Features
From building businesses in the Far East to the main board of R&C
(Excerpted from the autobiography of Lalith de Mel)
From time to time head hunters had been contacting de Mel about leading initiatives in developing markets. So he sought an appointment with the Chief Executive and asked him bluntly whether he was a potential Board candidate. He would go no further than to assure him that he was on the shortlist for the Board. The CEO sensed de Mel might leave and did not want that and so the conversation veered to what he would like to do next.
He had often argued at the Group’s strategic discussions that the Far East was an area of great potential. So he was asked whether he would like to move to the territory and make a serious effort to build a series of new businesses for Reckit and Colman in the area and was promised all the financial and human resources he required.
He decided to take on this role. He also decided that if he was not appointed to the Board after his stint in the Far East, he would move to one of the other groups which were contacting him about working for them in a regional role in the Far East. He thought it would be much more fun spending the rest of his working life in the East than in the West.
So he came home and told his wife and family that he was thinking about moving to Singapore. His wife thought Singapore was exciting (she really enjoyed her stay there). His daughter Chiara had just finished the first term of GCSE at a school which was her fourth school as they had also sent her to Colombo for a few years in the Sinhala stream at St. Bridget’s. He was worried about the disruption and decided that he would not push her and gently floated the idea. She too was up for it. The only condition his daughter imposed was that she wouldn’t move unless they took their dog, a Cavalier King Charles Spaniel called Dusty, to Singapore as well. So he took off to Singapore with his wife, daughter, Dusty and their Sri Lankan housekeeper.
Building businesses in the Far East
The two top items on the agenda were finding a house and a school. The company had a nice spacious house with a large garden, something that was very rare in central Singapore. Everybody liked the house so housing got a tick. The next item on the agenda was a school. His daughter got a place at United World College, so that too was ticked. The next was getting to school and back. Singapore was extremely safe and they didn’t have an issue with sending their daughter back and forth from school using public transport.
In the former British colonies, people spoke English. A reasonable amount of English was also spoken in Thailand. The Indonesians did not speak English. It was a very large market and it was useful in Indonesia to speak Bahasa to get around the market and ask a few meaningful questions. It was also useful for his golf since the caddies in Singapore and Malaysia spoke Bahasa. So he put that on the agenda.
The Far East was the one major gap in the Reckitt & Colman portfolio of countries. They had a big business in the USA, a good presence in Canada, businesses across Latin America and Europe and in the major markets in Africa, Australasia and South Asia.
“I had been making the case for developing the Far East regularly at the Group’s annual conference on strategy. I had said many times that this region would at some stage in the future be a huge consumer market. The individual markets would all grow at a different pace, but they would all grow. Those not familiar with the territory saw a hazier picture.
China had not opened up and may never do so. Japan was difficult. The news about Indonesia, Thailand, Taiwan, Philippines and Korea was more about political turmoil and less about big consumer markets. There were many claims on the Group’s resources, and the Far East was perceived as something that would be a long haul and years of losing money. Every year they said ‘let’s look at it again next year’.
They were also turned off as foreign investment was regulated in every country in some form or the other and the route may be joint ventures and that did not appeal. Approval was required from various authorities and there was the smell of corruption in the air in most of these countries. All this meant complexity and that did not appeal to the Group.
That was the background when I accepted the challenge. I said, ‘I will set out what I will endeavour to do’ and wanted approval in principle. I added that I wanted to be left in peace to get on with it without a host of corporate planning and finance staff visiting, nit-picking and debating the viability of my plans.
I said I would set up an operating entity with own or joint manufacturing facilities in Singapore, Malaysia, Thailand, Philippines, Taiwan, Indonesia, China, a marketing entity in Hong Kong and Joint Ventures in Japan. The target for completion was three years. I said this would provide the basic infrastructure that would enable the Group to progressively build its business in the region in the future. I added that if we did not put these starting blocks in place, we would never be able to benefit from the growth in the region.
Chief Executive, John St. Lawrence knew that if I did not get a clear yes, without a variety of conditions and reviews before each tranche of funding, I would walk away.
