Connect with us

Opinion

Relevance of past in planning future

Published

on

Sri Lanka is undergoing perhaps the worst existential crisis since independence. We are on the verge of financial bankruptcy. With the rulers appearing both rudderless and clueless in sorting out the many complex issues that arise on a daily basis, the country is rapidly and surely moving towards an abyss. Masses are losing faith in democracy which is being manipulated to their own advantage by those who have tasted unbridled power over the years. The rulers appear to be gathering their forces to confront a likely uprising of the starving masses, by bringing in the armed forces to the forefront for civilian administration. The priority of the ruling family appears to be to ensure their continued dominance in all aspects. The behaviour and utterances of members of the so called “Royal Family” show that they are living, at our expense, in an entirely different world, far removed from the suffering masses. Their subservient ministers come out with absurd statements that are an insult to the intelligence of the people. Almost every day we hear of a new episode of corruption amounting to billions. The commissions appointed to investigate them at a tremendous cost to the taxpayer, produce reports the contents of which the people are hardly aware of and the rulers do not appear to read even. While many culprits have been identified, no action has been taken, reportedly because those in power are also involved as co-conspirators.

While the government is talking of adjusting its way forward, it is very unlikely that any meaningful course correction is possible without a radical change in thinking and the personalities. Changing parties at every election has been an exercise in futility. Both major parties and their offshoots have been in government with nothing much achieved and themselves responsible for corruption, to deserve a return to power. The main opposition parties appear disorganized without putting forward a definite programme for recovery. There is no apparent attempt at a consensus for toppling a dominating regime. As corruption and spreading racial disharmony remain two of the main obstacles to development, it is prudent to look towards a grouping which has a clean record as far as these issues are concerned.

Though I have never been a sympathiser of the JVP, it appears that they deserve to be given a chance to show them practice all the right things they have been preaching. The fact that they never abused public property, like vehicles, official residences even during the brief period they were in government, should be borne in mind. Their leaders have been very truthful and loaded with correct facts when they expose every dirty deal of those in power. None of the facts and figures they came out with have been disputed so far. In parliamentary debates they have been speaking to the point despite many wild distractions attempted by the opposing groups in government. In the recent budget debate, as always, it was exemplary how they came out with myriads of true statistics to prove their arguments on diverse subjects. The public kept in the dark by the rulers should be ever so grateful to the JVP leader for exposing the treacherous Yudaganavi deal.

Their policy document as developed by the NPP gives a very accurate analysis of the current problems and practical long term solutions. I am impressed by their faith in government regulated private enterprise, private education and healthcare services while strengthening the role of the state in all these sectors to benefit all layers of society. They are the only party to promise getting rid of unnecessary perks for parliamentarians like pensions and vehicles and maintenance of ex presidents.

The main brickbats directed at them are based on the two youth rebellions, the last one over three decades ago. No one should condone that. There are many families who still mourn their kith and kin brutally killed during that tragic period. I do not wish or feel competent enough to analyse what led to that unfortunate episode. Ever since then, they are playing a vital role in espousing democratic principles with not an iota of evidence that the party is likely to return to such atrocities. Apart from a few ageing members with no active role in the party activities at present, the current leadership has not been involved or justified what happened then. It was encouraging to hear the JVP leader recently expressing his regret about the immense hardship and suffering to the people, while stating that they were forced into violence by dictatorial regime of the day, who continued to ignore the plight of the youth. The current state of affairs with gross unemployment, youth unrest and financial bankruptcy would retrospectively justify what they were trying to impress upon the rulers then though there is no doubt that the method adopted was unacceptable in a democracy.

It has become a favourite pastime for parliamentarians from the ruling party to question the number of buses, transformers and other public property set on fire by the rebels, during three or four months of the rebellion. It should be understood that such action was by misguided, enraged youth with the mistaken belief that they were going to change the prevalent unjust social structure. It is conveniently forgotten how the white clad “gentlemen” of the ruling clans preaching democracy and professing patriotism systematically fleeced the country over several decades by fraud leading to the imminent bankruptcy. Billions of dollars suspected to be hoarded abroad if repatriated could pay back most of the foreign debt the country is burdened with.

