Connect with us

Features

Recent earth tremors around Victoria dam – a scientific explanation in relation to the tectonic history of Sri Lanka

Published

on

By Dulip Jayawardena

(Retired Economic Affairs Officer United Nations ESCAP 1990 to 2003 Former Director Geological Survey Department- Present GSMB (1983-1986)

Earth tremors were reported in the print and electronic media on 29 August and also 2 September 2020 in an area surrounding the Victoria dam in Kandy. The Geological Survey and Mines Bureau (GSMB) the designated Agency to monitor such earth tremors have mobilized geologists to investigate the damages caused by such earth movements.

The Director General of the GSMB announced that there had been no records of such tremors in the Pallekelle seismic monitoring station which is close to the areas affected. However, a senior Director who is a geologist gave a different version and reported that tremors were detected at the monitoring station.

The reporting of earth tremors and earthquakes are on the Richter scale, which has been revised many times. According to this scale unit 1 records a micro tremor not felt or felt rarely and the frequency of occurrence worldwide is several million per year. The scale 2 -2.9 is felt slightly by some people and damage to buildings and the worldwide frequency per year is over 1 million. The magnitude 3 to 3.9 is a minor tremor often felt by people but very rarely causes damage. Shaking of indoor objects can be noticed. The frequency is over 100,000 per year. The magnitude 4.0 -4.9 is noticeable with the shaking of indoor objects and ratting noises and felt by most people in the affected area and slightly felt outside and generally causes minimal damage. Moderate to significant damage very unlikely. Some objects may fall off shelves or be knocked over and the frequency worldwide is 10,000 15 000 per year.

 

Tectonic evolution of Sri Lanka theories of three peneplains and upliftment and plate tectonics

The earlier theory of the three peneplains was proposed by Wadia in the late 1948 when he was the Director of the Mineralogy Department. His theory was based on the ring of waterfalls around the country that were caused by erosion of the rocks to the upper plain mid plain and the lower plain.

However, in 1974 after a gravity survey was conducted by the Geological Survey Department (Present GSMB ) covering the entire island and it was conclusively proved that the there was an upliftment of the Precambrian terrain composed of over 80 per cent of the land area which had earlier being recognized as the Highland and Vijayan Series.

The Gravity Map of Sri Lanka on the scale of 1:100000 was published with an explanation as Professional Paper No 3 with T Hatherton, D. B. Pattiarachchi and V. V. C. Ranasinghe. This was possible with technical cooperation by the Government of New Zealand under the Colombo Plan.

During the gravity survey, earlier trigonometrical stations established by the Survey Department on the triangular survey for the topographical maps were reopened. It was then noticed that some bench marks for these stations were uplifted especially in the hill country of the island.

The most significant revelation was a significant gravity low continuously identified between the eastern boundary of the Highland and Vijayan series rocks. This led to the theory of plate tectonics where the Vijayan series sank below the Highland series forming a convergent plate boundary.

The evidence for such activity can be seen in the change of course of the Mahaweli river from a direction of north east to north as indicated by some Buddhist shrines such as Somawathi and Deegawapi which were earlier on the banks of this river.

Earth tremors are noted frequently along this fault line and geologists together with geophysicists should constantly monitor such movements.

 

A new tectonic plate boundary between

Australia and India

Many researchers have carried out extensive studies on the development of a new tectonic plate boundary in the Indian Ocean which occurred over 40 million years ago. This boundary that runs east west is about 400-500 kms south of Sri Lanka. If this boundary is activated it will have devastating effects to the infrastructure south of Sri Lanka such as the Hambantota Port, Mattala Airport and industrial zones envisaged in the area.

 

Danger to Victoria concrete arch

dam from earth tremors

Victoria dam is the largest concrete dam in Sri Lanka built under the Mahaweli Project costing Rs 9.8 billion during 1980-1984 to solve problems as hydropower for the country diversion of water for agriculture, solving unemployment, encouraging inland fisheries and flood control.

