Connect with us

Opinion

Ranil’s undiplomatic DW interview

Published

on

I write his comment after reading and rereading the Editorial and Dr Upul Wijayawardhana’s opinion –Ranil seems to have seen sense at last, in The Island of Friday October 6. Also having listened twice to the videoed interview.

As usual, The Island editor in his editorial, wrote perfect sense. His header, Berlin Buster conveys so much summing up the interview as bluster on the part of Ranil W. ‘Bluster’ is defined as ‘Talk in a loud, aggressive, or indignant way with little effect, which was exactly President Ranil Rajapaksa – whoops sorry –Ranil Wickremesinghe’s stance with the TV news network Deutsche Welle in Berlin recently.

To comment on Dr W’s title. I say it should have additions inserted: Ranil seems to have seen sense at last, ‘but became insensible and intolerant in the Berlin interview.’ His article carried not much critical comment on the interview per se but praised RW and digressed to UNHCR and Mangala Samaraweera.

To this careful listener and observant reader our Prez was totally out of character and disgraced himself. He was undiplomatic; took offence where no offence was meant; was from very early on in the interview on the defensive and assumed insults and fault finding and very definitely Western degrading of Sri Lanka. To this woman he appeared childish in his assumptions, attitude and even in the language he used.

As the editor wrote “Wickremesinghe, who was once accused of being subservient to the West, is now taking on the West as vigorously as the Rajapaksas.” He mentions the radical change of RW and asks whether it is “due to his close association with the Medamulana family since last year’s political marriage of convenience.” Of course it is and some say he is defending those brothers. He seems to have even caught the ‘makka’ of being abrasive, aggressive and not able to carry through an interview with diplomacy and no show of temper. Hope the flea of hounding journos has not been caught; we want to live longer. So different from the RW, who was intellectual and cool and admired by oldies whatever his political tactics were.

I quote certain statements made by RW in the interview which prove my negative judgment of how he handled the DW interview. Given the fact that interviewers are not the most unbiased, the onus to keep cool is on the person interviewed, which RW definitely was not. The interview started off well and degenerated to almost a word slamming match.

Talking of children being deprived of adequate food and a Save the Children report, RW retorts: “Don’t accuse us …” Then who is to be accused of what the child of SL suffers? RW admitted we had food scarcity and added that under his presidency things are much better. (?)

About the BBC Channel 4 documentary: “Why do you treat C4 as sacred?” Uncalled for remark and accusation since the interviewer just asked his question, not loaded at all with blame of accusation or even innuendo. Then started the battle of words – heated on RW’s side. RW insisted he and his government were dealing with the Bishops’ Conference and not the Cardinal. Then he burst out: “You take a piece of paper from Cardinal… You have no business… You try to corner me.”

About missing persons and reconciliation: “We had British, Australian, Indian, Pakistani, Chinese secret service policemen in Sri Lanka helping us…” He asked the interviewer whether they ever got international help to solve their problems, meaning so why insist on us getting international persons to investigate Sri Lankan matters. “You are talking nonsense …

“Don’t accuse me. I have run the business long before you. Western media thinks we are bad; what international enquiries have you had? Do you think Sri Lanka is second class?” “Don’t shout at me!” “You have made a serious accusation” which was denied by interviewer.

After more or less answering a question on Missing Persons Commission, RW shouts: “You are shouting I am bad.” Childish comment and we know about the Commission and how slow it has been.

The Interviewer asked several times to be allowed to complete asking his question. RW retorts towards the end of the interview: “What you have got is all bunkum” about the human rights situation in the country.

What was the purpose of the bravado? One cannot imagine RW merely lost his cool or was badgered by the interviewer who was good in his job; he could not be accused of belittling Sri Lanka

I sum up my assessment with these words: surprising; uncalled for belligerence; jumping to negative conclusions; accusing interviewer of statements he did not make; very disappointing.

One further point. No one must claim that if Modi brought down an interviewer, our Big Boss can do the same. So different are the two countries and respective leaders. India is sought after by the most important nations, while Sri Lanka is looked askance as a miserably failed, bankrupt country that allowed its past leaders to set the rot in.

Interested woman



Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Opinion

Education needed about people not feeding wildlife

Published

on

Being wildlife enthusiasts and bird watchers we took a river “safari” during a recent family trip to Bentota. We were dismayed to see that it seems to be the standard practice to feed the monkeys, I think they were the purple faced langurs, that were encountered on the river banks. Each boat that passed by stopped with boxed fruit, coconut and other odds and ends to feed them.

We managed to stop our guy from doing so but faced derision and laughter that we shouldn’t be afraid of monkeys. We tried to explain to him that this is a plague affecting Sri Lanka; elephants being fed on road sides and even in national parks, monkeys being fed from hotel balconies and apparently during river boat rides, birds being fed on hotel terraces etc.

This was met with further mockery and amused dismissal. An effort to make them understand that this was their livelihood that they were destroying it in this manner sailed over their heads. They even have a picture of a baby crocodile on the shoulders of a tourist on their billboard.

