Opinion
Crying need for a Think Tank
BY Dr B.J.C.Perera
MBBS(Cey), DCH(Cey), DCH(Eng), MD(Paed), MRCP(UK),
FRCP(Edin), FRCP(Lon),
FRCPCH(UK), FSLCPaed, FCCP,
Hony FRCPCH(UK), Hony. FCGP(SL)
Specialist Consultant Paediatrician and Honorary Senior Fellow, Postgraduate Institute of Medicine, University of Colombo, Sri Lanka.
The word “think tank” owes its origins to John F. Kennedy, America’s 35th President, who collected a group of top intellectuals in his White House — people like McGeorge Bundy, Robert S. McNamara, John Kenneth Galbraith, Arthur Schlesinger and Ted Sorenson, among others, to give him counsel on issues, from time to time. He described it as having them on tap and on the turn of the spigot, good advice was on hand. He called them his “think tank”. Kennedy, describing their first dinner meeting, said the White House never had so much brilliance and brain power in its dining room since Thomas Jefferson had dinner alone in it.
The two words ‘Think Tank’ have been bandied around quite a bit in many parts of the world. The real definition and a graphic description of it is as given above. The members of such a Think Tank would play a seminal role in assisting the Head of State of a nation to make the right decisions.
A fundamental necessity for a ‘think tank’ is the realisation by a Head of State that he or she cannot be an expert on anything and everything. That person needs intense, and far-thinking intellectual assessment of a given situation, or a planned course of action, by experts in the given field, as also by doyens in other arenas. Since Independence, most of our woes have been brought about by the elected Heads of State getting into a mindset that the person concerned is indeed ‘it’, a phenomenon that this writer calls the ‘I Syndrome’, the latter being a group of features which consistently occur together. It denotes a group of collective thinking, on the part of the person concerned, that he or she is a ‘know all’. No human, on planet earth, would fit the bill in such a contention as a ‘master of all.’ The downfall of many Heads of State was due to them having the wrong type of ‘advisors’ around them.
Our country is at a critical juncture. With the developments over the last few days, there is much speculation about the path that a Head of State should take. This writer does not know how the dice will turn but, within the next few days, we will have a Head of State, who will be entrusted with the daunting task of steering the country out of the abyss of despair.
I believe that a Think Tank is perhaps one that could facilitate this process and guides the Head of State on the right path. I would like to list the following as absolute requirements for such a Think Tank.
The Think Tank will consist of highly educated intellectuals and proven experts in different disciplines, head-hunted and hand-picked by the Head of State. I would suggest a set of 20 people for this endeavour in the Think Tank.
ALL of them would be completely apolitical, honest and trustworthy.They would not be expected to address the Head of State as “Your Excellency”. After all, in the United States of America and the Russian Republic as well as in many countries of the developed world, the Head of State is addressed as Mr President. In the United Kingdom, the Prime Minister is addressed as Mr Prime Minister.
There will be two experts from a given field. This would be to ensure that there will be an opportunity to consider different perspectives on a given subject under discussion.The Think Tank will meet once a month, perhaps on the evening of the fourth Sunday of every month. There will be no perks, no foreign trips, no remuneration of any kind, or special privileges attached to a position in the Think Tank. They will not be provided with any transport to attend meetings with the Head of State. The discussions would be over a simple home-cooked meal. It must be impressed on them that this initiative is a mission of commitment to the nation and is not for any personal gain. All 20 will be expected to attend every meeting. There will not be any meetings with selected individuals.
The Head of State will meet them alone without any secretaries politicos or other hangers-on.The members should be assured that they are at liberty to disagree with the Head of State and that there will not be any punitive measures imposed for any disagreement. President Kennedy encouraged his Think Tank to disagree with him whenever its members were against a proposed course of action.There will not be any rancour during meetings and the Think Tank members will be able to disagree without being disagreeable.
The Head of State would have the freedom to remove any of the members from the Think Tank if that person seeks any undue privileges but not because the person disagrees with the Head of State.