“Victoria Dam is a double curvature (cupola) arch dam of 122 meters maximum height and 520 meters crest length. The arch dam is constructed with the individual crown cantilevers. A large amount of water load acting on the upstream surface of the dam is transferred to the abutment by arch action and a certain amount of water load is transferred to the foundation by cantilever action. The destruction of the Victoria dam can cause flooding up to Trincomalee affecting the livelihood of the area .crack was identified and it has been developing in the downstream face of the Victoria dam (Sri Lanka Head works Division of Mahaweli Authority 2014)Therefore the Victoria Dam is investigated to identify the effect of earthquake ” (Ref Assessment of Concrete Arch dam under Possible Earthquake Loading in Sri Lanka Case Study on Victoria Dam by Shobitha Tharamarajah and Kamal Karunananda International Journal of Scientific and Engineering Research Volume 8 Issue 10 October 2017 ISSN 2229-5518)”

Another article titled “Comprehensive monitoring of Victoria Dam /Civil + Structural Engineer magazine <https://csengineermag.com/comprehensive-monitoring-of- victor…. > should also be studied.

All interested parties should access these excellent articles as it covers all aspects of strengthening the Victoria dam to avoid any major catastrophe.

 

Reservoir induced earthquakes –application to arch and gravity dams in Sri Lanka

As stated above, the only large concrete arch dam in Sri Lanka is the Victoria dam, which was built mainly for the supply of hydroelectricity. Another concrete arch dam is Canyon producing hydroelectricity.

Apart from the Victoria dam there are dams built for irrigation and hydroelectricity throughout Sri Lanka which are gravity concrete dams. There are also embankment dams constructed mainly for irrigation.

The gravity dams constructed mainly for generation of hydroelectricity are at Bowatenna, Broadlands, Castlereigh Dyraaba, Kalu Ganga, Kotmale, Kukule Ganga,Laksapana, Maskeliya, Moragahakanda, Moragolla Norton ,Nilambe, Polgolla Puhulpola, Rantambe, and Upper Kotmale Ganga,

(Ref Dams and reservoirs of Sri lanka –Wikipedia< https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of _dams_and reservoirs_in _…)

It is asked whether the gravity dams constructed mainly in the hill country are being monitored for any tremors using the latest seismic equipment as at Victoria as reservoirs of these dams will also be subject to reservoir triggered seismicity giving rise to earth tremors or earthquakes.

It is also noted that most of the above reservoirs are located in areas with less inhabitants and the tremors will not be felt as at Victoria.

Dams in Sri Lanka are built on valleys that have formed by active erosion with recent theory of upliftment as indicated by the gravity survey covering the island. It is also known that under compressional tectonic force reverse or thrust faults produce upliftment giving rise to tremors

It is known that reservoir induced seismicity can also occur after a few years and will depend on the permeability of the rocks beneath the reservoir.

It is also noted that indused earthquakes at reservoirs experience delayed triggering at depths of 10 to 20 kilometers. Such earthquakes may occur 10 to twenty years after filling the reservoir. In this regard it is noted that the Victoria reservoir was filled in 1985 which is 35 years ago.

Further the other gravity dams also should be subject to regular monitoring for any tremors due to reservoir triggered seismicity. However, it is not easy to predict reservoir induced seismicity due to the state of stress and the rock strength at earthquake depths are not subject to direct measurement.

Ref : Dams and earthquakes –Seismology Research Centre

(https://www.src.com.au/earthquakes/seismology-101/dams-eart .. )

 

Recommendations

In the above article I have attempted to explain the recent earth tremors experienced in the valley surrounding the Victoria Dam as well as the high ground which occupied by villagers. These tremors were felt on two occasions and the GSMB has mobilized a number of geologists to investigate what damages have been caused to the dwellings etc. A retired Professor of Geology of the Peradeniya University has attributed the tremors to the extensive quarrying operations carried out for limestone in an area above the Victoria dam.

The GSMB is also investigating the triggering of these tremors due to the Victoria reservoir indused seismicity which I have also dealt above.

With my past experience as a geologist who mapped the area in the late 1970s there are many fold belts with prominent fault zones that could be activated with gradual upliftment of the terrain as proved by the gravity survey conducted in 1975.

It is important to monitor the other gravity dams I have listed as with age of these dams the pore pressure will increase at depths to kilometers beneath the reservoir.

I urge the government to appoint a multidisciplinary team of experts comprising of geologists , geophysicists, hydrologists, civil engineers and those from the NBRO as well as the universities to study the state of the Victoria dam as well as other gravity dams and recommend an effective method of monitoring such tremors.