I got approval without any conditions and was up and running straightaway. I had already built a factory and had an office in Singapore and used this as the support base for the new businesses. At the end of three years I delivered. I did everything that I said I would do.
During this time I never visited the UK. I did not step into the corporate office for three years and I did not attend any of the annual conferences. I blocked all efforts by corporate planning and finance staff to visit the region to ask their usual probing questions to justify their roles. If they wrote, it went into the bin. But I religiously reported every month on progress to my Group Director, who fortunately had the good sense to leave me severely alone.
The only visitors I permitted were the Chairman and the Main Board Executive Directors.”
To summarize, de Mel established a company and business in Singapore with good manufacturing facilities, a company and business in Malaysia with manufacturing facilities, Joint Venture in Thailand with the Thai partner having manufacturing facilities, a new Joint Venture with a factory in Indonesia, a Joint Venture with an old trading firm in the Philippines which had manufacturing facilities, a new company with manufacturing facilities in Taiwan, a Joint Venture with the Chinese Government authorities, two manufacturing Joint Ventures in Japan, one in food and one in consumer products, and a new company in Hong Kong that was the resource base for developing China.
He had visits from the Main Board Directors. Some of them may even have had doubts that he had created so many businesses so quickly and wanted to see for themselves whether it was just a name board on the wall or whether there were actual manufacturing facilities, staff, products in retail outlets and a distributing network. They all went on trade visits and saw Reckitt & Colman products on the shelf, including the newly-launched Dettol plaster, soap and shower products, which have now grown to be mega products. The Chairman, Sir Michael Colman, had also visited and been impressed with what had been achieved in a short time.
From this model of developing a region in a rush, the key learning was to have top quality local management staff and de Mel put a lot of time and effort into making sure that he managed to get the appropriate staff. He never used any expats in the countries (except for a small corporate team of one Pakistani and one Indian in his corporate office in Singapore).
After two- and- a-half-years, when most of it was done, Corporate Headquarters insisted that he should do the Advanced Management Program at Harvard Business School and so it was off to the USA and Harvard. Multinationals put emphasis on evaluating and training their senior employees and one of the places considered best for this was the Harvard Business School and its acclaimed Advanced Management Program (AMP) for professionals higher up in the organization.
AMP was an uninterrupted and highly-condensed MBA for top business executives who could not spend a year away from the business. So the program had what they would usually do in a year condensed into four hectic months. Therefore he spent four months in Harvard away from his duties in Singapore doing exactly that.
It expected full commitment, especially because the program was to enhance not only the leadership capacity of the participants but also that of the organizations they worked for. It was for potential business leaders who were one or two levels away from the position of CEO and identified by the employer as persons vital to the company’s future business plan.
The program enabled the participants to meet and learn under recognized thought leaders, skilled educators, ground-breaking researchers, active corporate board members and award-winning authors. The majority of those who joined the program came from companies with an annual revenue in excess of $250 million and should have had at least 20 to 25 years of work experience including substantial time as a senior executive. Thus, a participant would be studying together with an elite group of business leaders groomed to graduate to the next level of the corporate ladder.
As a highly-integrated and fully-immersive program, its intention was to bring out analytical skills and cross-functional perspectives in a short period of time. Therefore AMP would ensure development in management skills, strategic insights, innovative thinking and initiating change as they were key qualities expected by the employer to drive their businesses. AMP was restructured to fit the current economic landscape so that the skills acquired could be applied in the participants work environment at the current point of time.
The ultimate perk of having completed the AMP is that one becomes a lifelong member in the Harvard Business School alumni and has exclusive access to its growing global network as well as resources and tools to keep learning. Though it was a stressful program that required a lot of hard work, Lalith enjoyed the course and successfully completed it.
At last an Asian director, appointed to the R&C main board at age 53 53
“My aspiration as a Regional Director was eventually to get on the Main Board of Reckitt & Colman PLC, which was a major top 100 company in the UK. I knew this was not going to be easy to achieve because it was an old traditional British company and a major top 100 public company in the UK. The Chairman at the time was Sir Michael Colman, a baronet. During my time at Corporate Headquarters, the Main Board Directors were all British with one exception, an Australian. I was the first non-British person to be a Regional Director. I had come through that glass ceiling and I wondered whether I could go through the next and get on to the Main Board.
