Connect with us

News

Shani claims before PCoI that CID briefed President Sirisena on gravity of threat posed by NTJ

Published

on

By Rathindra Kuruwita

Former President Maithripala Sirisena had been informed, on 2 February 2019, of extremist activities by National Thowheed Jamaat (NTJ), but the latter did not give him an opportunity to discuss the matter at the National Security Council (NSC), former CID Director Shani Abeysekara on Tuesday (26)  night informed the PCoI probing the Easter Sunday attacks. The ex-CID Director said that following their investigations on the vandalizing of Buddha statues at Mawanella in 2018 and the detection of explosives at the Wanathawilluwa Jihadist training camp on January 2019, the CID had informed President Sirisena the gravity of the situation and the threat posed by the NTJ to the country’s national security. “On February 2, 2019, during a meeting with former President Maithripala Sirisena at his residence, former CID SDIG Ravi Seneviratne informed Sirisena of the threat posed by NTJ to the country’s national security. Presdent Sirisena informed us that he would give us an opportunity to discuss the matter at the NSC.

However, the CID had never got the opportunity, he added. The Commissioners asked the witness whether President Sirisena had been informed that Zahran Hashim was behind the Mawanella and Wanathawilluwa incidents. Abeysekara said that it was unlikely that Sirisena would focus on one person because he had been informed of the NTJ. He added that the NTJ’s plan was to carry out an attack in May 2020, but that plan changed after the raid of the jihadist camp. The Commissioners also asked the witness about the release of two suspects arrested at the jihadist camp. Abeysekara said that in February 2019 there was a meeting with former Defence Secretary Hemasiri Fernando and former Western Province Governor Azath Salley and during that meeting Salley had asked them to release these suspects.”I didn’t want to grant the request because those suspects were under detention and were to be questioned. Later, CID CI Janaka Marasinghe, who was in charge of the investigation, gave me a report saying that there was insufficient evidence against the two men. I had to release them.”

Abeysekara was also asked why the CID  had failed to arrest Zahran Hashim. The CID usually traced a suspect by tracking a person’s phone connection and call details, he said. “Zahran and his team had used an app named ‘Threema’ to make calls. That was the reason why we couldn’t locate him.”



Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Batalanda report sent to AG

Published

on

The Presidential Commission report on the Batalanda detention facility has been sent to the Attorney General. The Presidential Media Division (PMD) said that the Commission report had been forwarded to the AG on the instructions of President Anura Kumara Dissanayake as the government decided to act on the findings.

The Parliament debated the report on 10 April. The government called for urgent action after Al Jazeera raised the issue with former President and UNP leader Ranil Wickremesinghe during an interview recorded in London in late February this year.

Continue Reading

News

Retired DIG: Tangible measures required to restore public confidence in police

Published

on

Jayakody

Probe into IGP Deshabandu: Justice Suresena’s committee meets today

The House Committee of Inquiry appointed to probe and report its findings on IGP Deshabandu Tennakoon will meet in parliament today (30).

Committee of Inquiry appointed through a parliamentary resolution in terms of Section 5 of the Removal of Officers (Procedure) Act, No. 5 of 2002, is chaired by Supreme Court Judge P.P. Surasena (Chairman). The other members of the committee are Justice W.M.O.P. Iddawala and Chairman, National Police Commission (NPC) E.W.M. Lalith Ekanayake.

M. Jayalath Perera, Director Legislative Services / Director Communication (Acting) yesterday (29) said that a police investigation team has been appointed to assist the committee. The names of its members have been submitted to the Committee of Inquiry probing what the official called acts of gross abuse of power.

This appointment has been made in response to a formal request by the Committee to the Acting IGP, seeking the assistance of a police investigation team to support the Committee’s investigation, Perera said. Since the appointment of the committee, it has met on three occasions with the last meeting held on Monday (28).

According to the House press office, the committee under the leadership of Supreme Court Justice Surasena for the first time met in parliament on April 23.

