Opinion
Alternative Medicine for COVID-19

A reply to letter by Prof. Rohini Fernandopulle
I wish to bring the following facts for your kind attention. In August 2020, for the first time in history, the State Ministry of Pharmaceutical Production, Supply & Regulation was established in Sri Lanka. I believe this was a progressive step to develop the pharmaceutical industry in Sri Lanka. Subsequently, as the State Minister of Pharmaceutical Production, Supply and Regulation, I have inaugurated and implemented many activities to promote local production, and distribution of pharmaceuticals, and also to strengthen the regulatory framework.
I am yet to receive a word of appreciation from the Sri Lanka Association of Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics (SLACPT). This deafening silence can be attributed to the fact that some of your membership does not approve the decisions made to blacklist and bar the politically motivated corrupt businesses that had infested the local market. I am well aware that some members had maintained a very close relationship with those business entities.
It is interesting to note that the Facebook page of SLACPT that was inactive for several months, who had not contributed by word or deed during the COVID-19 pandemic and the last post was on 16th March 2020, has suddenly awakened, published and propagated misinformation on 1st November 2020.
Also, I was informed that several members of SLACPT are instigating other organizations, newspapers and websites to publish the misinformation. Some members of your association embarked on vilifying and discrediting me, and the Government of Sri Lanka.
I would like to state that a team of professional and credible academics including Dr Saroja Weerakoon & Prof. Kamal Perera (Institute of Indigenous Medicine, University of Colombo), Prof. Dulani Gunasekara (Pediatrician, University of Sri Jayewardenepura) and Prof. T S Suresh (Department of Biochemistry, University of Sri Jayewardenepura) had researched “Sudarshana Syrup”. I was not a part of this research group or the study. I along with the Hon. State Minister Sisira Jayakodi, Secretary to the Ministry & the Director of the IDH hospital met with this team at my office. When requested, I undertook to facilitate a Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) in the State Sector. Thereafter, I directed the director of the IDH hospital to discuss the possibility of conducting the RCT, with the consultants attached to IDH.
During this meeting, I categorically emphasized the procedure to be followed before the syrup can be prescribed by the allopathic doctors. However, if the drug is in the Ayurveda pharmacopoeia, there will be no restrictions for Ayurveda practitioners to prescribe the said drug. Hence, it is an unnecessary request to “reconsider the decision to recommend the use of this drug” because this decision was not taken. Per my knowledge, this drug is still not produced commercially; therefore there was no point to worry Prof. Fernandopulle, concerning “increase of the sale”
I feel this letter is unprofessional and is motivated by a third party. I would like to know if all the listed office bearers and the council members are aware that this letter has been directed to me or is this just the personal opinion of Prof. Fernandopulle. If she had a concern about the publications on media and social media on “Sudarshana Syrup”, as a professional, I would expect her to clear the issues with me before publishing such a biased, unfair and destructive letter, based on nothing but distorted and misquoted facts. Further, SLACPT would contact Prof Asita de Silva, President elect of their association for an elucidation. He is the chairman of NMRA, which is under my purview, hence we regularly meet for official matters.
I earnestly request SLACPT to creatively and constructively contribute to the new program to create a self-sufficient nation with pharmaceuticals and the mission of controlling COVID-19, rather than issuing destructive and misleading letters.
CHANNA JAYASUMANA
State minister
Opinion
LG polls, what a waste of money!

If the people of this country were asked whether they want elections to the local government, majority of them would say no! How many years have elapsed since the local councils became defunct? And did not the country function without these councils that were labelled as ‘white elephants’?
If the present government’s wish is to do the will of the people, they should reconsider having local government elections. This way the government will not only save a considerable amount of money on holding elections, but also save even a greater amount by not having to maintain these local councils, which have become a bane on the country’s economy.
One would hope that the country will be able to get rid of these local councils and revert back to the days of having competent Government Agents and a team of dedicated government officials been tasked with the responsibility of attending to the needs of the people in those areas.
M. Joseph A. Nihal Perera
Opinion
What not to do