I had been involved in advising the late Dr A. N. S. Kulasinghe on the problems involved in the construction of the Upper Kothmale gravity dam in a landslide prone area. However it is now opportune to monitor any seismicity and take remediable measures.

As revealed above the Victoria dam developed a crack on the downstream part in 2014 and is important that constant monitoring should be carried out .

I was also involved in following up the construction of the Victoria dam in early 1980 when the then Professor of Geology of the Peradeniya University revealed that a major fault zone runs along the axis of the dam. However, the consultant engineers responded that the Victoria dam was designed to take a wave crest of 10 meters over the dam and there is no danger to its stability.

I hope this article will be helpful to the experts to draw up a comprehensive long term plan to monitor our gravity dams that mainly generate hydroelectricity as well provide water for irrigation.

Last but not least the effects of climate change on these reservoirs and the surrounding areas should not be ignored .

(The author can be reached at fasttrack@eol.lk )



Features

Is ‘Knowing’ everything?

Published

on

by Panduka Karunanayake

The current fluid situation in the country has brought into focus some fundamental issues, as well. Ordinarily, in the midst of pressing problems, like what we are experiencing, it is customary to push fundamental issues to the back seat. But, it is exactly because such issues have been sidelined, in the past, that we have had to arrive in this sorry state today. In addition, in an extremely fluid and uncertain situation, such as this, the only stable and reliable position that remains for us to make decisions from is, in fact, with fundamentals.

In this essay, I wish to focus on a fundamental issue: the relationship between knowledge and expertise, on the one hand, and the societal weal on the other. This relationship came into sharp focus, in my mind, when I saw a social media posting, by one of my academic colleagues. Let me first anonymise the academic (after all, it is not only he who thinks like this) and quote the Google translation of a part of his posting:

“Everyone knows everything there is to know. Everyone can express things. There are also necessary media for that. Who are we? What do we need? No one can make monopoly decisions about, etc. Therefore, there is no democracy more than this. What is needed now is to make maximum use of that democracy.”

This argument implies that because we live in the Digital Age, where knowledge is distributed very democratically, decision-making by the ordinary citizen is at a level close to, if not identical to, that of the expert. It suggests that the next step is to discover an optimum governance mechanism. At its core is the suggestion that the time has come to supplant the expert with the knowledgeable citizen.

What is fundamentally wrong in this argument?

‘Knowing’ and ‘understanding’

‘Knowing’ is not everything. When we were schoolchildren, in the 1970s, we heard this explained to us clearly by Dr E.W. Adikaram, who made a distinction between දැනුම (‘knowing’) and අවබෝධය (‘understanding’). He pointed out that the task of education should be giving us the latter, not the former. But somehow, we seem to have forgotten (or ignored) that advice. This distinction is also seen in Albert Einstein’s famous quip that education is what is left when we have forgotten what we had learnt – අවබෝධය (‘understanding’) remains while දැනුම (‘knowing’) is forgotten with time.

The crucial point is this. The wide dissemination of knowledge that is seen in today’s Digital Age, by itself, actually promotes only ‘knowing’. We can do an Internet search and find any knowledge we want, and once we have got it, we can say that we ‘know it’ – seemingly, just like the expert. But there is a significant gap between this ‘knowing’ and the ‘understanding’ that is possessed by those who have studied this same quantum of knowledge, more systematically and in depth.

Such persons study this knowledge in relation to other quanta of knowledge, so that they are aware of a more whole, interconnected and integrated existence of the discrete quantum of knowledge. For instance, they then see not only that quantum, but also its origins, applications, limitations, fallacies and fallibilities, as well as how it is connected to the broader map of knowledge.

Of course, there are nowadays also the democratic distribution of learning experiences, too, such as open-access online courses. These would certainly give someone a much better view of the subject than a discrete webpage, but I would still caution, and point out the significant journey from knowing something to fully understanding it.

One clear indication of ‘understanding’ is the ability of the person, who possesses the knowledge, to apply it in different, seemingly unrelated situations. It is, in fact, this very point that is nowadays used by prestigious universities, overseas, when selecting students for their undergraduate courses – rather than the old-fashioned measures of superficial ‘knowing’, such as what we still mostly use here.