Political sources pointed out that while Chief Justice Murdu Fernando, PC, named justice Surasena, Premier Dr. Harini Amarasuriya and Opposition Leader Sajith Premadasa agreed on the appointment of justice Iddawala as their nominee while the inclusion of Chairman of NPC is mandatory in terms of the relevant Act.

Sources said that the focus of the inquiry would be deployment of CCD (Colombo Crime Division) to mount an operation on Dec 31, 2023 targeting W 15 hotel at Weligama. During the proceedings at the Matara Magistrate court it has come to light that IGP Tennakoon dispatched CCD team without informing the local police thereby leading to a fire-fight between the team from Colombo and joint Weligama police-army mobile patrol near W 15 hotel.

Retired Senior DIG Priyantha Jayakody said that it would be the responsibility of the powers that be to ensure the restoration of public confidence in law enforcement.

Jayakody served as the Senior DIG Crimes and Organised Crimes at the time of his retirement in 2021. Referring to the Weligama incident, Jayakody said that the allegations that had been made against the IGP pertaining to the deployment of CCD outside laid out procedures eroded public faith in the government. Therefore the appointment of the Committee of Inquiry in line with the relevant act to probe the IGP conducted without undue delay should be appreciated, Jayakody said, pointing out that the government and the Opposition had agreed on the process undertaken.

The retired DIG said so in response to The Island queries regarding possible impact the investigation could have on the police.

Jayakody said that in terms of the Constitution that had been introduced in 1978, the appointment and removal of the IGP was the President’s prerogative. However, as many felt that privilege undermined good governance, through the 17th Amendment to the Constitution that had been introduced unanimously, the power to appoint IGP was entrusted with the Constitution Council, Jayakody said.

The CC was meant to ensure public representation in the decision making process at the highest level, Jayakody said. “At the beginning 10-member CC included five civil society representatives. Subsequently, civil representation was brought down to three,” Jayakody said, adding that the failure on the part of that Amendment to propose a mechanism/system to remove a person appointed by CC to high office was a serious lapse on the part of parliament at that time.

Had the 19th Amendment addressed that as well, there wouldn’t have been any need to appoint a Committee of Inquiry to probe IGP Tennakoon.

Tennakoon was appointed IGP on February 26, 2024. The controversial policeman received the appointment as Acting IGP on Nov 29, 2023 in spite of strong protests from various quarters.

Jayakody said that the move against the IGP was a lesson for all law enforcement officers regardless of rank that operating outside procedures could be quite disastrous.

By Shamindra Ferdinando

Continue Reading

News

Govt. denies President receiving any update on CIABOC probe on ex-State Minister

Published

on

Nalinda

Cabinet spokesman Dr. Nalinda Jayatissa yesterday (29) denied President Anura Kumara Dissanayake receiving an update from CIABOC regarding the ongoing bribery case involving former Uva Chief Minister Chamara Sampath Dassanayake and former President Ranil Wickremesinghe.

Dr. Jayatissa, who is also the Health and Media Minister, said so responding to media queries at the post-Cabinet press conference held at the Information Department.

Minister Jayatissa said that there was no issue as regards President Dissanayake’s commenting on the matter as it was not a secret. President Dissanayake only quoted Wickremesinghe’s social media post on his correspondence with the Bribery Commission.

Having given a statement to the CIABOC on Monday (28) regarding his earlier declaration that withdrawal of fixed deposits belonging to Uva PC was not a crime, Wickremesinghe queried as to how President Dissanayake came to know of his correspondence with the Bribery Commission.

Minister Jayatissa pointed out that Wickremesinghe posted in his social media on April 11 that he could not appear before the Bribery Commission on April 11 and that he was given another date.

“Summoning Ranil Wickremesinghe before the Bribery Commission was a known fact by April 11. The President came to know about it through Ranil’s social media posts. The Bribery Commission had not informed of it to the President,” the Minister said.

Continue Reading

Trending