The Main Board was composed of the Chairman, Chief Executive, six Group Directors and four Non-Executive Independent Directors. The challenge was to become one of the six Executive Directors. An opening came about only when one of the Main Board Members reached retiring age or was removed. At the time de Mel returned from Harvard, the Chief Executive and one other Director were due to retire and two slots were available.
A team of two Non-Executive Directors were given the task of selecting the next CEO. The favourite for the role was the most senior Director. I knew him well; he was a Regional Director occupying the next office when I came to London and we were good friends. We also played cricket together for the R&C London team. Early in his career he had been appointed to the Main Board and was the longest on the Board, so I felt that if my friend Peter Maydon was appointed, perhaps I would have a chance of getting on the Board. The final recommendation of the Non-Executive Director selection team was a surprise; they recommended a very young man, Vernon Sankey, who was the youngest on the Board. The full Board, after considering it, decided to appoint him.
The top team in the company comprised the Group Directors, the Regional Directors and Heads of the major businesses. We all attended various residential conferences from time to time so knew each other well as we ate together and had a few drinks at the bar together in the evenings. When I heard that Vernon Sankey was appointed I was surprised, but I did not feel uncomfortable because I knew Vernon quite well.
The appointment of an executive director of a major public company was an important task. After internal discussions, the chairman would make a recommendation to the full board which would make the final decision. The head of human resources had a large role to play as he was responsible for managing management succession for all the key jobs and he had a short list for all the jobs and had all the career information about potential candidates.
The retiring chief executive would also participate as the prospective candidates had all worked for him. The incoming chief executive would have a big say because the new board would be his team. An agreed decision would be recommended by the chairman to the full board.
On the day that the Board announced the appointment of Vernon Sankey, I was in Singapore. I remember the day well. Late in the evening, I had a call from Vernon in London and he said he would like me to join the Board as a member of his team. At last, the objective of getting on the board of this UK top 100 company was finally achieved. When 1 was appointed I got a flood of letters of congratulation.
Those who did, and would report to me, probably felt it was prudent to congratulate the new boss. What I found gratifying was to receive many letters from former colleagues. I have quoted below from three interesting letters.
Ted Wright when he was Group Director of the Overseas Group invited me to work in London as a Regional Director. This is what he said:
What a cheering announcement we found when we got back from a trip to France this week! I was truly delighted with the news of your appointment to the Board with responsibility for the whole Pacific Rim (West).
I well remember the day when I decided that your abilities were never likely to be adequately exploited if stayed in your native Sri Lanka and it’s immensely satisfying to see one’s predictions proved correct. You have mastered every challenge thrown at you and, I know will do the same with the new ones… With all good wishes for a most successful future,
Yours,
Ted
A letter from Stan Ward who was the Head of HR. He had retired by the time I went to Singapore. I was delighted to learn that far back when Stan was Head of HR, I was in the frame for a Board appointment.
I cannot say how delighted I was to hear the news of your appointment. Heartiest congratulations and best wishes for your future success.
Forgive me if I’m indiscreet, but it was always an ambition of mine that You would get on the Board, so I’m doubly pleased that one of my favourite ‘old boys’ has made it… Again, every good wish and warmest congratulations and regards,
Stan
A letter from Peter Knee, the last Group Director I reported to before being appointed to the Board:
“…you have worked hard and successfully for the promotion and also waited overlong for it. May the fact that it has now occurred be seen by you as a well-deserved recognition of your talent and achievements, and by the R&C world at large as both and more. And here I am thinking particularly of encouragement it will bring to all those in many countries who may have wondered whether R&C would cease to be a British international company and start to become a truly described multinational one. It has!”
The euphoria of the appointment and the congratulations received soon evaporated and became a memory of the past. It was overtaken by the challenge to prove beyond any doubt that those who appointed me had made a correct decision. I was aware that there would be some who were unhappy with the decision, particularly those who saw themselves as candidates for the Board. If my performance had bumped along and if I had difficult issues with senior managers, they would have gleefully pointed out publicly that I was not up to it.
