Connect with us

Opinion

Resignations without giving reasons

Published

on

We are going through tumultuous times, indeed. The COVID pandemic is the main challenge facing the nation as much as it is to the entire world. The economy is on the verge of bankruptcy, aggravated by the pandemic.

As far as the medical emergency is concerned, advice of the experts in the field, which we are not short of, is indispensable. In fact many countries have entrusted the task of planning the control strategy entirely to the medical and public health professionals. Other government agencies are only responsible for implementing such plans. Likewise, in Sri Lanka, many committees and task forces have been appointed to formulate policies with regard to control measures for the pandemic. Many experts have been deliberating various policy decisions ever since the pandemic began. Unfortunately, we find that in implementing whatever such decisions taken behind closed doors, there are obvious discrepancies. This has been mostly seen in the way the accepted protocol in the rollout of the vaccines has been altered from time to time, to suit unknown beneficiaries. The imposition of restriction of movements, like lockdowns, too have been on dubious grounds and appear to be done with much reluctance. The armed forces appear to have been given an inappropriately prominent role in the control measures. The latest such irregularity is the decision to carry out vaccination of the over 20 age group in Hambantota with a much sought-after brand of vaccine that it is claimed should have been reserved for school- children. Known political affiliations of the area, local politicians appearing to take credit and the A rmy and youth organisations carrying it out with no involvement of the health officials gave the impression that the whole exercise was politically motivated. The Health Ministry officials failed to give a valid explanation as to the process confirming suspicions people had all along.

It is against this background that two eminent medical specialists, one of them the esteemed physician spearheading the curative aspects, resigned from the main COVID control task force. The medical professionals concerned were aware from the very beginning that these and other respected experts in the task forces were unhappy about the way their advice was ignored by the decision-makers. They have indicated their grievances at various discussions in the medical forums about the pandemic. It is generally accepted that we may have so far failed to control the epidemic adequately resulting in avoidable deaths due to these irregularities.

These are the latest in a series of resignations from various committees and task forces dealing with the pandemic. They include leading experts in clinical medicine, public health, and laboratory services like virologists. The resignations cause vacancies which cannot be filled easily and could seriously hamper the pandemic control efforts. If this unhealthy state of affairs is to be rectified, the general public and the civil society activists should be kept informed so that there will be some compulsion on the decision-makers to take corrective action. Otherwise the narrative of the political masters that all decisions are taken strictly according to expert advice goes unchallenged. General assumption that nothing can change the behaviour of those in power is to accept defeat.

Despite much criticism of the honesty of the public servants, we have had a few honourable men and women over the years who have been brave enough to resign their posts when they are unhappy with what goes on in their offices beyond their control, due mostly to political interference. A few that come to my mind in the recent years include a chairperson of the Board of Investments and some other chairmen of state corporations and authorities.

However, it is disappointing to note that in almost all these instances the officers concerned have not been confident enough to give the reasons for resignation, instead just quoting “personal reasons”. Perhaps in order not to embarrass the political masters, they prefer to keep the reasons to themselves thus washing their hands off any controversy. It may also be due to their genuine fears about possible repercussions as many of them remain government employees and such retaliation is known to occur. This aspect of course cannot be taken lightly. Still in the event of any retaliation no doubt all professional organis ations will unite to oppose any such moves. It is encouraging to note that people are ready to challenge all that is undemocratic and irregular done by the authorities.

Yet by keeping the public in the dark about the various problems that do not give them the opportunity to do an honest job of work, they are denying the chance to correct the situation by identifying what went wrong. The whole purpose of such resignations is lost if they are not brave enough to speak out the truth. Such silence would encourage the wrongdoers to gladly continue with their work without any hindrance as their questionable actions remain only as speculation without any confirmation of allegations with first hand information. All professionals and others who know the true facts but chose to remain silent may be considered silent accomplices to wrongdoing. Many commentators in the public media have made even disparaging remarks about this failure, at times giving incorrect interpretations as well.

Hence when responsible officers undertake a task of national importance, it is their public duty to divulge any obstacles that interfere with their functioning leading to their resignation. They can at least release their letters of resignation to the press. Quietly excusing themselves out of an unhappy situation and allowing the harmful state of affairs to continue cannot be condoned.

Dr. Sarath Gamini De Silva



Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Opinion

Need for best relations with China

Published

on

(This letter was sent in before the announcement of the government decision to allow the Chinese survey vessel to dock at Hambantota – Ed.)

I once met Pieter Keuneman sometime after he had lost the Colombo Central at the general election of 1977. We met at the SSC swimming pool, where he had retreated since his favourite haunt at the Otters was under repair. Without the cares of ministerial office and constituency worries he was in a jovial mood, and in the course of a chat in reference to a derogatory remark by one of our leaders about the prime minister of a neighbouring country, he said, “You know, Ananda, we can talk loosely about people in our country, but in international relations care is needed in commenting on other leaders”.

