Opinion
IMF lifeline and everyone’s duty

The pros and cons of seeking IMF intervention to help us out of the current crisis will take a while to subside. Meanwhile, it may do no harm to ponder how we could position ourselves to draw maximum benefits from the IMF intervention.
The IMF is neither Santa Claus, nor Beelzebub. It is more like a Headmaster, dictating what his errant wards should have done, but have not.
To try to paint a picture of wizardry, particularly as personal genius is ridiculous and will only invite foot- dragging and sabotage. Attempting to ascribe development as due to anyone’s personal genius, is tempting but clearly false. I might mention, in passing, that true leadership is when the “I” part is very seldom used, and ‘we” the commoner. A good General, they say, seldom commands “Go”, but more often. “Follow me”. Most of our Politicians observe this in the breach. Examples are not uncommon! The analogy with the separation of elephants into those who parade in the Perahera, and them that haul logs, is apt. If credit is ascribed to President Ranil Wickremesinghe (or anyone else), it is wrong and could only deepen our misery.
If one desires wide participation, all pretensions of credit to individuals, must be resolutely avoided. Otherwise all presumptions, prejudices and partisanship will surface, and diminish progress.
We are historically an Agrarian society. It has been and will continue as such into the foreseeable future. This need not deter efforts to simultaneously and sincerely, develop key industrial fronts (unlike the “Hoaxwagen Assembly” in Kuliyapitiya, or the wondrous project at Yatiyantota, to turn Plastics into Petrol). Leave these fictions aside and let us look at less “Airy-Fairy” nonsense and move on to feasible programmes based on our resources in the Agricultural sector.
Lacking the resources or technology attempts to replicate a historical Industrial revolution, may be futile. One fears that the grandiose dreams for The Port City may join a long queue of projects, suggestive of inadequate planning and poor hopes. The hasty cancellation of the “Colombo Project” is proof. All it achieved is probably a massive financial waste and soured the feelings of Japan, who has been one of our most generous donors and supporters. Do we care?
While dreamers and “planners “amuse themselves, we should aim at less bombastic, and more real possibilities. I guess that the “proper” term is “Comparative Advantage” We have considerable resources (please avoid cheating ourselves by claiming we are “The Best in the World”).
Even a cursory look would suggest that our effort should focus on three resources where borrowed money may be gainfully applied. To my mind, they would include (a) processing of Agricultural surpluses/wastes. (b) harnessing the enormous Ocean extent that our country is entitled to as its “Exclusive Economic Zone “, designated under the UN, Law of the Seas Convention. (c) Such of our mineral resources (now exported “raw”), be refined as far as possible, to add value. This would apply to Ilmenite, rutile and possibly Apatite in the future. The same would apply also for our famed gemstones and pearls, more of which could leave as finished jewellery.
Any innovations selected should keep our “Food Security” needs as a main motivator. We may well be inspired by what a Canadian farmer is supposed to have said to his British counterpart, “We eat what we can, and can what we can’t.”
A virile export sector should perhaps ideally grow out of an effort to primarily meet local needs. “Two Tier” systems are doomed to fail. In agriculture it is rare that production exactly matches demand. Any surpluses should feed processing facilities designed to receive and process any excesses.
It is said that the Portuguese were attracted by our being first place (justifiably) in the World for Cinnamon, accounting at that time, for 100% of World Trade. The colonial powers would understandably have focused on export potentials. Tea and rubber took precedence, while cheap rice could be got from Burma. This motivation needs to be re-examined and justifiable changes be made, to bring local needs to the forefront. The Covid epidemic, if it did any good, led to a reminder that self-sufficiency in basic food needs is an imperative.
The existing agricultural scene displays a historical dichotomy. This manifests as differences in financing, staffing, equipment and resource allocations. This shows most in the research and extension services. Any attempt to iron out existing differences will admittedly present difficulties, which could ignite resistance. Carefully considered modalities might even include a “rotational system”, to optimise resource use and possibly accommodate officers’ work preferences as well. Clearly, any such change will require very careful consideration, as many barriers exist.
Under existing realities, resource use is sub-optimal, and the twin evils of neglect or of duplication. are inevitable.
