Sports
Only if Buultjens knew that teams have pulled out of rugby sevens!
By A Special Sports Correspondent
There is trouble brewing for the Sri Lanka Schools Rugby Football Association (SLSRFA) ahead of the much looked forward to under 19 ‘Elite’ Schools Rugby Sevens because several schools are reported to make themselves unavailable for the two- day competition.
There are several pros and cons to this issue of non-availability of teams. But what should be underscored is that all schools must remember one valuable dictum that even those participating at The Olympics honour; which is ‘participating is more important than winning’. At the time of writing as many as 10 schools have given enough signs that they’ll not be taking part in the competition citing the upcoming O’ Level Exam and also injuries to key players.
One must remember that those who pull out of the competition will be labeled as spoilers. This attitude of pulling out or boycotting a tournament, when at school level, sparks the attitude in individuals to go against a system or be selfish. Are these schools which are struggling to field their best team for the schools rugby sevens giving the message that they don’t have a second-string outfit or junior team in their ranks and are bankrupt for players?
The good news for rugby fans is that the top teams which dazzled at the recently concluded Zahira Centenary Sevens have made themselves available for the tournament which will be worked off at the Royal Sports Complex and CR&FC, according to media reports. St. Peter’s, which won the Cup Championship at the Zahira Sevens, are slotted in with Maliyadeva Kurunegala in group ‘H’ while Isipatana College, which finished as runners-up in that tournament, are pooled in group ‘A’ with St. Benedict’s College. Royal College which won the Plate Championship at the Zahira Sevens are slotted in with Carey and Nalanda in group ‘D’. If some of the popular rugby playing schools opt to pull out then it would leave the doors open for lesser-known rugby playing schools to fill the voids and ensure that the ‘tournament goes on’.
One little error in calculation that is troubling this tournament is the scheduling of the Zahira Sevens too close to the Elite schools rugby sevens. You cannot possibly ask schools to play back-to-back sevens tournaments with just a few days of rest between tournaments. Injuries to players are a key concern for school rugby teams and don’t forget that there is a league tournament – where the stakes are so high- also on the cards and scheduled to commence in June this year. This writer can say so because the Zahira Sevens was conducted with the blessings of the SLSRFA; the rugby authority that draws up the school rugby calendar for the year. The Zahira Sevens was conducted on March 2 and 3 in Colombo with the participation of the best 16 schools teams in the island. There is a school of thought that having two fiercely competitive school rugby sevens tournaments too close to each other is not a good idea and will drain the players of their energies.
Much money and time are invested on school rugby and to prepare the players for traditional and tournament matches. Also, one must remember that the schools 15-a-side season has two tournaments which is followed by trials to select a team for the junior Asian Championship. Schoolboys have to also balance their education with sports. All that must be achieved while in school; before these boys reach the age 21. There are also schoolboys who take part in more than one sport and also dabble in activities outside sports. Some also have dreams of entering university and a handful have to satisfy goals of parents; individuals who want to live their dreams through their children. Hence the pressure on children who do sports and studies can build up to reach breaking point in an individual.
School rugby is so commercialized these days. Just look at the attire of a school rugby player and observe the number of logos of various sponsors stitched to the playing garment. Then there must be the expectations of sponsors too!
This flooding of sponsors to school rugby can throw out existing traditions. No one talks about the Philip Buultjens Trophy which was on offer for the schools rugby sevens winners. Do the school authorities still keep this trophy on display at this tournament and award it to the winners? So many companies engaged in the communication business are involved in rugby and they have their own trophies which they wish to see been given away to winners at the podium. For the record the Philip Buultjens Trophy was first on offer at the schools rugby tournament in 1975 and Trinity led by Rohan Sourjah won that tournament beating Royal 18-16 in the final. Just to talk about endurancein players of those days, the Trinity side was represented by the same seven players during the entire tournament; meaning the reserves were never used. (This information was taken from NeilWijeratne’s well compiled book titled ‘Sevens Saga’).