Readers may justifiably ask whether there are Sri Lankans, residents in Sri Lanka, who would fit the bill? I have absolutely no doubt whatsoever that if one looks carefully, they are there in plenty. They are mostly the back stage performers; even retired ones with a wealth of experience. They are the unsung heroes who would always put the country before themselves. Their intelligence, abilities and honour are totally beyond reproach.
These suggestions are provided with the best of intentions and goodwill to help the Head of State to govern the country properly and join the people in a relentless march towards affluence. The Think Tank members will hopefully advise the Head of State on how to provide home-grown food security and facilities for agriculture, how to offer all essential needs for our populace, including fuel and good transport, look after the health of our people, take all necessary steps to increase exports, limit imports only to absolute essentials and, of course, promote tourism. These will be the initiatives that would take us on the road towards munificent grandeur.Is there a statesman, or stateswoman, in our country who would be up to this task of formulating such a ‘Think Tank’? I fervently hope so.
Postscript
The writer hastens to say he has no intention of being a part of the proposed ‘Think Tank’.
Opinion
Spending on import of goods we could produce locally
It has been reported that Sri Lanka continues to spend vast sums of foreign exchange on importing goods that could be produced domestically with ease. This pattern raises serious concerns. It may be driven, in part, by vested interests profiting from import commissions and easy margins.
Another contributing factor could be the perceived need to cater to foreign tourists, especially in the hospitality sector.
However, this raises a troubling question: are we spending more on imports to serve tourists than we earn from their visits?
Besides food, a wide range of imported items—including building materials and hotel-related paraphernalia—are draining our foreign reserves. While tourism is touted as a major foreign exchange earner, the actual net benefit to the country remains unclear. It may enrich hotel owners and create jobs, but whether it truly strengthens our economy is debatable.
A Ratnayake
Opinion
Mannar wind power project and people’s protests
It has been reported that the government has abruptly halted the Mannar wind power project, which was to be launched by a prominent conglomerate.
This conglomerate is widely known to have close ties with the ruling party, and several of its directors currently hold positions in government-linked institutions.
Would a government that has been accused of changing its mind quite frequently, really suspend a multi-billion-rupee project simply because of objections from a small group of citizens in one corner of the country?
Is this a rare instance of the government standing up for ordinary people—or is it something else entirely?
Is it that the government decision has resulted from an internal conflict?
S K Muthukumara
Opinion
Inserting the foot in your mouth
At a diplomatic reception held in Vienna in the 1960s, British Foreign Minister George Brown sat in his chair enjoying a glass of wine. Then he heard the orchestra strike up a tune. When he turned round he saw a beautiful woman seated beside him. He politely asked her, “Madame, may we dance?” The lady in scarlet dress told him, “No, Mr Brown, for three reasons. First, this is a reception, not a ball. Second, even were this a ball, this would still be a state anthem and not a waltz. And third, were this a ball and not a reception and were that a waltz and not a state anthem, I would still be the Cardinal Archbishop.”
This is a well-known faux pas, a French term meaning an action or remark that causes embarrassment because it is not socially correct. Although we do not hear this phrase today, we still make socially unacceptable remarks every now and then. One day I met an old friend in Colombo who had migrated to Canada a few years ago. I said, “Good to see you again. How is your wife?” He looked at me in a serious way and asked, “Didn’t you know that she passed away a few years ago?” I felt like banging my head against a wall.
Although we dress well we have not been able to check ourselves when we speak to others. Faux pas has been defined by Pundit Michael Kinsley as the truth politicians accidentally speak. At the 1980 Democratic Convention, U.S. President Jimmy Carter extolled the virtues of former Vice President Hubert Horatio Humphrey as “Hubert Horatio Hornblower.”
Major social faux pas
Forgetting someone’s name is a major social faux pas. Sir John Kotalawala addressing an election rally turned to the organiser and asked “What’s that b ….’s name?” I met my former English teacher at a wedding ceremony after a long time. He greeted me, “Hello, Kodituwakku. How are you?” My wife asked me whether I had changed my name from Kodituwakku to Karunaratne. I told him, “Sir, I am not Kodituwakku …” Then he cut me off by saying, “Oh, it’s a faux pas.”
We meet so many people and sometimes we tend to forget their names. It is quite natural. However, when you have to introduce a friend to another person you have to remember his name. By the way, if you have to attend a function, do not go there too early or too late. They are supposed to be social blunders. Remember that we had a President who was always late for Cabinet meetings!
If you have to attend a wedding or interview, dress properly. You should not wear casual clothes for such events. There is no excuse for dressing improperly. However, if you forget someone’s name, you can ask for his name politely. A simple apology will smooth things over. You may have heard of Dr Sigmund Freud’s eponymous slip of the tongue. One day a man arrived at a railway station to buy tickets to Pittsburgh. He went to the ticket counter and asked for “Two tickets to Tittsburgh.” Sometimes people mispronounce your name. One day a wealthy socialite Mrs Stuyvesant Fish attended a fancy-dress ball in Rhode Island. At the entrance she told the butler the theme of the costume as “A Norman peasant.” Later she heard someone announcing “An enormous pheasant.”
Disrespectful and rude
If you keep on checking your mobile phone repeatedly when someone is trying to speak to you, you are committing a social faux pas. Many people view this behaviour as an indication that you are not paying attention to what another person is saying. This is something disrespectful and rude.
Sometimes we misunderstand others. One day Robert Benchley, an eminent author, while leaving a restaurant at night saw a man in uniform. The author thought that he was the doorman and asked him to call a cab. The man in uniform turned round and told him, “I happen to be a rear admiral in the U.S. Navy.” “In that case,” Bentley said, “get me a battleship.”
Another example of social faux pas is excessively dominating a conversation. To avoid hogging the conversation, practise active listening. If you talk to someone, look at his face and maintain eye contact. Ask him thoughtful questions, if necessary.
Talking about women
At a party Ben and Peter were drinking and talking about women. After some time they saw two women coming down the staircase. Ben said, “That’s the woman I was in love with.” Peter said, “That’s my wife.” Ben immediately corrected himself by saying, “I mean the other woman.” “That’s my daughter,” Peter said somewhat angrily.
There are many other instances where you make blunders. One such instance is attending a birthday party empty-handed. If you are unable to decide what to give as a gift, a reasonable amount of money can be given to the birthday boy or girl.
Some women do not like to divulge their real age. Therefore do not press them to do so. On the other hand, both men and women do not like to tell you how much they earn. Such matters are extremely personal.
Intimate personal details
When you strike up a friendship with someone for the first time, make it a point not to share intimate personal details. If you do so, you will make yourself a laughing stock. Reveal your real character to close friends, if it is really necessary.
Finally, bragging is a form of faux pas. One day a young lecturer was invited to deliver a talk on the English Day at a prestigious school in Colombo. Instead of telling the students the importance of English, she started bragging about how she got a postgraduate degree at a young age. Another lecturer began his lecture by telling the audience that he had a doctorate. They do not realise that people are not interested in their academic qualifications. You are judged by your performance.
By R. S. Karunaratne ✍️
karunaratners@gmail.com
-
Features6 days agoFavourites for the title of Miss Universe 2025
-
Midweek Review7 days agoFocus on Minister Paulraj’s UK statement
-
News6 days agoDr. Saman Weerasinghe receives Russia’s prestigious Order of Friendship
-
Opinion5 days agoReturning to source with Aga
-
Opinion7 days agoAmid winds and waves: Sri Lanka and the Indian Ocean – III
-
Business5 days agoMiss Universe Sri Lanka 2025 Lihasha Lindsay White departs for Bangkok
-
Features6 days agoVision of Dr. Gamani Corea and the South’s present development policy options
-
Features7 days agoSri Lanka’s Northern Gateway: Economic promise and geopolitical power in the Indian Ocean