The value of pooling available resources was shown, when in the early seventies, the Coconut Leaf Miner, (Promecotheca Cumingi) threatened and could well have doomed our coconut industry. A collaborative effort was swiftly mounted, bringing together Entomologists from the Crop Protection services of the CRI, RRI, TRI, Department of Agriculture and the Universities who, assisted by FAO, were able to quickly bring the pest under control. The invaluable interest and intervention by Dr Colvin. R. de Silva, then Minister of Plantation Industries has to be remembered.
I will take this opportunity to illustrate how logical pursuit of simple observations could lead to implications for more purposeful utilisation of existing resources and hopefully, even provide some possible clues on how our education systems too may also be refined. The example is based on what any reasonably observant person would have noticed.
(i) Periodic climatic perturbations necessitate drought and flood relief measures, not infrequently, closely following each other. One may (flippantly) notice that we have institutes for “Disaster Management”, and not as “Prevention”, (suggestive of some element of “Planning” of such travails). “Drought relief” may often be succeeded a few weeks later by “Flood relief”
(ii) Many of our major rivers generally run brown. Why so, one may reasonably ask? Logic would suggest that there are serious deficiencies in how we manage our land and water resources.
Regarding (ii) above, suspended silt imparts the brown colour. Most buildings require very large quantities of sand. Much of this is river sand. How does this virtually limitless sand gethere? It has to be mainly from eroded soil from the uplands. The sand contents of soil are highly variable, ranging from near zero (in clays and bogs), to nearly 100% (in sand dunes and beach sands. Sand is extracted for urban construction largely from river beds
Quantities involved are massively mind-boggling. We may assume that a normal upland loamy soil would have about a 10% sand fraction Thus the thousands of tons removed (mainly from the priceless topsoil) being eroded is very serious.
It is reckoned that some 400 years of weathering of rock is required to produce 1.0 cm of topsoil. Efforts have been made to ascribe this erosion to potato, tobacco, or vegetable growers (of course, not to 100 + years of tea – much of it above the upper limits of elevation, ordained by Soil Conservation Acts).
This example indicates a need for Irrigation, Forestry, Wildlife, Environment, Agriculture and Plantation Crops, Land Use, Development and Planning (at the least), to act in concert, much more so than they now do. Clearly all this adds up to serious deficiencies in our water- management sector. Perhaps even a separate Ministry for “Water Management and Land Use” should be accorded priority, if thought useful.
As a “footnote”, my original intent was to toss some ideas for future prospects, but as this piece has exceeded expectations (and possibly strained Editorial Indulgence), this will have to await a separate piece.
Dr. Upatissa Pethiyagoda
Opinion
A reflection on discipline and perspective

Crime and Punishment are perennial, vexed, debatable matters that can aptly be applied to the current controversy on the appropriateness of corporal punishment by schoolteachers.
Much publicity has recently been generated by an alleged corporal punishment by a teacher in Royal College. In the midst of all this, we must also consider the ripple effect such public scrutiny may have on other teachers. Many might now hesitate to correct or discipline a student out of fear of being misunderstood or publicly shamed.
A possible likely outcome is that a growing number of teachers may simply choose to limit themselves to merely textbook teaching – doing only what is required of them and nothing more. But if most teachers take a step back, fearing a backlash, what happens to discipline? What happens to the values, the life lessons and the personal growth that come from being held accountable? We risk creating a system where young students grow up without boundaries, without guidance, and ultimately, without the character that true education is meant to build.
The Royal matter
Much has been said over the recent incident involving a teacher at Royal College, which has now gone viral on social media. This is now in the hands of the Child Protection Authority, and naturally, emotions are running high.
Let me start by saying categorically that I do not condone violence or abuse in any form. If a student has been harmed—physically or emotionally—there is a legal process in place, and it must take its course, fairly and justly, without bias.
However, I write not to justify wrong, but to offer some perspective—especially to those who may not know the culture and values that shaped generations of Royalists before them.
I’m not an academic, nor a brilliant thinker. What I am is someone who learned life’s greatest lessons on the playing fields of Royal. Discipline, resilience, respect—these were not just words; they were lived experiences, often taught the hard way.
During my time at Royal Primary (from 1945 to 1950), corporal punishment was the norm. We were mischievous, as young boys often are, and the cane was a regular visitor. I, like many others, was caned more times than I can count. We didn’t run home to complain. In fact, the one time I told my mother, I received two additional slaps from her! That was the thinking back then—it taught us to take responsibility for our actions.
