Connect with us

News

Former Lankan Foreign Secretary advocates for non-alignment

Published

on

(L-R) Dr. Wijewardena, Prof. Herath, Paranavithana and Nilanthan Niruthan (pic courtesy Nexus Research)

Ex-CBSL Deputy Governor backs AKD’s ETCA move 

By Shamindra Ferdinando

Executive Director of Lakshman Kadirgamar Institute (LKI) Ambassador Ravinatha Aryasinha strongly asserted that Sri Lanka shouldn’t under any circumstances align with the US, China or India.

Aryasinha, who had served as Foreign Secretary during the presidencies of Maithripala Sirisena and Gotabaya Rajapaksa underscored the need not to antagonize any country.

Briefly referring to Sri Lanka’s relations with India and China, the one-time Ambassador in Washington, as well as top envoy in Geneva, emphasized that Sri Lanka couldn’t choose between China and India. “I wouldn’t want to make that choice. I think we need to respect each for their contribution to us,” Ambassador Aryasinha said, warning of far reaching consequences of being aligned with one country.

The LKI chief said so at the conclusion of a discussion on Indo-Lanka relations organized by Nexus Research, backed by One-text Initiative, at the 80 Club recently.

The opening remarks were made by Nexus Chairman, Prof. Charitha Herath, and the two-hour discussion was moderated by Nexus Director, Karunarathna Paranawithana, both former lawmakers.

Ambassador Aryasinha explained his position after former Deputy Governor, CBSL Dr. W.A. Wijewardena, and Executive Director of the Centre for Law and Security, Studies Nilanthan Niruthan, declared their support for alignment with Narendra Modi’s India.

Dr. Wijewardena didn’t mince his words when he declared that Sri Lanka should jump on the bandwagon. Commending President Anura Kumara Dissanayake for resuming talks on the Economic and Technology Cooperation Agreement (ETCA) with New Delhi, the senior economist declared that we couldn’t do without India.

Having briefly dealt with the Indo-Sri Lanka Free Trade Agreement of 1998, talks on Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement (CEPA) that had been undertaken during Ranil Wickremesinghe premiership but never materialized, and resumption of talks with India on CEPA, with it been rebranded ETCA, Dr. Wijewardena alleged the UNP leader didn’t have the strength to go ahead with it.

Ravinatha

The former CBSL Deputy Governor emphasized that India was so far ahead and further expanding rapidly Sri Lanka should align with them without delay.

Niruthan censured Sri Lanka’s approach towards foreign relations with the focus on what he described as the pathetic failure on the part of successive governments to think and act strategically. Alleging that Sri Lanka pursued policy without really understanding what he called the larger picture.

In support of his argument that Sri Lanka should align with India, Niruthan mentioned Israel as well as Japan and South Korea immensely. Declaring that non-alignment is irrelevant today, Niruthan, throughout his thought-provoking presentation, emphasized the need to go with what he called a strategic swing state.

 Attorney-at-Law Shiral Lakthilaka questioned why Sri Lanka, too, couldn’t be a strategic swing state like India. Niruthan explained as to why bankrupt Sri Lanka couldn’t achieve that status.

The Island

sought Niruthan’s opinion on major discrepancy in the joint communique issued following President Dissanayake’s meeting with Premier Modi and the latter’s statement at the joint press conference in respect of the proposed Security Cooperation Agreement (SCA).

While the joint communique proposed that the two governments examine the possibility of concluding a comprehensive framework agreement on defence cooperation, Premier Modi declared that they decided to quickly finalize the proposed SCA. Niruthan opinionated that we should go by the joint communique.

The gathering was also reminded that India couldn’t absolve itself of the responsibility for carrying out a terrorist campaign here in the ’80s.

Commenting on the joint communique issued by China and Sri Lanka following talks between President Jinping and President Dissanayake, Niruthan compared Sri Lanka’s position in 2023 and 2025 in respect to Taiwan. Having previously accepted the One-China policy, the new government had gone a step further by declaring support for all efforts by China to achieve national reunification and opposed Taiwan seeking independence in any form.

In terms of the China-Sri Lanka joint communique, Sri Lanka would have to back Chinese invasion of Taiwan. Declaring that the China-Taiwan conflict is one of the three major issues that dominated the world today, Northam stressed that Sri Lanka, according to the joint communique, had taken a clear stand on the issue involving China.

