The Asia-Pacific region’s undoubted economic strength and prowess led to this century being dubbed the ‘Asian Century’ by the world but it is plain to see that the latter phrase is acquiring heavy political overtones as well. This is on account of the region becoming a storm centre of global politics.
If one needs fresh evidence that economics, indeed, drive politics, it’s all here in the Asia-Pacific. In degree to the proportion to which the Asia-Pacific emerges as a world economic hub of the first degree, to the same extent do international politics tend to gravitate heavily on the region. The COVID-19 pandemic, to be sure, has blunted the Asia-Pacific’s economic vibrancy and strength to a degree, but the region could be expected to remain the foremost growth centre of the world. This will be true to the extent to which the West continues to lose its global economic and political clout.
The commentator would be stating the obvious by saying that the Asia-Pacific is home to the world’s most powerful economies. In an economic sense China dominates South-East Asia and the Far East, for instance, while India is predominant in South Asia. Moreover, there’s the ASEAN Ten and Japan to also contend with.
However, in tandem with these economic realities, the Asia-Pacific has come to bristle with international military and political tensions which have the potential to render the region a zone of endemic armed confrontation, provided the Asia-Pacific’s several flash-points are ably managed by the relevant states and the international community. For example, it is quite some time since China came to be suspected of aiming at territorial gains in the South China Sea at the expense of some regional players who are also becoming notable global economic powers; Vietnam and the Philippines being just two of these. There is also China’s continuing squabble with Japan over a cluster of islands in their adjacent seas which needs to be watched closely and ably managed.
The fact is that the Asia-Pacific region has sizeable gas and oil reserves and these assets needs to be seen as setting the stage, to an extent, to the above conflicting territorial claims. China is home to a vast population and it ought to be plain to see why she should be making territorial claims in the South China Sea and other areas of contention. Moreover, almost all the notable economic players of the Asia-Pacific have been fast-industrializing states that are power and energy-hungry. They cannot afford to lose hold of territory that is considered resource-rich.
Given this general backdrop of the Asia-Pacific’s lingering inter-state tensions, a comparatively recent development that ought to accentuate the region’s profile as a potential international military flash-point is the increasing security cooperation between the US, India, Japan and Australia. Described as the ‘Quad’, this group’s principal aim, apparently, is to blunt China’s increasing influence and power in the Asia-Pacific.
Elaborating on this development, commentators said that the Quad is focused in the main on countering China’s ‘wolf-warrior diplomacy’ and on keeping sea lanes open that link West and East on the economic plane in particular. Of added significance is the fact that the Quad consists of four major democracies. In a sense, a democracy versus authoritarianism stand-off could also be considered as shaping-up in the region, since China is an authoritarian state. If not a hot war, then a cold war of sorts seems to be in the offing, since political systems are a vital factor in this regional power struggle.
The region’s security-linked concerns could also be expected to be heightened by the signing of a military pact between India and Japan sometime next month. Reports said that a highlight of the formalizing of this pact between Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe will be the signing of a military and logistics agreement titled, ‘Acquisition and Cross Servicing Agreement’. The impending military pact ought to be seen by China as a further hindrance to its efforts at strengthening its influence and power in the Asia-Pacific.
One of the most significant indicators that the Asia-Pacific is the new theatre of big power rivalry is the US’ increasing alliance with India, besides its continuing support for Japan on a number of fronts. The US is on record as backing India’s entry to the UN Security Council and although the world would not see the latter effort bearing positive results any time soon, US support for India in this connection amounts to sealing an alliance that both the US and India see as urgently needed in view of China’s increasing power and influence in the Asian region and outside it. The fact that the US and India are seen as the world’s foremost democracies ought to have a solidifying impact on the strengthening alliance.
These developments are also of vital significance as the UN records its 75th year in existence. It has done well to keep the world largely intact over the years but its most important organ in the keeping of world peace, the Security Council, suffers from the limitation of being unrepresentative of the current international distribution of power.
At the time of the founding of the UN, global power was seen as being mainly wielded by the US, USSR, China, France and the UK. Accordingly, they comprised the Permanent Membership of the UNSC. But today, there are many more countries that are seen as wielding substantial global power and influence and they too are tapping on the UNSC’s door, seeking Permanent membership. Among the latter are, India, Germany, Brazil and South Africa.
