Features
Principles And Principals

by Goolbai Gunasekara
Principals in the early years of the 20th century commanded a kind of respect that was almost adulatory. And why did they do so? For one thing the well-known private schools both in Colombo and the outstations ran their schools themselves Each school was an entity with a Board of Management and was run by a Principal of its choosing. It has been an accepted fact that the schools established by British and American missionaries had excellent standards of education, albeit (and unfortunately) aimed at making Sri Lankans good little Colonials.
During my days as a Girl Guide, we still took the oath with British overtones and that was around the time we were just getting Independence. In that climate Private Schools chose their own Principals. Many of them all over the island were foreigners, mostly English, Scottish or American (as in the case of my own mother.)
Parents trusted Principals and did not dream of contradicting them. Certainly parents did not rush to rescue their offspring, the way they do now, the minute the school exerted any disciplinary action. Parents hardly allowed me (as Head of an International School) to mete out deserved punishments.
I remember a case at Asian International School when a class of 12-year olds left school for the day with their desks overturned, the floor littered with paper and left- over food. They had celebrated a friend’s birthday after class and the whole room was a total mess. The maid doing the cleaning came to me and told me it would take her an entire afternoon to bring the class back to its usual state of order.
I told her to leave the room as it was, and I locked the door. The next morning no one could get into the room and the class was milling around anxiously. They sent me worried emissaries. “Mrs. GG we can’t get into our class.” “Some idiot has locked us out…..The maid has lost the key I think.”
Their Form teacher, the maid and I had brooms, dusters and sponges ready. Before the little miscreants could have their usual classes, they had to clean every corner of that room so that it literally sparkled.
I must say the punishment was well taken. Parents were amused that their sons actually wielded brooms. But it sent a lesson to others too. Classes could not be left messy. Untidy, dusty perhaps but not dirty and smelly. No parent complained.
While I was a schoolgirl, we feared the parental fall-out far more than we feared the Principal herself. NEVER did parents take the side of us wrongdoers. They had little faith in our ability to behave with circumspection. In fact, if we had any rights as students, we did not know of them. Parents had an infinite, almost childlike trust in our Principals and Teachers and phone calls to the School’s Head trying to get us off punishments were unheard of. It was often felt that the school Principal had been quite lenient with us given the sorry state of our behaviour in general.
It is with considerable alarm that anyone involved in Education reads the daily papers these days. Principals of outstation school are being interdicted, assaulted, arrested and even remanded for all sorts of ‘crimes’ ranging from abuse of power to rape. One must wonder, therefore, how these Principals get to such high office if so, clearly unsuited for the responsibility of running a school. How are they chosen?
All Government school Principals are selected by the Department of Education I suppose. I have been told that the process of selection does not depend on ‘suitability’ and ‘capability’ and definitely not on reputation. Principals get to run schools if they have been teachers long enough and have somehow been classified as being in the A Grade.
Schools have no say in the matter and once Principals are put in place, they have very little real authority. That resides in the Department of Education.
For instance, I must wonder what control can a Principal exert over teachers under him when he does not have the right to either hire or fire them? A really bad teacher cannot even be fired by the Department of Education unless he/she has broken the law or has done something so reprehensible there is public castigation.
This happens oftener than it should. Papers again are full of stories of child abuse by those who actually have no talent for teaching but are there at the will and pleasure of a Department in Colombo.
Coming back to Principals – is there any training for these Government posts or is the policy to keep them in office until retirement age deems it necessary? Is there no better way, to ensure that our children do not have a fairer deal than what they now receive? (I am speaking mainly of out- station schools).
My own suggestion has been that parents could be given a greater say in school affairs. Perhaps they should interview prospective Principals who are now arbitrarily foisted on them and see whether the candidate is suitable or not for their school. Parents are well able to judge, and I feel a certain input from them would be very useful to all concerned.
Principals could also be given a greater say in how curriculums are taught. I believe it is now done on a day by day ordering by the Department of Education. Principals cannot deviate from this. They cannot make use of any innovative methods they may have. They cannot introduce anything new into the daily routine. In short, they might as well be automata.
I recall that about 12 years ago a Principal was severely reprimanded because he had allowed Drill periods at a time which was not officially laid down. Such stifling of initiative does not bode well for the education of our children.