School rugby at present is thriving thanks to the support of old boys and sponsors. The SLSRFA must be thankful for that. This is because the schools section of Sri Lanka Rugby (SLR) is neither known to have the acumen to handle a complicated sport like rugby nor has it the connections to raise much needed funds for the game.
Many years ago, when the SLSRFA was run by able men like Lal Kumarasinghe (President) and Mohammed Zainudeen (Secretary) the schools tournaments were run with the precision of Swiss watches. Kumarasinghe would handle the tournament desk at schools tournaments by himself. He passed away in 1999. Those were the years of schools rugby and trouble makers were punished then and there with no favors granted because of school or family ties. But still there were politics involved in school rugby even then; especially when the SLR got involved in school rugby on occasions when a national team had to be selected for an overseas tournament.
In the year 1988 SLR received an invitation to compile a school side to contest the Roslyn Park Sevens in England. The team from Sri Lanka comprised Lasitha Guneratne (Captain), Sudesh. Abeysinghe, Asoka Jayasena, Rizwi Suhyb, Bindu Dandeniya, Thakshila Hettiarachchi, M.Thaam, Ruwan Ranasinghe, Hilmy Saheed and Rohan Ranarajah. The selection trials for this tour were conducted in March 1988 and there were disputes regarding who should be coach. After that tour, the inter-school rugby sevens, worked out in August that year, produced an invincible champion side in Kingswood. Sadly, none of the players from the champion Kingswood team got the opportunity to be included in this tour; hence their potential remained untapped from the perspective of being members of the junior national sevens team.
Times have changed and when a tournament uses the name ‘Elite’ sevens one cannot possibly expected a person like Philip Buultjens (A versatile sportsman produced by St. Anthony’s Katugastota) to be remembered in rugby these days. The same can be said about Noel Gratiaen; in whose name the Gratiaen Cup was awarded to the winners of the game between Colombo Schools and Outstation Schools. Gratiaen was a lawyer and also held post of President of SLR in the years 1948 and 1950. People with authority prefer to associate names of mobile phone companies with sports events of today and conveniently forget about our rugby legends.
Coming back to the upcoming Schools Elite sevens the rugby fraternity hopes that most of the team’s that are experiencing the unavailability of players will put their ‘houses’ in order and live up to the spirit of sportsmanship. This April is the time for both the New Year and annual traditional games. A well- conducted rugby event can add to the glamour of the festive season.
Sports
Canada reacts as cheating row rocks curling superpower
A scandal at the Winter Olympics has left the Canadian curling teams on the defensive and Canadians reeling over the crack in their country’s polite persona.
Over the weekend, Canadian curler Marc Kennedy had an expletive-filled outburst after Sweden accused him of cheating during a match, and later said his team might be the target of a “premeditated” attack by their rivals.
Kennedy was accused of “double-touching” – touching the stone a second time after initially releasing it down the ice. The next day, Canadian women’s captain Rachel Holman was accused of using the same move.
Both have denied the accusations, but Canada’s curling teams, who historically have dominated the sport, now face questions over their tactics.
While the curlers have shown their anger over the situation during matches, fans of the sport and Canadians have questioned whether the team acted in the spirit of curling.
“It’s a sad day for Canadian sport,” Tim Gray, from Alberta, told the BBC. “Integrity in the sport is important, even if you have to call it on yourself.”
An opinion piece in the Canadian news outlet, the Globe and Mail, pointed to some of the frustration: “These Canadian curling teams are not fun bad guys. They come off like the sort of competitors who need so desperately to win that they will do anything – even things that are pointless – in order to get there.”
Cathal Kelly, the writer of the opinion piece, continued: “There’s an easy way out of this – stop struggling. Stop acting like our curling reputation matters more than our national one. Be the bigger man and woman, even if you don’t think you did anything wrong.”
