Business
Proposed new Tourism Act comes under fire for ‘divorcing private sector involvement’
By Hiran H.Senewiratne
Leading travel and tourism industry specialists, Anura Lokuhetty and Nilmin Nanayakkara, both counting over 40 years of experience in the industry lashed out at the proposed new Tourism Act, which divorces the private sector involvement in the industry completely.
Both specialists stated in one voice to “The Island Financial Review” that, firstly, this is not the time to bring a Tourism Act and secondly, there was no need to bring a new Act. “This is detrimental to the entire industry. It dilutes the importance of the private sector, which contributes more than 90 per cent to the industry, they said.
Lokuhetty the former president of the Tourist Hotels Association of Sri Lanka (THASL) recalled that the Tourism Act was first introduced in 1968 and then a new one was introduced in 1978. It created four separate bodies overseeing, Tourism Promotion (SLTBP) Regulation (SLTDA) HR Training (SLITHM) and MICE (SLTCB).
Lokuhetty added: “The private sector plays a 99 per cent role in the industry and has invested billions of rupees to build hotels, maintain them and employ over 600,000 staff.
“The industry brings in around USD 4.5 billion annually (pre Covid-19 era), making it the third forex earner, contributing 12.6 per cent to GDP and there are around 2 million dependents on the industry.
“Unlike in other countries, Sri Lanka travel sector stakeholders did not retrench staff even when the hotels were closed down during Covid-19 and Easter Sunday attacks, shouldering that financial burden as well.
“In addition, we also provide 1 per cent from our turnover and not from profits to the government (in addition to other taxes) as a Tourism Development Levy which is used for promotions and other matters.
“Today there are over 38,000 rooms and 50,000 other accommodation providers, including home stayers, in the industry. Under the present Tourism Act the private sector is very well represented in these four bodies creating a ‘good mix’ and when key decisions are taken the private sector ‘voice’ is represented.
“Under the proposed Act, one body is going to be created scrapping three of the institutions (excluding SLITHM), which will weaken the say of the private sector when it comes to decision making in key sectors, like land allocations (tourism has a large land bank spread all over Sri Lanka), providing budgets for promotions, overseas tours and other key areas and there would be no proper ‘check and balance’ system. One other area is the maintenance and deployment of the TDL fund which is now worth several billion.
“The Act is also going to be passed in a major hurry and this also raises suspicions over the bona fides of bringing such an Act. Some stalwarts of the industry too are not briefed properly and their views too have not been sought out.
” If Sri Lanka Tourism wants to make changes, they can always bring in amendments and not a completely new Act also not at a time when hoteliers are facing the biggest threat to their survival.
“Arrivals have dropped due to Covid -19 and hoteliers are facing power cuts, lack of diesel and gas and also skyrocketing commodity prices and other issues and to burden them with a new Act does not ‘fit’ well at this time.”
Meanwhile, a Tourism Ministry official when contacted said that the industry would only gain by bringing a new Tourism Act since it would speed up decision-making and lead to the betterment of the industry. “Today we have to upkeep and coordinate four bodies and obviously when they are trimmed to two, there are advantages. Still, there would be representation from the private sector and already over 70 tourism associations have endorsed this and are eagerly waiting until it is implemented to reap benefits, he said.
The official added: “It’s the large tourism hoteliers who oppose this as they are only ones reaping benefits from the industry and don’t want ‘small players’ to propose and get involved in the decision-making process. We have also had a series of discussions with several bodies and have also obtained Cabinet approval for this new Act which will help to increase the benefits of the revenue from the industry among small timers as well.”
Meanwhile, Nilmin Nanayakkara, former president of the Sri Lanka Association of Inbound Tour Operators (SLAITO) said that the so-called 70 plus associations that Sri Lanka Tourism claims are supporting the industry were never even heard of four years ago and they have suddenly sprung up. “The leading associations are SLAITO, THASL, and ASMET (representing the SME sector) and all of them are against the Act. The current four bodies in tourism are not burdens but assets working towards the betterment of tourism as professionals are in them and they provide valuable inputs to the industry which are highly respected.”
Business
Arvind Subramanian: Why hasn’t Sri Lanka’s democracy acted as a hedge against economic chaos?
In a sobering and intellectually provocative lecture delivered yesterday at the Central Bank of Sri Lanka, Dr. Arvind Subramanian, former Chief Economic Advisor to the Government of India, posed a “haunting” question to the nation’s policymakers: Why has one of the world’s oldest democracies outside the West failed to leverage its political system to ensure economic stability?
