Connect with us

News

Central Bank treading a thin line on continuation of moratoriums

Published

on

By Sanath Nanayakkare

The Central Bank of Sri Lanka is not in a position to put pressure on commercial banks to offer moratoriums continuously as there was another side to the loan repayment saga, the bank’s Deputy Governor Ms.Yvette Fernando said yesterday.

“I appeal to the borrowers who can pay, to pay their loans for their own best interests. And those whose income generation has been truly affected due to the ongoing pandemic would hear an announcement from the Central Bank in the coming weeks for a different arrangement, Fernando told the media at an online forum subsequent to the CBSL Monetary Board’s monthly monetary policy review meet.

The Deputy Governor added: “I think we have been in moratoriums for about one year. We need to always remember that moratoriums have also the other side of it. When it comes to financial institutions, they have a continuous obligation to make payments to their depositors. So even as the Monetary Board and the Central Bank, we are not in a position to tell the banks continuously to continue these moratoriums. However, considering the situation, Tourism and Passenger Transport sectors are still in moratoriums with some adjustments until September. But based on the more recent situation we are going through – we have already started discussions with the banks and the Finance House Association to see how best or what kind of facilitation we can give these borrowers because we understand that there can be payment delays because of the culture of certain businesses and as a result their income generating avenues have been disturbed.

“And by all means, any bank will definitely be in a favourable way because banks also want their investments or the loans to be paid on time or avoid complete defaults. The discussions we have had with the banks in this regard have been favorable, but we are not at this point looking at a complete moratorium because I think we cannot do this when we carefully consider the point of view of the banks and finance companies also. We have to understand the fact that these banking and non-banking sector companies are operating at different levels and so they don’t have the same capacity to go through these kinds of moratoriums continuously. So we have to address that.

‘These discussions are ongoing and most probably very soon we will be able to announce something that will help the really affected borrowers also. I kindly would like to say that anybody who can pay or in a position to pay their loans should continue to do so because it is in their best interests to do so. Your delaying the payment of a loan means; there’s going to be some additions to it, so it’s in your best interests to pay while you can. But for those who are really affected, we are in the process of looking at it and we will make some announcement.

‘But broadly speaking, we are taking the position that it is the bank and the borrower who could practically agree on a suitable arrangement. One year into moratoriums, the financial institutions also know about the nature of their customers and what kind of disturbance they encountered on the ground. With that knowledge, we are looking to issue instructions to the banks in this regard.’

 

 



Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

CEB seeking tariff hike while making huge profits, says opposition trade union leader

Published

on

Ananda Palitha

Convenor of the Samagi Joint Trade Union Alliance affiliated with the Samagi Jana Balawegaya, Ananda Palitha, yesterday (16) said that the Ceylon Electricity Board was seeking to raise electricity tariffs by 13.56% percent although it had earned a profit of more than Rs 22,000 mn.

The CEB recently submitted its proposal to the Public Utilities Commission of Sri Lanka (PUCSL) for an electricity tariff revision for the second quarter of this year – the period effective from April 1 to June 30.

Palitha alleged that the PUCSL, in spite of knowing the massive profit earned by the CEB, at the expense of the hapless public, had chosen to allow the state enterprise to propose an additional burden.

The economic, technical and safety regulator of the electricity industry, and the designated regulator for petroleum and water services industries, should exercise its powers in terms of the PUCSL Act No. 35 of 2002 and the Sri Lanka Electricity Act No. 20 of 2009 to provide relief, the veteran trade unionist said.

Palitha emphasised that the PUCSL had the right to intervene on behalf of electricity consumers but, unfortunately, chose to facilitate the CEB’s despicable strategy. “The proposal to increase tariffs by 13.56% was meant to divert attention. The real issue at hand is the percentage of electricity tariff reduction,” Palitha said. The former UNPer found fault with the Opposition for failing to expose the CEB.

Taking into consideration the Rs 22,000 millionplus profit, the PUCSL could order the CEB to grant relief to consumers, Palitha said, adding that the CEB and PUCSL, together, deprived electricity consumers tariff reduction in the first quarter of this year, too.

In January this year, the CEB asked for a 11.59% tariff increase though it was enjoying Rs 22,000 mn profit at that time, the trade unionist said.

Palitha said that as the PUCSL received all data available to the CEB it was fully aware of the finances of the state enterprise.

In January, 2025, regardless of the NPP government floating the idea regarding as much as a 37% tariff increase, the PUCSL granted a 20% tariff reduction (25% of Rs 22,000 mn profit), Palitha said.

According to him, as a result of relief granted to the consumers, the profits had been reduced to Rs 16,000 mn but by June 2025 profits had increased to Rs 18,000 mn and there was a need to grant tariff reduction. But, the NPP, having always lashed out at the International Monetary Fund (IMF) in the run up to the presidential election, held in September 2024, started playing a different tune.

Responding to The Island queries, Palitha said that contrary to claims that the CEB proposed a 13.56% tariff increase to cover up losses caused by the importation of low-quality coal for the Norochcholai Lakvijaya coal-fired power plant, the current strategy seemed to have been adopted at the behest of the IMF.

Instead of granting tariff reduction for the third quarter in 2025, the PUCSL ordered an 18% increase, Palitha said. The trade unionist claimed that the Finance Ministry, at the behest of the IMF, directed both the CEB and the PUCSL to increase electricity tariffs by 20% in violation of the relevant Acts, he said.

Then in Oct, 2025, the CEB proposed a 6.8 % tariff increase at a time its profits were around Rs 22,000 mn. The CEB and PUCSL staged a drama over that proposal and finally, on the false pretext of the CEB’s failure to furnish its proposal on time, the revision was dropped, Palitha said. The SJB activist pointed out that the Opposition failed to highlight that consumers had been deprived of downward revision in spite of massive profits earned by the Board. “In fact, when Energy Minister Kumara Jayakody met trade unions, he very clearly declared that they were considering electricity power reduction, perhaps by 10%, 12% or 15%. But in the end nothing happened.”

Now the same drama is being enacted by the government, the CEB and the PUCSL, Palitha said.

By Shamindra Ferdinando

Continue Reading

News

BASL protest march

Published

on

BASL President Rajeev Amarasuriya addressing the media at the BASL Head Office, Colombo, yesterday (16). He demanded that the government apprehend those responsible for the killing of a lawyer and his wife at Akuregoda, close to the tri-forces headquarters on Friday (13). Pic by Nishan S. Priyantha

Members of the BASL yesterday (16) staged a protest march over the murder of a lawyer and his wife in Akuregoda, Thalangama, last week. The BASL staged a protest march from the Supreme Court Complex to the BASL Head Office.

Continue Reading

News

IMF MD here

Published

on

Kristalina

Managing Director of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) Kristalina Georgieva arrived in Colombo yesterday (16) for top level discussions with the government. She is scheduled to leave tomorrow (18) after meeting government authorities and key stakeholders, observing firsthand the impact of Cyclone Ditwah, and discussing ways in which the IMF could support recovery efforts and contribute to building a more resilient future for all Sri Lankans, sources said.

Continue Reading

Trending