The controversy began on Friday when Swedish player Oskar Eriksson accused Kennedy of double-touching.
As the game continued, Kennedy and Eriksson got into a verbal back-and-forth that included expletives.
Their exchange quickly went viral as a video appearing to show Kennedy touching the stone on occasion.
Kennedy got a verbal warning from World Curling for using foul language, but he was not formally charged with cheating by the governing body.
The next day Kennedy said: “I probably could have handled it better. But we’re human out there and there’s a lot of emotions. I’m not going to apologise for defending my teammates and standing up for myself.”
“I’ve curled my whole life, never once with the intention of getting an advantage through cheating,” he added.
Then, Canadian curling had another instance of purported cheating.
Match officials accused the Canadian women’s team on Saturday of the same double-touch violation.
Rachel Homan who said there was a “zero percent chance” of the violation, as she and her teammates looked on frustratingly. The Canadians lost to the Swiss, 8-7.
On Sunday, Great Britain’s men’s team was accused of the same violation.
Both Homan and British men’s curler Bobby Lammie had stones removed from play due to alleged violations.
Homan later slammed the officials’ decision to remove her stone during a defeat to Switzerland, saying it was “insane”.
All of the incidents led World Curling to clarify that double-tapping is not allowed.
“During forward motion, touching the granite of the stone is not allowed. This will result in the stone being removed from play,” they said.
World Curling does not use video to review play, but they did send two officials to monitor how players released their stones in subsequent games.
“Following a meeting with representatives of the competing National Olympic Committees, an update in the stone monitoring protocol has been confirmed, beginning with the evening session on Sunday 15 February,” World Curling said in a statement.
“This change in protocol will see the two umpires who had previously been actively monitoring athlete deliveries remain available in the field of play, but will now only monitor athlete deliveries at the request of the competing teams.”

Reaction to the controversy in Canada has been mixed.
“Do I think the finger affects the rock, no I do not,” Ankara Leonard from the Royal Montreal Curling Club told the BBC. “Do I think we have to play within the rules? Yes.”
While curling columnist and Olympian Tomi Rantamaki, in an article for The Curling News, warned that Canada’s dominance in the world of curling means its players should be mindful of the influence they have.
“Young players in Finland, Korea, Italy, Sweden – everywhere – often copy what Canadian teams do. They copy the athlete’s delivery, the sweeping, the tactics, the communication,” Rantamaki wrote. “And they copy the behaviour.”
[BBC]
Latest News
Nepal, Scotland chase win to close out what-if tournament
Regrets. Scotland and Nepal will have a few.
They arrived at the 2026 T20 World Cup with little to lose. Scotland’s 11th-hour entry after Bangladesh’s expulsion was an unexpected boost. Nepal, meanwhile, are a nation on the cusp of nailing the big time, and what better way to signal that intent by bloodying a few noses and perhaps even sneaking out of Group C?
And yet, both will go into their meeting in Mumbai wondering what could have been. Nepal were 11 runs from 8 balls away from victory in their opening against England, while Scotland spurned 30 runs in their innings against the same opponents, which might have afforded them more room to cash in the nerves they elicited in an ultimately unsuccessful defense of 152.
A comprehensive defeat to West Indies on Sunday closed all mathematical avenues for Nepal’s progression, before England’s second number on their Auld enemy was to come through another sketchy situation against Italy on Monday to secure their own Super Eights spot. And so, what might have been a genuine winner-takes-all bout is anything but. Regardless of the result, both teams will be heading home.
Of course, there is pride to play for, but perhaps a bit more on Nepal’s side of the ledger. Captain Rohit Paudel called for more opportunities against Full Member teams going forward, after making England sweat. Signing off with a maiden T20 World Cup win can further their push for more of a look-in. Their fans have made a compelling case in the stands.