‘Understanding’ and ‘doing’

While there is a distinction between ‘knowing’ and ‘understanding’, our intellectual growth does not stop even there.

There is a whole heap of difference between merely ‘understanding’ and ‘doing’ something with that understanding. That is because understanding occurs strictly in the cognitive domain, while applying it to actually do something requires an engagement with the real world. That requires a lot more – things that remain implicit in the real world around us, which are abstracted only to a limited extent when they are written down as ‘knowledge’.

In the past, acquiring these real-life capabilities have been given terms, like ‘skills’, ‘experience’, ‘common sense’, ‘wisdom’ and so on. A more recent practice is to categorise them also as forms of knowledge (i.e., procedural knowledge and conditional knowledge). These weave together, as a person tries to translate an idea into action, and if the person succeeds, we say that this has created ‘functioning knowledge’. Naturally, only a very limited portion of this is found in books or Internet sources, and ‘knowing’ and even ‘understanding’ are thus only a very small part of what constitutes the intellect of a person who can actually do something in real-life situations.

‘Doing’ and ‘critiquing’

Even this is not the full story. All these steps – knowing, understanding, doing – are part of generally ‘how things are’, and not necessarily ‘how things should be’. One of the most important aspects of an academic’s or intellectual’s work is evaluating this ‘things as they are’ and providing a detached, dispassionate critique of it. More conventional terms used to describe this function are ‘critical thinking’ and ‘discourse analysis’. We would expect the academic or intellectual to harness his or her extensive knowledge of the subject with regard to past events, current trends and future possibilities; to then reflect deeply, imagine alternatives and weigh their pros and cons; and to tell us how we can ‘do things better’. This is the whole process that we call (or should call) ‘research’, ‘innovation’, ‘development’, ‘creativity’, etc.

This is the full spectrum of how the human mind works as it progressively becomes more functional and efficacious: knowing, understanding, doing and critiquing. The process of education, from primary to post-doctoral, should be designed with this in mind.

Enter ‘the expert’

There are two types of expertise. The first is routine expertise, which is the ability to carry out a certain task repetitively with a minimum amount of error. It is built by systematic learning with feedback, assiduous practice and extensive experience. The second is adaptive expertise, which is the ability to face new and unprecedented situations where there are little or no known standard procedures (and thus no routine expertise) and come up with innovative solutions that provide a way out. It is built, in addition to the above, by reflective practice and experience in innovative and creative behaviours.

It is not hard to see that in recent years, we have had the need for adaptive expertise – with both the COVID-19 pandemic and the current crisis. They have called upon our doctors, businesspersons, economists, etc., with adaptive expertise, to come forward and do what they know best.

Such past unprecedented events, in our country, led to complete transformations of society, leading to better times (albeit, after decades of effort): e.g., the 1870s coffee blight and the devastating malaria epidemic of 1934-35. Those were examples of (British) adaptive expertise in action.

The ‘knowledgeable’ citizen

The citizen who now shuns expertise is a person who thinks that, because he (or she) has access to knowledge, he has already ‘jumped’ from ‘knowing’ to ‘critiquing’ and that there is no difference between him and the expert. One should avoid jumping into this bandwagon. One should also take care not to throw the expert out in a hurried attempt to throw the politician out.

We cannot build a better governing system using people who lack ‘understanding’ and expertise, notwithstanding any level of ‘knowing’ that they might possess thanks to the Digital Age. We must keep these fundamentals in mind when we explore questions, such as the place of democracy or the value of a constitution, the notion that the gap between people and experts has narrowed, that people can decide for themselves, and so on.

Our post-Independence history is a litany of how our experts failed to produce a beneficial effect in Sri Lanka while contributing to the building of other nations. The solution is to overcome the blocks to this that have existed until now – rather than shunning expertise. We need more expertise, not less.

(The writer teaches in the University of Colombo, where he is currently the Director of the Staff Development Centre. He acknowledges the mentoring of Professor Suki Ekaratne in developing many of these ideas; Professor Ekaratne founded the country’s first SDC, 25 years ago.)

Continue Reading

Features

Join hands with your spiritual power to save Lanka!