This was not a job for life. If you did not perform, you had to go and take early retirement! That was the polite way to say that one was fired. During my tenure two Main Board Directors and one Chief Executive took early retirement.
Returning to the UK
We had kept our home and so we had no problems on that score. Our worry was Chiara, our daughter’s education. Fortunately she had a good track record with eight As at GCSE in Singapore. She got a place at the very elitist boys’ school Westminster that had just started taking in girls for Advanced Levels. We were always concerned about whether the many changes in schools due to my movements would affect her studies. Fortunately they did not. She got three As in her A/Level exam and the Certificate of Excellence for Economics given for the best two papers in Economics. Much to our disappointment she would not go to Cambridge after being offered a place at my old college after a gap year and instead went to Warwick University, which had a good reputation for Economics. She did well as usual and got a first class in her BSc Economics.
Features
Amid Winds and Waves: Sri Lanka and the Indian Ocean – references Prof. Gamini Keerawella
The following are the references for the four-part article, Amid Winds and Waves: Sri Lanka and the Indian Ocean byProf. Gamini Keerawella, published in The Island on 10, 11, 12 and 13 Nov.
Acharya, Amitav. 2014. The End of American World Order. Cambridge: Polity Press
Amrith, Sunil S. 2013. Crossing the Bay of Bengal: The Furies of Nature and the Fortunes of Migrants. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Baldwin, David A. 2016. Power and International Relations: A Conceptual Approach. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Brewster, David. 2014. India’s Ocean: The Story of India’s Bid for Regional Leadership. London: Routledge.
Blanchard, Jean-Marc F., and Colin Flint. 2017. “The Geopolitics of China’s Maritime Silk Road Initiative.” Geopolitics 22 (2): 223–245.
Bose, Sugata. 2006. A Hundred Horizons: The Indian Ocean in the Age of Global Empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Browning, Christopher S. 2006. “Small, Smart and Salient? Rethinking Identity in the Small States Literature.” Cambridge Review of International Affairs 19 (4): 669–684. https://doi.org/10.1080/09557570601003536
Buzan, Barry, and Ole Wæver. 2003. Regions and Powers: The Structure of International Security. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Campbell, Kurt M., and Iain H. Houlden, eds. 1989. The Indian Ocean: Regional and Strategic Studies. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Chacko, Priya. 2021. “Sri Lanka and the Indian Ocean: Geopolitical Crosscurrents.” Third World Quarterly 42 (8): 1647–1665.
Chaturvedi, Sanjay, and Michal Okano-Heijmans, eds. 2019. Connectivity and the Indo-Pacific: Concepts, Challenges, and Prospects. Singapore: Springer.
Chaudhuri, K. N. 1985. Trade and Civilisation in the Indian Ocean: An Economic History from the Rise of Islam to 1750. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Crawford, Neta C. 2000. Rethinking International Relations. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Cordner, Lee. 2010. “Rethinking Maritime Security in the Indian Ocean Region.” Journal of the Indian Ocean Region 6 (1): 67–85
Das Gupta, Ashin, and M. N. Pearson, eds. 1987. India and the Indian Ocean, 1500–1800. Calcutta: Oxford University Press.
de Silva, Colvin R. 1953. Ceylon under the British Occupation : 1795-1833. Colombo: Ceylon Apothecaries
Finnemore, Martha, and Kathryn Sikkink. 1998. “International Norm Dynamics and Political Change.” International Organization 52 (4): 887–917.
Gunasekara, T. 2021. Maritime Diplomacy and Small State Strategy: Sri Lanka in the Indian Ocean. South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies 44(2): 275–292.
Hey, Jeanne A. K., ed. 2003. Small States in World Politics: Explaining Foreign Policy Behavior. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
Holmes, James R., and Toshi Yoshihara. 2008. Chinese Naval Strategy in the 21st Century: The Turn to Mahan. London: Routledge.
