Features
The lockdown dilemma
The agonising question in the minds of most governments today is to lockdown or not. The problems seem to be clouded priorities and mixed-up objectives. After all, isn’t the main priority of a government to ensure the safety of the people they represent. If the answer was that simple the course of action to be followed would be a “no brainer”! Governments would go into total lockdowns and support their people with state funds and hope that the funds would last until the virus was defeated.
It isn’t that easy, is it? The secret seems to be early and clear decision-making. The government of New Zealand made its decision early. They went for a lockdown and chose a strategy that entailed eradication of the virus in the community. They stuck to their plan in the face of howls of protest from the opposition and assorted others representing business and industry. That plan has worked well, and the citizens enjoyed a “near normal” lifestyle. However, the virus is back in the community in NZ. One case has been identified and that person has travelled out of Auckland when he could have been infectious. The whole country has been put into a level 4 lockdown (highest level) for 3 days and Auckland where the case lives has been put into a level 4 lockdown for 7 days at this stage Lockdowns in the past were adhered to in a very responsible manner, but any future lockdowns may not have the same unstinted corporation from the public.
The decision in Aotearoa was relatively easy to make. A small population, a rich country with surplus funds, and a mainly farming community with plenty of food to go around. Exports are still in demand and some revenue streams still functioning. A labour government in power and the fat cats of big business kept at an arms-length may also have helped. Tourism has been terminally affected but the unemployment numbers are at an all-time low, something which defies logic but is supported by the statisticians. One undeniable fact is that the government must be praised for sticking to their original decision and being guided by science at every turn.
Our beloved pearl seems to be the opposite. There is the same sort of two-thirds majority in parliament that the labour government of Aotearoa enjoys. There are much more draconian laws and a very powerful executive president in place. It seems to be the decision-making and leadership combined with not taking advice and guidance from the correct sources that have led to the current situation. The Government of Lanka could have done whatever they wanted to handle the pandemic, but they seem to have blundered badly. It breaks my heart to see the terrible pictures coming out of the hospitals and I wonder why those who post them on the internet do so. Is it to inform the public or is it to cause irreparable damage to our motherland? We debate this matter fiercely among the expatriate community in New Zealand and cannot reach an answer that everyone can agree to. Must we degrade ourselves to this extent? Must we drag ourselves and our country through the mud like this? Will we ever recover from the damage that has been caused to our country and its reputation and ability to handle disasters and uncertain situations? We have dug ourselves a huge pit and have sunk into the depths of the third world or even lower to a fourth world if that was possible.
What have we done to deserve this you may say? Where do we go from here? The first thing would be to decide if we are going for eradication in the community or herd immunity. It seems that the first alternative doesn’t exist and therefore only the herd immunity option exists. The best way of doing this is to vaccinate as many people as possible, as quickly as possible. Of course, there are logistics involved, logistics of supply of the vaccine and then administering it. Vaccinating under a lockdown may be an alternative to limit the spread of the virus. Doubtfulness on the efficacy of the vaccines is not something worth debating at present. Procrastination and vacillation will make the situation worse. The Army seems to have initiated a good programme but has been faced with logistical issues. Accusing the health ministry of sabotage etc is not the answer. The answer is to learn from the mistakes made, and not do it again.
Meanwhile, what of the economy you may say. Despite the panacea for all ills seemingly printing more and more money, we all know that is nonsense. We need to strengthen our exports and develop domestic tourism. The hotels and guest houses will have to lower their rates and market the beauty and diversity of our country. Beauty and diversity that many city dwellers have not had the opportunity to enjoy in the correct manner. A rushed weekend here and there mostly filled with the male members of the party in an alcoholic haze and the women either cooking or simply sitting around and possibly gossiping is not the way to enjoy our country. Do something you have not done before. Go to places you have not been before, places outside the beaten track, after all, we can now access all parts of the country, can’t we?
Our staple agricultural product tea needs much work in the fields. New vegetative propagation tea plants need to replace seedling plants that are decades old and way past optimum bearing. Why not employ the unemployed daily paid labourers, house them on the estates and pay them with printed money?! Replant the tea fields and strengthen something that we already have and a product that is world-famous. The same can apply to Rubber and Coconut, the mainstay of our economy in the past. I am sure various schemes for such courses of action have already been tabled. They should be auctioned, and the people encouraged to participate in saving the economy.