Titled ‘Reviving Growth While Maintaining Stability,’ the lecture moved beyond technical prescriptions. Dr. Subramanian, now a Senior Fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics, admitted that his experience with the complexities of the Indian economy had made him “humble and somber,” leading him to focus on the broader socio-political structures that dictate a nation’s fate.
Dr. Subramanian argued that in India, democracy acted as a vital pressure valve that prevented both extreme political violence and economic chaos. He noted that while the process of nation-building is historically violent – citing the West’s decimation of populations and China’s estimated 40–75 million deaths between 1950 and 1976 – India managed to maintain a relatively low degree of mass violence.
“Democracy had a key role to play in that,” he asserted. “It is one of India’s major achievements.”
The speaker extended this logic to the economic sphere, suggesting that Indian democracy created a “societal demand” for low inflation.
In India, he noted, there is a pervasive political belief that if inflation crosses the 5 percent threshold, the government is likely to lose the next election. This political accountability forced the Central Bank and the State to maintain macro-stability.
The crux of Dr. Subramanian’s address was the “intellectual puzzle” of why Sri Lanka, which received universal franchise well before India, did not experience the same stabilising effects of democracy.
He presented two charts that he described as “haunting.” The first revealed that Sri Lanka has spent 60 percent of its time under IMF programmes, indicating a state of “perennial macro-economic stress.” In contrast, India has not sought an IMF programme in the 35 years following its 1991 reforms.
“Why does Indian society demand low inflation and macro-stability, while the same doesn’t happen in Sri Lanka?” he asked. Despite its long democratic tradition, Sri Lanka has consistently seen higher inflation and greater financial instability than its neighbour.
Dr. Subramanian also highlighted a stark difference in how both nations treat foreign capital. Pointing to data on external debt stock as a share of Gross National Income (GNI), he illustrated that Sri Lanka has been consistently and significantly more reliant on foreign capital than India or China.
While some argue that Sri Lanka’s small size necessitates a reliance on foreign capital, Dr. Subramanian remained unconvinced, noting that India also suffered from low domestic savings for decades but chose a more cautious path.
“India has been much more cautious in opening up to foreign capital,” he explained. While foreign capital can drive growth, it brings the “downside of risk and volatility” as capital flows in and out – a reality that came to haunt Sri Lanka in recent years through its high exposure to foreign currency-denominated debt.
The lecture concluded not with a list of “1, 2, 3 points” for recovery as the wider audience had expected, but with a challenge to the Sri Lankan intelligentsia. If democracy is meant to be a safeguard against political and economic disorder, the breakdown of that mechanism in Sri Lanka requires deep introspection.
“Different societies differ,” Dr. Subramanian concluded. “But if democracy had a key role in avoiding volatility in India, why shouldn’t it have been so in such an old democracy as Sri Lanka? It is worth pondering over,” he said.
By Sanath Nanayakkare
Business
HSBC kicks off ‘Clean Waterways’
HSBC will launch ‘Clean Waterways’ in partnership with the Beira Lake Restoration Task Force that was convened by the Governor of the Western Province to restore Beira Lake. HSBC in partnership with Clean Ocean Force will build and operate two solar powered, zero emission, waterway cleaning boats, which are the first of their kind in Sri Lanka. They will be used extensively in support of restoring the Beira Lake ecosystem and its surrounding environment.
Once a picturesque centerpiece in Colombo, Biera Lake is now suffering from significant pollution. Urbanization and lack of effective waste management practices have led to large volumes of plastic and floating organic debris, untreated sewage and industrial effluents contaminating the water. Resultant algal blooms, unchecked hyacinth growth and water stagnation further give the lake a detrimental odour and appearance. The pollution has degraded water quality, harmed aquatic life posing health risks to residents living in proximity by attracting disease-carrying fauna.
The Biera Lake Restoration Task Force was convened by the Governor of the Western Province with the purpose of delivering cleaner waterways in the urban environment. It is vital to educate and support change for communities that reside near the Beira Lake. To achieve this, a dedicated community outreach programme will reach over 5000 wider residents through awareness building and education which is anticipated to reduce ‘waste at source’.