Published

on

By Ven. Matthumagala ChandanandaThero
Ehipassiko Meditation Center
Calgary -Canada

When Sri Lanka was hit by the catastrophic tsunami waves in 2004, almost all citizens strived in unison to stand up as one because they perceived the calamity as a natural disaster. Without distinction of class, creed or race, people volunteered to help the victims. Monks of all sectors were prompted for action—therapeutic pirith chanting was started all over the country. Blessed water was sprinkled, especially over the coastal areas with the help of Sri Lanka Air Force helicopters. Some coastal areas had become ghastly graveyards within minutes of disaster, with thousands of dead bodies scattering in every direction. World Health Organization immediately warned of another impending threat: a wave of epidemics due to decomposing bodies of humans and animals.

However, Sri Lankans could surprise even the developed nations by recovering from this trauma so fast. The predicted epidemics could never raise their heads. So was with the Covid-19 pandemic, which was also generally perceived as a natural disaster—and people fought it with the team spirit. So far Sri Lanka has lost a relatively smaller number of lives to Covid-19 when compared to those of affluent nations, and it is certainly not just a coincidence.

However, when it comes to the unprecedented economic downfall currently taking place in Sri Lanka, rather than seeing it as yet another crisis, they have to overcome with team spirit. People have viewed it through the lens of ‘personality view’ (sakkāya ditti), and have attributed the responsibility to certain politicians, vehemently accusing and cursing the culprits. The whole effort was seething with anger, jealousy and vengeance—this is an absolute deviation from the path of Dhamma. Under such circumstances, no wonder that people could not recover as efficiently as they should in this crisis. Of course, if those politicians are guilty, suitable action have to be taken, but in a democratic way, and under no circumstances the destructive emotions like anger could be justified to come to play in a big way as has unfortunately happened (Kakacupama sutta). To be angry is like eating poison, expecting your enemy to die! If you think that you are concerned of being with crooked politicians, we should learn to be saner but not crazier.

Famous Sri Lankan poet, Mahagama Sekera, has said something pithy in his book, Prabuddha, and could be rendered into English thus: “If we could motivate people to be violent against injustice, cannot we persuade them to refrain from inequity”? This sensible question echoes in my mind every time I see a violent protest. Buddha who utters only meaningful words, had said: “Overcome the wicked by goodness” (Dhammapada). True, as ordinary people, we might not have political strength, financial power and the inheritance of an aristocratic lineage, as possessed by some politicians in this country. But we have a somnolent giant within us—the power of mind! We just have to train our mind to release this giant. Remember, through struggle comes strength—especially when we set ourself on the right path!

Once upon a time in ancient India, a seven-year-old monk was going on his rounds for collecting alms following a great master called Arhath Sariputta. This novice having observed some people were engaged in woodwork, curiously inquired from the senior monk: “What are they doing?” “They are carpenters; they bring wood from the forest—after cleaning, cutting and treating the wood, they make items like cartwheels”, explained Venerable Sariputta. Then the novice asked: “Do woods have a mind?” “No, woods do not have a mind, but humans who do have minds, creatively change wood according to their needs and make various items”, said the elderly monk. This explanation was a great eye-opener for the reflective novice. He thought, if people can change things using their minds, isn’t it possible to tame the mind using that power of mind itself? Spurred on by this incident, before long, the junior monk escaped from the King of Death (Mara)—the most difficult one to defeat!

On seeing amazing modern equipment like computers, smart phones, air planes, etc., it really makes sense if we also reflect on the fact that: “Such inventions are created by human mind; therefore, my mind is more powerful than those products.” In fact, Buddha pointed out that he does not see anything in this universe so powerful and versatile like the mind, which could become amazingly powerful and versatile upon development. Buddha also taught us how to progressively develop our mind but for the good. Even great meditators who wielded psychic power had only started their journey from the humble state we are in—so please be positive.

Now the human race is getting closer to the brink of extinction due to the dangers like adverse effects of the climate change and possible nuclear warfare. To the dismay of world-renowned scientists, some politicians have openly stated that the climate change to be a hoax— a former US President is also among them! We cannot expect political leaders, national or international, to protect the future generation’s opportunity to inhabit this precious planet. As I have argued in the previous articles, a SPIRITUAL REVOLUTION is the need of the hour.However, our immediate concern is to protect Sri Lanka from the internal and external threats, she has faced with.