I am only a keen observer, not an affiliate of any political faction. At every election I have voted purely on the merits of the party policies considering the issues that prevailed at that particular time. Although, like many of my acquaintances, I always hoped the JVP would have a strong representation in the opposition, I could never bring myself around to vote for them. A rethink on this aspect is now opportune. My observations show that in the same way Viyathmaga gathered momentum before the last election, there is increasing enthusiasm of the educated youth and the middle classes towards the forces headed by the JVP. The formation of the National People Power (NPP) has allowed a wider circle of the educated people to gather round them with the sole purpose of saving the country from falling into an abyss. However It is unrealistic to expect their current meager 3% vote base could be turned into a winning majority in the short term. But they deserve a strong representation in government where they will be an effective force to reckon with. JVP should discard their avowed stand not to cooperate with larger political groupings. Although a coalition with those groups may be against their basic policies, a working arrangement as happened in 2015 is mandatory if any success is to be achieved. Their history of not getting actively involved in government by not accepting portfolios makes them only sideliners or onlookers with no practical role to play and nothing concrete achieved at the end. Instead, with a strong representation in the parliament, they should seriously consider becoming a partner of a government which they can leave with honour if they are not happy with the progress. By now they should have realised that making noises from the opposition has not made much difference to the sorry plight of the masses. Instead they are being castigated as a party for the opposition only.

As I have stated in my earlier articles, democracy may not be the ideal system of governance for a society with wide discrepancies in the distribution of wealth resulting in abject poverty for a significant proportion of the population. The electorate is being blamed by pundits for the poor selections of representatives made at every election. But what choice have they got other than voting for the one who has given or promised them a few provisions for the next meal or some building material for a roof over their heads? The fact that the political novice, a close relative of the ruling family, who headed the list of preferences in the Matara District at the last election, had spent around Rs. 50,000.00 for every vote received (whose money I wonder) and overtook well known respected veteran politicians with fewer resources illustrates this point.

Thus what I suggested above is a possible solution to the immediate problems. A radical change in the system of governance is the ultimate necessity.

Free Thinker



Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Opinion

HW Cave saw Nanu Oya – Nuwara rail track as “exquisite”

Published

on

Plans to resurrect the Nanu Oya – Nuwara Eliya rail track are welcome. The magnificent views from the train have been described by H W Cave in his book The Ceylon Government Railway (1910):

‘The pass by which Nuwara Eliya is reached is one of the most exquisite things in Ceylon. In traversing its length, the line makes a further ascent of one thousand feet in six miles. The curves and windings necessary to accomplish this are the most intricate on the whole railway and frequently have a radius of only eighty feet. On the right side of the deep mountain gorge we ascend amongst the tea bushes of the Edinburgh estate, and at length emerge upon a road, which the line shares with the cart traffic for about a mile. In the depths of the defile flows the Nanuoya river, foaming amongst huge boulders of rock that have descended from the sides of the mountains, and bordered by tree ferns, innumerable and brilliant trees of the primeval forest which clothe the face of the heights. In this land of no seasons their stages of growth are denoted by the varying tints of scarlet, gold, crimson, sallow green, and most strikingly of all, a rich claret colour, the chief glory of the Keena tree’.

However, as in colonial times, the railway should be available for both tourists and locals so that splendid vista can be enjoyed by all.

Dr R P Fernando
Epsom,
UK

Continue Reading

Opinion

LG polls, what a waste of money!

Published

on

If the people of this country were asked whether they want elections to the local government, majority of them would say no! How many years have elapsed since the local councils became defunct? And did not the country function without these councils that were labelled as ‘white elephants’?

If the present government’s wish is to do the will of the people, they should reconsider having local government elections. This way the government will not only save a considerable amount of money on holding elections, but also save even a greater amount by not having to maintain these local councils, which have become a bane on the country’s economy.

One would hope that the country will be able to get rid of these local councils and revert back to the days of having competent Government Agents and a team of dedicated government officials been tasked with the responsibility of attending to the needs of the people in those areas.

M. Joseph A. Nihal Perera

Continue Reading

Opinion

What not to do

Published

on

Trump and Zelensky arguing in the White House

By Dr Upul Wijayawardhana

It is immaterial whether you like him or not but one thing is crystal clear; Donald Trump has shown, very clearly, who is the boss. Surely, presidents of two countries are equal; perhaps, that is the impression Volodymyr Zelensky had when he went to the White House to meet Trump but the hard reality, otherwise, would have dawned on him with his inglorious exit! True, the behaviour of President Trump and VP Vance were hardly praiseworthy but Zelensky did what exactly he should not do. Afterall, he was on a begging mission and beggars cannot be choosers! He behaved like professional beggars in Colombo who throw money back when you give a small amount!!

