News
Crisis management: Premier proposes setting up of National Council
Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe, in his address to the nation, proposed to set up a National Council consisting of the Speaker, the Prime Minister, the Leader of thea Opposition and the leaders of the major parties to work out solutions for the prevailing crises in the country.
“The National Council can talk about the policies of the country. It can also talk about the decisions of the Cabinet. It can also talk about the reorganisation of the Parliament of this country. If so, it can be called a political body. The National Council has the right to summon the Cabinet of Ministers and the Chairmen of Committees. According to the new system we have proposed, the President will be held accountable to the Parliament. The Cabinet of Ministers is also accountable to Parliament. The National Council is also accountable to Parliament,” the Premier said in his address to the nation.
Full text of Prime Minister Wickremesinghe’s address: Today, the main issues in our country are not limited to the economic sphere. There are also two major issues in the political sphere. The re-introduction of the 19th Amendment is one of these issues. We, as party leaders, are now preparing the 21st Amendment in this regard.
The second issue is to work towards the abolition of the Executive Presidency. The timing and methodology must be decided by the Party Leaders.
The functioning of the Parliament has been paralyzed due to the weakening of the Parliamentary powers by the 20th Amendment. The Executive has been given more powers. The main allegation today is that the Parliament has not acted to prevent the economic crisis. There is an allegation that even though the ruling party had a majority in Parliament they neglected the work of the Parliament. Everything was systematically controlled by the Cabinet Ministers.
We do not always have to look at what happened in the past, but there are examples we can follow.
Before the independence of Sri Lanka there was a State Council from 1931 to 1947. That State Council functioned following the committee system. Each subject was divided into seven committees. The Chairmen of the Committees became Ministers. The seven Ministers had formed a Cabinet. In addition, there were three officials appointed by the Governor.
In addition, there was an Accounts Committee to control public money. At that time, we had the opportunity to carry out this methodology successfully.
Now we need to change the structure of Parliament and create a new system by combining the existing system of Parliament or the Westminster system and the system of State Councils. In those cases, Parliament can participate in governing the country.
First of all, the existing laws need to be strengthened in order to give those powers to Parliament in the exercise of monetary powers.
Following the example of countries such as the United Kingdom, New Zealand and India, we are proposing a stronger and more powerful law.
At present there are three Committees on Government Finance. The three Committees are the Public Finance Committee, the Accounts Committee and the Committee on Public Enterprises. Leader of the House Dinesh Gunawardena has made several proposals to strengthen the powers of these three Committees.
In addition, we are bringing recommendations forward.
We are working to establish two new Committees on Monetary Affairs. We will appoint a Legal and Methodological Committee to look into the matter.
Secondly, the main problem we face is the financial condition of the banks and financial institutions. There are a number of issues that have been weakened.
Under our Standing Order 111 we can appoint oversight committees. No oversight committees have been appointed before. Therefore, we propose to appoint ten oversight committees. They also report to Parliament on policies. Parliament should act on that. It should also be noted that the chairpersons of these five Finance Committees and the Ten Supervisory Committees are appointed by backbenchers. They are not appointed by Ministers.
Therefore, we have the opportunity to work out a methodology that is independent of the Cabinet of Ministers and works with both the Minister and the Parliament.
The youth are calling for a change in the existing system. They also want to know the current issues. Therefore, I propose to appoint four youth representatives to each of these 15 committees. One of them will be appointed by the Youth Parliament. The other three will be from the protesting groups and other activist groups. The methodology used to choose these individuals can be decided by the youth organizations themselves.
In addition, we hope to involve people with expertise in specific fields in this work. Through this work, young people will be able to learn about problems and provide solutions to them on their own. They will be able to contest elections if they wish to do so.
We also propose a National Council. A committee consisting of the Speaker, the Prime Minister, the Leader of the Opposition and the leaders of the major parties is called the National Council.
It should be said that the National Council is very important. The National Council can talk about the policies of the country. It can also talk about the decisions of the Cabinet. It can also talk about the reorganization of the Parliament of this country. If so, it can be called a political body.
The National Council has the right to summon the Cabinet of Ministers and the Chairmen of Committees.
According to the new system we have proposed, the President will be held accountable to the Parliament. The Cabinet of Ministers is also accountable to Parliament. The National Council is also accountable to Parliament. Fifteen Committees and Oversight Committees are accountable to Parliament.
There is a system in place to control the Government through the Cabinet, to examine the work of the President, to oversee the work of the political affairs through the National Council and to oversee the financial affairs and other matters of the other fifteen committees. There are articles prepared on this matter. I appreciate that a number of other organizations have made similar proposals.
News
Regulatory rollback tailored for “politically backed megaprojects”— Environmentalists
Investigations have revealed that the government’s controversial easing of environmental regulations appears closely aligned with the interests of a small but powerful coalition of politically connected investors, environmentalists have alleged.
The move weakens key Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) requirements and accelerates approvals for high-risk projects, has triggered a storm of criticism from environmental scientists, civil society groups and even sections within the administration, they have claimed.
Environmental Scientist Hemantha Withanage, Executive Director of the Centre for Environmental Justice, told The Island that the policy reversal “bears the fingerprints of elite political financiers who view Sri Lanka’s natural assets as commodities to be carved up for profit.”
“This is not accidental. This is deliberate restructuring to favour a specific group of power brokers,” he told The Island. “The list of beneficiaries is clear: large-scale mineral extraction interests, luxury hotel developers targeting protected coastlines, politically backed hydropower operators, industrial agriculture companies seeking forest land, and quarry operators with direct political patronage.”