The mullering at the hands of Italy felt like a blow to that cause, even though that should not be the case. It is counter-productive to pit Associate nations against one another to deem who is worthy of a bigger slice of pie, be that funding or opportunities against major sides, particularly when the deck is stacked against them on those grounds in the first place.
These are issues Scotland know plenty about, even if their surprise entry into this tournament is their sixth visit to a T20 World Cup. Between the 2024 T20 World Cup and this one, they had played just seven T20Is outside of qualification tournaments, and only three against a Full Member (a series against Australia in September 2024). They themselves have a statement to make on Tuesday.
Scotland’s initial three-match residence in Kolkata featured a 73-run win against Italy, as they became the first side at this World Cup to breach 200. That was sandwiched by losses to West Indies and England, though the latter did play out in front of a crowd of more than 40,000. This will be similarly well-attended.
One of these teams will take the lead after a 1-1 head-to-head established during a tri-series Scotland hosted and won last summer, with an emphatic win over Nepal. Their first meeting three days earlier was a low scoring shootout which Sandeep Lamichanne seized; the legspinner taking 4 for 11 then bagging the winning run off the penultimate delivery.
As such, there is plenty of familiarity on the ground for this encounter, which will been played out on what has been a game Wankhede track. Nepal’s three matches at this venue to Scotland’s none gives them a sizable advantage, but their batting has not come close to replicating the heights Kushal Bhurtel, Dipendra Singh Airee and Lokesh Bam threatened to take them to against England over a week ago.
They were tentative against Italy (who chased down 124 without loss and with ease) and overawed by Group C leaders West Indies. It spoke to the standards expected that consultant coach Nic Pothas used his pre-match press conference to lament the team for “not learning fast” and making familiar errors.
Scotland, too, have errors to learn from, particularly their leg-side missteps against England when it came to the sweep shot. “The nature of the wicket [at the Wankhede] probably looks even slower than Kolkata and might take more turn,” Tom Bruce said on Monday. We shall see.
It has been a peculiar tournament for Sandeep Lamichane. Nepal’s greatest cricketing export has just one wicket at an average of 94.00, with an economy rate of 9.4 – galling numbers for a seasoned wristspinner. The 25-year-old has shown no verve, and was bullied by Anthony Mosca in the defeat to Italy, with the opener carting him for three sixes, finishing with 28 off the 13 deliveries he faced from the leggie. As mentioned further up, Lamichanne has good recent form against Scotland which he could do with replicating to save what has otherwise been an abject tournament.
Mark Watt, meanwhile, will be keen to bounce back from the shellacking he received against England. His 0 for 43 from three overs contributed to Scotland’s inability to fully turn the screw against their neighbours to the south, hammered over the fence three times by Tom Banton in a first over that went for 22 – an exchange that got Banton out of a funk and on his way to a match-winning 63*. Watt is a canny enough operator to not let that aberration dull his shine.
Nepal have been relatively consistent with their selections, sticking by 10 players and shuffling between Sher Malla (offbreak), Lalit Rajbanshi (left arm orthodox) and Sompal Kami (medium-pace) for the final spot. The suggestion on the ground is they may go in unchanged from the West Indies match after Kami provided some handy but ultimately moot lower-order runs with an unbeaten 26. Should they err towards spin, Malla may get the nod over Rajbanshi, whose single over against Italy went for 19.
Nepal (probable): Aasif Sheikh (wk), Kushal Bhurtel, Rohit Paudel (capt), Dipendra Airee, Aarif Sheikh, Lokesh Bam, Gulsan Jha, Karan KC, Sompal Kami/Sher Malla, Nandan Yadav, Sandeep Lamichhane.
Scotland have called up seamer Jack Jarvis as a replacement for Safyaan Sharif, who has been nursing a groin strain picked up in training. But the sense is they will go in with the same XI they played against England.
Scotland (probable): George Munsey, Michael Jones, Brandon McMullen, Richie Berrington (capt), Tom Bruce, Michael Leask, Matthew Cross (wk), Mark Watt, Oliver Davidson, Brad Wheal, Brad Currie.
