Connect with us

Opinion

Corrupt Cameron!

Published

on

By Dr Upul Wijayawardhana

Maybe, it is time to add a new phrase to the political lexicon: ‘A corrupt Cameron’ to mean a corrupt politician! Perhaps, doing a Cameron can mean using one’s position and influence for doing shady deals, purely for personal gain! I am making these suggestions, based purely on the unveiling drama of political corruption in the UK, the leading actor being the former Prime Minister, David Cameron. Yes, it is the very same David Cameron who opted to go to Jaffna, ‘kissing children’ for votes, instead of being at the opening ceremony of the Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting in Colombo, in November, 2013!

We are well aware that our political class has become progressively corrupt, since independence from the British, and critics have often made comparisons with politicians of the West to tell us how bad our lot is. However, it looks as if the rapidly-advancing juggernaut of capitalism is making the rest of the world, including Britain, to follow suit. The continuing pandemic has laid bare the vast extent of corruption in most countries. A number of accusations have been made about the award of very fruitful contracts to friends and relations of Ministers in the UK. Of course, corruption comes in many forms and I have referred to in my previous writings about the unwarranted, unjustified campaign against the only vaccine affordable for poor countries, Oxford AstraZeneca vaccine, spearheaded by Chancellor Merkel and President Macron. But Cameron’s actions are in a totally different league!

“We all know how it works. The lunches, the hospitality, the quiet word in your ear, the ex-minister and ex-advisers for hire, helping big business find the right way to get its way”

Guess who said this? It indeed was David Cameron! He said so in a speech, on lobbying, shortly before he became Prime Minister. Just two years after being forced out of that post, his position becoming untenable after the Brexit fracas, what he did was exactly that. Worse still, it looks as if he laid the foundation for his misdeeds, whilst still in office.

Cameron allowed financier Lex Greensill to work from his office, in Downing Street, as a senior adviser on a scheme of dubious value to the government. Two years later, Cameron became a senior adviser in Lex Greensill’s Greensill Capital, a supply chain finance company which thrived on giving loans to companies to tide over till their invoices were paid. His annual salary was one million dollars, for part-time work! On top of that, he got bonuses and shares which he sold at a profit.

Greensill Capital got its funds from investors who were paid back with interest once the short-term loans were repaid. However, Greensill Capital overstretched itself by giving excessive loans and collapsed in March due to the insurers refusing to cover the loans. Many investors were left with huge losses but Cameron, in a matter of two or three years, made a total killing of 10 million dollars, according to the BBC Panorama programme, broadcast on 9th August.

Before the collapse, Greensill Capital, tried to get a new investor: the UK government. David Cameron did his utmost to make it happen. He sent 56 messages, lobbying ministers and senior civil servants. He approached the Chancellor of the Exchequer and wanted the Bank of England to invest more than £10bn of taxpayers’ money in Greensill’s loans. The Bank of England turned Greensill down.

However, prior to this, in June 2020, Greensill had been approved as a lender, under a government scheme, designed to get emergency cash to companies affected by the coronavirus pandemic. Unpaid loans, under this scheme, may result in a loss of around £320 million to the British taxpayer, it is claimed.

David Cameron stands accused of personally promoting Greensill Capital to other investors, too, as he appeared with Lex Greensill, the company founder, in an event promoted by the Swiss Bank, Credit Suisse, in 2019. Those convinced by Cameron to invest have paid a heavy price whilst he has laughed his way to another bank!

There is more: Cameron has helped a genetics firm to get a government contract, it is alleged. It has emerged that he encouraged Health Secretary Matt Hancock to speak at a conference, co-hosted by the firm, Illumina, shortly before it won a £123m government contract for genetic sequencing, without competition.

Interestingly, in spite of all this, it is claimed by the government that no one seems to have broken rules as there are huge gaps in regulations, though they were supposed to have been strengthened after previous scandals. The best known is the ‘cash-for-questions’ scandal of 1994, when a lobbyist gave ‘brown-paper bags’ stuffed with money for MPs to ask questions which resulted in the collapse of John Major’s government. Tony Blair’s government was tainted by the ‘Bernie Eccleston affair’ after it exempted Formula 1 from the tobacco advertisement ban in 1997, as Bernie Ecclestone had contributed a million pounds to party funds.

