Connect with us

News

Prof. Peiris warns Pub. Administration Secy. of three-year jail term

Published

on

Govt defeat at LG polls certain, early general election inevitable

By Shamindra Ferdinando

Breakaway SLPP group Nidahasa Janatha Sabhawa says a general election is inevitable early this year. Top rebel group spokesperson Prof. G.L. Peiris, MP, on Monday (16) asserted that the Wickremesinghe-Rajapaksa government was trying to postpone Local Government polls scheduled for Feb-March, somehow, as it realized continuation of current arrangement wouldn’t be possible in the wake of certain defeat at the forthcoming polls.

Addressing the media at their Nawala Office, the former External Affairs Minister said that the parliamentary majority the ruling coalition still enjoyed didn’t reflect the actual situation on the ground.

In spite of UNP leader Ranil Wickremesinghe being elected by parliament on July 20, 2022 to complete the remainder of Gotabaya Rajapaksa’s five year term, contentious issues, such as the resolution of the national issue couldn’t be addressed by an administration that didn’t have a popular mandate.

The parliamentary approval for 2023 budget received on Dec 08, 2022 too hadn’t given Wickremesinghe’s government confidence to face the electorate at the LG polls, Prof. Peiris said. Therefore, the government ‘s reluctance to face LG polls meant that it was not in a position to contest general election, Prof. Peiris said, predicting mini poll would be followed by general election within 3-4 months.

Referring to Supreme Court taking up two fundamental rights petitions filed by Opposition political parties, tomorrow (Jan. 18), Prof. Peiris said that the government couldn’t reverse the electoral process now.

Prof. Peiris said that the declaration made by EC pertaining to the acceptance of nominations from Jan 18-21 meant ongoing government efforts to put off LG polls couldn’t succeed, under any circumstances.

Demanding that Attorney General Sanjay Rajaratnam, PC, take appropriate measures against Public Administration Secretary Neal Bandara Hapuhinna for trying to halt the electoral process, Prof Peiris said the Opposition wouldn’t hesitate to move court against the concerned official in case the AG failed to do what was expected of him.

President Wickremesinghe brought in Hapuhinna as Public Administration Secretary in place of Priyantha Mayadunne.

The National List MP said that Hapuhinna couldn’t absolve himself of the responsibility for interfering in the process by claiming he acted on the instructions of the Cabinet-of-Ministers. The rebel MP warned that Hapuhinna’s offense carried a three year jail sentence.

Hapuhinna on Jan. 10 directed District Secretaries not to accept deposits. He withdrew the orders within hours in the face of unwavering stand taken by the EC.

Prof. Peiris emphasized that the executive or the Cabinet of Ministers couldn’t interfere with the electoral process. Declaring that Hapuhinna was personally responsible for the illegal directive issued by him, Prof. Peiris pointed out how the recent Supreme Court judgment pertaining to 2019 Easter Sunday carnage held the accused personally responsible for the lapses that caused death and destruction.

Prof. Peiris warned Hapuhinna of dire consequences unless he tendered a proper apology to court.

The former minister scoffed at the ongoing attempt to justify the postponement of LG polls on the basis of insufficient funds as required financial allocation had been made in budget 2023. The projected government expenditure had been estimated at Rs.5, 819 bn whereas the allocation for LG poll was Rs. 10 bn, or just 0.17 percent of the total expenditure.

Commenting on recent statements that had been attributed to the EC, Prof. Peiris said that actually the poll could be conducted at a lower cost to the taxpayer.

The SLPP National List MP alleged that the recent claim the IMF asked the government to stop printing money therefore it was not in a position to meet even the basic requirements was a transparent bid to deceive the public.

The lawmaker challenged the government to table staff level agreement between the government and the IMF reached on Sept. 01, 2022. “In spite of repeated requests, the government didn’t submit the agreement,” Prof. Peiris said, questioning the validity of the often repeated claim the government couldn’t print money in terms of the said agreement.

If so, the government owed an explanation as to how as much as Rs 278 bn had been printed between Oct 1, 2022 and Dec 31, 2022, the former minister said.

Asserting that interest rates had been increased extraordinarily last year, during April 01-Dec 31, 2022 period, a staggering Rs 848 were paid as interests, the lawmaker said.

If the government is genuinely concerned about runaway expenditure, State Ministries could be abolished, Prof. Peiris said, asking whether the powers intended to fill the remaining 12 vacancies in the cabinet.

The postponement of LG polls for whatever reason could have a detrimental impact with the IMF loan facility, the ex-minister warned.



Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Showers about 100 mm are likely at some places in the Western, Sabaragamuwa, Central, Uva, Southern, North-western, Northern and North-central provinces and in Trincomalee district.

Published

on

By

WEATHER FORECAST FOR 11 MAY 2026
Issued at 05.30 a.m. on 11 May 2026 by the Department of Meteorology

 

The low-level atmospheric disturbance in the vicinity of Sri Lanka is likely to develop into a low-pressure area around the next 36 hours. Therefore, the prevailing showery conditions over the island are expected to continue during the next few days.

Showers or thundershowers will occur at times in most parts of the island and Cloudy skies are expected, under the influence of the aforementioned system. Heavy showers about 100 mm are likely at some places in the Western, Sabaragamuwa, Central, Uva, Southern, North-western, Northern and North-central provinces and in Trincomalee district.