[Cricinfo]
Latest News
Zimbabwe take on Ireland with clarity about Super Eights path
When Ireland arrived in Kandy on Sunday afternoon, with just two points after three games, their chances of qualifying for Super Eights may have seemed fanciful. But courtesy an outstanding Sri Lankan chase against Australia on Monday night, the possibilities for Group B have been thrown wide open.
Sri Lanka have qualified, but Ireland now know that a win against Zimbabwe on Tuesday will keep them in with a very real chance of qualification – provided Sri Lanka also beat Zimbabwe in their final match.
If those very specific set of circumstances – including Australia beating Oman – occur, then Australia, Zimbabwe and Ireland could all end on four points each, separated solely by net run-rate.
But that might be getting ahead of ourselves. Zimbabwe simply need to win against Ireland to end all speculation, and considering they’re coming off a stunning 23-run victory over Australia, it would take a brave person to back against them.
Captain Sikandar Raza is also not one to allow his team to let their guard down. He has emphasised the need to maintain focus, warning that earlier performances will “count for nothing if the team slips up now.
Ireland, meanwhile, have lost to Sri Lanka and Australia earlier in the tournament but their dominant 96-run win over Oman – including a tournament-high of 235 – will have provided a timely boost in confidence. They also come in with a chip on their shoulder, over constant comparisons to Associate nations, something they will be keen to put right with a win over Zimbabwe.
Lending more unpredictability to this game is that the historical rivalry is remarkably balanced, with both sides having won eight apiece of their 18 T20I meetings.
With the extra bounce on offer, the Pallekele International Cricket Stadium is one of the rare Sri Lanka grounds where more wickets have fallen to seam (201) than spin (154). It would be no surprise if seamers from both teams prove to be the difference on Tuesday.
In Richard Ngarava, Blessing Muzarabani and Brad Evans, Zimbabwe have a pace triumvirate that can be the envy of any side in this tournament. They’ve taken 16 wickets amongst them, and managed to brush past Australia even with Ngarava out of the XI. Moreover, Muzarabani has won two Player-of-the-Match awards.
In Mark Adair, Ireland have the quintessential work horse. Despite making his debut after Josh Little and Barry McCarthy, he’s played more T20Is – 100 – than the other two and managed to pick up 142 wickets. He also loves bowling against Zimbabwe; his 24 wickets are the most he has taken against an opposition. With Little finding his form last time out with a first three-for since March 2024, Ireland will know any chance of success depends on how quick their seam-bowling unit find their rhythm.
Ireland are unlikely to change a winning combination after their exploits against Oman.
Ireland (probable XI): Tim Tector, Ross Adair, Harry Tector, Lorcan Tucker (capt & wk), Curtis Campher, George Dockrell, Gareth Delany, Mark Adair, Josh Little Barry McCarthy, Matthew Humphreys
Zimbabwe would have had a close eye on the pitch Sri Lanka played Australia on, but the only expected change is the return of Richard Ngarava who missed out last time as a precaution.
Zimbabwe (probable XI): Brian Bennett, Tadiwanashe Marumani (wk), Dion Myers, Sikandar Raza (capt), Ryan Burl, Tashinga Musekiwa, Brad Evans, Wellington Masakadza, Graeme Cremer, Blessing Muzarabani Richard Ngarava
[Cricinfo]
-
Life style2 days agoMarriot new GM Suranga
-
Business1 day agoMinistry of Brands to launch Sri Lanka’s first off-price retail destination
-
Features2 days agoMonks’ march, in America and Sri Lanka
-
Midweek Review6 days agoA question of national pride
-
Business6 days agoAutodoc 360 relocates to reinforce commitment to premium auto care
-
Opinion5 days agoWill computers ever be intelligent?
-
Features2 days agoThe Rise of Takaichi
-
Features2 days agoWetlands of Sri Lanka:
