News
Parliament in turmoil over unseating of Ramanayake
By Saman Indrajith
Parliament sittings were suspended for several minutes yesterday following an uproar over the unseating of SJB’s Ranjan Ramanayake, who is currently servig a jail term. The SJB MPs staged the protest after Speaker Mahinda Yapa Abeywardena announced that Ramanayake had lost his parliamentary seat owing to his conviction by the Supreme Court and incarceration.
The Speaker said: “I wish to bring to the notice of the House the correct position in respect of the letter that was sent by the Secretary General of Parliament informing the Chairman of the Election Commission that a vacancy has occurred in the membership of the Ninth Parliament due to the fact that Ranjan Ramanayake Member of Parliament for the Electoral District of Gampaha has ceased to be a Member of Parliament in terms of Article 66(d) of the Constitution of the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka.
Ranjan Ramanayake was convicted by the Supreme Court on 12th January 2021 for the offence of contempt of court punishable under Article 105 (3) of the Constitution and was sentenced to a term of 4 years rigorous imprisonment. The conviction by the Supreme Court attracted the provisions of the Article 66 (d) of the Constitution which reads that “The seat of a Member shall become vacant if he becomes subject to any disqualification specified in Article 89 or 91. The Article 89 (d) of the Constitution goes on to say that ” No person shall be qualified to be an elector at an election of the President, or of the Members of Parliament or to vote at any Referendum if he is subject to any of the following disqualifications, namely, if he is serving or has during the period of seven years immediately preceding completed serving of a sentence of imprisonment (by whatever name called ) for a term not less than six months imposed after conviction by any court for an offence punishable with imprisonment for a term not less than two years or is under sentence of death or is serving or has during the period of seven years immediately preceding completed the serving of a sentence of imprisonment for a term not less than six months awarded in lieu of execution of such sentence ; Provided that if any person disqualified under this paragraph is granted a free pardon such disqualification shall cease from the date on which the pardon is granted.
Accordingly, by operation of the law Ranjan Ramanayake would cease to be a Member of Parliament from the date the conviction was entered upon by the Supreme Court. However, Ranjan Ramanayake through his lawyers, petitioned the Court of Appeal by way of a writ application that by virtue of the conviction he would not lose his seat and requesting the court to grant a prohibition or a restraining order preventing the Secretary General of Parliament from informing the Chairman of the Election Commission that a vacancy has arisen in the ninth Parliament consequent to Ranjan Ramanayake vacating his seat. The Court of Appeal has not accepted this position and has dismissed the case without issuing any formal notice to the Respondents. With the dismissal of the writ application before the Court of Appeal the temporary restraining order issued by the Court of Appeal preventing the Secretary General of Parliament from informing the Chairman of the Election Commission regarding the vacancy has also ceased to exist.
In the circumstances, once all the above requirements are fulfilled under Article 89 (d) of the Constitution to quote the very Order of the Court of Appeal in the writ matter in connection with this case it is stated as follows; “I do agree with the submission of the learned Senior Additional Solicitor General that the act of sending a communication to the Election Commission under Section 64 (1) of the Parliamentary Elections Act would tantamount to a physical act by the 1 st Respondent short of an exercise of power. In other words, with a vacancy staring in his face the Secretary General has no option but he is required by law to inform the Election Commission of such vacancy. In doing so he is carrying out a purely ministerial act. I have already referred to the fact that the exercise of a purely ministerial act is not subject to be quashed by a writ of certiorari nor is such an exercise subject to any restriction by a writ of prohibition. If the Secretary General fails to act at that stage, a writ of mandamus would lie to compel him to perform his legal duty.”
The reason for me to make this announcement is that yesterday in the House, the Leader of the Opposition made a statement that the Secretary General of Parliament has taken steps to inform the Chairman of the Election Commission that Ranjan Ramanayake has vacated his seat due to non-attendance of Parliament for a period of 3 months and the non-acceptance of his leave motion also contributed to this situation. As indicated above, I would like to inform the Leader of the Opposition that this position is not correct and the vacation of seat by a Member of Parliament for non-attendance for 3 months is envisaged in the Constitution in Article 66 (f) whereas the letter sent by the Secretary General is under Article 66 (d) the content of which has been explained above.