The two other major issues were the Russia-Ukraine conflict and the Israel war on Gaza, Niruthan said, pointing out Sri Lanka strongly backed Palestine. Therefore, Sri Lanka had taken a clear stand on two of the three major issues and Sri Lanka was on the China-Russia alliance side.

Appreciating growing Indian power at global level, Niruthan explained the strategic swinging state India simultaneously be part of BRICS as well as Quad. According to Niruthan, Sri Lanka’s alignment with India wouldn’t endanger us in the global arena whereas alignment with either the US or China would place us firmly in a block.

Among those who expressed views on Indo-Lanka relations and way forward were Prof. Rohan Samarajeewa, former Minister Dr. Ramesh Pathirana, and ex-State Minister Eran Wickremaratne. Former lawmaker Mrs. Ferial Ashraff was also present.

Niruthan dealt with growing external Indian military action and interventions/rescue operations under Premier Modi’s leadership. During Modi’s rule more operations were carried out, much more than all past governments had done. Although Niruthan gave specific examples of such actions, there was no reference to Indian intervention in Sri Lanka and the Maldives where Indian-trained Sri Lankan terrorists made an abortive attempt to assassinate President Maumoon Abdul Gayoom in Nov, 1988.

Niruthan also discussed the Indian nuclear capabilities while comparing them with other world powers, including members of the Security Council. Special mention was made of the Indian nuclear triad (capability to strike back in spite of being attacked with nuclear weapons. Unlike the UK, India could act on its own in case of a nuclear situation, Niruthan declared, while underscoring how Sri Lanka could benefit immensely from a permanent partnership with India.

Ambassador Aryasinha stressed the pivotal importance of Chinese support during Sri Lanka’s war against the LTTE that was brought to a successful conclusion while Dr. Wijewardena pointed out problems experienced when procuring armaments from China, particularly due to payment issues.

China and Pakistan steadfastly backed Sri Lanka’s war against separatist terrorism.



Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Coal scandal: Govt. urged to release lab report

Published

on

Pubudu Jagoda

The government is under mounting pressure to release a foreign laboratory report on the controversial coal consignment imported for the Lakvijaya Power Plant, with the Frontline Socialist Party (FSP) accusing the authorities of political interference and tender manipulation.

Speaking to the media after a party meeting in Homagama yesterday, FSP Education Secretary Pubudu Jagoda demanded an immediate explanation for the delay in disclosing the report from a Dutch laboratory, Cotecna, which was commissioned to test samples of the coal stocks in question after doubts were raised about an earlier local laboratory assessment. Jagoda said Cabinet media spokesperson Dr. Nalinda Jayatissa had announced that the report would be submitted by 16 January, but it had yet to be made public.

“The Sri Lankan lab confirmed the coal was substandard and could damage both the environment and power plant machinery. The foreign lab has independently verified the same results, we are told. Yet, political pressure appears to be delaying the release of the report.” He warned that any attempt to issue a false report would eventually be exposed and urged the government and the laboratory to maintain transparency.

SLPP MP D.V. Chanaka told Parliament last week that while 107 metric tonnes of coal were normally required per hour to generate 300 megawatts, but as many as 120 tonnes of newly imported coal were needed to produce the same amount of power due to its lower calorific value. Tests showed the first two shipments had calorific values of 5,600–5,800 kcal/kg, below the required minimum of 5,900 kcal/kg, said.

Jagoda accused the government of tailoring procurement rules to benefit an Indian supplier, citing a drastic reduction in reserve requirements—from one million metric tonnes in 2021 to just 100,000 tonnes in 2025—and alleged previous irregularities by the company, including a 2016 Auditor General finding regarding a rice supply contract and the 2019 suspension of a key agent of the company by the International Cricket Council over match-fixing.

He further criticised systemic manipulation of the coal tender process, including delays in issuing the tender from the usual February-March window to July, and progressively shortening the submission period from six weeks to three, giving an advantage to suppliers with stock on hand.

The Ministry of Energy recently issued an amended tender for 4.5 million metric tonnes of coal for the 2025/26 and 2026/27 periods, following the cancellation of an earlier tender. Jagoda warned that procurement delays and irregularities could trigger coal shortages, higher spot-market purchases, increased electricity costs, and potential power cuts if hydropower falls short.