Despite the risk of belonging to the minority, perhaps of non-Americans, I must say that I quite like Trump and admire him as a straight-talking politician. He keeps to his words; however atrocious they sound! Unfortunately, most critics overlook the fact that what Trump is doing is exactly what he pledged during his election campaign and that the American voters elected him decisively. When he lost to Biden, all political commentators wrote him off, more so because of his refusal to admit defeat and non-condemnation of his supporters who rioted. When he announced his intention to contest, it only evoked pundits’ laughter as they concluded that the Republican Party would never nominate him. Undaunted, Trump got the party to rally round him and won a non-consecutive second term; a feat achieved only once before, by Grover Cleveland around the end of the nineteenth century. His victory, against all predictions, was more decisive as he got more collegiate votes and, even though it does not matter, won the popular vote too which he did not get when he got elected the first term. Even his bitterest critics should accept this fact.

Zelensky was elected the president of Ukraine after the elected pro-Soviet president was deposed by a ‘peoples revolution’ engineered by the EU with the support of USA. After this, the EU attempted to bring Ukraine to NATO, disregarding the Munich agreement which precipitated the Russian invasion. He should have realised that, if not for the air-defence system which Trump authorised for Ukraine during his first term, Russian invasion would have been complete. It may well be that he was not aware as when this happened Zelensky may still have been the comedian acting the part of the president! Very likely, Trump was referring to this when he accused Zelensky of being ungrateful.

Zelensky also should have remembered that he disregarded requests from Trump, after his defeat by Biden, to implicate Biden’s son in some shady deals in Ukraine and that one of the last acts of Biden was to pardon his son and grant immunity to cover the alleged period. Perhaps, actions of the European leaders who embrace him every time they see him, as a long-lost brother, and invitations to address their parliaments has induced an element of the superiority complex in Zelensky that he behaved so combative.

Trump wanted to be the mediator to stop the war and spoke to Putin first. Instead of waiting for Trump to speak to him, egged on by EU leaders Zelensky started criticising Trump for not involving him in the talks. His remark “He should be on our side” demonstrated clearly that Zelensky had not understood the role of a mediator. His lack of political experience was the major reason for the fiasco in the White House and the subsequent actions of Trump clearly showed Zelensky where he stands! PM Starmer and President Macron seem to have given some sensible advice and he seems to be eating humble pie. In the process Trump has ensured that the European nations pay for their defence than piggy-backing on the US, which I am sure would please the American voter. By the way, though Macron talks big about defence France spends less than 2% of GDP. Trump seems vindicated. Of course, Trump could be blamed for being undiplomatic but he can afford to be as he has the upper hand!

Ranil on Al Jazeera

Zelensky has shown what not to do: instead of being diplomatic being aggressive when you need favours! Meanwhile, Ranil has shown what not to do when it comes to TV interviews. God only knows who advised him, and why, for him to go ‘Head to Head’ with Mehdi Hasan on Al-Jazeera. Perhaps, he wanted to broadcast to the world that he was the saviour of Sri Lanka! The experienced politician he is, one would have expected Ranil to realise that he would be questioned about his role in making Sri Lanka bankrupt as well, in addition to raising other issues.

The interview itself was far from head to head; more likely heads to head! It turned out to be an inquisition by Tiger supporters and the only person who spoke sense being Niraj Deva, who demonstrated his maturity by being involved in British and EU politics. The worst was the compere who seems keen to listen his own voice, reminding me of a Sinhala interviewer on a YouTube channel whose interviews I have stopped watching!

Ranil claims, after the interview was broadcast, that it had been heavily edited reduced from a two-hour recording. Surely, despite whatever reason he agreed to, he should have laid ground rules. He could have insisted on unedited broadcast or his approval before broadcast, if it was edited. It was very naïve of Ranil to have walked in to a trap for no gain. Though his performance was not as bad as widely reported, he should have been more composed at the beginning as he turned out to be later. Overall, he gave another opportunity for the Tiger rump and its supporters to bash Sri Lanka, unfortunately.

Medhi Hasan should watch some of David Frost interviews, especially the one with Richard Nixon, and learn how to elicit crucial information in a gentle exploratory manner than shouting with repeated interruptions. He does not seem to think it is necessary to give time for the interviewee to respond to his questions. I will never watch Al-Jazeera’s “Head to Head” again!

Ranil’s best was his parting shot; when asked by Hasan whether he would contest the next presidential election, he said “No, I will retire and watch Al-Jazeera and hope to see you better mannered”!

Continue Reading

Trending