protester holds up a sign on Monday denouncing Donald Trump’s behaviour during the 2016 election (Aljazeera)

Defence calls its first witnesses, including feisty Costello

With the prosecution’s case at an end, it was time for the defence to take its turn to call witnesses.

The first was a paralegal named Daniel Sitko, who works for Blanche, the defence lawyer.

Sitko presented a chart that gave an overview of the phone calls between Cohen and Robert Costello, a lawyer who previously offered to transmit messages between Cohen and Trump.

The defence only questioned Sitko long enough to establish that Cohen’s communications with Costello were frequent, particularly in 2018 when he faced legal troubles.

Then, the defence’s second witness took the stand: Costello himself.

The decision to call Costello was not without controversy. The prosecution objected to his inclusion: Cohen has admitted to lying to Costello, and for his part, Costello has taken a prominent public role in questioning Cohen’s credibility.

Costello was also a late addition to the defence’s list of possible witnesses, and Judge Juan Merchan was forced to rule quickly about how much of Costello’s testimony he would allow.

Merchan said Costello could “offer some rebuttal” to Cohen’s testimony, but the judge added he would not allow the situation to become a “trial within a trial”.

But right away, Costello’s appearance on the witness stand was tense: The lawyer audibly reacted when the prosecution raised objections to his testimony, saying “jeez” and calling the situation “ridiculous”.

It was enough to earn a stern rebuke from Judge Merchan, who briefly cleared the courtroom to address Costello directly.

“Mr Costello, I want to discuss proper decorum in my courtroom. When there’s a witness on the stand, if you don’t like my ruling, you don’t say ‘jeez’,” Merchan said. “You don’t give me side eye, and you don’t roll your eyes.”

Costello was ultimately allowed to resume his testimony, which centred on allegations that Cohen lied about Trump’s knowledge of the hush-money payments.

“Michael Cohen said numerous times that President Trump knew nothing about those payments, that he did this on his own, and he repeated that numerous times,” Costello said.

Illinois Representative Mary Miller speaks to the press in an outdoor news conference in New York, as a Trump supporter waves a flag reading, "Trump won."
Illinois Representative Mary Miller joins Trump supporters outside the Manhattan Criminal Court on May 20 to speak to the press (Aljazeera)

Trump’s court entourage includes Hells Angels

The day ended with Costello’s fiery appearance on the witness stand and the prospect of further questioning from prosecutors on Tuesday.

While much of the court’s attention was focused on the final witnesses in the trial, members of Trump’s entourage also caught the media’s eye.

Seated among Trump’s inner circle was Chuck Zito, the former president of the New York chapter of the Hells Angels bikers club.

Now an actor, Zito faced his own criminal charges and served a prison sentence from 1985 to 1991.

Also in the audience were Congress members like Representative Andrew Clyde of Georgia.  “What needs to happen is this particular judicial-type system needs to be defunded,” Clyde said, calling for federal funding to be cut to Manhattan’s courts.

Trump himself spoke to the press outside of the courtroom, revisiting familiar themes that the prosecution was politically motivated, and complaining about the “freezing cold” setting.

“They have no case. They have no crime,” Trump said, adding that the judge was “corrupt” and “interfering with an election”.

Trump is expected to face President Joe Biden, a Democrat, in November’s presidential race.

(Aljazeera)



Foreign News

Heavy rains and flooding kills at least 23 in Nairobi

Published

on

By

A man looks through the wreckage of private vehicles destroyed following heavy rainfall in the Grogan area of Nairobi [BBC]

At least 23 people have been killed in Nairobi after heavy rain overnight caused severe flooding in Kenya’s capital city.

Police said about 30 people had been rescued but many others drowned after being swept into rivers – some have been electrocuted.

Kenya’s military has been deployed to help people trapped inside their cars as police described widespread damage to properties as well as road closures.

Several flights bound for Nairobi Airport had to be cancelled or diverted to the coastal city of Mombasa.

“The torrential rains have led to significant flooding, unfortunately resulting in 23 fatalities so far, the destruction of property, road closures, and the displacement of residents,” police said in a statement on Saturday afternoon.

 

[BBC]

Continue Reading

Foreign News

Qatar partially reopens airspace as Iranian strikes continue to hit Gulf

Published

on

By

A Qatar Airways Airbus A350-900 plane is seen in Doha, Qatar [File: Aljazeera]

Qatar has partially reopened its airspace days after Iranian missile and drone strikes forced the country to ground all flights as a United States-Israeli military campaign against Iran continues into its seventh day.

The Qatar Civil Aviation Authority announced the limited opening on Friday evening, saying flights would operate through “designated navigational contingency routes with limited operational capacity” in coordination with the Qatari armed forces.

The move marks a cautious first step towards restoring air links to one of the Gulf’s most important aviation hubs but falls well short of a return to normality, with scheduled commercial flights to and from Doha remaining suspended until a further official announcement is made.

The Qatar Civil Aviation Authority said the partial reopening covers only a narrow category of flights “designated for passenger evacuation” and air cargo services.

Passengers with confirmed bookings were urged to follow updates from their airlines directly before travelling to the airport.

Early on Saturday, Qatar Airways said it “intends to operate repatriation flights on 07 March, departing Hamad International Airport to the following airports: London (LHR), Paris (CDG), Madrid (MAD), Rome (FCO), Frankfurt (FRA)”.

It added that priority would be given to “stranded passengers with families, elderly passengers, and those with urgent medical and compassionate travel needs”.