We are well aware that our politicians are hypocrites. Ranil objects to the Army conducting the vaccination campaign but has his jab at the Army Hospital, and Sajith, who promised that he would have his jab only after every eligible citizen had theirs, suddenly had the jab on the advice of his treating physician! But Cameron’s hypocrisy beats all this. Shortly before an anti-corruption summit in London, in May 2016, in a conversation with the Queen, Cameron was overheard saying:

“We’ve got some leaders of some fantastically corrupt countries coming to Britain… Nigeria and Afghanistan, possibly the two most corrupt countries in the world.”

Archbishop of Canterbury Justin Welby had intervened to say: “But this particular president is not corrupt… he’s trying very hard” confirming that the Nigerian President Muhammadu Buhari was elected the previous year after vowing to fight corruption.

Neither Cameron nor the other prime ministers have faced any sanctions. Perhaps, our politicians can learn a lesson or two, from their British counterparts, how to legitimize corruption. In any case, without a doubt, they will continue doing Camerons!



Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Opinion

Resolution of grief, not retribution

Published

on

Ahamed Kathrada, friend and advisor to Nelson Mandela said of Robben Island, where Mandela was imprisoned for close to 30 years, that “While we will not forget the brutality of apartheid, we will not want Robben Island to be a monument to our hardship and suffering.”

Similarly, we do not want our beloved country to be a monument to our suffering. As Kathrada said, we want our country to be a symbol of the triumph of the human spirit against the forces of evil, a triumph of courage and determination over human frailty and weakness. Managing the painful history of this country should be focused on achieving this objective.

Emotions, such as sadness, worry, anger and in some cases, hatred, festering in our society over the past forty years appear now to be reaching boiling point.

Considering my professional background and knowledge of the mind, I am not surprised by that.

Violence is wrong no matter which side it comes from and regardless of its source. However, the bitter truth that emerges when examining the history of the past forty years, even when looking at it from the best possible angle, is that the foundation of the immoral, illegal and violent politics established took root in Sri Lanka, after 1977.

Actions and counteractions of the negative political culture including violence then established, brought nothing but destruction to Sri Lanka.

The bitter truth is that our collective conscience, sensitivities and actions as a nation, are shaped and coloured by this ongoing aggression and violence that equally affected both the South and the North.

The specific period of terror of 1987 – 1989 was focused mainly in the South. Accepting the fact that the majority of those who suffered during this period were Sinhala Buddhists is merely stating the reality; it is not approaching the problem from a narrow, racist or religious perspective.

It should also be added that I myself was a victim of that terror.

The Sinhala Buddhist culture has a distinctive tradition process for alleviating the grief due to a death by holding awake: sharing the pain of loss with those closest to you, and engaging in religious activities specifically in remembrance of the dead person, a sequence of events including offering alms, that provides time to heal.

It is this cultural heritage of managing loss and grief that was taken away from those who lost their lives and their loved ones in 1987- 89. It is only those who have faced such unfortunate experiences who know the compulsion and pain left by that void, where there was no time to process loss and grief. It is time for introspection – for genuine reflection.

With this background as our legacy over multiple generations, we need to pay greater attention to guarding ourselves against the potential response of “identification with the aggressor.” Identification with the aggressor is an involuntary or sub-conscious psychological defence mechanism and a reaction to trauma where the victim who underwent the trauma identifies with and mimics the behaviour of the person who carries out the violence, as a psychological coping mechanism.

Such responses can be seen in, for example, children undergoing abuse, or young people undergoing ragging. The usual reaction one would expect is for the victim to refrain from abuse or ragging. However, contrary to that expectation, research has revealed that the victim displays behaviour similar to that of the person who abused or ragged him/her.

A clear understanding of how is this concept likely to impact the current political climate is critical at this juncture.

Wielding immense political power, politically less experienced and matured social strata may unknowingly become prone to treating their opponents in the same way that the oppressors of the past victimised them. Therefore, the leadership should be sensitive to the potential of former victims almost unknowingly impose past sufferings on current opponents. It is the responsibility of politically enlightened social strata to identify and prevent that situation in advance. It is a moral obligation of all political parties not just the ruling party.

I would like to share a personal experience in this context. Assistant superintended Senaka de Silva was the man who brutally tortured me at the torture camp at Chitra Road, Gampaha, run alongside the Batalanda torture camp.

After my release, I was working as the Head of the Emergency Treatment Unit at the Sri Jayewardenepura Hospital, when the former ASP de Silva brought his niece there for treatment, unaware that I worked there. He was disconcerted to see me and immediately turned back and walked away. I sent the security officer to bring that child back, admitted her to the hospital and did my best to treat her. The thought process and action that I followed that day is what I adhere to date as well. At the time I was only a specialist in family medicine, today, as a professor of psychiatry, I see these events from a much broader point of view.