Hourani, George F. 1995. Arab Seafaring in the Indian Ocean in Ancient and Early Medieval Times. Rev. ed. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Ingebritsen, Christine. 2006. Small States in International Relations. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
Kaplan, Robert D. 2010. Monsoon: The Indian Ocean and the Future of American Power. New York: Random House.
Keerawella, Gamini. 2024. India’s Naval Strategic ascent ane the Evolving Natal Security Dynamics of the Indian Ocean-BCIS Research Monograph Series 2024/1. Colombo: Bandaranaike Centre for International Studies.
Kuik, Cheng-Chwee. 2008. “The Essence of Hedging: Malaysia and Singapore’s Response to a Rising China.” Contemporary Southeast Asia 30 (2): 159–185. https://doi.org/10.1355/cs30-2a.
Li, Mingjiang. 2018. China’s Maritime Silk Road Initiative, Africa, and the Middle East. Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan.
Mahan, Alfred Thayer. 1890. The Influence of Sea Power upon History, 1660–1783. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.
Marx, Karl. 1952. The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte. New York: International Publishers.
Medcalf, Rory. 2020. Indo-Pacific Empire: China, America and the Contest for the World’s Pivotal Region. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Mignolo, Walter D. 2011. The Darker Side of Western Modernity: Global Futures, Decolonial Options. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Pearson, M. N. 2003. The Indian Ocean. London: Routledge.
Rothstein, Robert L. 1968. Alliances and Small Powers. New York: Columbia University Press.
Schweller, Randall L. 1994. “Bandwagoning for Profit: Bringing the Revisionist State Back In.” International Security 19 (1): 72–107. https://doi.org/10.2307/2539149.
Strange, Susan. 1988. States and Markets. London: Pinter.
Thorhallsson, Baldur, and Robert Steinmetz, eds. 2017. Small States and Shelter Theory: Iceland’s External Affairs. London: Routledge.
Till, Geoffrey. 2013. Seapower: A Guide for the Twenty-First Century. 3rd ed. London: Routledge.
Walt, Stephen M. 1987. The Origins of Alliances. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Wilson, Ernest J. 2015. Hard Power, Soft Power, Smart Power. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
(Author is a former professor of Modern History at the University of Peradeniya. He could be contacted through Keerawellag@gmail.com)
Features
Vision of Dr. Gamani Corea and the South’s present development policy options
The ‘takes’ were numerous for the perceptive sections of the public from the Dr. Gamani Corea 100th birth anniversary oration delivered at ‘The Lighthouse’ auditorium, Colombo, by Dr. Carlos Maria Correa, Executive Director of the South Centre in Geneva on November 4th. The fact that Dr. Gamani Corea was instrumental in the establishment of the South Centre decades back enhanced the value of the presentation. The event was organized by the Gamani Corea Foundation.
The presentation proved to be both wide-ranging and lucid. The audience was left in no doubt as to what Dr. Gamani Corea (Dr. GC) bequeathed to the global South by way of developmental policy and thinking besides being enlightened on the historic, institutional foundations he laid for the furtherance of Southern economic and material wellbeing.
For instance, in its essential core Dr. GC’s vision for the South was given as follows: sustainable and equitable growth, a preference for trade over aid, basic structural reform of global economy, enhancement of the collective influence of developing countries in international affairs.
Given the political and economic order at the time, that is the sixties of the last century, these principles were of path-breaking importance. For example, the Cold War was at its height and the economic disempowerment of the developing countries was a major issue of debate in the South. The latter had no ‘say’ in charting their economic future, which task devolved on mainly the West and its prime financial institutions.
Against this backdrop, the vision and principles of Dr. G.C. had the potential of being ‘game changers’ for the developing world. The leadership provided by him to UNCTAD as its long-serving Secretary General and to the Group of 77, now Plus China, proved crucial in, for instance, mitigating some economic inequities which were borne by the South. The Integrated Program for Commodities, which Dr. G.C. helped in putting into place continues to serve some of the best interests of the developing countries.