By Dr Upul Wijayawardhana
It is immaterial whether you like him or not but one thing is crystal clear; Donald Trump has shown, very clearly, who is the boss. Surely, presidents of two countries are equal; perhaps, that is the impression Volodymyr Zelensky had when he went to the White House to meet Trump but the hard reality, otherwise, would have dawned on him with his inglorious exit! True, the behaviour of President Trump and VP Vance were hardly praiseworthy but Zelensky did what exactly he should not do. Afterall, he was on a begging mission and beggars cannot be choosers! He behaved like professional beggars in Colombo who throw money back when you give a small amount!!
Despite the risk of belonging to the minority, perhaps of non-Americans, I must say that I quite like Trump and admire him as a straight-talking politician. He keeps to his words; however atrocious they sound! Unfortunately, most critics overlook the fact that what Trump is doing is exactly what he pledged during his election campaign and that the American voters elected him decisively. When he lost to Biden, all political commentators wrote him off, more so because of his refusal to admit defeat and non-condemnation of his supporters who rioted. When he announced his intention to contest, it only evoked pundits’ laughter as they concluded that the Republican Party would never nominate him. Undaunted, Trump got the party to rally round him and won a non-consecutive second term; a feat achieved only once before, by Grover Cleveland around the end of the nineteenth century. His victory, against all predictions, was more decisive as he got more collegiate votes and, even though it does not matter, won the popular vote too which he did not get when he got elected the first term. Even his bitterest critics should accept this fact.
Zelensky was elected the president of Ukraine after the elected pro-Soviet president was deposed by a ‘peoples revolution’ engineered by the EU with the support of USA. After this, the EU attempted to bring Ukraine to NATO, disregarding the Munich agreement which precipitated the Russian invasion. He should have realised that, if not for the air-defence system which Trump authorised for Ukraine during his first term, Russian invasion would have been complete. It may well be that he was not aware as when this happened Zelensky may still have been the comedian acting the part of the president! Very likely, Trump was referring to this when he accused Zelensky of being ungrateful.
Zelensky also should have remembered that he disregarded requests from Trump, after his defeat by Biden, to implicate Biden’s son in some shady deals in Ukraine and that one of the last acts of Biden was to pardon his son and grant immunity to cover the alleged period. Perhaps, actions of the European leaders who embrace him every time they see him, as a long-lost brother, and invitations to address their parliaments has induced an element of the superiority complex in Zelensky that he behaved so combative.
Trump wanted to be the mediator to stop the war and spoke to Putin first. Instead of waiting for Trump to speak to him, egged on by EU leaders Zelensky started criticising Trump for not involving him in the talks. His remark “He should be on our side” demonstrated clearly that Zelensky had not understood the role of a mediator. His lack of political experience was the major reason for the fiasco in the White House and the subsequent actions of Trump clearly showed Zelensky where he stands! PM Starmer and President Macron seem to have given some sensible advice and he seems to be eating humble pie. In the process Trump has ensured that the European nations pay for their defence than piggy-backing on the US, which I am sure would please the American voter. By the way, though Macron talks big about defence France spends less than 2% of GDP. Trump seems vindicated. Of course, Trump could be blamed for being undiplomatic but he can afford to be as he has the upper hand!

Ranil on Al Jazeera
Zelensky has shown what not to do: instead of being diplomatic being aggressive when you need favours! Meanwhile, Ranil has shown what not to do when it comes to TV interviews. God only knows who advised him, and why, for him to go ‘Head to Head’ with Mehdi Hasan on Al-Jazeera. Perhaps, he wanted to broadcast to the world that he was the saviour of Sri Lanka! The experienced politician he is, one would have expected Ranil to realise that he would be questioned about his role in making Sri Lanka bankrupt as well, in addition to raising other issues.
The interview itself was far from head to head; more likely heads to head! It turned out to be an inquisition by Tiger supporters and the only person who spoke sense being Niraj Deva, who demonstrated his maturity by being involved in British and EU politics. The worst was the compere who seems keen to listen his own voice, reminding me of a Sinhala interviewer on a YouTube channel whose interviews I have stopped watching!
Ranil claims, after the interview was broadcast, that it had been heavily edited reduced from a two-hour recording. Surely, despite whatever reason he agreed to, he should have laid ground rules. He could have insisted on unedited broadcast or his approval before broadcast, if it was edited. It was very naïve of Ranil to have walked in to a trap for no gain. Though his performance was not as bad as widely reported, he should have been more composed at the beginning as he turned out to be later. Overall, he gave another opportunity for the Tiger rump and its supporters to bash Sri Lanka, unfortunately.
Medhi Hasan should watch some of David Frost interviews, especially the one with Richard Nixon, and learn how to elicit crucial information in a gentle exploratory manner than shouting with repeated interruptions. He does not seem to think it is necessary to give time for the interviewee to respond to his questions. I will never watch Al-Jazeera’s “Head to Head” again!
Ranil’s best was his parting shot; when asked by Hasan whether he would contest the next presidential election, he said “No, I will retire and watch Al-Jazeera and hope to see you better mannered”!
Opinion
Ajahn Brahm to visit SL in May 2025