The force of emotions arising due to pain or injustice can be destructive to society, but it is also possible to divert it into a force for good. For example, the lack of any post-election violence at the Presidential elections of 2024 indicated a commendable positive direction in social movements. Similarly, the dialogue arising around the Batalanda torture camp, too, should be constructive and forward thinking, so that we shall never again see such an immoral political culture in Sri Lanka.

Ahamed Kathrada, friend and advisor to Nelson Mandela said of Robben Island, where Mandela was imprisoned for close to 30 years, that “While we will not forget the brutality of apartheid, we will not want Robben Island to be a monument to our hardship and suffering.”

Similarly, we do not want our beloved country to be a monument to our suffering. As Kathrada said, we want our country to be a symbol of the triumph of the human spirit against the forces of evil, a triumph of courage and determination over human frailty and weakness. Managing the painful history of this country should be focused on achieving this objective.

This does not mean that we have to essentially follow the South African model of truth commission for reconciliation but we do it in a culturally sensitive way that suits us.

As a Nation we all need to understand that situations arise neither to laugh nor to weep, but to learn from past experience.

(The author of this article became a JVP activist as a student in 1977. He was the Secretary of the Human Rights organisation of Sri Lanka in late 1970s and early 1980s. He was known as the personal physician to the late leader of the JVP Rohana Wijeweera.

He was arrested and imprisoned in 1983, but later released without any charge. He was abducted in broard daylight on the 19 July 1988, held in captivity and tortured. He was released in 1990.

An internationally renowned academic, he is an Emeritus Professor of Global Mental Health at Kings College London and Emeritus Professor Keele University. He is also the Director, Institute for Research and Development in Health and Social care and the Chairman of the National Institute of Fundamental Studies.)

by Professor Athula Sumathipala

Continue Reading

Opinion

Haphazard demolition in Nugegoda and deathtraps

Published

on

A haphazardly demolished building

The proposed expansion of the Kelani Valley railway line has prompted the squatters to demolish the buildings and the above photograph depicts the ad-hoc manner in which a building in the heart of Nugegoda town (No 39 Poorwarama Road) has been haphazardly demolished posing a risk to the general public. Residents say that the live electric wire has not been disconnected and the half-demolished structure is on the verge of collapse, causing inevitable fatal damages.

Over to the Railway Department, Kotte Municipality Ceylon Electricity Board and the Nugegoda Police.

Athula Ranasinghe,

Nugegoda.

Continue Reading

Opinion

Aviation and doctors on Strike

Published

on

Crash in Sioux city. Image courtesy Bureau of Aircraft Accident Archies.

On July 19, 1989, United Airlines Flight 232 departed Denver, Colorado for Chicago, Illinois. The forecast weather was fine. Unfortunately, engine no. 2 – the middle engine in the tail of the three-engined McDonnell Douglas DC 10 – suffered an explosive failure of the fan disk, resulting in all three hydraulic system lines to the aircraft’s control surfaces being severed. This rendered the DC-10 uncontrollable except by the highly unorthodox use of differential thrust on the remaining two serviceable engines mounted on the wings.

Consequently, the aircraft was forced to divert to Sioux City, Iowa to attempt an emergency crash landing. But the crew lost control at the last moment and the airplane crashed. Out of a total of 296 passengers and crew, 185 survived.

The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) declared after an investigation that besides the skill of the operating crew, one significant factor in the survival rate was that hospitals in proximity to the airport were experiencing a change of shifts and therefore able to co-opt the outgoing and incoming shift workers to take over the additional workload of attending to crash victims.

One wonders what would have happened if an overflying aircraft diverted to MRIA-Mattala, BIA-Colombo, Colombo International Airport Ratmalana (CIAR) or Palaly Airport, KKS during the doctors’ strike in the 24 hours starting March 12, 2025? Would the authorities have been able to cope? International airlines (over a hundred a day) are paying in dollars to overfly and file Sri Lankan airports as en route alternates (diversion airports).

Doctors in hospitals in the vicinity of the above-named international airports cannot be allowed to go on strike, and their services deemed essential. Even scheduled flights to those airports could be involved in an accident, with injured passengers at risk of not receiving prompt medical attention.

The civil aviation regulator in this country seems to be sitting fat, dumb, and happy, as we say in aviation.

Guwan Seeya

Continue Reading

Trending