Sri Lanka has just lost a great educationist. Dr. Ralph Alles had vision and imagination and he put both to brilliant use. I was privileged to have worked with him on several projects in his schools and through sheer force of personality he was able to found D.S. Senanayake College and turn this new school into one of the best in Colombo.
Parents of that school will never forget that he was dismissed for his pains on a technicality! You can see what I mean about Principals not being encouraged to show versatility or to have any visionary ideas. He later built his own school that is today a roaring success. He also won the case against his unfair dismissal.
To be a successful Principal requires so much more than simply being an A Grade teacher in Government service. It is time the Government took serious notice of the type of person to whom they are handing out these positions of control especially when they are dealing with the youngsters of our country.
(Excerpted from The ‘Principal’ Factor first published in Lanka Market Digest)
Features
Accidents and lessons from civil aviation

This has reference to the Helicopter crash at Maduru Oya and the CTB bus crash at Kotmale. While the accident investigations are ongoing, with regards to the bus accident, one witness on TV said that there had been a protective fence by the roadside near the precipice in the past and that had been removed and not been replaced.
What is wrong with us Sri Lankans? Why don’t we listen to the experts?
So, who is an expert? A classic definition of an expert is a person who has special skill or knowledge relating to a particular subject. One related problem may be that our experts don’t speak up loud and clear as they fear that they may be penalised. Last year I spoke up as a concerned private citizen, in a TV show, about how things sometimes work in the Civil Aviation Authority, Sri Lanka (CAASL) and was thrown out of the Independent Accident Investigation Pool, without even an inquiry or the request of a ‘show cause’ letter. Later however, the present Director General of Civil Aviation Authority wanted me back on the team but the Ministry of Aviation declared that I was over seventy years old and rejected his suggestion. Having years of experience in ‘Aviation’ worked against me. We all know the ‘truth’ sometimes hurts.
I have been a student of Air Safety for over fifty years and even in the aviation field the people who should know better are slow to make changes when experts exercise their concerns and suggest ways and means to make things safer. Not only that, people in the frontline become downright stubborn and feel it is a loss of face (dignity) to change for the better after accepting expert opinion. Rather than doing what is right they seem to dwell on who is right and creating unwanted conflict. It must be a national trait like in the far east.
Civil Aviation is meant to be one of the safest, if not the safest means of transport worldwide. People in ‘Aviation’ are encouraged to be preventive, predictive and pro-active by the International Civil Aviation Organisation (ICAO). We are taught early in our careers that accident don’t only happen to others and that it could easily happen to anyone including you. Unfortunately, even in aviation in Sri Lanka, not listening to experts is the ‘norm’.
Many reforms were introduced to Airports and Civil Aviation after the two major crashes of Martin Air and Icelandic Airways that occurred in Sri Lanka, in the seventies. But it is extremely doubtful whether the long-term lessons were learnt. Otherwise reforms in other modes of transport like Marine, Rail and Road would have experienced a trickle-down effect.
Safety is a case of risk management. The safest aircraft is an aircraft on ground. The safest ship is a ship in the harbour. A safest train is a train in the yard or where a road vehicle is concerned, leaving them in the garage. They must earn their keep and therefore take risks. Every task for that matter, has an element of risk. It is usual for accident investigators after the crash to identify a series of incidents that led to the accident. Interrupting any one of them in what is now known as the ‘Error Chain’ could have prevented death and destruction. In other words, there is not one reason but many in sequence.
Many experts have complained for more than 15 years, about the nine-foot concrete wall at the Gall Road boundary of the Ratmalana Airport being a potential hazard for aircraft landing and taking off.
The experts in the Organization of Professional Associations (OPA) among other groups have complained about the absence of hazard lighting at the Nelum Kuluna (Lotus Tower) during the daylight hours, which is most dangerous and illegal.
Medical students and Doctors wear dark (Midnight) blue uniforms, with no reflective material whatsoever, in the vicinity of the National Hospital in the night and walk along dimly lit roads. Exactly what the road safety experts say not to do. It is made worse by rain in the vicinity.