The Ajahn Brahm Society of Sri Lanka (ABSSL) is pleased to announce that Ajahn Brahm will be visiting Sri Lanka for a short stay in May this year. Many, both Buddhists and non-Buddhists, know him and have listened to his addresses made on earlier visits, including his 2023 public talk at the BMICH, which was attended by over 4,000 people.
Ajahn Brahmavamso, popularly known as Ajahn Brahm, is the Head Abbot of Bodhinyana Monastery in Serpentine, Perth. He was a pupil of the famous Thai forest monk Ajahn Chah, considered the best Theravada meditation teacher in the last century. By his own choice, Ajahn Brahmavamso shortened his name and was extra pleased that the initials represent the major religions of the world. He is renowned world-wide as an outstanding meditation bhikkhu, teacher and instructor, guiding thousands of practitioners.
As in previous visits, Ajahn Brahm’s schedule will be packed with addresses, meetings with senior professionals, business leaders, and researchers. This year, a special session has been included for teenagers and young adults.
The agenda planned for him includes:
·
Public address at the BMICH to all irrespective of religion and age; then to a younger audience.
· Exclusive Leadership Forum for senior professionals and business leaders.
· Forum with academics engaged in research at the Centre for Meditation Research, University of Colombo.
· A week-long meditation retreat for the Ven Sangha and experienced lay meditators.
Public Addresses
The public addresses will be on Sunday, May 18, 2025, from 7:00 am to 11:00 am, at the BMICH Main Hall and Sirimavo Halls; Ajahn Brahm moving from one hall to another so the entire audience sees him. Each hall will be well equipped with audio and video presentation. The first address: The Art of Meaningful Living, is designed for all, age notwithstanding, offering wisdom and practical insights for a fulfilling life. The second: Coping with Life Transitions and Emotional Challenges, is a special session tailored for teens and young adults, addressing key challenges faced by them in today’s fast-paced, competitive world. Both talks will be in English, with concise translation to Sinhala by Ven Damita Thera.
Exclusive Forums
On Saturday, May 17, 2025, two exclusive forums will be held at the BMICH Committee Room, Jasmine Hall. The first such session will be with eighty invited Sri Lankan academics and scientists engaged in research on meditation at the Centre for Meditation Research of the University of Colombo. This will be followed in the evening by an interactive session for a hundred invited senior professionals and business leaders, featuring a talk on leadership followed by a Q&A session.
Meditation Retreat
The most significant item on Ajahn Brahm’s programme will be a week-long meditation retreat at the Barberyn Waves Ayurveda Resort in Weligama. Focus is intended to be on the fifty members of the Ven Sangha. A limited number of experienced lay meditators will also have the opportunity to participate.
Participation & Registration
Those interested in attending the public talks at the BMICH are kindly advised to register at to secure free passes. For further information, please contact the Ajahn Brahm Society of Sri Lanka at .
-
Editorial7 days ago
Ranil roasted in London
-
Features7 days ago
The JVP insurrection of 1971 as I saw it as GA Ampara
-
Opinion6 days ago
Insulting SL armed forces
-
News4 days ago
Alfred Duraiappa’s relative killed in Canada shooting
-
Features7 days ago
Mr. JR Jayewardene’s passport
-
Features7 days ago
As superpower America falls into chaos, being small is beautiful for Sri Lanka
-
Opinion7 days ago
Beyond Victory: sportsmanship thrives at Moratuwa Big Match
-
Foreign News12 hours ago
Search continues in Dominican Republic for missing student Sudiksha Konanki