It was the responsibility of succeeding generations to build on this historic basis for economic betterment which Dr. G.C. helped greatly to establish. Needless to say, all has not gone well for the South since the heyday of Dr. G.C. and it is to the degree to which the South re-organizes itself and works for its betterment as a cohesive and united pressure group that could help the hemisphere in its present ordeals in the international economy. It could begin by rejuvenating the Non-aligned Movement (NAM), for instance.
The coming into being of visionary leaders in the South, will prove integral to the economic and material betterment of the South in the present world order or more accurately, disorder. Complex factors go into the making of leaders of note but generally it is those countries which count as economic heavyweights that could also think beyond self-interest that could feature in filling this vacuum.
A ‘take’ from the Dr. GC memorial oration that needs to be dwelt on at length by the South was the speaker’s disclosure that 46 percent of current global GDP is contributed by the South. Besides, most of world trade takes place among Southern countries. It is also the heyday of multi-polarity and bipolarity is no longer a defining feature of the international political and economic order.
In other words, the global South is now well placed to work towards the realization of some of Dr. GC’s visionary principles. As to whether these aims could be achieved will depend considerably on whether the South could re-organize itself, come together and work selflessly towards the collective wellbeing of the hemisphere.
From this viewpoint the emergence of BRICS could be seen as holding out some possibilities for collective Southern economic betterment but the grouping would need to thrust aside petty intra-group power rivalries, shun narrow national interests, place premium value on collective wellbeing and work towards the development of its least members.
The world is yet to see the latter transpiring and much will depend on the quality of leadership formations such as BRICS could provide. In the latter respect Dr. GC’s intellectual leadership continues to matter. Measuring-up to his leadership standards is a challenge for BRICS and other Southern groupings if at all they visualize a time of relative collective progress for the hemisphere.
However, the mentioned groupings would need to respect the principle of sovereign equality in any future efforts at changing the current world order in favour of all their member countries. Ideally, authoritarian control of such groupings by the more powerful members in their fold would need to be avoided. In fact, progress would need to be predicated on democratic equality.
Future Southern collectivities intent on bettering their lot would also need to bring into sharp focus development in contrast to mere growth. This was also a concern of Dr. G.C. Growth would be welcome, if it also provides sufficiently for economic equity. That is, economic plans would come to nought if a country’s resources are not equally distributed among its people.
The seasoned commentator is bound to realize that this will require a degree of national planning. Likewise, the realization ought to have dawned on Southern governments over the decades that unregulated market forces cannot meet this vital requirement in national development.
Thus, the oration by Dr. Carlos Maria Correa had the effect of provoking his audience into thinking at some considerable length on development issues. Currently, the latter are not in vogue among the majority of decision and policy makers of the South but they will need ‘revisiting’ if the best of Dr. GC’s development thinking is to be made use of.
What makes Dr. GC’s thinking doubly vital are the current trade issues the majority of Southern countries are beginning to face in the wake of the restrictive trade practices inspired by the US. Dr. GC was an advocate of international cooperation and it is to the degree to which intra-South economic cooperation takes hold that the South could face the present economic challenges successfully by itself as a collectivity. An urgent coming together of Southern countries could no longer be postponed.
Features
Attitude development: Key to national progress
In a developing country like Sri Lanka, one of the main challenges, is developing attitudes and social values of its citizens. Attitudes are the behaviours and beliefs that shape an individual’s or society’s actions. These attitudes have a significant impact on personal and societal development. Therefore, developing the right attitudes is crucial for the progress of a nation.
Why is Attitude Development Important?
Attitude development has a profound impact on various aspects of society. For instance, promoting efficiency, creativity, and innovation can accelerate economic growth. When citizens have a positive attitude towards work and entrepreneurship, they are more likely to contribute to the country’s economic development. Similarly, preserving and promoting social and cultural values can strengthen social harmony and cohesion. A society with a positive attitude towards diversity and inclusivity is more likely to be peaceful and prosperous.
Role of Education in Attitude Development
Education is a key factor in shaping attitudes. A well-educated population is more likely to have a positive attitude towards life, work, and society. Education helps individuals develop critical thinking skills, which enable them to make informed decisions and solve problems effectively. Moreover, education can promote values such as tolerance, empathy, and respect for others, which are essential for building a harmonious society.