Drive along the streets of Colombo and you will discover traffic lights that are obstructed by trees. Some are twisted around their mountings to such an extent that the lights could be seen by the traffic from the side roads, creating confusion. The authorities didn’t care two hoots. Someone has to be held accountable.
There is no point having ‘all the king’s horses and all the king’s men’, offering compensation after the event. An ounce of prevention is better than a ton of cure.
While I was writing this, another van went off a precipice a few miles away from the first Kotmale accident scene. It is human to err, but nothing is being done to improve safety. Late Prof James Reason said that it is difficult to change the ‘human condition’, but we could change the conditions that humans operate in. Like we do in ‘Aviation’ could we restrict some of these dangerous routes to ‘daylight operations only’ or restrict the size and weight of vehicles operating in the night till the road safety standards are improved.
I have mentioned ‘Civil Aviation’ as the SLAF accident record presently under review. In all fairness to all, it must be done by an independent team for the sake of ‘transparency’.
If we take our minds back to all the major transport accidents in Ceylon/ Sri Lanka, we have always been ‘reactive’ towards transport accidents, be it Road/ Highway, Rail, Marine or Air. Could they have been prevented if safety measures were in place before the unfortunate events occurred?
I believe that the need of the day is to have a qualified Council/ Board like the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) USA, whose thoughts and actions will be ‘predictive, preventive and proactive’ with respect to transportation incidents/ accidents. This organisation shall address ‘Safety’ 24/7. Obviously, prevention is better than cure!
The said Council/ Board will consist of experts from all modes of transportation who will promulgate and implement Rules and Regulations to strictly ensure safety of a multimodal transportation system existing within the country. For instance, ‘Aviation’ has been dealing with ‘Fatigue’ for many years. It also has limits on alcohol and attempts to control drug abuse among Operators.
If an incident/accident occurs, the suggested Council/Board would carry out independent inquiries into the same and produce unbiased reports with suggestions on how to modify the system safety.
The report will only be on the circumstances and the series of events which led to such an incident/ accident and will not attempt to apportion the blame on any organisation or individual.
However, if an element of negligence is highlighted then and only then shall legal action be contemplated on those accountable.
Think about it.
This is common sense.
(The writer is a former member of the accident investigation pool of CAASL.)
by Capt. G A Fernando
RCyAF/ SLAF, Air Ceylon. Air Lanka, Singapore Airlines, SriLankan Airlines, CAASL.
gafplane@sltnet.lk
Features
Eurovision 2025: Austria wins with last-minute vote

Austrian singer JJ has won the Eurovision Song Contest in Basel, Switzerland, after a nail-biting finish that saw him topple Israel from pole position at the very last minute.
The 24-year-old, who is a counter-tenor at the Vienna State Opera, took the title with the song Wasted Love, a tempestuous electro-ballad about unrequited love.
“Thank you so much for making my dreams come true,” he said as he accepted the coveted glass microphone trophy. “Love is the strongest force in the world, let’s spread more love.”
The singer scored 436 points, with Israel in second place on 357 and Estonia third on 356.
Eurovision 2025: The top five contestants
- Austria: JJ – Wasted Love
- Israel: Yuval Raphael: New Day Will Rise
- Estonia: Tommy Cash – Espresso Macchiato
- Sweden: KAJ – Bara Bada Bastu
- Italy: Lucio Corsi – Volevo Essere Un Duro

The Austrian said his whole family had arrived to support him at the contest, including his 85-year-old grandfather, and a four-month-old niece, who watched outside with his brother.
It is the third time Austria has won the contest, with previous victories going to Udo Jürgens’ Merci, Cherie in 1966; and Conchita Wurst with Rise Like a Phoenix in 2014. JJ was inspired to take part in Eurovision by Conchita.
The singer had always been one of the favourites to win, but the most hotly-tipped contestants were Sweden’s KAJ – whose tongue-in-cheek ode to sauna culture, Bara Bada Bastu, ultimately took fourth place.
Speaking after the show, JJ said he was “so pleased” that viewers had connected with his story of heartache.
“I wanted to let them have an insight on my deepest soul [and] how I felt when we wrote the song.”
“What I’m trying to commit [to] is that there’s no wasted love. There’s so much love that we can spread around. It’s the strongest force on planet earth.”
