Opinion
PM Proposes New Laws to Ban Cattle Slaughter: Is it Rational?
As reported in the media on 9th September, the Prime Minister, has proposed to bring legislation to stop cattle slaughter, and he believes that many MPs are supportive of his proposal. Has the PM considered all facets of the matter before rushing into this decision?
It is largely the bulls and bull calves that are slaughtered, not that cows are totally spared!. With the use of bullock cart for transport and bulls for ploughing rapidly on the decline with the introduction of vehicles and tractors, there is a large concomitant decline in the demand for bulls other than for meat, and disposal of bulls and bull calves has become a problem to cattle keepers other than for meat. While the religious Buddhists and Hindus may support the proposal, the Muslims obviously will object as beef is a major source of their meat other than mutton and chicken, and Christians and Catholics may keep quiet!
Many Buddhist temples now have the popular practice of salvaging cattle from slaughter by buying them and giving them free of charge to cattle rearers. Of course, how many of them eventually end up in the slaughter house is not known!
There are many lessons we can learn from India on this matter. Acharya Vinoba Bhave, widely revered as the spiritual heir of India’s independence leader Mahathma Gandhi, campaigning against cattle slaughter and appealing to rich landowners to donate land to landless farmers, walked from village to village some 40,000 miles on the mission during his life time! History records that his mission was only partly successful. However, over the years sparing old animals both cows and bulls was a serious problem in that they were competing for pasture and fodder with productive milch cows and bulls working the fields! The anti-cattle slaughter project gradually lost momentum with his death, and the land project too was not a total success either as some of the donated lands were hardly cultivated.
Slaughter of cattle, especially cows is a controversial topic in India because of the cows traditional status as a venerated and respected animal and the ethical principle of Ahinsa to some sects of Hinduism, Sikhism, Jainism, and Buddhism. It is however a major source of meat for Muslims as well as for adherents of some other non-vedic, Abrahamic and other religions.
From the time of partition and drafting of the new Indian constitution, there had been continuous agitation by Hindus and several other above mentioned religious sects to incorporate relevant provisions in the constitution banning cattle slaughter. However, the draft Indian constitution of October 1947 did not contain any reference to cattle slaughter but a subsequent provision in February 1948 because of agitations , proposed as Article 38A, referred to the matter as follows: “The State shall endeavour to organise agriculture and animal husbandry on modern and scientific lines and in particular take steps to preserve, protect and improve the useful breeds of cattle and ban the slaughter of cows and other useful cattle, specially milch cattle and of child-bearing age, young stock and draught cattle”. This provision then does not prohibit slaughter of unproductive animals. The Indian government has, in Article 38 A of the constitution tactfully enabled economics to supersede ethic and religious considerations, and we have here a lesson to learn. In fact, that the constitutional amendment was conceived in deceit was the view of many.
Twenty out of the 28 states in India currently have various laws regulating the act of cow slaughter, prohibiting the slaughter of cows. Only the boneless meat of buffalo, meat of goat and sheep and birds are permitted for export as per the current Indian laws. India feels that the restriction on export to only boneless meat with a ban on meat with bones will add to the brand image of Indian meat. However, a Supreme Court of India suspended the ban on sale of cattle in its judgement in July 2017giving relief to beef and leather industries.
Unbelievably, as per a 2016 United States Department of Agriculture review, India has rapidly grown to become the world’s largest beef exporter, accounting for 20% of world’s beef trade based on its large water buffalo meat processing industry.
Coming back to the Premiers proposal, total banning of cattle slaughter would with time drag the country into a serious dilemma of increased competition between productive cattle such as cows and draft bulls and unproductive ones , bulls and old cattle, for limited pasture and fodder, the very same reason why Vinoba Bhave’s mission on cattle slaughter stoppage failed. Already pasture and fodder limitations are a serious constraint to expansion of our milk production. Shortage of pasture is not an uncommon sight during dry weather as seen in the picture, especially in the dry zone.
The manner in which animals for slaughter is usually handled and the method of slaughter here is often very cruel and disgusting. It should be a great relief if there are at least humane methods of slaughter in place as in developed countries, and laws regulating slaughter technology to ensure them.
Is only cattle slaughter a sin? What about hundreds of chicken, goats and pigs that are slaughtered, and tons of fish caught daily! Aren’t those deeds sin? And our law makers are so irrational as to stop the sale of meat on some Poya days but not fish! All life is equally precious.
Dr Parakrama Waidyanatha
Opinion
Education needed about people not feeding wildlife
Being wildlife enthusiasts and bird watchers we took a river “safari” during a recent family trip to Bentota. We were dismayed to see that it seems to be the standard practice to feed the monkeys, I think they were the purple faced langurs, that were encountered on the river banks. Each boat that passed by stopped with boxed fruit, coconut and other odds and ends to feed them.
We managed to stop our guy from doing so but faced derision and laughter that we shouldn’t be afraid of monkeys. We tried to explain to him that this is a plague affecting Sri Lanka; elephants being fed on road sides and even in national parks, monkeys being fed from hotel balconies and apparently during river boat rides, birds being fed on hotel terraces etc.
This was met with further mockery and amused dismissal. An effort to make them understand that this was their livelihood that they were destroying it in this manner sailed over their heads. They even have a picture of a baby crocodile on the shoulders of a tourist on their billboard.