The Gulf country has been repeatedly struck by Iranian missiles and drones throughout the now seven-day conflict, forcing the country to activate its air force and use interceptors to defend its territory. Qatar’s Ministry of Defence confirmed the country had been struck by 14 ballistic missiles and four drones fired from Iran on Thursday.

More than 2,000 flights have been cancelled at Doha’s Hamad international airport since the conflict began.

Aviation across the Gulf

Across the Gulf, airports and airlines have been scrambling to manage the fallout from nearly a week of Iranian missile and drone barrages, launched in retaliation for the ongoing US-Israeli military campaign – codenamed Operation Epic Fury – which has killed at least 1,332 people in Iran since strikes began last Saturday, according to Iranian officials.

Emirates airline announced it is operating a reduced schedule while working to restore full network operations, carrying approximately 30,000 passengers out of Dubai on Friday alone.

By Saturday, the airline said it would have 106 daily return flights operating to 83 destinations, close to 60 percent of its full network, with a return to 100 percent expected “within the coming days, subject to airspace availability”.

Dubai international airport, the world’s busiest airport for international passengers, was evacuated on Sunday following Iranian strikes and has recorded close to 4,000 flight cancellations since Monday.

Abu Dhabi’s Zayed international airport has seen more than 1,000 cancellations and continues to operate at limited capacity.

Kuwait, also impacted by Iranian strikes, saw its airport undergo sustained physical damage in drone strikes, leaving some workers with minor injuries, and its airspace remains fully closed to commercial traffic.

Kuwait Airways has begun rerouting citizens with prior bookings through Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

An estimated 23,000 flights have been cancelled since late February, according to analytics firm Cirium.

[Aljazeera]

Continue Reading

Foreign News

Human rights court orders reparations for forced sterilization case in Peru

Published

on

By

Demonstrators stage a performance dedicated to the victims of forced sterilisation in Lima, Peru, on March 6 [Aljazeera]

The Inter-American Court of Human Rights (IACHR) has ordered Peru to pay reparations to the family of Celia Ramos, a mother of three whose death resulted from a campaign of forced sterilizations during the 1990s.

Thursday’s landmark ruling stated that the 34-year-old Ramos was coerced into sterilization against her will, causing an allergic reaction that led to her death.

The court ordered Peru to pay her family $340,000 as part of the ruling.

It noted that the Peruvian government had “failed to fulfill its obligation to initiate and conduct a thorough investigation” into Ramos’s case, heightening the strain on her family.

“Ms Ramos Durand’s family members — especially her three daughters, who were children at the time of the events — suffered profound harm as a consequence of the sterilization and death of Celia Edith Ramos Durand and the impunity surrounding the case,” the IACHR wrote in its decision.

Peru’s campaign of forced sterilization took place under the late President Alberto Fujimori, whose tenure included widespread human rights abuses that continue to cast a shadow over the country.

The scheme largely targeted poor and Indigenous women who were often tricked or coerced into sterilisation procedures.

This week’s ruling is the first time the human rights court has weighed in on the issue, which has been the subject of years of legal contestation in Peru.

“After almost 30 years of searching for justice, the Inter-American Court of Human Rights recognised the responsibility of the Peruvian state in the forced sterilization and death of Celia Ramos,” the Peruvian feminist organisation DEMUS said in a social media post, celebrating the ruling.

“This ruling marks a fundamental step in reparations for Celia, her family and the thousands of victims of forced sterilizations in Peru.”

As many as 314,000 women and 24,000 men were sterilized against their will in Peru under Fujimori’s government, which sought to forcibly lower the birth rate as a means of addressing poverty.

The procedures were particularly invasive for the women involved, and some suffered long-term complications, including death.

Family members often received little information about the circumstances that led to loved ones dying after the unnecessary operations. Some survivors did not realise what had happened to them until years later, when they discovered they were unable to have children.

In Ramos’s case, the 34-year-old mother had gone to a state health clinic for medical assistance on July 3, 1997, but was instead forced to undergo tubal ligation.

Ramos, however, suffered a severe allergic reaction during the procedure. She was placed in a recovery room, but the clinic was not able to treat her adequately.

In its decision, the IACHR explained that the clinic “lacked the necessary equipment and medications for adequate risk assessment or to handle emergencies”.

Ramos was ultimately transferred to an intensive care unit in the city of Piura, where she died 19 days later, on July 22, 1997.

The state did not carry out an autopsy and declined to share details with her family.

The compensation outlined in this week’s ruling includes reimbursement for the costs of medical procedures conducted to save Ramos’s life and the estimated loss of income from her death.

In October 2024, the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women at the United Nations ruled that Peru’s sterilization programme amounted to sex-based violence and discrimination against poor, rural and Indigenous women.

The committee’s statement cited a lack of adequate medical facilities and a lack of informed consent, just as the IACHR did in its decision this week.

“The victims described a consistent pattern of being coerced, pressured, or deceived into undergoing sterilizations at clinics lacking proper infrastructure or trained personnel,” committee member Leticia Bonifaz said.

“The procedures were carried out without informed consent from these victims, with some of them, especially those from remote areas, unable to read and speak Spanish, or fully understand the nature of the procedure.”

Scholars have concluded that Fujimori’s sterilization campaign was driven, in part, by racist views among government officials who saw rural, Indigenous communities as an obstacle to economic modernisation.

[Aljazeera]

Continue Reading

Trending