Asked how he would celebrate, he replied: “Honestly, I need to sleep now. I’m tired.”

For the second year in a row, there was controversy over Israel’s participation, with protestors arguing for the country’s dismissal over its military action in Gaza.
Pro-Palestinian protests took place on the streets of Basel in the hours before the contest.
Later, a man and a woman were prevented from invading the stage during Israel’s performance.
“One of the two agitators threw paint and a crew member was hit,” said Swiss broadcaster SRG SSR in a statement to the BBC.
“The crew member is fine and nobody was injured.
“The man and the woman were taken out of the venue and handed over to the police.”
The performance, by young singer Yuval Raphael, was unaffected.
The 25-year-old is a survivor of the Hamas attacks of 7 October, 2023, an experience which coloured her delicate ballad, New Day Will Rise.
The Israeli delegation said Raphael was left “shaken and upset” by the incident, but that it was “extremely proud” of her performance “which represented Israel in a respectful manner”.

Elsewhere, Eurovision was its usual explosion of high camp, sexual innuendo and dresses being removed to reveal smaller, tighter dresses.
Malta’s Mariana Conte was forced to rewrite her disco anthem Serving Kant to remove what sounded like a swear word – but performed the censored version with a knowing wink, safe in the knowledge the audience would fill in the blanks.
Although it was a fan favourite, Conte could only manage 17th.
Estonia’s Tommy Cash, who came third, also kept the innuendo train running, with Espresso Macchiato, a caffeinated disco anthem featuring the unforgettable phrase: “Life is like spaghetti, it’s hard until you make it.”
Another highlight was Finland’s Erika Vikman, who dispensed with double entendres entirely on Ich Komme, a vibrant hymn to sexual pleasure.
The singer ended her performance by taking flight on a giant phallic microphone that shot sparks into the air.
It thrust her into 11th position, and a permanent place in the Eurovision pantheon.
The contest also dealt with more weighty subjects like economic migration (Portuguese rock band Napa) and environmental catastrophe (Latvia’s Tautumeitas, who scored 12 points from the UK jury).
Dutch singer Claude delivered a heartfelt tribute to his mother in C’est La Vie – an upbeat anthem that reflected on her positivity as she uprooted the family from their home country of the Democratic Republic of Congo as a child.
In a touching climax, the 21-year-old danced with an image of his childhood self in a mirror on the stage.

Also reflecting on their childhood was French singer Louane, whose tearjerking ballad was dedicated to her mother, who died of cancer when she was 17.
In one of the night’s most striking performances, she was surrounded by a whirlwind of sand as she hollered the word “mother” over and over again.
One of the favourites to win, it ended the night in seventh place, after receiving a disappointing 50 points from the public.
JJ’s performance was similarly dramatic. Shot entirely in black and white, it saw him being tossed around on a rickety boat, as waves (of emotion) threatened to consume him.
An honourable mention also goes to Italy’s Lucio Corsi, whose harmonica solo in Volevo Essere Un Duro marked the first time a live instrument has been played at Eurovision since 1998.

The UK spent a third year in the bottom half of the leaderboard, despite a spirited performance from girl group Remember Monday.
A group of friends who met at high school, their inventive pop song What The Hell Just Happened? drew on their many years of experience in West End theatre.
The girls pulled off their tricky three-part harmonies while dancing around a fallen chandelier, but the performance didn’t connect with voters.
Despite earning a healthy 88 points from juries – including 12 from Italy – it bombed with viewers.
They ended in 19th place, one below last year’s entrant Olly Alexander.
The group laughed off their “nul points” score from the public, holding up peace signs and hugging each other as the score was announced.

The voting was utter chaos.
Thirteen of the 26 finalists received the maximum of 12 points from at least one jury, leaving the competition completely open before the public vote was counted.
Israel, who had been languishing in the bottom half of the table, then received 297 points from the public (out of a possible maximum of 444). Twelve of those points came from the UK.
For a while, it looked like Yuval Raphael’s lead might be unassailable – but Austria’s tally of 178 was the last to be announced, leaving the singer empty-handed.
And spare a thought for Switzerland.
Their contestant, Zoë Më, was in second place after the jury vote, with 214 points. Then the public gave her the night’s only other zero-point score.