Information gathered through government insiders points to four clusters of projects that stand to gain substantially:
Several politically shielded operators have been lobbying for years to weaken environmental checks on silica sand mining, gem pit expansions, dolomite extraction and rock quarrying in the central and northwestern regions.
High-end tourism ventures — especially in coastal and wetland buffer zones — have repeatedly clashed with community opposition and EIA conditions. The rollback clears obstacles previously raised by environmental officers.
At least half a dozen mini-hydro proposals in protected catchments have stalled due to community objections and ecological concerns. The new rules are expected to greenlight them.
Plantation and agribusiness companies with political links are seeking access to forest-adjacent lands, especially in the North Central and Uva Provinces.
“These sectors have been pushing aggressively for deregulation,” a senior Ministry source confirmed. “Now they’ve got exactly what they wanted.”
Internal rifts within the Environment Ministry are widening. Several senior officers told The Island they were instructed not to “delay or complicate” approvals for projects endorsed by select political figures.
A senior officer, requesting anonymity, said:
“This is not policymaking — it’s political engineering. Officers who raise scientific concerns are sidelined.”
Another added:”There are files we cannot even question. The directive is clear: expedite.”
Opposition parliamentarians are preparing to demand a special parliamentary probe into what they call “environmental state capture” — the takeover of regulatory functions by those with political and financial leverage.
“This is governance for the few, not the many,” an Opposition MP told The Island. “The rollback benefits the government’s inner circle and their funders. The public gets the consequences: floods, landslides, water scarcity.”
Withanage issued a stark warning:
“When rivers dry up, when villages are buried in landslides, when wetlands vanish, these will not be natural disasters. These will be political crimes — caused by decisions made today under pressure from financiers.”
He said CEJ was already preparing legal and public campaigns to challenge the changes.
“We will expose the networks behind these decisions. We will not allow Sri Lanka’s environment to be traded for political loyalty.”
Civil society organisations, environmental lawyers and grassroots communities are mobilising for a nationwide protest and legal response. Several cases are expected to be filed in the coming weeks.
“This is only the beginning,” Withanage said firmly. “The fight to protect Sri Lanka’s environment is now a fight against political capture itself.”
By Ifham Nizam
News
UK pledges £1 mn in aid for Ditwah victims
The UK has pledged £1 million (around $1.3 million) in aid to support victims of Cyclone Ditwah, following Acting High Commissioner Theresa O’Mahony’s visit to Sri Lanka Red Cross operations in Gampaha.
“This funding will help deliver emergency supplies and life-saving assistance to those who need it most,” the British High Commission said. The aid will be distributed through humanitarian partners.
During her visit, O’Mahony toured the Red Cross warehouse where UK relief supplies are being prepared, met volunteers coordinating relief efforts, and visited flood-affected areas to speak with families impacted by the cyclone.
“Our support is about helping people get back on their feet—safely and with dignity,” she said, adding that the UK stands “shoulder to shoulder with the people of Sri Lanka” and will continue collaborating with the government, the Red Cross, the UN, and local partners in recovery efforts.
She was accompanied by John Entwhistle, IFRC Head of South Asia, and Mahesh Gunasekara, Secretary General of the Sri Lanka Red Cross.
News
WFP scales up its emergency response in Sri Lanka
The United Nations World Food Programme (WFP) has scaled up its emergency response in Sri Lanka following the devastation caused by Cyclone Ditwah, thanks to a generous AUD 1.5 million contribution from the Government of Australia. This support is enabling WFP to deliver life-saving fortified food and provide cash assistance to families most affected by the disaster, Australian High Commission said in a release yesterday.
It said: The first airlift of fortified biscuits – 10 metric tonnes from WFP’s humanitarian hub in Dubai arrived in Sri Lanka, with upto 67 metric tonnes expected in the coming days. WFP has already dispatched fortified biscuits to Nuwara Eliya and Kegalle. Further deliveries are planned for Badulla and Kandy, among the hardest-hit districts.
“Australia stands with Sri Lanka at this devastating time. We are proud to work closely with our longstanding humanitarian partner the WFP, as well as with the Sri Lankan government and local authorities, to rapidly respond to meet the urgent needs of those affected communities,” said Australia’s High Commissioner to Sri Lanka, Matthew Duckworth.
WFP’s fortified biscuits provide a quick boost of energy and nutrition when families need it most.
“As rescue operations wind down, our priority is delivering life-saving fortified food to tackle immediate food needs of affected families, targeting especially those most at risk – children, older persons, pregnant and breastfeeding women, and people with disabilities, who often bear the brunt of such crises,” said Philip Ward, Representative and Country Director of the World Food Programme.
Australia’s contribution will also fund cash assistance programmes, complementing Government efforts to help families meet essential needs and rebuild their lives. WFP continues to appeal for additional donor support to sustain emergency operations and accelerate recovery for communities devastated by Cyclone Ditwah.
-
News3 days agoOver 35,000 drug offenders nabbed in 36 days
-
News7 days agoLevel III landslide early warning continue to be in force in the districts of Kandy, Kegalle, Kurunegala and Matale
-
Business5 days agoLOLC Finance Factoring powers business growth
-
News5 days agoCPC delegation meets JVP for talks on disaster response
-
News2 days agoCyclone Ditwah leaves Sri Lanka’s biodiversity in ruins: Top scientist warns of unseen ecological disaster
-
News5 days agoA 6th Year Accolade: The Eternal Opulence of My Fair Lady
-
News3 days agoRising water level in Malwathu Oya triggers alert in Thanthirimale
-
Features1 day agoFinally, Mahinda Yapa sets the record straight
