Connect with us

News

TISL challenges National Audit (Amendment) Bill

Published

on

Transparency International Sri Lanka (TISL) filed legal action last week (22), in the Supreme Court challenging the National Audit (Amendment) Bill which was published in the gazette on 23rd June 2025. The Bill is to amend the National Audit Act No. 19 of 2018. The petition has been filed in public interest.

TISL has, in a media statement, said that the National Audit Act is one of the key legislative tools to uphold financial accountability and combat corruption within the public sector. It empowers the Auditor-General to audit public institutions and hold officials accountable for misuse or mismanagement of public funds. This is done particularly through its provisions on imposing surcharges as penalties. Surcharge is designed to ensure that public officers are accountable for losses or mismanagement of public resources due to fraud, negligence, misappropriation, or corruption. In the proposed amendment, there are several provisions that weaken this framework and risk undermining the independence, authority, and effectiveness of the public auditing process.

One of the most concerning features of the Bill is the proposed removal of “negligence” as a basis for surcharge under Sections 19 and 23 of the principal enactment. This lowers the standard of responsibility for public officials, potentially shielding them from being held liable even where losses to the state are caused by careless or reckless duty of care. This contradicts the public trust doctrine and weakens constitutional safeguards for citizens against mismanagement of public funds.

The bill introduces a “Surcharge Review Committee” to make decisions on recommendations on imposing a surcharge made by the Auditor-General. The power to make final decisions on surcharging and the amounts to be recovered is vested in the “Surcharge Review Committee” appointed by the President. The Petition flags concerns over the absence of a mechanism to ensure that the decisions taken by the Surcharge Review Committee are open, fair, and accountable.

TISL also raises concerns over the lack of clear timelines and sanctions for non-compliance with the complaint mechanism on audit findings to law enforcement. The proposed amendments allow the Auditor-General to notify, where reasonable grounds to believe that any fraud, corruption or misappropriation in any transaction has been committed, the Chief Accounting Officer in terms of the auditee entity or Secretary to the Cabinet of Ministers when such allegation is against the Chief Accounting Officer, to act “immediately”, thereby placing the obligation of making a complaint to law enforcement. However, absence of defined timeframes or penalties for non-compliance opens this process to arbitrary delay, inaction, or political influence – seriously weakening enforcement.

Sri Lanka’s own Governance Action Plan and the National Anti-Corruption Action Plan 2025–2029, along with the IMF Governance Diagnostic Assessment, call for stronger public audit frameworks and robust enforcement. However, the Bill’s proposed amendments inhibit these national and international commitments. Instead of strengthening institutional oversight, it dilutes accountability and compromises timely legal action on audit findings.

At a time when Sri Lanka is attempting to restore public confidence in state institutions and meet its anti-corruption reform pledges, it is imperative that the Auditor-General’s independence and enforcement powers are preserved – not curtailed.

TISL’s petition urges the Supreme Court to determine that the relevant clauses of the Bill are inconsistent with key provisions of the Constitution, including the sovereignty of the people, the right to equal protection of the law, and the proper exercise of public power.



Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Health authorities on high alert over Nipah Virus threat

Published

on

Sri Lanka has stepped up efforts to detect and respond to a potential outbreak of the deadly Nipah virus (NiV), with health authorities enhancing surveillance and laboratory readiness amid growing concerns in the region.

The Medical Research Institute (MRI), the country’s premier laboratory, has upgraded its testing capacity with the latest technology to identify the Nipah virus, enabling early detection of suspected cases, an MRI source said.

Nipah virus is a highly infectious zoonotic disease that can spread from animals

to humans and also through human-to-human contact. Fruit bats are the natural hosts of the virus.

First identified in Malaysia in 1988, the virus has since caused deadly outbreaks in countries including India and Bangladesh. Experts warn that Sri Lanka, with its close human-animal interactions and tropical climate, must remain vigilant against such emerging infectious diseases.

The case fatality rate of Nipah virus ranges from 40% to 75%, making it one of the most lethal viral infections affecting humans. There are currently no specific drugs or vaccines, with treatment relying mainly on intensive supportive care, health specialists say.

Symptoms of infection initially include fever, headaches, muscle pain, vomiting, and sore throat, followed by dizziness, drowsiness, altered consciousness, and neurological signs indicating acute encephalitis. Severe cases may progress to atypical pneumonia, acute respiratory distress, seizures, and coma within 24 to 48 hours.Authorities continue to urge heightened awareness and precautionary measures, emphasizing that early detection and rapid response are key to preventing outbreaks.

by Chaminda Silva ✍️

Continue Reading

News

Free Media Movement demands govt. accountability on free speech issues

Published

on

The Free Media Movement (FMM) has demanded government accountability on many freedom of expression issues referred to in a statement issued by the Human Rights Commission in a statement issued last week.

The statement under the hands of FMM Convener Lasantha De Silva and Secretary Dileesha Abeysundera says FMM has paid close attention to the statement issued by the Human Rights Commission (HRC) under reference number HRC/S/i/E/03/02/26. It has also informed that global stakeholders, including the International Federation of Journalists—of which it is a member—that are already closely monitoring this matter.

In its statement, HRC has elaborated at length on the issues that have arisen in Sri Lanka concerning freedom of expression and online safety. It specifically points out that the actions of the Sri Lanka Police have been a major contributing factor to these concerns. The Commission notes that recent conduct of the police has indirectly interfered even with the professional activities of journalists.

HRC has also drawn attention to the practice of summoning journalists and other activists before the police without providing clear reasons, in violation of circulars issued by the IGP. In certain instances, the police have stated that journalists were summoned due to alleged defamation arising from media activities.

However, freedom of expression guaranteed by the Constitution is restricted only within constitutionally prescribed limits. Accordingly, defamation that is no longer a criminal offence cannot be acted upon by the police. Such matters constitute civil offences that must be resolved before courts of law. The Commission further observes that attempts by politicians and others to lodge complaints with the Criminal Investigation Department regarding defamation are efforts to portray defamation as a criminal offence.

The HRC statement also addresses the Online Safety Act. While emphasizing the need to be mindful of online safety, the Commission points out that the current law does not address genuine needs. Therefore, as already demanded by many stakeholders, the government has the option to repeal this Act.

In addition, HRC has outlined a three-pronged approach that should be adopted to safeguard freedom of expression, as guaranteed by the Constitution and in line with Sri Lanka’s commitments under the Universal Declaration of Human Rights of the United Nations.

FMM said it is of the view that the Government of Sri Lanka must give serious consideration to this statement and to the recommendations emphasized therein. “This is a moment in which the accountability of the Sri Lankan government is being questioned. Accordingly, the Free Media Movement urges the government to take immediate steps to implement the recommendations set out in this statement,” it said.

Continue Reading

News

Opposition alleges Govt deliberately delaying PC polls

Published

on

ITAK Batticaloa District MP Shanakiyan Rasamanickam accused the government in Parliament on Friday of deliberately delaying Provincial Council elections, pointing to its failure to nominate members to a Parliamentary Select Committee.

The committee, tasked with considering matters related to Provincial Council polls, was announced on 6 January 2026. Opposition parties submitted their nominees promptly.

However, a month later, the government has yet to name its eight members, preventing the committee from being constituted and from commencing its work, Rasamanickam alleged.

Opposition representatives argue that this delay represents intentional inaction aimed at postponing elections. They urged the government to appoint its nominees without further delay to allow the committee to proceed.

Continue Reading

Trending