Pieter, the scion of an illustrious Dutch burgher family, the son of Supreme Court judge A. E Keuneman, after winning several prizes at Royal College, went to Cambridge in 1935. There he became a part of the Communist circle, which included the famous spies Anthony Blunt, later keeper of the Queen’s paintings Kim Philby, and Guy Burgess. Eric Hobsbawm, the renowned historian commenting on this circle, wrote of the very handsome Pieter Keuneman from Ceylon who was greatly envied, since he won the affections of the prettiest girl in the university, the Austrian Hedi Stadlen, whom he later married. Representing the Communist Party in parliament from 1947 to 1977, soft-spoken in the manner of an English academic, Pieter belonged to a galaxy of leaders, whose likes we sorely need now.

I was thinking of Pieter’s comments considering the current imbroglio that we have created with China. Our relations with China in the modern era began in 1953, when in the world recession we were unable to sell rubber, and short of foreign exchange to purchase rice for the nation. The Durdley Senanayake government turned to China, with which we had no diplomatic ties. He sent R G Senanayake, the trade minister, to Peking, where he signed the Rice for Rubber Pact, much to the chagrin of the United States, which withdrew economic aid from Ceylon for trading with a Communist nation at the height of the Cold War.

Diplomatic relations with China were established in 1956 by S W R D Bandaranaike, and relations have prospered under different Sri Lankan leaders and governments, without a hint of discord. In fact, in addition to the vast amount of aid given, China has been a source of strength to Sri Lanka during many crises. In 1974, when the rice ration was on the verge of breaking due to lack of supplies, it was China, to which we turned, and who assisted us when they themselves were short of stocks. In the battle against the LTTE, when armaments from other countries dried up, it was China that supported us with arms, armoured vehicles, trucks, ships and aircraft.

It was China and Pakistan that stood by our armed services in this dire crisis. More recently, amidst the furore, created by Western nations about human rights violations, China was at the forefront of nations that defended us. A few weeks ago, it was reported that the UK was ready with documents to present to the UN Security Council to press for war crimes trials against the Sri Lankan military, but the presence of China and Russia with veto powers prevented it from going ahead with its plan.

It is in this context that we have to view the present troubles that have engulfed us.President Ranil Wickremesinghe, in the short period he has been in office, has won the sympathy of people by the speed with which he has brought some degree of normalcy, to what was a fast-disintegrating political environment. On the economic front, his quiet negotiations and decisions are arousing hopes.

A shadow has been cast over these achievements by the refusal to let in the Chinese ship to Hambantota, a decision made on the spur of the moment after first agreeing to allow it entry. The manner in which it was done is a humiliation for China, one administered by a friend. We must remember that these things matter greatly in Asia.

These are matters that can be rectified among friends, if action is taken immediately, recognising that a mistake has been made. The President should send a high-level representative to assure the Chinese leadership that these are aberrations that a small country suffers due to the threats of big powers, to smoothen ruffled feelings, and normalize relations between two old friends. The American-Indian effort to disrupt a 70-year old friendship, will only lead to its further strengthening in the immediate future

ANANDA MEEGAMA

Continue Reading

Opinion

A change of economic policies for Sri Lanka

Published

on

Millions of Sri Lankans are anxiously waiting to see what actions will be taken to make life bearable again.If we follow the example of successful countries we see them exploit their opportunities, and use the wealth created, not to import cars and go on luxury trips abroad, but to re-invest the money proceeds in further projects to bring in even more money. They proceed in this way until their citizens have good standard of living. Probably, the best example of that compounding of wealth is Singapore.

Singapore exploited its geographic advantages. It provided cruise ships with bunkering services and repair, later they provided airlines with refueling and expanded that to one night free stop- overs for passengers to buy luxury goods at their glamorous, tax-free shopping malls. The Japanese were making wonderful new gadgets: cameras, music players, portable radio cassette players, binoculars, all available in the malls and sold tax free!! Lee Kuan Yu forbade the ladies to wear denim jeans, and to wear dresses with hem lines coming down two inches below the knee! He even instructed the ladies to smile! No man could have long hair for fear of arrest. Littering was prohibited, so was chewing gum and smoking butts on the roads and pavements. The place was kept clean!

They used the proceeds arising from all this commercial activity to build housing blocks, develop new roads and other beneficial projects. (Individuals were not allowed to walk away with the profits, just to fritter them away.) Sentosa Island had installed a communications dish antenna connecting it with New York and the financial markets. This was an example of intelligent seizing of opportunities. I account for this intelligent development as due to the high educational and knowledge of Singapore’s progressive management. The result is a firm currency, holding its value.

Something similar has happened to Russia. Russia is rich. It is under progressive intelligent management. Stalin had developed the railway network across the full eleven time zones. But many areas remained to be connected. Putin found the finances to develop coal mines, develop oil and gas deposits and build railway bridges and tunnels for better access to markets and their demand for Russian products. Even as you read this, trains of 70 plus trucks, each with 70 tons of coal are grinding their way to China, day and night. Gas is flowing through an extensive network of pipelines, both east to China and west to friendly countries in Southern Europe. Mr. Putin and his men have succeeded in getting Russia fully functional. And the more Russians there are to spend money, so the more demand for goods and services: shops, etc., providing multiplying employment in Russia.