According to what Buddha taught, we could employ our spiritual power to mitigate the catastrophes befall the human society. Spiritual Act of Truth (sathyakriya) is one way to achieve this noble goal. Jathaka stories reveal how Bodhisatwa (would-be Buddhas) performed Acts of Truth to ensure his own safety and of others as well. According to Mahawansa (the Great Chronicle), King Siri Sanghabo used this powerful influence to save his countrymen from a dangerous epidemic called Rakthakshi.

With the noble guidance of Most Venerable Kukulpané Sudassee Thero, the Spiritual Studies and Research Wing of Sathjana Social Development Foundation in Horana has been conducting Acts of Truth since 2008, in which hundreds and thousands of compassionate humans around the world unleash their spiritual power at one particular time, with the singular intention of mitigating the catastrophes of human society. Now a cynic might ask: of what use is your spiritual attempts, if the country is plunged into an economic crisis of this magnitude? Sri Lanka is located in an epic place in this planet—epic in many known and unknown ways, and Sri Lankans enjoy great benefits of the legacy. Together with these privileges, some additional responsibilities are also assigned to us—that is the way it is! Again and again, clouds bring us rain; again and again farmers sow seeds; again and again people eat (never tired)— therefore, why not flexing the spiritual muscles also similarly– again and again, and aggressively repeat our wholesome interventions? Because, it seems that conspiracies too are attempted again and again to unsettle the island! In fact, Dalai Lama deserves praise for saying: “Peace is not simply the absence of war. It is not a passive state of being. We must wage peace, as vehemently as we wage war.”

For the fulfilment of this lofty goal, we should find the correct method of performing it. In an Act of Truth, we have to vividly reflect on a wholesome deed we have performed, and we determine thus… ‘By the power of this truth, may the disasters heading towards the country be averted! May Buddha-sāsana and human lives be protected’!

For the success of an Act of Truth or Sathyakriya, three important conditions should have to be fulfilled:

1. The deed you reflect upon should be TRUE

2. It should have been performed by YOU

3. You have to arouse the same state of mind or pitch which has been there at the time you performed this act (e.g., If you think of an instance in which you donated something wholeheartedly, you have to recall and establish that particular mental state vividly at the time of performing Sathyakriya.

Complying with the invitation of many devotees, Ven. Dr. Kukulpané Sudassee Thero has decided to organise yet another Act of Truth on Thursday (the full moon day), 11th of August 2022, at 8:07 a.m. Sri Lanka time. In the evening also we will repeat it at the same time. If you live outside Sri-Lanka, please calculate your own local time, equivalent to the above. Ven. Sudassee Thero kindly requests the participants not to use this particular instance for achieving their personal intentions but to leave them for some other day, if necessary. We stress this point, because on some earlier occasions, some narrow-minded people were seen to ‘highjack’ such a moment, in an attempt to solve their own personal problems. Spiritual power is not for the selfish, for sure.

When hundreds and thousands of people release their compassionate mental power to the universe at a single moment in one single stream, we can generate a sort of spiritual power of tremendous strength capable of mitigating various woes currently plaguing the country.

We kindly invite all of you to participate in this great meritorious deed, with much-needed team spirit, irrespective of race, cast or creed, from wherever you are in the world, and perform the above-mentioned Act of Truth.When we set ourselves in a more humane path, instead of seething with negative emotions, and impulses, the guarding angels of the country will be kinder towards the society, extending their providence for the safety of our motherland.

Continue Reading

Features

‘Slow Food’, the growing concept taking over ‘Fast Food’ rage

Published

on

Slow Food is everything opposite to the concept of fast food. While fast food involves highly processed food ingredients, ‘assembled’ together quickly, to form a meal, Slow Food refers to the inclusion of unprocessed food ingredients, cooked in an authentic manner to create a wholesome meal.

SNS:When In Rome, Do as Romans Do’ the saying literally proven right in the late 80s, in the city of Rome when a unique food movement, ‘slow food’ was born against another food frenzy, ‘Fast food’ which started from the US and has hooked the world since the 1920s.