Simply posting photographs of the chaos and suffering and dragging us into depression and panic not to mention destroying our reputation internationally seems to be all we are doing at the moment. Having said that it doesn’t mean that matters should be hushed up and the mismanagement and sheer idiocy of some of the people in charge of running the Pearl should be shoved under the carpet. A token Cabinet reshuffle seems to have achieved nothing with people who could have done better jobs in the health ministry for example not getting the job.
Maybe, the public has taken to the internet because they have no confidence in the mainstream media? The damage caused by a controlled press and media should be looked at by those running newspapers and TV and radio stations with their own agendas and in sycophantic servitude to the government! You are more than responsible for the mess we are in.
Features
Rethinking global order in the precincts of Nalanda
It has become fashionable to criticise the US for its recent conduct toward Iran. This is not an attempt to defend or rationalise the US’s actions. Rather, it seeks to inject perspective into an increasingly a historical debate. What is often missing is institutional memory: An understanding of how the present international order was constructed and the conditions under which it emerged.
The “rules-based order” was forged in the aftermath of two catastrophic wars. Earlier efforts had faltered. Woodrow Wilson’s proposal for a League of Nations after World War I was rejected by the US Senate. Yet, it introduced a lasting premise: International order could be consciously designed, not left solely to shifting power balances. That premise returned after World War II. The Dumbarton Oaks process laid the groundwork for the UN, while Bretton Woods established the global financial architecture.
These frameworks shaped modern norms of security, finance, trade, and governance. The US played the central role in this design, providing leadership even as it engaged selectively- remaining outside certain frameworks while shaping others. This underscored a central reality: Power and principle have always coexisted uneasily within it.
This order most be understood against the destruction that preceded it. Industrial warfare, aerial bombardment, and weapons capable of unprecedented devastation reshaped both the ethics and limits of conflict. The post-war system emerged from this trauma, anchored in a fragile consensus of “never again”, even as authority remained concentrated among five powers.
The rise of China, the re-emergence of India, and the growing assertiveness of Russia and regional powers are reshaping the global balance. Technological disruption and renewed competition over energy and resources are transforming the nature of power. In this environment, some American strategists argue that the US risks strategic drift Iran, in this view, becomes more than a regional issue; it serves as a platform for signalling resolve – not only to Tehran, but to Beijing and beyond. Actions taken in one theatre are intended to shape perceptions of credibility across multiple fronts.
Recent actions suggest that while the US retains unmatched military reach, it has exercised a level of restraint. The avoidance of escalation into the most extreme forms of warfare indicates that certain thresholds in great-power conflict remain intact. If current trends persist-where power increasingly substitutes for principle — this won’t remain a uniquely American dilemma.
Other major powers may face similar choices. As capabilities expand, the temptation to act outside established norms may grow. What begins as a context-specific deviation can harden into accepted practice. This is the paradox of great power transition: What begins as an exception risk becoming a precedent The question now is whether existing systems are capable of renewal. Ad hoc frameworks may stabilise the present, but risk orphaning the future. Without a broader framework, they risk managing disorder rather than designing order. The Dumbarton Oaks process was a structured diplomatic effort shaped by competing visions and compromise. A contemporary equivalent would be more complex, reflecting a more diffuse distribution of power and lower levels of trust Such an effort must include the US, China, India, the EU, Russia, and other key powers.
India could serve as a credible convenor capable of bridging divides. Its position -engaged with multiple powers yet not formally aligned – gives it a degree of convening legitimacy. Nalanda-the world’s first university – offers an appropriate symbolic setting for such dialogue, evoking knowledge exchange across civilisations rather than competition among them.
Milinda Moragoda is a former cabinet minister and diplomat from Sri Lanka and founder of the Pathfinder Foundation, a strategic affairs think tank could be contacted atemail@milinda.org. This article was published in Hindustan Times on 2026.04.19)
By Milinda Moragoda
Features
Father and daughter … and now Section 8
The combination of father and daughter, Shafi and Jana, as a duo, turned out to be a very rewarding experience, indeed, and now they have advanced to Section 8 – a high-energy, funk-driven, jazz-oriented live band, blending pop, rock, funk, country, and jazz.