In degree to the proportion to which China’s global power increases, the US’ support for India’s bid to achieve Permanent Membership of the UNSC is bound to increase as well. However, since the UNSC would not be in a position to increase its membership in the short and medium terms, due to a number of reasons, it will remain unrepresentative of the world’s new power configurations.
India is bound to remain an International Law abiding country but future steadfast support for UN agencies and organs on the part of US central administrations, particularly if they are of the orientation of the present one headed by President Donald Trump, would be difficult to guarantee. Such considerations should prompt the UN in the direction of swift, progressive reform.
Credibility in governance through elections and not security forces
By Jehan Perera
President Ranil Wickremesinghe’s warning that he is prepared to declare a state of national emergency and use the military to suppress any public protests for change of government would reflect the pressures he is under. The manner in which he has used the security forces to deal with the protest movement has been unexpected. His words and deeds are contradictory to what he has previously stood for as a five-time former prime minister. This is especially true in the case of the ethnic and religious minorities who have consistently voted for him and his party at elections. They have felt safer and more secure under his governments which always sought to reduce the heavy hand of state oppression in which national security is given pride of place. He has always promised them much though he has been unable to deliver on much of what he promised.
Notwithstanding the unfortunate rhetoric and actions of the present time the belief still persists that President Wickremesinghe is the best of the available options. Recent pronouncements of the president have reignited hope that he will address the problems of the religious and ethnic minorities. He has stated that he does not want to leave this problem to the next generation. He has said that he wants to resolve this intractable national problem by the country’s 75th independence anniversary on February 4 next year. The hope that the president will make a fresh effort to resolve their problems has led the main Tamil party, the TNA, to desist from voting against the budget which passed with a relatively small majority. Their spokesperson, M A Sumanthiran said in Parliament that due to the president reaching out to them, stretching out his hand, they did not vote against the budget although they disagreed with it.
It is not only in words that the president has reached out to the ethnic and religious minorities. Reports from the north and east indicate that the Maveer (Heroes) Day commemorations this year took place without incident. During the past two years scores of people were arrested and a massive presence of security forces blocked the people from participating in public events. On this occasion the security forces did not get involved in any attempt to stop the commemorations. University students distributed sweets and even cut a birthday cake to celebrate slain LTTE leader Velupillai Prabhakaran’s birthday. The analogy that the president drew to himself being seen as a Hitler who exterminated ethnic and religious minorities is misplaced. The release of those held under the Prevention of Terrorism Act for engaging in similar acts in the past would further contribute to the reconciliation process.
In this context, the president’s use of militaristic rhetoric can only be understood in relation to the growing economic crisis that shows no sign of abating. The anticipated IMF bailout package is at risk of getting indefinitely delayed. It was initially anticipated to come in September then in November but now January is being targeted. Japan’s top brokerage and investment bank, Nomura Holdings Inc, has warned that seven countries – Egypt, Romania, Sri Lanka, Turkey, Czech Republic, Pakistan and Hungary – are now at a high risk of currency crises. Sri Lanka is in third place on the table of risk. The next devaluation of the rupee could see another spike in inflation that will make the cost of living even more unbearable to the masses of people.
The president is on record as having said that the economic crisis will get worse before it improves. Both anecdotal and statistical evidence indicates that it is indeed worsening. University teachers at the University of Sabaragamuwa reported that attendance in their classes was down by at least a quarter. Students who come from other parts of the country are unable to afford the cost of meals and so they stay at home. A study by the Institute of Policy Studies has shown that about four percent of primary, 20 percent of secondary and 26 percent of collegiate students had dropped out of school in the estate sector, which is the worst affected. The future costs to the country of a less well educated population is incalculable and inhumane.
As it is the situation is a dire one for large swathes of the population. Research from the University of Peradeniya has revealed that close to half of Sri Lanka’s population, 42 percent (up from 14 percent in 2019) are living under the poverty line. Professor of Economics Wasantha Athukorala has said there is a dramatic increase in the poverty level of over three-hold across the past three years. In 2019, nearly 3 million people lived below the poverty line, but that number has increased to 9.6 million in October 2022. In these adverse circumstances stability in a polity can be ensured either through legitimacy or through force. It would be tragic if the latter is the choice that is made.