We need to consider the following:
Educate such tour operators about the importance of not interfering with the environment and the behaviour of wild animals.
Include education and training in the hotel school, and in schools in tourist resort towns about their duty and responsibility to the environment and the ecosystem on which we all depend.
If it is not already the case such operators should have licenses that should be revoked and fined if found to be engaging in such destructive acts.
Tamara Nanayakkara
Opinion
Capt. Dinham Suhood flies West
A few days ago, we heard the sad news of the passing on of Capt. Dinham Suhood. Born in 1929, he was the last surviving Air Ceylon Captain from the ‘old guard’.
He studied at St Joseph’s College, Colombo 10. He had his flying training in 1949 in Sydney, Australia and then joined Air Ceylon in late 1957. There he flew the DC3 (Dakota), HS748 (Avro), Nord 262 and the HS 121 (Trident).
I remember how he lent his large collection of ‘Airfix’ plastic aircraft models built to scale at S. Thomas’ College, exhibitions. That really inspired us schoolboys.
In 1971 he flew for a Singaporean Millionaire, a BAC One-Eleven and then later joined Air Siam where he flew Boeing B707 and the B747 before retiring and migrating to Australia in 1975.
Some of my captains had flown with him as First Officers. He was reputed to have been a true professional and always helpful to his colleagues.
He was an accomplished pianist and good dancer.
He passed on a few days short of his 97th birthday, after a brief illness.
May his soul rest in peace!
To fly west my friend is a test we must all take for a final check
Capt. Gihan A Fernando
RCyAF/ SLAF, Air Ceylon, Air Lanka, Singapore Airlines, SriLankan Airlines
Opinion
Global warming here to stay
The cause of global warming, they claim, is due to ever increasing levels of CO2. This is a by-product of burning fossil fuels like oil and gas, and of course coal. Environmentalists and other ‘green’ activists are worried about rising world atmospheric levels of CO2. Now they want to stop the whole world from burning fossil fuels, especially people who use cars powered by petrol and diesel oil, because burning petrol and oil are a major source of CO2 pollution. They are bringing forward the fateful day when oil and gas are scarce and can no longer be found and we have no choice but to travel by electricity-driven cars – or go by foot. They say we must save energy now, by walking and save the planet’s atmosphere.
THE DEMON COAL
But it is coal, above all, that is hated most by the ‘green’ lobby. It is coal that is first on their list for targeting above all the other fossil fuels. The eminently logical reason is that coal is the dirtiest polluter of all. In addition to adding CO2 to the atmosphere, it pollutes the air we breathe with fine particles of ash and poisonous chemicals which also make us ill. And some claim that coal-fired power stations produce more harmful radiation than an atomic reactor.
STOP THE COAL!
Halting the use of coal for generating electricity is a priority for them. It is an action high on the Green party list.
However, no-one talks of what we can use to fill the energy gap left by coal. Some experts publicly claim that unfortunately, energy from wind or solar panels, will not be enough and cannot satisfy our demand for instant power at all times of the day or night at a reasonable price.
THE ALTERNATIVES
It seems to be a taboo to talk about energy from nuclear power, but this is misguided. Going nuclear offers tried and tested alternatives to coal. The West has got generating energy from uranium down to a fine art, but it does involve some potentially dangerous problems, which are overcome by powerful engineering designs which then must be operated safely. But an additional factor when using URANIUM is that it produces long term radioactive waste. Relocating and storage of this waste is expensive and is a big problem.
Russia in November 2020, very kindly offered to help us with this continuous generating problem by offering standard Uranium modules for generating power. They offered to handle all aspects of the fuel cycle and its disposal. In hindsight this would have been an unbelievable bargain. It can be assumed that we could have also used Russian expertise in solving the power distribution flows throughout the grid.
THORIUM
But thankfully we are blessed with a second nuclear choice – that of the mildly radioactive THORIUM, a much cheaper and safer solution to our energy needs.
News last month (January 2026) told us of how China has built a container ship that can run on Thorium for ten years without refuelling. They must have solved the corrosion problem of the main fluoride mixing container walls. China has rare earths and can use AI computers to solve their metallurgical problems – fast!
Nevertheless, Russia can equally offer Sri Lanka Thorium- powered generating stations. Here the benefits are even more obviously evident. Thorium can be a quite cheap source of energy using locally mined material plus, so importantly, the radioactive waste remains dangerous for only a few hundred years, unlike uranium waste.
Because they are relatively small, only the size of a semi-detached house, such thorium generating stations can be located near the point of use, reducing the need for UNSIGHTLY towers and power grid distribution lines.
The design and supply of standard Thorium reactor machines may be more expensive but can be obtained from Russia itself, or China – our friends in our time of need.
Priyantha Hettige
-
Business4 days agoAutodoc 360 relocates to reinforce commitment to premium auto care
-
Midweek Review4 days agoA question of national pride
-
Opinion3 days agoWill computers ever be intelligent?
-
Midweek Review4 days agoTheatre and Anthropocentrism in the age of Climate Emergency
-
Editorial6 days agoThe JRJ syndrome
-
Features9 hours agoThe Rise of Takaichi
-
Opinion4 days agoThe Walk for Peace in America a Sri Lankan initiative: A startling truth hidden by govt.
-
Opinion5 days agoBeyond 4–5% recovery: Why Sri Lanka needs a real growth strategy
