Connect with us

News

Kiriella casts aspersions about Minister Ali Sabry’s neutrality

Published

on

By Saman Indrajith

Chief Opposition Whip and Kandy District SJB MP, Lakshman Kiriella expressed his displeasure with the media’s perceived lack of attention to his statement made at the last sitting day in Parliament. His statement pertained to concerns regarding conflicts of interest arising from Foreign Minister Ali Sabry’s presentations at international forums in relation to the Easter Sunday terror attacks.

Kiriella said that he had been approached by the Catholic Church on Friday morning, urging him to convey to Parliament their reservations about the involvement of Foreign Minister Sabry in matters concerning the Easter Sunday investigations and at international forums relating to the subject. The Church, led by Cardinal Malcolm Ranjith, had come under criticism from government members for advocating Sabry’s removal from such affairs, Kiriella said.

During his participation in a two-day parliamentary debate on Friday, Kiriella said: “I was contacted this morning by the Church and asked to inform the House that they oppose Foreign Minister Sabry’s involvement in the Easter Sunday probe or with international forums on the matter due to his apparent conflicts of interest.” Sabry had previously appeared for Gotabaya Rajapaksa in 35 legal cases, raising concerns about his impartiality in the Easter Sunday issue. Anura Kumara Dissanayake had also pointed out Sabry’s previous role as counsel for Mohamed Ibrahim, whose sons were involved in the terror attacks.

“Soon after Channel 4 aired its documentary on Easter Sunday, former President Gotabaya Rajapaksa issued a statement of denial of any meetings with SIS intelligence Chief Suresh Sallay during the period referred to by the documentary as Sallay was in Malaysia for three years. These are stories that should have been told to children. I have a document which proves that intelligence operatives of the US and China are going all over the world using various passports. It is very usual for senior intelligence officers to have several passports. It is a common practice. Even some of the MPs in this House have more than one passport.

“Channel 4 exposure confirms what was found by the Presidential Commission of Inquiry. I call on the President to make use of the information given by Channel 4 to commence investigations. He could also commence investigations into the killing of Lasantha Wickrematunga because the Channel 4 programme provides information about that killing too.

“Sri Lanka today is in dire straits as we could not investigate the charges on human rights violations alleged to have taken place during the last phase of the war against the LTTE. Soon after the war the then UN General Secretary Ban ki-moon came to Lanka and went to meet the then President Mahinda Rajapaksa in Kandy. There the UN secretary General spoke for the need of an international probe on the allegations. Mahinda Rajapaksa said that there was no need for such an international probe and undertook to conduct an investigation.

As a result of that came the Lessons Learnt and Reconciliation Commission. The report of the LLRC came, we all including the government and the opposition even the international community accepted that report. But its recommendations were not implemented. So, there is a demand for an international probe on the matters.

Nine generals who had fled this country are now giving evidence against Sri Lanka in international forums. So, there are calls for an international probe on Easter Sunday terror attacks. This means the country is being asked to face two international probes. This situation would not be in favour of Sri Lanka especially in terms of foreign investments and aid to this country,” Kiriella said.



Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

LG Commissioners in dilemma over guidelines and Elections Act

Published

on

Executive Director of the Institute for Democratic Reforms and Electoral Studies (IRES) Manjula Gajanayake has said the Local Government Commissioners have created confusion and a severe erosion of public trust in the electoral process at local level by adhering to election laws  and administrative guidelines selectively without adopting a consistent approach.

The authority to establish local government bodies— particularly the hung ones––has been granted to the Local Government Commissioners in the nine provinces. However, this process has now sparked controversy largely due to ambiguity over how to elect council heads.

At the heart of the issue is the Local Government Elections Act, which does not specify the procedures to be followed in electing the heads of local bodies. To address this issue, the Secretary to the Ministry of Local Government and Provincial Councils has issued a 28-page set of guidelines. This guideline gained much  attention during the election of the Mayor of the Colombo Municipal Council, where opposition members claimed that the head of the council had to be elected according to the guidelines in question. However, the guidelines merely state, “Each member should be consulted, and the method of voting should be decided accordingly.”

The Opposition seemed to have ignored that there were three acceptable methods of voting––by a show of hands, through a secret ballot, or by using an electronic system, Gajanayake said. Still, the real issue lies in the application of the guidelines by the Local Government Commissioners.

For instance, the Western Province Commissioner opted for a secret ballot in the Colombo MC. In contrast, in many other councils, the voting method was determined based on the  preference of the majority of members. In Local Government Institutions in  Uva, North Central, and North Western provinces, where members called for open votes by the show of hands— the commissioners  complied.

However, inconsistency re-emerged in the first meeting of the Seethawakapura Urban Council of the Colombo District in the Western Province. Out of 25 members,14 requested an open vote. The Commissioner, however, insisted on a secret ballot. As a result, all 14 members walked out in protest, and the meeting was adjourned without electing a head.

By PRIYAN DE SILVA  ✍️

Continue Reading

News

Hotel shooting: Weligama police probe riddled with flaws, CID tells committee

Published

on

Deshabandu Tennakoon

CID Director of Investigations Ashoka Shelton Karunathilaka told the Parliamentary Inquiry Committee probing the interdicted IGP Deshabandu Tennakoon that numerous flaws had been found in the investigations carried out by the Weligama Police into a shooting incident at the W15 Hotel.

Giving evidence before the special inquiry committee, chaired by Supreme Court Justice Preethi Padman Surasena, Karunathilaka said that the Weligama Police had proceeded with their investigation riddled with flaws. “Even the locations of spent bullet casings at the crime scene were not properly marked. There was a mismatch between the empty bullet casings and the recovered ammunition. Additionally, CCTV footage from the crime scene area shows inconsistencies.These investigative shortcomings were the reason why legal action was taken against the OIC of the Weligama Police Criminal Investigation Division. Moreover, no proper investigation was carried out into the police officer who was fatally shot.”.

The committee met for the eighth day on Wednesday, when seven witnesses testified. The final witness of the day was Karunathilaka, who pointed out the deficiencies in the initial investigations by the Weligama Police.

At this point, counsel S. Weerawikrama, representing Deshabandu Tennakoon, questioned whether the warrant for Tennakoon’s arrest had been obtained under political or ministerial pressure.

Karunathilaka answered in the negative.

During the session, counsel Weerawikrama raised his voice while cross-examining the witness, prompting one of the committee’s judges to advise him to ask questions without getting agitated.The day’s proceedings concluded with the committee recording the testimonies presented by the prosecution, led by Deputy Solicitor General Dileepa Peiris.

By Kamal Bogoda

Continue Reading

News

Harshana resigns from Parliament

Published

on

Harshana

Secretary General of Parliament Kushani Rohanadeera has informed the Chairman of the Election Commission in writing that a vacancy has arisen in Parliament due to the resignation of Dr. Harshana Suriyapperuma.

Dr. Suriyapperuma, a National List Member of Parliament representing the NPP and the Deputy Minister of Finance and Economic Stabilization, submitted his letter of resignation to the Secretary General of Parliament, Kushani Rohanadeera.

According to the letter submitted by Dr Suriyapperuma, the resignation is effective from June 20, 2025.

Accordingly, the Secretary General has informed the Chairman of the Election Commission that, in terms of Section 64(5) of the Parliamentary Elections Act No. 1 of 1981, the seat held by Dr Harsha Suriyapperuma in the Tenth Parliament is now vacant.

Speculation was rife at the time of going to press that Dr. Suriyapperuma would be appointed Secretary to the Finance Ministry.

Continue Reading

Trending