To gasps in the arena, her song Voyage was demoted to 10th place.
There was disappointment, too, for fans of Canadian singer Céline Dion, who had been rumoured to appear at the contest.
The singer won Eurovision for Switzerland in 1988, and had appeared in a video wishing the contestants good luck at Tuesday’s semi-final.
Despite hopes from Eurovision organisers that she might turn up, the moment never came to pass.
[BBC]
Features
After Anura, Namal?

“…if this isn’t happening, what is?” Carolina De Robertis (The President and the Frog)
José Mujica, the poorest president in the world, died this week. As a young activist he had joined the Marxist Tupamaros guerrilla movement and was imprisoned for 14 years, most of it in a hole in a ground where he befriended ants and a frog to stay sane. During his five years as Uruguay’s president, he continued to live in his ramshackle farmhouse-home with his wife and three-legged dog Manuela, went about driving his old Volkswagen car, and donated most of his salary to charities.
Since the Uruguayan constitution does not permit consecutive presidential terms, Mr. Mujica bowed out in 2015. Despite a 70% popularity rate, he didn’t consider another presidential run. In one of his final interviews, he criticised left-wing presidents of Nicaragua and Venezuela for clinging to power and wondered at comeback attempts by Cristian Kirchner of Argentina and Evo Morales of Bolivia. “How hard it is for them to let go of the cake,” he marvelled ((https://www.france24.com/en/live-news/20241129-we-re-messing-up-uruguay-icon-mujica-on-strongman-rule-in-latin-america).
Not wanting to ‘let go of the cake,’ is a political norm in today’s Sri Lanka. “Politicians never retire from politics,” Mahinda Rajapaksa said in 2024 (https://www.instagram.com/dailymirrorlk/reel/DBLMDBtsP82/). ). He had done more than most to set that trend in motion. Up until 2005, presidents retired after completing their two terms. President Rajapaksa removed the two-term provision in 2010, contested for a third term in 2015, lost, and, instead of retiring, contested the general election becoming an ordinary parliamentarian.
Anything to keep even a sliver of the cake.
“Attachment is the root of suffering,” The Buddha warned (https://suttacentral.net/mn105/en/sujato?lang=en&layout=plain&reference=none¬es=asterisk&highlight=false&script=latin). When political leaders become attached to power, the suffering becomes nationalised. For instance, had JR Jayewardene not been so intent on maintaining power, there would have been no 1982 Referendum and all the ills which followed.
Mr. Jayewardene wanted power for himself and his party. Mahinda Rajapaksa’s attachment to power is dynastic. He wants power, if not for himself, then for an immediate family member. In 2019, this gave us Gotabaya Rajapaksa. In 2029, it might give us Namal Rajapaksa.
Namal Rajapaksa replacing his father and uncles as the public face of the SLPP doesn’t mean any change in the feudal ethos underlying Rajapaksa politics. The party remains a fief and its activists continue to be vassals. A short You Tube video shot at a local government election meeting in Moneragala symbolises this continuity. In it, young Namal, dressed like his father, descends a long flight of stairs to be worshipped by two young men (possibly candidates). Their backs and heads are bent, their hands pressed together. Mr Rajapaksa is unembarrassed by this display of servility. On the contrary, he seems to be accepting it as his due, a crown prince being venerated by his future subjects (https://www.youtube.com/shorts/_BsTCv6H-bY).
Commenting on our economic prospects, the World Bank said, “Despite the recovery in 2024, medium-term growth is expected to remain modest, reflecting the scarring effects of the crisis…” (Sri Lanka Development Update 2025). That unprecedented crisis birthed two unimaginable outcomes, Ranil Wickremesinghe and Anura Kumara Dissanayake presidencies. Both outcomes were impossible under normal circumstances. At the 2020 general election, Ranil Wickremesinghe had lost his own seat and the NPP/JVP had gained just 3% of the vote. Without President Gotabaya, there wouldn’t have been a President Ranil or a President Anura.
Will the ineptitude of the Dissanayake administration open the door to another unthinkable – a Namal Rajapaksa presidency?