President Wickremesinghe has been stressing the importance of political stability to achieve economic development. His recent statement that the security forces will be used to negate any unauthorised protest is a sign that the government expects the conditions of economic hardship to escalate. The general public who are experiencing extreme economic hardship are appalled at the manner in which those who committed acts of corruption and violence in the past are being overlooked because they belong to the ruling party and its cliques. The IMF has made anti-corruption a prerequisite to qualify for a bailout, calling for “Reducing corruption vulnerabilities through improving fiscal transparency and public financial management, introducing a stronger anti-corruption legal framework, and conducting an in-depth governance diagnostic, supported by IMF technical assistance.”
It is morally unacceptable even if politically pragmatic that the president is failing to take action against the wrongdoers because he needs their votes in parliament. As a start, the president needs to appoint a credible and independent national procurement committee to ensure that major economic contracts are undertaken without corruption. Second, the president needs to bite the bullet on elections. The country’s burning issues would be better accepted by the country and world at large if they are being dealt with by a statesman than by a dictator. Government that is based on the people’s consent constitutes the sum and substance of democracy. This consent is manifested through free and fair elections that are regularly held. Local government elections have been postponed for a year and are reaching their legal maximum in terms of postponement. These elections need to be held before March next year.
Elections will enable the people to express their views in a democratic manner to elect their representatives for the present. This would provide the government with guidance in terms of the decisions it is being called to take to revive the economy and place the burden in a manner that will be acceptable to the people. The provincial council elections have been postponed since 2018. Democratically elected provincial councils share in the burdens of governance. The devolution of power that took place under the 13th Amendment was meant to promote ethnic harmony in the country. The president who has taken the position that he is for a solution to the ethnic conflict should seriously consider conducting the provincial council elections together with the local government elections se their financial costs. By doing so he will also gain legitimacy as a democratic statesman and not a dictator.
WEDNESDAY – Movie Review
The Addams Family is back with a new tale to tell! Originally created by Charles Addams as a comic strip published in The New Yorker, it offered readers a sarcastic take on the ‘typical nuclear family’ by substituting it with a more macabre bunch of strange and eerie individuals. Since then the titular family has been adapted on to the big screen many times, from live action movies to animated versions, the Addams Family has gained many fans throughout the years. Created by Alfred Gough and Miles Millar, with Tim Burton working on four episodes of the eight-part series, Wednesday is a welcoming tale for young fans, but unfortunately fails to think outside the box and remains anchored to the floor with a messy storyline.
Dead-eyed Wednesday Addams (Jenna Ortega) is a stubborn, independent and intelligent teenager in this new series. Her penchant for attracting trouble wherever she goes alarms her parents, Morticia (Catherine Zeta-Jones) and Gomez (Luis Guzmán). With an already strained relationship with her parents (specifically her mother), Wednesday is enrolled at Nevermore, an academy for outcasts like herself. Having attended the academy themselves, Morticia and Gomez are hopeful that their daughter will ‘fit right in’. Caught between trying to build her own identity and other teenage complexities, Wednesday soon finds herself in the middle of a twisted mystery.
This is the first time audiences are introduced to a teenage Wednesday, which allowed the creators to build a new world on their own terms, but while keeping true to the original nature of the character. The creators do a fair amount of world building by introducing other outcasts like the Fangs (vampires), Stoners (Gorgons), Scales (sirens) and Furs (werewolves), among others. Nevermore Academy itself is beautiful and comes with the classic package of creepy crypts, hidden rooms and secret societies. The series also offers a decent amount of gore, although they could have added more given Wednesday’s proclivity for gore-related activities. The series deals with classic young-adult tropes which includes teenage crushes, bullies, relationships and even prom, among other things. The series navigates through Wednesday’s journey of self-discovery, which is a new avenue for both the character and the fans. From understanding and displaying her emotions to discovering her identity and understanding her peers, the series takes a deep dive into heavy material.
Ortega’s performance as the titular character plays a major role in keeping audiences glued to the screen. This is also the first time viewers are shown a teenage Wednesday Addams, which works to Ortega’s benefit as she depicts more dimensions to the ghoulish, morose character many are associated with based on previous renditions. Her facial expressions and ability to deliver on seriously emotional moments strengthens her role as the lead. The rest of the Addams Family, even with limited screen time, lack the eccentricities their characters should have. Hopeless romantics Morticia and Gomez seem incompatible in this version and Uncle Fester is far less crazy than he ought to be. The only member worth mentioning is the Thing—a severed hand— who brought more character and spirit to the series acting alongside Ortega. With barely any room to develop a majority of the characters are prosaic and tedious, even though they remain vital to the plot.