Let me be clear: I’m not saying things must remain the same. Times have changed and so have the boundaries of what is acceptable. What I’m questioning is the way we are responding as if one or two incidents can define the entire teaching profession at Royal.
There are nearly 500 teachers at Royal College now. Most are committed educators who give their best every single day. Why must we paint them all with the same brush because of the actions of a few?
We seem to be caught between two extremes: we complain about student indiscipline—hooting, bullying, misbehaving—but then we condemn every teacher who takes a strong stand on discipline. We can’t have it both ways.
Yes, Royal too has its share of “rotten apples.” So does every great institution in the world. But let us not forget the thousands of students who have been shaped by the silent, committed service of teachers who never sought recognition or fame.
I’ve personally experienced forms of punishment that, by today’s standards, would be considered extreme. Yet, those moments, though harsh, taught me resilience. They instilled in me the values that made Royal College the respected institution it is today.
I urge you all not to excuse wrongdoing—but to look at this situation in perspective. Let justice take its course but let us not allow a single incident to overshadow the legacy of an entire institution or profession.
Let’s respond with fairness, wisdom, and above all, respect—for our students, our teachers, and the Royal values we stand for.
Lorenz Pereira by email
Opinion
Remembering Naval Officer we lost on Easter Sunday Attack 2019

WV, RWP& Bar, RSP, VSV, USP, NI (M) (Pakistan), ndc, psn, Bsc (Hons) (War Studies) (Karachi) MPhil (Madras), Former Navy Commander and Former Chief of Defense Staff, Former Chairman, Trincomalee Petroleum Terminals Ltd, Former Managing Director Ceylon Petroleum Corporation, Former High Commissioner to Pakistan
Today, is 20 April 2025 the Easter Sunday. Six years ago on Easter Sunday 2019. SLCG Ship Suraksha, a 100 meter long Offshore Patrol Vessel (OPV), was getting ready for a 14-days Patrol. Her tanks were topped up with fuel, all victuals (required for 10 officers and 100 men crew for 14 days) loaded. Both cold and cool rooms were full with fresh fish/meat and vegetables. Ship was ready to sail at 12 noon on 21st April 2019.
A young lieutenant on board, who took over his new appointment as assistant logistic Officer a few days back, was working hard. It was a new appointment, new ship, new friends and new crew, for him. He was keen to impress them with his work. A call came from home around 7AM from his mother to say they are on their way to the village Church in Kochchikade, Negombo.
He was the second son of a devoted Catholic family.
He thought of one thing. I am going miss Easter Sunday Mass. He suddenly got an idea and quickly went up to the Commanding Officer’s cabin. He gently tapped on the door.”Yes” the Commanding Officer replied. “The door is open”. His Commanding Officer was a decorated former Naval Special Forces Captain. He had served with the Sri Lanka Coast Guard on a two year tenure as Commanding Officer of OPVs. The young Lieutenant requested the Commanding Officer’s permission to go to Church. Even though the Commanding Officer was a veteran decorated Naval Officer with a career of bravery and valour, he was very understanding.
After all, his young subordinate was requesting to go to church on Easter Sunday, an important holy day for Christians. He knew his junior was a Catholic. He himself also was a devoted Catholic and had attended midnight Easter Mass. He gave permission to the young officer to go to Church and also said a few words which he regrets today. “Sugath, the closest Church to us is St Anthony’s Church Kochikade here. It was customary for many Naval personnel, whether they are Catholics or not, to light a candle in this church when they get their new seagoing appointment. We turn our ships towards church before leaving Colombo harbour to get the blessings of St Anthony. Because as you are very well aware, St Anthony is the Saint who looks after seafarers like us. So, please go Son. Take the ship’s vehicle. Come back by 11. We are sailing at 12.”
The young Lieutenant quickly changed into his best civilian clothes and went to church. He was thinking of lighting a candle, praying and returning to the ship in the same vehicle. The time was 0830. He heard the announcement that the Tamil mass starts at 0840. The Church was full of devotees. Families with their children dressed in best Sunday dresses. They were happy, chatting to each other and eagerly waiting for Mass to start. Our young Lieutenant spoke and understood Tamil very well. So, he changed his mind. His CO had told him to come back by 11. There was enough time for him to attend the Tamil Mass. He told the Navy driver to go back. He told the driver “I will attend Mass and come back to the ship. I can get a three-wheeler. It’s not that far from here to the Naval Base”.
The Tamil Mass started at 0840 sharp. The suicide bomber walked into the Church at 0845 and detonated himself.
With the deafening sound the Naval Base by the Church was activated. News started to spread after the blast inside the Church. The CO of the SLCG ship Suraksha knew his subordinate was in church. He rang on his mobile while rushing to the scene. The young lieutenant’s Mobile was ringing, but no answer. Ship’s crew look out for their officer whilst helping casualties. CO rang the mobile of his subordinate officer again. This time someone answered! A female voice! She introduced herself as a nurse in Accident Ward of General Hospital Colombo. She said in a faint voice, “Sir, he is dead!”
The CO sat on the road curb with tears in his eyes. He was a battle-hardened Naval Special Forces man. He had seen enough deaths and grief in his life, but this loss hit him hard. He kept saying “my son! Why did I allow you to go to Church.”
Lieutenant (S) Sugath Nadeeshan Silva was born in Kochikade, Negombo on 23rd November 1991, the second son in the family. He had an elder and a younger brother. He had his early education at Thoppuwa St Philip Neri Sinhala Mixed School, Kochchikade and Mari Stella College, Negombo. He proved to be a brilliant student, excelling in studies and sports.
He joined Sir John Kotelawala University as an Officer Cadet on 17th September 2012.
Sugath excelled in cricket. He earned his Bachelor’s degree in Logistics Management in 2016 from KDU and successfully completed the Sub Lieutenant Logistics course at Naval and Maritime Academy, Trincomalee. He joined SLCG ship Suraksha as his first sea appointment when his untimely demise occurred caused by a terrorist attack. He was promoted posthumously to Lieutenant Commander and buried with full military honours. May he Rest in Peace!
At the going down and in the morning, we will remember him. Please remember him in your prayers.
By Admiral Ravindra C Wijegunaratne
Opinion
Remembering Lankan squash veteran Lakdasa Cooray

Five years ago today, the Sri Lankan squash fraternity bid farewell to one of its most dedicated and influential figures — Lakdasa Cooray.
Hailing from Moratuwa, Cooray entered the national squash scene representing Sri Lanka Army Squash in the early 1980s, not long after the establishment of the Sri Lanka Squash Federation. Being a former Defence Services Champion and Masters Player and talented all-round sportsman, he possessed a natural aptitude for coaching, which soon became his lifelong passion. Remarkably, many of the top squash players in the country rose through the ranks under his expert guidance, often provided without any remuneration.
Over a career that spanned more than three decades, Cooray served as Head Coach for numerous national teams on international tours. His reputation extended beyond Sri Lanka, earning him recognition across the Asian squash community.
He also contributed significantly to the development of the sport at the grassroots level. As a member of the Executive Committee of the Sri Lanka Squash Federation, he worked tirelessly to promote squash in schools, clubs and outstation regions throughout the country.
Beyond coaching, Cooray was a respected referee, known for his fearless decision-making that often silenced even the most vocal critics, be they passionate spectators or competitive players.
His influence extended to inspiring players from the tri-services to take up coaching themselves, many of whom have proven their calibre at the highest levels of the sport.
In his later years, his active role in the squash community somewhat diminished, especially following the tragic passing of his only son, skilled squash player Kavinda Cooray. Despite his declining health, his legacy endured.
Today, the squash community in Sri Lanka remembers Lakdasa Cooray not just as a coach or official, but as a true servant of the game: a man who gave his all and asked for nothing in return. A legend, never to be forgotten.Rear Admiral Palitha Weerasinghe (Rtd)
-
Business3 days ago
DIMO pioneers major fleet expansion with Tata SIGNA Prime Movers for ILM
-
Features5 days ago
Nipping the two leaves and the bud
-
News2 days ago
Family discovers rare species thought to be extinct for over a century in home garden
-
Features5 days ago
Avurudu celebrations … galore
-
Features4 days ago
Prof. Lal Tennekoon: An illustrious but utterly unpretentious and much -loved academic
-
Foreign News2 days ago
China races robots against humans in Beijing half marathon
-
Latest News7 days ago
Trump freezes $2bn in Harvard funding after university rejects demands
-
News5 days ago
Counsel for Pilleyan alleges govt. bid to force confession