We need to consider the following:

Educate such tour operators about the importance of not interfering with the environment and the behaviour of wild animals.

Include education and training in the hotel school, and in schools in tourist resort towns about their duty and responsibility to the environment and the ecosystem on which we all depend.

If it is not already the case such operators should have licenses that should be revoked and fined if found to be engaging in such destructive acts.

Tamara Nanayakkara

Continue Reading

Opinion

Capt. Dinham Suhood flies West

Published

on

A few days ago, we heard the sad news of the passing on of Capt. Dinham Suhood. Born in 1929, he was the last surviving Air Ceylon Captain from the ‘old guard’.

He studied at St Joseph’s College, Colombo 10. He had his flying training in 1949 in Sydney, Australia and then joined Air Ceylon in late 1957. There he flew the DC3 (Dakota), HS748 (Avro), Nord 262 and the HS 121 (Trident).

I remember how he lent his large collection of ‘Airfix’ plastic aircraft models built to scale at S. Thomas’ College, exhibitions. That really inspired us schoolboys.

In 1971 he flew for a Singaporean Millionaire, a BAC One-Eleven and then later joined Air Siam where he flew Boeing B707 and the B747 before retiring and migrating to Australia in 1975.

Some of my captains had flown with him as First Officers. He was reputed to have been a true professional and always helpful to his colleagues.

He was an accomplished pianist and good dancer.

He passed on a few days short of his 97th birthday, after a brief illness.

May his soul rest in peace!

To fly west my friend is a test we must all take for a final check

Capt. Gihan A Fernando

RCyAF/ SLAF, Air Ceylon, Air Lanka, Singapore Airlines, SriLankan Airlines

Continue Reading

Opinion

Global warming here to stay

Published

on

The cause of global warming, they claim, is due to ever increasing levels of CO2. This is a by-product of burning fossil fuels like oil and gas, and of course coal. Environmentalists and other ‘green’ activists are worried about rising world atmospheric levels of CO2.  Now they want to stop the whole world from burning fossil fuels, especially people who use cars powered by petrol and diesel oil, because burning petrol and oil are a major source of CO2 pollution. They are bringing forward the fateful day when oil and gas are scarce and can no longer be found and we have no choice but to travel by electricity-driven cars – or go by foot.  They say we must save energy now, by walking and save the planet’s atmosphere.

THE DEMON COAL

But it is coal, above all, that is hated most by the ‘green’ lobby. It is coal that is first on their list for targeting above all the other fossil fuels. The eminently logical reason is that coal is the dirtiest polluter of all. In addition to adding CO2 to the atmosphere, it pollutes the air we breathe with fine particles of ash and poisonous chemicals which also make us ill. And some claim that coal-fired power stations produce more harmful radiation than an atomic reactor.

STOP THE COAL!

Halting the use of coal for generating electricity is a priority for them. It is an action high on the Green party list.

However, no-one talks of what we can use to fill the energy gap left by coal. Some experts publicly claim that unfortunately, energy from wind or solar panels, will not be enough and cannot satisfy our demand for instant power at all times of the day or night at a reasonable price.

THE ALTERNATIVES

It seems to be a taboo to talk about energy from nuclear power, but this is misguided. Going nuclear offers tried and tested alternatives to coal. The West has got generating energy from uranium down to a fine art, but it does involve some potentially dangerous problems, which are overcome by powerful engineering designs which then must be operated safely. But an additional factor when using URANIUM is that it produces long term radioactive waste.  Relocating and storage of this waste is expensive and is a big problem.

Russia in November 2020, very kindly offered to help us with this continuous generating problem by offering standard Uranium modules for generating power. They offered to handle all aspects of the fuel cycle and its disposal.  In hindsight this would have been an unbelievable bargain. It can be assumed that we could have also used Russian expertise in solving the power distribution flows throughout the grid.

THORIUM

But thankfully we are blessed with a second nuclear choice – that of the mildly radioactive THORIUM, a much cheaper and safer solution to our energy needs.

News last month (January 2026) told us of how China has built a container ship that can run on Thorium for ten years without refuelling.  They must have solved the corrosion problem of the main fluoride mixing container walls. China has rare earths and can use AI computers to solve their metallurgical problems – fast!

Nevertheless, Russia can equally offer Sri Lanka Thorium- powered generating stations. Here the benefits are even more obviously evident. Thorium can be a quite cheap source of energy using locally mined material plus, so importantly, the radioactive waste remains dangerous for only a few hundred years, unlike uranium waste.

Because they are relatively small, only the size of a semi-detached house, such thorium generating stations can be located near the point of use, reducing the need for UNSIGHTLY towers and power grid distribution lines.

The design and supply of standard Thorium reactor machines may be more expensive but can be obtained from Russia itself, or China – our friends in our time of need.

Priyantha Hettige

Continue Reading

Trending