Underwhelming governance
The NPP/JVP administration is yet to spawn a major scandal on par with the innumerable Rajapaksa outrages or the bond scam. Most of its wrongs are of a relatively minor order, more peccadillos than crimes. Yet these delinquencies, together with an absolute genius for sloppiness, are earning for it a reputation of bumbling ineptitude.
Think of that monkey census. Or those May Day buses illegally parked on the Southern Highway. Or the silly sayings of Nalin Hewage, Chatura Abeysinghe, and Nilanthi Kottahachchi.
The Asoka Ranwala saga is emblematic of the aura of maladroitness that is plaguing the NPP/JVP administration. Five months after that needless (indeed infantile) doctorate affair, Mr. Ranwala is yet to produce his PhD certificate from his supposed alma mater. His silence on the matter is understandable. Not so the silence of the government. He continues to be not just a parliamentarian but also a member of the NPP’s executive committee. In fact, the official NPP website continues to list him as Dr Asoka Ranwala! (https://www.npp.lk/en/about). If the NPP cannot update its own website, how can it change a system, let alone create a New Man who embodies civic virtues and humanitarian values?
From l’affaire Ranwala to the chaotic scenes at the Tooth Relic exposition, the missteps of the NPP/JVP government become magnified because of the glaring difference between the party’s promise and the administration’s reality. In its desire to win, the NPP/JVP generated unrealistic and unrealisable expectations, building a pedestal for itself high to the point of perfection. Its inability to live up to those expectations, to remain on that pedestal is causing immense damage to its credibility. Going by the government’s dismal performance at the LG polls so soon after its soaring victory at the parliamentary election, voters feel disillusioned, even cheated. For a six-month old government, that is not a good place to be.
Add to this the government’s inexplicable inefficiency on matters large and small, despite having both the presidency and more than a two-thirds majority in parliament. The rice crisis is an obvious case in point. President Dissanayake went so far as to threaten rice oligopolists in public, on TV. Yet the oligopolists continue to retain the upper hand. Minister Saroja Paulraj’s insensitive attitude to the suicide of a 16-year old student is atrocious; even more unforgivable is the government’s inability to take any action against the tuition class owner (and NPP member) whose alleged public shaming was, reportedly, the immediate cause of that young girl’s suicide.
The missteps continue to multiply, from the prime minister’s intemperate remarks about breaking election laws ‘shape eke’ to limiting government’s weekly media briefings to those journalists registered with the Media Ministry (that ban kept out Shantha Wijesooriya despite his accreditations from the International Federation of Journalists and the Sri Lanka Working Journalists Association).
None of these needed to happen since they were not necessary for the government to maintain power. All of these could have been quenched with a few simple acts, starting with an apology. But they remain unattended and continue to fester, causing government serious reputational damage.
Little wonder the NPP/JVP lost 2.3million votes in under six months. Vote-haemorrhaging on such a scale is probably unprecedented in Lankan electoral history. The NPP/JVP not only lost the 1.2million votes it gained between presidential and parliamentary election; it also lost 1.1million votes from its presidential election score. If not staunched soon, this sort of bleeding cannot but lead to a dismal electoral death in 2029.
Perhaps the NPP/JVP’s greatest defeat is the stunning loss of confidence it suffered among Tamil and Muslim voters. Both communities abandoned the NPP/JVP and gravitated to their traditional parties in substantial numbers at the LG polls.
The government’s insensitivity and arrogance would have played a seminal role in this fall from electoral grace. Take, for instance, the March 2025 gazette stating that close to 6,000 acres of land in the Northern province will be taken over by the government if ownership is not confirmed within three months. The injustice and the discrimination of this proposed measure are palpable. The population in the Northern districts suffered grievously from the war, including destruction of property and displacement. Giving such a people just three months to prove ownership of land is a violation of natural justice. And such an unjust gazette targeting the Sinhala majority is unlikely to be issued by this or any other government. Little wonder Tamils felt disenchanted and a substantial number of them reverted to their traditional party loyalties.
