Connect with us

Features

Full implementation of 13A– Final solution to ‘national problem’ or end of unitary state? – Part IX

Published

on

by Kalyananda Tiranagama
Executive Director
Lawyers for Human Rights and Development

(Part VIII of this article appeared yesterday (09)

After Mahinda Rajapaksa became President in 2005, I sent him a letter, as the Executive Director of the Lawyers for Human Rights, narrating this experience and explaining this plight of educated jobless youth in the North and requesting him to appoint them as teachers to all the Sinhala schools in the country to teach Tamil to children, at the same time appointing Sinhala youth to all the Tamil schools to teach Sinhala to Tamil children. This would certainly have resulted in bringing about a better understanding between the Sinhala and Tamil communities. There was not even an acknowledgement of the receipt of this letter.

When Prof. G. L. Peiris was appointed Minister of Education in Gotabhaya Rajapaksa government in 2019, I again made this request. He highly appreciated the suggestion and expressed his desire in public to give effect to it. But before he could take any practical steps, his Ministry was changed.

Tamil politicians do not like Sinhala people learning Tamil or Tamil people learning Sinhala. They know that if the Sinhala and Tamil people can communicate with each other overcoming this language barrier, they cannot hoodwink the Tamil people and keep them under their domination. The demands made by Tamil Political parties are not those of the ordinary Tamil People. They are the demands of high caste elitist circles in Tamil society leading the Tamil political parties with the dream of setting up the separate state of Tamil Ealam in the North and the East of Sri Lanka and governing it. It was they who provided the leadership, remaining behind from the scene, to the Tamil youth to carry on the 30-year war, giving effect to the Vaddukkodai Resolution of 1976.

If President Wickremesinghe actually thinks that he can bring about real national unity, harmony and national reconciliation among the Sinhala and Tamil People by acceding to the demands of the Tamil political parties in the North and the East, he is only day-dreaming. When he talks of the common dream of Sampanthan and his, he knows what the dream of Sampanthan is. He is playing a political game to get the support of Tamil diaspora for his economic revival plans. With his proposals placed before the All-Party Conference in Parliament on August 8, he is only laying the groundwork to enable Sampanthan to achieve his cherished goal of setting up a federal state in the merged North -East functioning under a unitary label. He cannot be unaware of what will be the final outcome of this process. As shown by his past political decisions, it is compatible with his thinking.

As shown by the results of the Presidential elections of 2019, the thinking of Wickremesinghe and that of the Leader of the Opposition Sajith Premadasa and his Samagi Jana Balavegaya appears to be the same. (See Table)

At the 2019 presidential election, the TNA consisting of all the Tamil political parties and led by Sampanthan forwarded 13 demands to the candidates of major political parties, extending their support to the one who accepted them. From the preamble and the first demand in the list appearing below, one can get a clear idea of as to the solution these Tamil political parties are seeking for the Tamil National Question:

‘‘Having realized that the final solution to the long standing Tamil Ethnic issue, which has remained in the Island of Sri Lanka as an unresolved National Question for several decades and been the cause for the war which extended for over three decades, would be the – (1) Acceptance of the political aspirations of the Tamil Nation; (2) Recognition of the Northern and Eastern Provinces as the historical habitat and the traditional homelands of the Tamil Nation: (3) Acknowledgement of the Sovereignty of the Tamil Nation and (4) Realisation of the fact that the Tamil People under the provisions of International Law are entitled to the right of self-determination, accordingly the creation of federal rule in the merged Northern and Eastern Provinces would be our considered stand-point.

‘‘With the hope of finding a final solution to problems of Tamil People the following demands were presented to Presidential candidates of major political parties:

‘‘ A solution to the Sri Lankan Tamil issue must be found by setting up a new federal constitution, rejecting the heretofore unitary constitution, accepting the nationhood of the Sri Lankan Tamils, and recognizing its sovereignty, and accepting that Tamils under the provisions of the International Law are entitled to the right of self-determination.’’

Premadasa or his party did not make any public statement as to whether he would accept these demands or not. However, the results in the districts constituting Northern and Eastern Provinces are a clear indication that Sajith Premadasa and his party had accepted these demands.

Premadasa won all the Districts in the Northern and Eastern Provinces represented by TNA MPs with an overwhelming majority of over 72% of the total votes cast. Out of his 69 million votes, Gotabaya Rajapakss got only 277,199 votes from all the five districts. There need not be any more proof of the understanding between the SJB and the TNA on these demands.

TNA spokesman M. A. Sumanthiran, in a statement issued on 01.08. 2023, following the discussions of the Tamil Political parties with the President stated all their demands in just one sentence: ‘‘Our position is that power sharing must be in a federal structure, consistent with the aspirations of the Tamil People expressed at every election since 1956.’’

Sumanthiran has taken care not to arouse fear in the minds of Sinhala people with unnecessary details of their discussion about their demands. He has summarised all their demands made since 1956 in this short sentence.

What are the aspirations of the Tamil People expressed at every election since 1956? A. Acceptance of Tamil People in Sri Lanka as a nation distinct from that of the Sinhalese; B. Northern and Eastern Provinces of Sri Lanka are the areas of traditional, historical habitation of the Tamil speaking people;

C. Merger of the Northern and Eastern Provinces to constitute one administrative unit;

D. Full devolution of power going beyond the 13th Amendment, creating a federal rule in the merged North – East Province;

E. The Tamil Nation has an inalienable right to political autonomy/self-determination.

As Sampanthan has repeatedly said on several occasions : ‘‘ Our expectation of a solution to the ethnic problem of the sovereignty of the Tamil people is based on a political structure outside that of a unitary government, in a united Sri Lanka in which Tamil people have all the powers of government needed to live with self-respect and self-sufficiency…. We must have unrestricted authority to govern our land, protect our own people, and develop our own economy, culture and tradition…

‘‘ We are not looking to divide the country. We are only trying to share power, the country will be one united, undivided, indivisible country….

‘‘ All the powers required to ensure the unity and indivisibility of the country – defence, foreign affairs, finance and currency and immigration and emigration – would remain with the Central Government….

‘‘ We must have all the other powers. Meaningful devolution should go beyond the 13th Amendment to the Constitution passed in 1987. ’’

Though Sampanthan has not expressed openly, there is one more aspiration specifically mentioned in the 13 demands of the TNA: ‘‘The inalienable right of the Tamil people under the provisions of the International Law to self-determination.’’ That is, in other words, the Right to declare unilateral independence and create a separate state at an opportune moment with international support.

Let us see what will happen to this country if President Wickremesinghe’s proposals made at the All-Party Conference are carried out:

According to the decisions of our Supreme Court, the Provincial Councils are already exercising federal powers. However, due to the executive power exercised by the President through the Governors and the Legislative power exercised by our Parliament to decide on National Policies and enact legislation on the subjects in the National List, the Provincial Councils have not become full federal states. With the implementation of the proposals of the President, the Provincial Councils will become full Federal States exercising sovereign legislative and executive power over all the subjects within their purview.

With the merger of the Northern and Eastern Provinces into one administrative unit, the North-East Provincial Council under TNA control, with only 12.6 % of the population of the country, will get the full control of 30% of the land area of Sri Lanka and 60% of its coast line extending from Silawathura in Mannar District to Yala boundary in the Moneragala District.

(a) Trincomalee, the strategically important, the largest natural deep-water harbour in the world and three other harbours – Mannar, Kankasanthurai and Oluvil; (b) Palali International Airport and 3 other internal Airports – Trincomalee, Batticaloa and Ampara; and (c) Indo – Lanka ferry services operating from Talaimannar and Kankasanthurai – will come under its control.

The North and the East are very rich in mineral resources. One of the world’s largest and best ilmenite deposits is at Pulmuddai. Pearl Fisheries are at Mannar. Though not exploited yet, explorations have discovered the existence of large deposits of oil and natural gas in the sea around the North – East Coast. The sea around the North – East is so rich in fishery resources, even the fishing community from areas like Negombo and Gandara and Tangalle in the South go to Mulathivu – Trinco areas for off-season fishing. All these resources will come under the sole control of the North – East Provincial Council. The Centre may not able to exercise any effective control over them, without going to clash with them. The other Provincial Councils do not have such abundance of natural resources.

One main allegation made by all the Tamil political parties against successive governments is the settlement of Sinhala people in the North – East under various development schemes like Galoya Scheme and Mahaweli. Let us see what they say: ‘‘ Successive Sinhalese governments since independence have used their political power to the detriment of the Tamils by making serious inroads into the territories of the former Tamil Kingdom by a system of planned and state-aided Sinhalese colonisation.’’ – (Vaddukkodai Resolution)

‘‘Sinhala colonisation in the Northern and Eastern Provinces presently with state assistance must be stopped immediately.

‘‘Since the Mahaweli Development Authority is engaged in planned Sinhala Colonization in the Northern Province under the pretext of redirecting of the Mahaweli River to the North, the jurisdiction of the said Authority must be forthwith terminated. Also the planned Sinhala Colonization taking place in the Eastern Province under the Mahaweli Development Scheme must also be terminated.

‘‘ The Moragaskanda Irrigation Scheme recently introduced is indulging in planned Sinhala Colonisation in the Vanni Region. All such Sinhala Colonization must forthwith be terminated.’’ – (13 Point Demands of TNA to Candidates of Presidential Election, 2019)

In their view the Sinhala People have no right to set up settlements and live in the Northern and Eastern Provinces. If they can make this type of demands when they have no State Power, what would not they do, if they get State Power into their hands? If these proposals are implemented, with Police Powers and Land powers in their hand, they can create a situation in which ‘‘those Sinhalese who are still living in the North and East, including those in Ampara and Trincomalee, would necessarily leave their lands and flee to the South.”

The bulk of the uncultivated arable land with irrigation facilities in the country is situated in the Northern and Eastern Provinces. All the other provinces are more thickly populated than the Northern and Eastern Provinces. Lack of arable land suitable for human settlement is a big problem these areas are facing. All the major reservoirs built under the Mahaveli Scheme and for hydropower generation are situated in the Central, Sabaragamuwa and Uva Provinces and hilly areas in these Provinces and in Kalutara, Galle and Matara districts are highly susceptible to landslides. Whenever there are heavy rains, several times a year, the Disaster Management Centre issues urgent warnings of landslides and the people in these areas have to live in constant fear. There is a danger of large number of people in these areas being displaced due to these natural disasters.

However, the government of Sri Lanka will not be able to set up settlements for these people in any area in the North- East however much unoccupied arable land with irrigation facilities suitable for large scale human settlements available there.

As President J. R. Jayewardene said in his Address to Parliament in 1986: ‘‘If they are implemented, the TULF would have all but attained Eelam. It need hardly be said that even if the demand for a Tamil Linguistic State is granted, further problems and conflicts are bound to arise between that Tamil Linguistic State of the North and East and the Centre. Water, hydropower and the apportioning of funds are some of the areas in which conflicts could arise. A cause or pretext for a conflict on which to base a unilateral declaration of independence could easily be found. There can be little doubt that what the TULF seeks to achieve by its demands is the necessary infrastructure for a State of Eelam, after which a final putsch could be made for the creation of a State of Eelam, comprising not only of the North and East, but of at least the hill country and the NCP as well.”

According to the International Court Judgement in the case of East Timor vs Portugal, the North-East administration, with shared sovereignty, can make an application to the International Court for its recognition as a separate state where their sovereign right is denied by the Centre over a conflict. That is why the TNA and other Tamil political parties repeatedly raise the demand: ‘‘ Tamil People under the provisions of International Law are entitled to the right of self-determination.’’ As JR said they will create a conflicting situation with unreasonable demands that no sovereign state can grant, and on the pretext of that they will try to create Eelam. The implementation of President Wickremesinghe’s proposals is likely to facilitate the establishment of a separate state in the North East of Sri Lanka. They will be able to achieve with international support, what they could not achieve with 30 years of war. Former President Mahinda Rajapaksa and his Podu Jana Peramuna will have no right to brag about their achievements in the 30-year war, unless they are prepared to come forward to prevent this with effective measures. Otherwise, they will also be equally responsible for the impending disaster of destroying unity and territorial integrity of Sri Lanka. (Concluded)



Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Features

Ranking public services with AI — A roadmap to reviving institutions like SriLankan Airlines

Published

on

Efficacy measures an organisation’s capacity to achieve its mission and intended outcomes under planned or optimal conditions. It differs from efficiency, which focuses on achieving objectives with minimal resources, and effectiveness, which evaluates results in real-world conditions. Today, modern AI tools, using publicly available data, enable objective assessment of the efficacy of Sri Lanka’s government institutions.

Among key public bodies, the Supreme Court of Sri Lanka emerges as the most efficacious, outperforming the Department of Inland Revenue, Sri Lanka Customs, the Election Commission, and Parliament. In the financial and regulatory sector, the Central Bank of Sri Lanka (CBSL) ranks highest, ahead of the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Public Utilities Commission, the Telecommunications Regulatory Commission, the Insurance Regulatory Commission, and the Sri Lanka Standards Institution.

Among state-owned enterprises, the Sri Lanka Ports Authority (SLPA) leads in efficacy, followed by Bank of Ceylon and People’s Bank. Other institutions assessed included the State Pharmaceuticals Corporation, the National Water Supply and Drainage Board, the Ceylon Electricity Board, the Ceylon Petroleum Corporation, and the Sri Lanka Transport Board. At the lower end of the spectrum were Lanka Sathosa and Sri Lankan Airlines, highlighting a critical challenge for the national economy.

Sri Lankan Airlines, consistently ranked at the bottom, has long been a financial drain. Despite successive governments’ reform attempts, sustainable solutions remain elusive.

Globally, the most profitable airlines operate as highly integrated, technology-enabled ecosystems rather than as fragmented departments. Operations, finance, fleet management, route planning, engineering, marketing, and customer service are closely coordinated, sharing real-time data to maximise efficiency, safety, and profitability.

The challenge for Sri Lankan Airlines is structural. Its operations are fragmented, overly hierarchical, and poorly aligned. Simply replacing the CEO or senior leadership will not address these deep-seated weaknesses. What the airline needs is a cohesive, integrated organisational ecosystem that leverages technology for cross-functional planning and real-time decision-making.

The government must urgently consider restructuring Sri Lankan Airlines to encourage:

=Joint planning across operational divisions

=Data-driven, evidence-based decision-making

=Continuous cross-functional consultation

=Collaborative strategic decisions on route rationalisation, fleet renewal, partnerships, and cost management, rather than exclusive top-down mandates

Sustainable reform requires systemic change. Without modernised organisational structures, stronger accountability, and aligned incentives across divisions, financial recovery will remain out of reach. An integrated, performance-oriented model offers the most realistic path to operational efficiency and long-term viability.

Reforming loss-making institutions like Sri Lankan Airlines is not merely a matter of leadership change — it is a structural overhaul essential to ensuring these entities contribute productively to the national economy rather than remain perpetual burdens.

By Chula Goonasekera – Citizen Analyst

Continue Reading

Features

Why Pi Day?

Published

on

International Day of Mathematics falls tomorrow

The approximate value of Pi (π) is 3.14 in mathematics. Therefore, the day 14 March is celebrated as the Pi Day. In 2019, UNESCO proclaimed 14 March as the International Day of Mathematics.

Ancient Babylonians and Egyptians figured out that the circumference of a circle is slightly more than three times its diameter. But they could not come up with an exact value for this ratio although they knew that it is a constant. This constant was later named as π which is a letter in the Greek alphabet.

Archimedes

It was the Greek mathematician Archimedes (250 BC) who was able to find an upper bound and a lower bound for this constant. He drew a circle of diameter one unit and drew hexagons inside and outside the circle such that the sides of each hexagon touch the sides of the circle. In mathematics the circle passing through all vertices of a polygon is called a ‘circumcircle’ and the largest circle that fits inside a polygon tangent to all its sides is called an ‘incircle’. The total length of the smaller hexagon then becomes the lower bound of π and the length of the hexagon outside the circle is the upper bound. He realised that by increasing the number of sides of the polygon can make the bounds get closer to the value of Pi and increased the number of sides to 12,24,48 and 60. He argued that by increasing the number of sides will ultimately result in obtaining the original circle, thereby laying the foundation for the theory of limits. He ended up with the lower bound as 22/7 and the upper bound 223/71. He could not continue his research as his hometown Syracuse was invaded by Romans and was killed by one of the soldiers. His last words were ‘do not disturb my circles’, perhaps a reference to his continuing efforts to find the value of π to a greater accuracy.

Archimedes can be considered as the father of geometry. His contributions revolutionised geometry and his methods anticipated integral calculus. He invented the pulley and the hydraulic screw for drawing water from a well. He also discovered the law of hydrostatics. He formulated the law of levers which states that a smaller weight placed farther from a pivot can balance a much heavier weight closer to it. He famously said “Give me a lever long enough and a place to stand and I will move the earth”.

Mathematicians have found many expressions for π as a sum of infinite series that converge to its value. One such famous series is the Leibniz Series found in 1674 by the German mathematician Gottfried Leibniz, which is given below.

π = 4 ( 1 – 1/3 + 1/5 – 1/7 + 1/9 – ………….)

The Indian mathematical genius Ramanujan came up with a magnificent formula in 1910. The short form of the formula is as follows.

π = 9801/(1103 √8)

For practical applications an approximation is sufficient. Even NASA uses only the approximation 3.141592653589793 for its interplanetary navigation calculations.

It is not just an interesting and curious number. It is used for calculations in navigation, encryption, space exploration, video game development and even in medicine. As π is fundamental to spherical geometry, it is at the heart of positioning systems in GPS navigations. It also contributes significantly to cybersecurity. As it is an irrational number it is an excellent foundation for generating randomness required in encryption and securing communications. In the medical field, it helps to calculate blood flow rates and pressure differentials. In diagnostic tools such as CT scans and MRI, pi is an important component in mathematical algorithms and signal processing techniques.

This elegant, never-ending number demonstrates how mathematics transforms into practical applications that shape our world. The possibilities of what it can do are infinite as the number itself. It has become a symbol of beauty and complexity in mathematics. “It matters little who first arrives at an idea, rather what is significant is how far that idea can go.” said Sophie Germain.

Mathematics fans are intrigued by this irrational number and attempt to calculate it as far as they can. In March 2022, Emma Haruka Iwao of Japan calculated it to 100 trillion decimal places in Google Cloud. It had taken 157 days. The Guinness World Record for reciting the number from memory is held by Rajveer Meena of India for 70000 decimal places over 10 hours.

Happy Pi Day!

The author is a senior examiner of the International Baccalaureate in the UK and an educational consultant at the Overseas School of Colombo.

by R N A de Silva

Continue Reading

Features

Sheer rise of Realpolitik making the world see the brink

Published

on

A combined US-Israel attack on Iran.(BBC)

The recent humanly costly torpedoing of an Iranian naval vessel in Sri Lanka’s Exclusive Economic Zone by a US submarine has raised a number of issues of great importance to international political discourse and law that call for elucidation. It is best that enlightened commentary is brought to bear in such discussions because at present misleading and uninformed speculation on questions arising from the incident are being aired by particularly jingoistic politicians of Sri Lanka’s South which could prove deleterious.

As matters stand, there seems to be no credible evidence that the Indian state was aware of the impending torpedoing of the Iranian vessel but these acerbic-tongued politicians of Sri Lanka’s South would have the local public believe that the tragedy was triggered with India’s connivance. Likewise, India is accused of ‘embroiling’ Sri Lanka in the incident on account of seemingly having prior knowledge of it and not warning Sri Lanka about the impending disaster.

It is plain that a process is once again afoot to raise anti-India hysteria in Sri Lanka. An obligation is cast on the Sri Lankan government to ensure that incendiary speculation of the above kind is defeated and India-Sri Lanka relations are prevented from being in any way harmed. Proactive measures are needed by the Sri Lankan government and well meaning quarters to ensure that public discourse in such matters have a factual and rational basis. ‘Knowledge gaps’ could prove hazardous.