Impact of Media on Attitude Development
The media plays a significant role in shaping attitudes. With the advent of social media, people are exposed to a vast amount of information, which can influence their attitudes and behaviours. The media can promote positive attitudes and values, such as kindness, compassion, and social responsibility. However, it can also perpetuate negative attitudes and stereotypes, which can be detrimental to society.
Role of Community Participation in Attitude Development
Community participation is essential for attitude development. When individuals participate in community service and volunteer work, they develop a sense of social responsibility and empathy towards others. Community participation can also promote values such as teamwork, leadership, and communication skills. Moreover, it can help build stronger, more cohesive communities.
Importance of Leadership in Attitude Development
Leadership plays a crucial role in shaping attitudes. Leaders can inspire and motivate individuals to adopt positive attitudes and behaviours. They can promote values such as integrity, accountability, and transparency, which are essential for building trust and confidence in institutions. Moreover, leaders can create a positive work culture that encourages innovation, creativity, and productivity.
Role of Parents and Teachers in Attitude Development
Parents and teachers play a vital role in shaping the attitudes of children. Children learn by observing and imitating adults, so it’s essential for parents and teachers to model positive attitudes and behaviours. They can promote values such as respect, kindness, and responsibility, which are essential for building a positive and productive society.
Benefits of Positive Attitudes
Positive attitudes have numerous benefits for individuals and society. They can improve mental and physical health, increase productivity, and enhance overall well-being. Positive attitudes can also promote better relationships, improve communication skills, and increase resilience. Moreover, they can inspire individuals to achieve their goals and pursue their passions.
Challenges of Developing Positive Attitudes
Developing positive attitudes can be challenging, especially in the face of adversity. It requires effort, commitment, and perseverance. Moreover, individuals may face resistance from others who are not supportive of change. However, with the right mindset and support, individuals can overcome these challenges and develop positive attitudes that benefit themselves and society.
Role of Technology in Attitude Development
Technology can play a significant role in attitude development. Online platforms and social media can provide access to information, resources, and support that can help individuals develop positive attitudes. Technology can also facilitate communication, collaboration, and networking, which are essential for building positive relationships and communities.
Future of Attitude Development
The future of attitude development is promising. With the increasing awareness of the importance of mental health, well-being, and social responsibility, more people are recognising the need to develop positive attitudes. Moreover, technological advancements and innovations can provide new opportunities for attitude development and social impact.
The attitude development is crucial for the progress of a nation. It requires a collective effort from individuals, institutions, and leaders to promote positive attitudes and values. By working together, we can build a society that is more harmonious, productive, and prosperous. By developing positive attitudes, we can overcome challenges, achieve our goals, and create a brighter future for ourselves and future generations.
Recommendations
To promote attitude development in Sri Lanka, we recommend the following:
* Integrate attitude development programmes in schools and universities
* Provide training and resources for parents and teachers to promote positive attitudes in children
* Encourage community participation and volunteer work
* Promote positive attitudes and values through media and social media
* Recognise and reward individuals and organisations that demonstrate positive attitudes and behaviours
By implementing these recommendations, we can create a society that values and promotes positive attitudes and behaviours. This will enable us to build a brighter future for ourselves and future generations.
By Jayantha K. Pathirana (M.A)
(Former Principal of Katuwana National School)
-
Features6 days agoRolls – Royce in Ceylon
-
News6 days agoTeachers threaten strike against education reforms and ‘bid to shut down more than 1,500 schools’
-
Features2 days agoFavourites for the title of Miss Universe 2025
-
News6 days agoSri Lanka: Fewer births, rapid ageing mark a new demographic era
-
Business5 days agoRajaputhra Foundation, Nawaloka Hospitals partner for free breast cancer awareness and screening
-
News4 days agoJSC removes 20 officials including judges
-
Opinion6 days agoA Royal tribute to a true Royalist — Lorenz Pereira
-
Editorial6 days agoEstablishing courts, closing schools