The persecution of Muslims for opposing the war in Gaza was probably a key reason for the erosion of Muslim support. The arrest of 21-year-old Mohammad Rusdi for pasting an anti-Israeli sticker was obviously not an isolated incident. According to SJB parliamentarian Mujibur Rahman, a 31-year-old Muslim man in Eravur has been questioned for writing, Allah will protect Palestine, in a poem. And in Colombo, the police had gone to the house of an organiser of an anti-Israel demonstration, a Muslim, and asked him such question as why do you call Netanyahu a terrorist (he is worse, a genocider) and why demonstrate here when Palestinian children are killed? (Perhaps the new head of SL-Palestine Parliamentary Friendship Association Dr Sunil Senevi can give the police a brief lecture as to why the murder of children in their tens of thousands in Palestine or elsewhere touches us all?).
The government’s only remaining advantage is the opposition’s weakness. That weakness will enable the government to complete its five years. But it will not save the government from defeat in 2029.
Renaissance for the Rajapaksas?
According to the IHP’s SLOTS poll, electoral support for Gotabaya Rajapaksa began to diminish in January 2022. Initially, the beneficiary of this disenchantment was Sajith Premadasa, as the leader of the largest opposition party. By June, public opinion began to shift again, in the NPP’s favour. At first, a party with a mere 3% base beating the main opposition to win presidential and parliamentary polls seemed hardly credible. But as the NPP continued to shore up its support, that outcome began to look inevitable.
The possibility of a repeat performance in 2029 cannot be ruled out. Not with the SLPP more than tripling its vote haul and nearing the one million mark at the local government election in under six months.
The SLPP that might win in 2029 would be not just a Rajapaksa party but also a party which normalises corruption, again. Corruption was not a Rajapaksa creation. Far from it. But it was under Rajapaksa rule that corruption became accepted as an integral part of development itself, an acceptable price we citizens pay for development. Going by a recent public statement by SLPP heavyweight Janaka Tissakuttiarachchi, development through corruption would become a signature trait of a Namal Rajapaksa administration just as it was of Mahinda and Gotabaya Rajapaksa administrations. “There is nothing to hide,” Mr Tissakuttiarachchi told a campaign meeting proudly. “Some local government members would build a road with their friends and would take a profit of 5,000, 10,000 from those contractors. They didn’t buy a packet of milk for their children with that 5,000, 10,000. They took that 5,000, 10,000 to the funeral and the wedding in the village. And that person built himself. He used the development work given by Mr. Mahinda to build himself up, contest the next election, and win.”
As Canadian-American political commentator (and one-time speech-writer for the second President Bush) said of the Trump administration, bad character will become a job qualification under a president Namal just as it was under presidents Mahinda and Gotabaya.
According to the Democracy Perception Index 2025, Sri Lankans believe that the main purpose of democracy is to improve living standards ((https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_nypzC0gt5c). This is a test the NPP government seems to be failing. If it cannot prevent a salt shortage and the skyrocketing of salt prices, there’s not much chance it can cause a real improvement in the living standards of ordinary Lankans. The promise to bring corrupt politicians to justice is beginning to seem like empty words, as does the boast to suppress underworld gangs and end the drug menace. If the government fails to upgrade its performance substantially by September, its image as ‘incompetent Tarzans’ (weda beri Tarzanla) will become set in stone.
When disenchantment leads to anger (and desire to teach the government a lesson for its false promises), the pendulum will swing as wildly as it did in 2024. It will stop not with Sajith Premadasa (whose verbosity conceals rather than reveals what he actually stands for) but move past him towards the anti-New Man and the natural guardian of the old system, Namal Rajapaksa.
by Tisaranee Gunasekara
-
Features1 day ago
Searching for George Keyt
-
Midweek Review5 days ago
Bronze statue for P’karan, NPP defeat in the North and 16th anniversary of triumph over terrorism
-
News3 days ago
Chikungunya spreading rapidly in Colombo and suburbs
-
Features1 day ago
The Strategic Imperative:Why Sri Lanka Could Transform Indo-Pacific Security Through Space
-
News6 days ago
Expert: Mismanagement of CEB hydro resources increases costly oil-powered electricity generation
-
News5 days ago
French Navy Ship ‘BEAUTEMPS BEAUPRE’ sets sail from Colombo
-
Business2 days ago
Hameedia launches ‘We Create’ – Sri Lanka’s first-ever online tailoring platform
-
Business2 days ago
Supreme Court launches online payments via GovPay – a milestone in judicial digitalization