Guitar wizard Shafi is a highly accomplished lead guitarist with extensive international experience, having performed across Germany, Australia, the Maldives, Canada, and multiple global destinations.
He is best known as a lead guitarist of Wildfire, one of Sri Lanka’s most recognised bands, while Jana is a dynamic and captivating lead vocalist with over a decade of professional performing experience.
Jana’s musical journey started early, through choir, laying the foundation for her strong vocal control and confident stage presence.
Having also performed with various local bands, and collaborated with seasoned musicians, Jana has developed a versatile style that blends energy, emotion, and audience connection.
The father and daughter combination performed in the Maldives for two years and then returned home and formed Section 8, combining international stage experience with a sharp understanding of what it takes to move a crowd.
In fact, Shafi and Jana performed together, as a duo, for over seven years, including long-term overseas contracts, building a strong musical partnership and a deep understanding of international audiences and live entertainment standards.
Section 8 is relatively new to the scene – just two years old – but the outfit has already built a strong reputation, performing at private events, weddings, bars, and concerts.
The band is known for its adaptability, professionalism, and engaging stage presence, and consistently delivers a premium live entertainment experience, focused on energy, groove, and audience connection.
Section 8 is also a popular name across Sri Lanka’s live music circuit, regularly performing at venues such as Gatz, Jazzabel, Honey Beach, and The Main Sports Bar, as well as across the southern coast, including Hikkaduwa, Ahangama, Mirissa, and Galle.
What’s more, they performed two consecutive years at Petti Mirissa for their New Year’s gala, captivating international audiences present with high-energy performance, specially designed for large-scale celebrations.
With a strong following among international visitors, the band has become a standout act within the tourist entertainment scene, as well.
Their performances are tailored to diverse audiences, blending international hits with dance-driven sets, while also incorporating strong jazz influences that add depth, musicianship, and versatility to their sound.
The rest of the members of Section 8 are also extremely talented and experienced musicians:
Suresh – Drummer, with over 20 years of international experience.
Dimantha – Keyboardist, with global exposure across multiple countries.
Dilhara – Bassist and multi-instrumentalist, also a composer and producer, with technical expertise.
Features
Celebrations … in a unique way
Rajiv Sebastian could be classified as an innovative performer.
Yes, he certainly has plenty of surprises up his sleeves and that’s what makes him extremely popular with his fans.
Rajiv & The Clan are now 35 years in the showbiz scene and Rajiv says he has plans to celebrate this special occasion … in a unique way!
According to Rajiv, the memories of Clarence, Neville, Baig, Rukmani, Wally and many more, in its original flavour, will be relived on 14th July.
“We will be celebrating our anniversary at the Grand Maitland (in front of the SSC playground) on 14th July, at 7.00pm, and you will feel the inspiration of an amazing night you’ve never seen before,” says Rajiv, adding that all the performers will be dressed up in the beautiful sixties attire, and use musical instruments never seen before.
In fact, Rajiv left for London, last week, and is scheduled to perform at four different venues, and at each venue his outfit is going to be different, he says, with the sarong being very much a part of the scene.
-
News6 days agoPNS TAIMUR & ASLAT set sail from Colombo
-
Business3 days agoHarnessing nature’s wisdom: Experts highlight “Resist–Align” path to resilience
-
News3 days agoGratiaen Trust announces longlist for the 33rd Annual Gratiaen Prize
-
News2 days agoFrom Nuwara Eliya to Dubai: Isha Holdings markets Agri products abroad
-
News3 days agoHeroin haul transported on 50-million-rupee contract
-
Latest News5 days agoSingapore Zoo’s first Sri Lankan leopard cubs make their public debut
-
News2 days ago‘Agents of the devil’ seeking to block Easter probe, Cardinal warns
-
News1 day agoChurch calls for Deputy Defence Minister’s removal, establishment of Independent Prosecutor’s Office