Meanwhile, there could be no doubt that Sri Lanka’s sovereignty was violated by the US because the sinking of the Iranian vessel took place in Sri Lanka’s Exclusive Economic Zone. While there is no international decrying of the incident, and this is to be regretted, Sri Lanka’s helplessness and small player status would enable the US to ‘get away with it’.

Could anything be done by the international community to hold the US to account over the act of lawlessness in question? None is the answer at present. This is because in the current ‘Global Disorder’ major powers could commit the gravest international irregularities with impunity. As the threadbare cliché declares, ‘Might is Right’….. or so it seems.

Unfortunately, the UN could only merely verbally denounce any violations of International Law by the world’s foremost powers. It cannot use countervailing force against violators of the law, for example, on account of the divided nature of the UN Security Council, whose permanent members have shown incapability of seeing eye-to-eye on grave matters relating to International Law and order over the decades.

The foregoing considerations could force the conclusion on uncritical sections that Political Realism or Realpolitik has won out in the end. A basic premise of the school of thought known as Political Realism is that power or force wielded by states and international actors determine the shape, direction and substance of international relations. This school stands in marked contrast to political idealists who essentially proclaim that moral norms and values determine the nature of local and international politics.

While, British political scientist Thomas Hobbes, for instance, was a proponent of Political Realism, political idealism has its roots in the teachings of Socrates, Plato and latterly Friedrich Hegel of Germany, to name just few such notables.

On the face of it, therefore, there is no getting way from the conclusion that coercive force is the deciding factor in international politics. If this were not so, US President Donald Trump in collaboration with Israeli Rightist Premier Benjamin Natanyahu could not have wielded the ‘big stick’, so to speak, on Iran, killed its Supreme Head of State, terrorized the Iranian public and gone ‘scot-free’. That is, currently, the US’ impunity seems to be limitless.

Moreover, the evidence is that the Western bloc is reuniting in the face of Iran’s threats to stymie the flow of oil from West Asia to the rest of the world. The recent G7 summit witnessed a coming together of the foremost powers of the global North to ensure that the West does not suffer grave negative consequences from any future blocking of western oil supplies.

Meanwhile, Israel is having a ‘free run’ of the Middle East, so to speak, picking out perceived adversarial powers, such as Lebanon, and militarily neutralizing them; once again with impunity. On the other hand, Iran has been bringing under assault, with no questions asked, Gulf states that are seen as allying with the US and Israel. West Asia is facing a compounded crisis and International Law seems to be helplessly silent.

Wittingly or unwittingly, matters at the heart of International Law and peace are being obfuscated by some pro-Trump administration commentators meanwhile. For example, retired US Navy Captain Brent Sadler has cited Article 51 of the UN Charter, which provides for the right to self or collective self-defence of UN member states in the face of armed attacks, as justifying the US sinking of the Iranian vessel (See page 2 of The Island of March 10, 2026). But the Article makes it clear that such measures could be resorted to by UN members only ‘ if an armed attack occurs’ against them and under no other circumstances. But no such thing happened in the incident in question and the US acted under a sheer threat perception.

Clearly, the US has violated the Article through its action and has once again demonstrated its tendency to arbitrarily use military might. The general drift of Sadler’s thinking is that in the face of pressing national priorities, obligations of a state under International Law could be side-stepped. This is a sure recipe for international anarchy because in such a policy environment states could pursue their national interests, irrespective of their merits, disregarding in the process their obligations towards the international community.

Moreover, Article 51 repeatedly reiterates the authority of the UN Security Council and the obligation of those states that act in self-defence to report to the Council and be guided by it. Sadler, therefore, could be said to have cited the Article very selectively, whereas, right along member states’ commitments to the UNSC are stressed.

However, it is beyond doubt that international anarchy has strengthened its grip over the world. While the US set destabilizing precedents after the crumbling of the Cold War that paved the way for the current anarchic situation, Russia further aggravated these degenerative trends through its invasion of Ukraine. Stepping back from anarchy has thus emerged as the prime challenge for the world community.

Continue Reading

Trending