Mark Surgenor, Chief Executive Officer, HSBC Sri Lanka stated “With over 130 years presence in Sri Lanka, HSBC understands the importance of Beira Lake to Colombo’s urban environment. Supporting cleaner waterways is a vital step towards restoration of that environment. Through this first ever public-private partnership, multiple stakeholders are coming together to work towards restoring this iconic lake. We have committed to support the Beira Lake Restoration Task force, not just with the much-needed funding, but also bringing best practices through our experience with similar projects in other markets that we operate in. The community outreach programme planned alongside the project is a critical step towards making this impact sustainable. HSBC has always been at the forefront of innovation in Sri Lanka and we look forward to continuing that for our next 130 years here”
Business
CORALL Conservation Trust Fund – a historic first for SL
Sri Lanka has moved to strengthen the financial backbone of its marine conservation efforts with the establishment of the country’s first CORALL Conservation Trust Fund, a landmark initiative that positions coral reef protection firmly within the framework of sustainable finance and long-term economic value creation.
The Trust Deed establishing the CORALL (Conservation of Reefs for All Lives and Livelihoods) Conservation Trust Fund was signed on December 31, 2025, by Environment Foundation (Guarantee) Limited (EFL) as Settlor together with the inaugural Board of Trustees. The Fund is designed to support the conservation of Pigeon Island National Park, Bar Reef Marine Sanctuary and Kayankerni Marine Sanctuary, along with their associated seascapes—areas that are central not only to marine biodiversity but also to fisheries, tourism and coastal protection.
From a business and policy perspective, the Trust Fund represents a decisive shift away from short-term, donor-driven conservation projects towards a structured and enduring financing mechanism. It is a key component of the Sri Lanka Coral Reef Initiative (SLCRI), a six-year national programme funded by the Global Fund for Coral Reefs and implemented by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), but critically, the Trust itself is structured to continue well beyond the project’s lifespan, offering a permanent vehicle for mobilising state, private sector and international sustainability-linked funding.
Coral reefs within the three targeted seascapes have been increasingly degraded by destructive fishing methods such as blast fishing, overfishing, coastal pollution, unregulated tourism and unplanned coastal development. These pressures carry significant economic consequences, undermining fish stocks, tourism revenues and the natural coastal protection that reefs provide. Project partners note that a major driver of this degradation is the limited understanding among communities and institutions of the true economic value of coral reefs as natural capital that underpins livelihoods and resilience.
EFL, as an implementing partner to IUCN, played a central role in shaping the Trust’s institutional and financial architecture. It carried out a comprehensive legal, policy and institutional review, provided recommendations on the structure of Conservation Trust Funds, and drafted both the Trust Deed and an operational manual embedding governance, accountability and transparency safeguards. These features are seen as critical in building investor and donor confidence, particularly at a time when environmental, social and governance (ESG) considerations are increasingly influencing capital flows.
The Board of Trustees, selected by IUCN and the SLCRI National Steering Committee following a public call for applications, brings together expertise from investment banking, commercial banking and marine science. The Trustees—Palitha Gamage, Prof. (Ms.) Sevvandi Jayakody, Nalin Karunatileka, Dr. (Ms.) Nishanthi Perera, Chanaka Wickramasuriya and Nishad Wijetunga—will oversee grant funding for conservation and restoration proposals submitted by Special Management Area Coordinating Committees, while also ensuring robust monitoring and evaluation to safeguard long-term financial and ecological sustainability.
“This marks a significant step in sustainable financing to conserve coral reef ecosystems which are critical for marine biodiversity conservation, coastal protection, climate resilience, and the livelihoods of coastal communities, said Dr. Shamen Widanage, Country Representative of IUCN Sri Lanka, highlighting the wider economic and social returns expected from the initiative.
EFL chairperson Deshini Abeyewardena said the Trust Fund reflects a broader shift towards innovative financing models for environmental protection.
“EFL is honoured to have been selected by IUCN to implement this landmark initiative. The establishment of the CORALL Conservation Trust Fund reflects EFL’s long-standing commitment to advancing environmental justice through strong governance, legal safeguards and innovative financing mechanisms. As Sri Lanka faces increasing pressures on its marine ecosystems, this Trust provides a credible and transparent platform to secure sustained investment for coral reef conservation, she said.
By Ifham Nizam
-
Editorial5 days agoIllusory rule of law
-
News6 days agoUNDP’s assessment confirms widespread economic fallout from Cyclone Ditwah
-
Editorial6 days agoCrime and cops
-
Features5 days agoDaydreams on a winter’s day
-
Editorial7 days agoThe Chakka Clash
-
Features5 days agoSurprise move of both the Minister and myself from Agriculture to Education
-
Features4 days agoExtended mind thesis:A Buddhist perspective
-
Features5 days agoThe Story of Furniture in Sri Lanka