Mr. Putin wants to build a road and rail link south through Iran to India. A design plan is in the works. It is being discussed with Iran and India. Putin is displaying initiative for the benefit of Russia and its citizens. Putin cares for the citizens of Russia and is creating both wealth and jobs too. Architects are designing attractive living spaces and buildings which provide a better environment for Russians and contractors are building it. Education of Russian citizens is playing a big part in Mr. Putin’s thinking, too. Russia needs a talented workforce.

The result is that the currency, the Ruble is strong and does not devalue. It keeps its value.Belarus, Russia’s neighbour, can also be praised for outstanding development. The population in the big towns is cossetted with amenities and facilities which provides a luxurious way of life for townspeople especially those with industrial jobs. However, it must be admitted, the standard of life for the minority 30% population living in the countryside has yet to catch up. The administration is strict and everyone is law abiding. For example, you can leave your hand phone at your seat while you visit the toilet conveniences and it will remain undisturbed until you return.

Belarus, being a mostly agricultural country has a big tractor manufacturing plant, it has a fertiliser mining and producing plant, it has a commercial vehicle plant, DK MAZ which produces industrial trucks such as fire extinguishing trucks and also produces the most comfortable, bright, low step buses and so on, and of course, Belarus makes its own industrial vehicle tyres. The towns are prosperous and clean and Minsk, the capital is a beautifully laid out city. Town apartment blocks are multi-storied living spaces, but are so well designed and fitted as to provide pleasant living spaces for its people. These reduce urban sprawl across the wooded countryside.

What are Sri Lanka’s strengths? It is a small island thus making communications short and sweet. Its location in the Indian Ocean is a plus, its scenic beauty is a plus allowing a thriving tourist trade for people from colder climates, and its soil and climate allows almost anything to be grown. Therefore its agriculture is a great strength. Its long coastline can provide fish if the fisherised. It has deposits of graphite and phosphates which can be exploited to produce profits for further investment in development projects. It has its illiminite sands which are an extremely valuable asset but need to be controlled and exploitation expanded. It has a whole gem mining industry which need to be managed in way beneficial to the government. It has several government owned businesses which need to be overhauled and modernized to convert losses to profits. The rupee in 1948 was equal to the English pound, now it is around 450 rupees to the Pound. That gives a good description of Sri Lankan past governance.

Profits from projects need to be ploughed back into further projects to bring about a higher standard of living for all its inhabitants. Then the Lankan reputation of being a paradise island with happy people will be restored.

Priyantha Hettige

Continue Reading

Opinion

Sapugaskanda: A huge challenge for RW

Published

on

It will be interesting to see if anything fruitful will come of the so-called “investigation” announced by the Minister-in-charge, about what seemed like an outrageous overtime payment to the petroleum refinery workers.While waiting for the outcome of that investigation, I thought of highlighting again the real and central issue that cuts across all loss-making government undertakings in Sri Lanka, such as the CPC, CEB, SriLankan Airlines, etc. that have been mercilessly sucking off tax-payer’s money into them like “blackholes”.

These organisations have been typically sustaining a mutual understanding with corrupt or inept politicians. “Sahana milata sewaya” (service at a concessionary price) was the catchphrase used by them to cover up all their numerous irregularities, wanton wastage, gravy trains, jobs for the boys and massive corruption, mostly with direct and indirect blessings of the politicians.

Here, I’d like to bring out just one example to help readers to get an idea of the enormity of this crisis built up over the past few decades. You’ll only have to look at what seemed like gross over-staffing levels of the CPC’s Sapugaskanda refinery, compared to international standards as shown below:

* Sapugaskanda Refinery – 50,000 Barrels Per Day (BPD); 1,100 employees Superior Refinery, Wisconsin, USA – 40,000 BPD; 180 employees

* Louisiana Refinery (including a fairly complex petrochemicals section), USA – 180,000 BPD; 600 employees

* Hovensa Refinery (now closed) – US Virgin Islands; 500,000 BPD; 2,100 employees.

These are hard facts available on the Internet for anyone to see, but I’m open to being corrected. I doubt if any sensible private investor would even dream of allowing such a level of gross over-staffing in their businesses.

As everyone knows, this is the position in all government business undertakings, as well as in most other government agencies in Sri Lanka. One can say that Sri Lankans have been willingly maintaining a crop of GOWUs (Govt Owned Welfare Undertakings), primarily for the benefit of the “hard-working” employees of these organisations, but at an unconscionably enormous cost to the rest. Obviously, this “party” couldn’t have gone forever!

Will Ranil be up to this challenge? I doubt very much.

UPULl P Auckland

Continue Reading

Trending