Tradition-loving Romans who did not like the American concept of ‘Fast Food’ protested and pitted against the launch of a popular American fast food giant in the city of Bra, resulting in the birth of Arcigola, the movement against the concept of ‘fast food’ and delved into a registered nonprofit organisation known as ‘Slow Food International’.

Slow Food: The intriguing concept and why it’s becoming a global rave

The fast-paced life of the world over the decades has changed the traditional concepts regarding food. Fast food may ease our life and the choices of food but has proven ill effects on health if consumed on a regular basis. The concept of ‘Slow food’ is pitching for nothing new but promoting to go back to our roots for the food choices for better and healthier lives.

Nutritionists have traditionally vouched for the food which is locally grown and eaten the way our forefathers have consumed, and that is exactly what ‘Slow food movement is promoting’.

The natural food that grows in the region where we live is the most suitable for our body, because the same natural forces impact our body and the locally grown food. Our fore-fathers depended majorly on the local food, which is a major reason for their healthy life and longevity.

What is Slow Food?

Slow Food is everything opposite to the concept of fast food. While fast food involves highly processed food ingredients, ‘assembled’ together quickly, to form a meal, Slow Food refers to the inclusion of unprocessed food ingredients, cooked in an authentic manner to create a wholesome meal.

Where fast food offers ‘on the go’ food that can be hand-held and eaten on the go, Slow Food promotes the idea of sitting down, relaxing and spending some time chatting with family and friends, while savouring the food.

Slow Food Movement

The Slow Food movement began from people’s natural emotion associated with food. Some people opposed the rise of fast-food culture and the disappearance of local traditions and food cultures.
Slow Food movement history
The inception of the Slow Food Movement is traced back to 1986 in the town of Bra and it began as ArciGola, by journalist Carlo Petrini. In 1989, ArciGola began to be known as Slow Food, when a protest broke out against the opening of McDonald’s at “Piazza di Spagna” in Rome. Protestors opposed the American fast-food giant, for opening its outlet in Rome. The ArciGola protest delved into a registered nonprofit organisation known as Slow Food internationally.
What is the Slow Food Movement and How Do We Adhere to it?
According to Perceptions of the slow food cultural trend among the youth by Lelia Voinea and Anca Atanase, “Slow Food has become an international movement that advocates for satisfying culinary pleasure, protects biological and cultural diversity, spreads taste education, links “green” producers to consumers and believes that gastronomy intersects with politics, agriculture and ecology. Slow Food proposes a holistic approach to food problems, where the economic, socio-cultural and environmental aspects are interlinked, being pursued as part of an overall strategy.”

Slow Food, a global movement of local traditions

With due course of time, Slow Food has become a global movement, with more food reformers joining hands together to join the cause. The movement has also involved several smaller international bodies under its fold. These organisations are carrying out various initiatives within their local ecosystem and creating awareness of eating healthy and locally grown food.

Benefit of ‘Slow food’

The concept of fast food was meant to cater to the needs of those individuals, who were short of time and had a busy lifestyle. Number of such people grew over the years and fast food eventually became mainstream and an inseparable part of our lives.
Slowly, people also began to understand the importance of healthy eating instead of industrial processed food, which lacks basic nutrients. The Slow Food Movement addresses two major concerns related to fast-paced lifestyle, one is the inclusion of healthy, wholesome and locally grown ingredients, cooked by using orthodox methods. The second is to eat the meal and the food slowly, while enjoying every bit of it, as opposed to fast food.

Slow Food movement in India

The Slow Food movement has involved several organisations in India under its fold. All these independent organisations are working towards promoting positive food practices, from organic farming to eating the local food produce. Ajam Emba Adivasi of Jharkhand,
Food education for Satvik Jeevan in Gujarat, Mumbai Earth Market, Nagaland for Biodiversity & Heritage Preservation, Nilgirs Coffee Coalition and Banyan Roots, in Udaipur, Rajasthan are all working in close conjunction with the Slow Food International

Slow Food movement in Europe

The Slow Food movement is fast picking up in Europe as an industry. Working for the rights of small-scale traditional food producers and raising awareness among consumers at the very basic level. It is dedicated towards creating a better and more responsible food system.

Objectives of Slow Food movement

It is globally working on a number of issues including common food policy, agriculture, fisheries, biodiversity, climate change, Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs) and responsible consumption and food labeling.

Continue Reading

Trending