Apart from Ortega, Gwendoline Christie and Emma Myers deserve honorable mentions for their roles as Nevermore’s head teacher, Larissa Weems and the peppy Enid Sinclair respectively. Enid quickly became a fan favorite as the character was the polar opposite to Wednesday. Her character is vital to Wednesday’s character development and their journey to find common ground as mismatched individuals is amusing.
Christina Ricci who played Wednesday in the 90s returns as ‘normie’ teacher, Miss Thornhill and unfortunately barely stands out and this in large part due to the messy storyline. The series is bogged down with numerous subplots and overlapping tropes and the characters with potential for growth are completely overlooked. With love triangles, bullies and killer monsters on the loose, the series self-destructs and the climax sinks into disappointment.
At the end of the day, Wednesday plays to the beat of the new generation and touches on new themes, which is welcoming seeing as the character should grow up at some point. While not everyone may relate to Wednesday’s teenage perils, it is interesting to witness her growth and her journey as an ‘outcast’ or ‘weirdo’. And while Wednesday doesn’t exactly offer a distinctly unique story, it gives audiences a small taste of what Jenna Ortega’s Wednesday is capable of. Creating a story around a well-established franchise is a difficult task, and in this case the creators fail to add value to their visions. If the series continues, the creators will have the opportunity to think further outside the box and push the limits to Wednesday’s character and give audiences a bone-chilling experience. Wednesday is currently streaming on Netflix.
Stage set for… AWESOME FRIDAY
The past few weeks have been a very busy period for the new-look Mirage outfit…preparing themselves for their big night – Friday, December 2nd – when they would perform, on stage, for the very first time, as Donald Pieries (leader/vocals/drums), Benjy (bass), Niro Wattaladeniya (guitar), Viraj Cooray (guitar/vocals), Asangi Wickramasinghe (keyboard/vocals), along with their two frontline female vocalist, Sharon (Lulu) and Christine.
They have thoroughly immersed themselves in their practice sessions as they are very keen to surprise their fans, music lovers, and well-wishers, on opening night…at the Peacock, Berjaya Hotel, in Mount Lavinia.
Action starts at 8.00 pm and, thereafter, it will be five hours of great music, along with EFFEX DJs Widhara and Damien, interspersed with fun and excitement…for the whole family!
Yes, opening night is for the whole family, so you don’t need to keep some of your family members at home – kids, especially.
Working on their repertoire for Friday, bassist Benjy says “what we will dish out will be extra special, with lots of action on stage.”
It would be interesting to see Sharon (Lulu) doing her thing with Mirage, after her early days with the Gypsies, and, I’m told, a dynamic performance from Sharon is what is in store for all those who make it to the Peacock this Friday
While the band was at one of their practice sessions, last week, they had a surprise visitor – Edward (Eddy) Joseph, a former member of the group Steelers, who is now based in Germany.
Eddy is here on a short visit and is scheduled to return to Germany, tomorrow (30).
He spent an hour with Mirage, at their practice session, and says he is disappointed that he would not be around for the group’s opening night.
However, there is a possibility of several well-known personalities, in the showbiz scene, turning up, on Friday night, to experience the sounds of the new-look Mirage, including Sohan Weerasinghe and Joey Lewis (from London).
Rajiv Sebastian, too, says he is keen to be a part of the fun-filled evening.
You could contact Benjy, on 0777356356, if you need to double check…their plans for AWESOME FRIDAY!
Embassy officer arrested at BIA remanded
Easter Sunday terror attack suspect hacked to death
Rail service between Mahawa and Jaffna to be suspended for five months
‘Dates have the highest sugar content to fight Coronavirus’
Sunday Island 27 December – Headlines
U.S. Congress to probe assets fleecing by US citizens of Sri Lankan origin
Opinion6 days ago
Rohan Abeywickrema – A pioneer in transport professionalism
News5 days ago
GCE O/L results to be released today
Opinion6 days ago
Rise against state repression: A call to the people
News5 days ago
Public protests: Alles claims UN pleased with police response
Features7 days ago
Are we out of touch with reality?
Business6 days ago
SOS Children’s Villages Sri Lanka joins ‘Karuna.lk’ powered by Dialog Foundation
News2 days ago
SLPP dissidents ask govt. to bring back USD 35 bn ‘parked’ overseas
Opinion7 days ago
Yes indeed, Hippocrates is turning in his grave