Jagoda called for urgent investigations into the procurement process, insisting that any mismanagement or corruption should not be passed on to the public.Denying any wrongdoing, the government has said it is waiting for the lab report.

by Saman Indrajith ✍️

Continue Reading

News

Greenland dispute has compelled Europe to acknowledge US terrorising world with tariffs – CPSL

Published

on

Dr Weerasinghe

The Communist Party of Sri Lanka yesterday (18) alleged that the US was terrorising countries with unfair tariffs to compel them to align with its bigot policies.

CPSL General Secretary Dr. G. Weerasinghe said so responding to The Island query regarding European countries being threatened with fresh tariffs over their opposition to proposed US take-over of autonomous Danish territory Greenland.

US President Donald Trump has declared a 10% tariff on goods from Denmark, Norway, Sweden, France, Germany, the UK, the Netherlands and Finland with effect from 1 February but could later rise to 25% – and would last until a deal was reached. Targeted countries have condemned the US move.

Dr. Weerasinghe pointed out that none of the above-mentioned countries found fault with the US imposing taxes on countries doing trade with Russia and Iran. Now that they, too, had been targeted with similar US tactics, the CP official said, underscoring the pivotal importance of the world taking a stand against Trump’s behaviour.

Referring to the coverage of the Greenland developments, Dr. Weerasinghe said that news agencies quoted UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer as having said that the move was “completely wrong”, while French President Emmanuel Macron called it “unacceptable.

Dr. Weerasinghe said that Sri Lanka, still struggling to cope up with the post-Aragalaya economic crisis was also the target of discriminating US tariff policy. The top CPSL spokesman said that the recent US declaration of an immediate 25% increase in tariff on imports from countries doing business with Iran revealed the prejudiced nature of the US strategy. “Iran is one of our trading partners as well as the US. Threat of US tariffs on smaller countries is nothing but terrorism,” Dr. Weerasinghe said, stressing the urgent need for the issue at hand to be taken up at the UN.

Responding to another query, Dr. Weerasinghe cited the US targeting India over the latter’s trade with Russia as a case in point. He was commenting on the recent reports on India’s Reliance Industries and state-owned refiners sharply cutting crude oil imports from Russia. The CPSL official said that the EU wouldn’t have even bothered to examine the legitimacy of US tariff action if they hadn’t been targeted by the same action.

Perhaps, those who now complain of US threats over the dispute regarding Greenland’s future owed the world an explanation, Dr. Weerasinghe said. The reportage of the abduction of Venezuela’s President and the first lady underscored that the US intervened because it couldn’t bear the Maduro administration doing trade with China and other countries considered hostile to them, Dr. Weerasinghe said.

The CPSL official said that the NPP couldn’t turn a blind eye to what was happening. Just praising the US wouldn’t do Sri Lanka any good, he said, adding that the Greenland development underscored that the US under Trump was not concerned about the well-being of any other country but pursued an utterly one-sided strategy.

The US dealings with the NPP government, particularly the defence MoU should be examined taking into consideration US tariffs imposed on Sri Lanka at the onset of the second Trump administration and ongoing talks with the US, Dr. Weerasinghe.

By Shamindra Ferdinando ✍️

Continue Reading

News

MPs’ Pension Repeal Bill challenged in Supreme Court

Published

on

 Two petitions have been filed before the Supreme Court challenging the constitutionality of the proposed Parliamentary Pensions (Repeal) Bill, which seeks to scrap pensions for legislators.

The Bill, presented to Parliament on 7 January by the Minister of Justice and National Integration, has drawn strong opposition from retired parliamentarians who argue that it undermines the rights of former lawmakers and their dependents.

One petition has been filed by former MPs M. M. Premasiri, Nawarathne Banda, Nishantha Deepal Gunasekara, and Saman Siri Herath, who served in Parliament from 2004 to 2010. The other petition is by former MPs Piyasoma Upali (1988–2004) and Upali Sarath Danstan Amarasiri (1988–2000).

The petitioners argue that former MPs, many of whom dedicated decades of service to the nation, often sacrificed careers and business prospects for public duty. They contend that retired MPs and some widows rely solely on their pensions, which range between Rs. 60,000 and Rs. 80,000, amounts they say are insufficient to cover basic living and medical expenses.

The petitions seek a declaration that the Bill requires approval by the people through a referendum and a two-thirds majority in Parliament, citing constitutional safeguards.

The petitions were filed through Attorney-at-Law Sanath Wijewardane and are to be supported by Dr. Wijeyadasa Rajapakshe PC.

 By AJA Abeynayake ✍️

Continue Reading

Trending