The general public is kindly requested to take adequate precautions to minimize damage caused by temporary localized strong winds and lightning during thundershowers.

Continue Reading

News

Treasury theft: Speaker’s conduct brought to IPU’s attention: SJB  

Published

on

Dayasiri

SJB MP Dayasiri Jayasekera has sought the intervention of the Inter-Parliamentary Union (IPU) to pressure the JVP-NPP government to respect the rights of the Opposition.

MP Jayasekera told The Island that they wouldn’t allow the NPP to suppress the truth regarding the theft of Treasury funds amounting to USD 2.5 million. He accused Speaker Dr. Jagath Wickremaratne of depriving the Opposition of its legitimate rights, at the behest of the government.

Jayasekera said that the Speaker’s conduct regarding the action taken against Deputy Secretary General of Parliament Chaminda Kularatne, too, had been brought to the notice of IPU and other international associations.

The text of MP Jayasekera’s letter to the Secretary general of IPU: “I respectfully submit this petition seeking the attention and intervention of the Inter-Parliamentary Union concerning a matter affecting parliamentary accountability, the rights of elected representatives, and the proper functioning of constitutional oversight within the Parliament of Sri Lanka.

On 06 May 2026, I Dayasiri Jayasekara MP submitted a formal request to the Hon. Speaker of Parliament seeking permission, under the Parliament (Powers and Privileges) Act No. 21 of 1953 and Standing Order 29(1), to raise a question of privilege regarding alleged constitutional and parliamentary violations by Mr. Harshana Suriyapperuma, Secretary to the Treasury of Sri Lanka.

The proposed privilege motion raised matters including:

1. Alleged violations of Articles 148, 149, and 150 of the Constitution of Sri Lanka concerning parliamentary control over public finance;

2. Alleged failure to report to Parliament concerning a controversial and unlawful transfer of approximately USD 2.5 million from the Treasury;

3. Alleged non-compliance with parliamentary committee procedures under the Standing Orders of Parliament;

4. Questions relating to constitutional eligibility under Article 91(1)(d)(xiii) of the Constitution concerning dual citizenship and qualification to sit and vote in Parliament;

5. A request that the matter be referred to the Parliamentary Ethics and Privileges Committee established under Standing Order 118.

 Despite the seriousness of the constitutional and parliamentary issues raised, the Hon. Speaker declined permission for the privilege issue to be raised in Parliament.

It is respectfully submitted that this refusal has the effect of:

•  Preventing an elected Member of Parliament from exercising his parliamentary oversight function;

• Restricting parliamentary scrutiny over matters involving public finance and constitutional accountability;

•  Undermining the privileges of Members of Parliament to raise matters of urgent public importance;

•  Limiting institutional transparency concerning allegations involving senior state officials.

The right of parliamentarians to raise questions of privilege and matters relating to constitutional governance is an essential component of parliamentary democracy and legislative independence. The refusal to permit even the presentation or preliminary consideration of such a matter raises serious concerns regarding parliamentary accountability mechanisms in Sri Lanka.

Accordingly, I respectfully request that the Inter-Parliamentary Union:

1.Take cognizance of this matter as one affecting the rights and functions of Members of Parliament;

2.Seek clarification from the relevant parliamentary authorities in Sri Lanka regarding the grounds upon which the privilege motion was disallowed;

3.Consider whether the refusal is compatible with internationally recognised principles of parliamentary democracy, accountability, and freedom of parliamentary speech;

4. Encourage the Parliament of Sri Lanka to ensure fair and transparent procedures governing parliamentary privilege motions and constitutional oversight.

I further request that this communication be placed before the appropriate committee or mechanism within the IPU dealing with the rights and duties of parliamentarians.”

Continue Reading

News

Navin calls for formal alliance between UNP and SJB

Published

on

UNP Vice President and Kandy District Leader, Navin Dissanayake, on Saturday, stressed that any proposed merger between the UNP and the SJB must be carried out formally rather than in an ad hoc manner.

Addressing a media briefing in Kandy, Dissanayake said a structured framework was essential to ensure the successful reunification of the two parties ahead of future elections.

“A formal mechanism must be established for the unification of the UNP and the SJB. This process cannot be confined to personal verbal assurances given to suit individual interests. We must build a strong framework to contest future elections as a united force,” he said.

He added that the UNP could only regain political strength by reuniting with factions that had broken away from the party.

Dissanayake also claimed that the Government would be compelled to hold Provincial Council elections amid mounting international and domestic pressure.

“India is exerting pressure to conduct these elections, while the people in the North are also demanding governance under the Provincial Council system. They are awaiting the polls,” he said.

Announcing his own political intentions, Dissanayake said he hoped to contest as the Chief Ministerial candidate for the Central Province at the next Provincial Council election.

“I intend to contest as the Chief Ministerial candidate for the Central Province. Having served as a Governor, I understand the extent of service that can be delivered to the people through a Provincial Council,” he said.

Recalling the history of constitutional devolution, Dissanayake said his late father, Gamini Dissanayake, had played a significant role in the introduction of the 13th Amendment to the Constitution of Sri Lanka.

by SK Samaranayake

Continue Reading

Trending