I wish to bring this matter to the notice of the House to provide greater clarity on this issue.”
SJB MPs wore black armbands to voice their objection to the decision taken by the Speaker to remove MP Ramanayake’s Parliamentary seat.
Opposition Leader Sajith Premadasa accused Speaker Mahinda Yapa Abeywardena of being part of a conspiracy to remove Ramanayake from Parliament.
Following their protest, the sittings were suspended and after several minutes the House resumed its sittings.
Latest News
“Sri Lanka Not Out of the Woods Yet” – IMF
The International Monetary Fund (IMF) has cautioned that while Sri Lanka has made notable progress in its economic recovery, the nation is still vulnerable and must work to protect the hard-earned gains it has achieved so far. Speaking at an IMF press briefing on September 12, Director of the IMF Communications Department Ms. Julie Kozack, emphasized the importance of sustained reforms and vigilance, especially with the upcoming presidential elections.
Kozack acknowledged the role of the people of Sri Lanka in determining the nation’s political future, noting, “It is important to understand that the outcome of the elections is for the people of Sri Lanka to decide. However, achieving the objectives of the IMF program is crucial to help Sri Lanka emerge from one of the most severe crises in its history. As I’ve already noted, a lot of progress has been made, but the country is not out of the woods yet, and it is important to safeguard those hard won gains.”
She highlighted key milestones the country has achieved under the IMF’s Extended Fund Facility (EFF) program. In June, the IMF’s Executive Board concluded the 2024 Article IV Consultation and the Second Review of the EFF, unlocking around USD 336 million in funding. Kozack reported that economic growth is beginning to recover, inflation is subsiding, international reserves are growing, and revenue collection is improving.
Despite this positive progress, Kozack warned that Sri Lanka remains exposed to significant economic risks. “Sustaining the momentum of reforms is essential,” she added.
On the subject of debt restructuring, Kozack responded to questions about private creditors submitting their proposals to the IMF, particularly in relation to Sri Lanka’s domestic debt restructuring efforts. She pointed out that key milestones had been achieved with the execution of domestic debt restructuring and agreements with the official creditor committee and EXIM Bank of China. However, she was careful to note that the IMF does not engage in direct negotiations between Sri Lanka and its creditors, instead offering an overall assessment of debt sustainability.
Kozack reiterated that while the IMF supports Sri Lanka’s reform efforts, the timing of the Third Review will depend on the outcome of the upcoming elections. “Program discussions will resume after the elections, once a new government is in place,” she stated.
The IMF’s message remains clear: Sri Lanka has come a long way, but the path to full recovery requires on-going commitment to reforms and a focus on economic stability.
Latest News
Stand united and committed to defeat all forms of extremism and strive for a more just and prosperous world by upholding the values exemplified by the Prophet – President
President Ranil Wickremesinghe in his Milad Un-Nabi message called upon all Muslims to stand united and committed to defeat all forms of extremism and strive for a more just and prosperous world by upholding the values exemplified by the Prophet.
The full text of President Wickremesinghe’s message:
Sri Lankan Muslims join their fellow believers worldwide in celebrating Milad-un-Nabi, commemorating the birth of Prophet Muhammad with a spirit of unity and brotherhood. The Prophet, renowned as Al-Amin (The Trustworthy), earned the unwavering trust of those around him through his integrity and character. His sacrifices for upholding justice, humanity, and righteousness are beyond measure.
The core teachings of Prophet Muhammad emphasize mutual understanding, justice, harmony, and the rejection of hatred. A closer study of his life and philosophy reveals that Allah elevates those who live with honesty and righteousness, granting them positions of honour and responsibility.
As we celebrate this blessed occasion, I believe that Muslims across the globe will stand united, committed to defeating all forms of extremism and strive for a more just and prosperous world by upholding the values exemplified by the Prophet.
I extend my heartfelt wishes to all Muslims for a blessed and meaningful Milad-un-Nabi.
Ranil Wickremesinghe,
President,
Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka.
News
Muslim group finds fault with govt. for lukewarm response
Lankans arrested on terrorism charges:
‘Foreign Ministry didn’t bother at least to update us on their status’
By Shamindra Ferdinando
The All Ceylon Union of Muslim League Youth Fronts (ACUMLYF) yesterday (15) said that the government owed an explanation regarding the arrest of four Sri Lankans on terrorism charges in Gujarat in late May this year.The grouping President Sham Nawaz said that though they had made representations in this regard to State Foreign Minister Tharaka Balasuriya in the first week of June, the Foreign Ministry at least didn’t bother to respond.
“We are concerned about the arrested persons’ wellbeing,”
Nawaz said, declaring that the families of the detained have a right to know what was going on. Nawaz pointed out that some reports suggested that the arrested persons had arrived in India to cause mayhem during the general election.
Nawaz emphasized that their effort shouldn’t be misinterpreted as an attempt to intervene on behalf of a group dubbed terrorists. The arrests were made by the Gujarat Anti-Terrorist Squad. Responding to another query, Nawaz said that they emphasized the responsibility on the part of the government to represent the interests of the detained persons in terms of the Vienna Convention on consular assistance.
Pointing out the conflicting claims regarding the arrests made on May 19/20, Nawaz said that Sri Lanka should seek access to the detained men without further delay.
Asked whether the families of the detained or some other interested party sought their intervention or he knew them personally, Nawaz emphasized that ACUMLYE stepped-in on its own.
Nawaz said that the delegation received an assurance from State Minister Balasuriya that consular matters would be duly followed up and due consideration would be given to the issues at hand raised by them.
Nawaz said that the delegation stressed the need for an independent local investigation as many raised doubts over the continuing allegations regarding the ISIS operations here. Such fears impacted the economy in many ways, Nawaz said, reiterating the responsibility on the part of the government to conduct no holds barred investigation into the allegations made by Indian authorities.
Contrary to repeated declarations in Indian media that the four arrested at the Sardar Vallabhai Patel airport in Ahmedabad had been linked to ISIS and coordinated by a Pakistani handler, investigations conducted by Sri Lankan authorities contradicted the Indian findings.
Authoritative officials said that India was yet to grant Sri Lankan investigators access to the suspects. Following the arrests made in Gujarat, nearly a dozen suspects were apprehended here, they said. According to them, Indian authorities had been promptly briefed of the status of the investigations conducted here though the two parties were yet to reach consensus on the issue at hand.
Responding to another query, Nawaz said that they wouldn’t seek the intervention of the Indian High Commission here. “We took up this issue with the State Foreign Minister three and half months ago. The FM’s failure to address our concerns is of grave concern and evidence of the pathetic state of affairs,” Nawaz said.
Nawaz alleged that at the drop of a hat those who had been detained in Gujarat were accused of being ISIS operatives. Referring to statements attributed to various Sri Lankan authorities with access to local investigations, Nawaz questioned whether Gujarat remained committed to the original charges or were prepared to reconsider the suspects’ status having taken into consideration investigations conducted by Sri Lankan authorities. Investigations have revealed that all of them had been involved in various nefarious activities over the years but never known for religious extremism.
-
Features2 days ago
Tea trouble brews for Sri Lankan presidential hopefuls
-
News3 days ago
Prez poll 2024: ITAK alleges bid to confuse Tamil electorate, reiterates backing for Sajith
-
News3 days ago
Anura criticises Ranil’s erratic behaviour
-
Features2 days ago
Countdown Week in Sri Lanka and Debate Week in the US
-
Editorial6 days ago
‘Poster boys’ and monsters
-
News4 days ago
ITAK reaffirms support for Sajith Premadasa
-
Features2 days ago
Ranil talks to the Sunday papers, fields wide-ranging questions
-
News3 days ago
Immigration and Emigration Chief ordered to appear before SC for failing to comply with order